This bill establishes a statutory right to information about and access to contraception and creates a provincially administered Free Access to Contraception Program. The Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ) must enter an agreement with the Minister defining covered people and methods; the program’s minimum list explicitly includes hormonal and non‑hormonal IUDs, implants, rings, patches, injections, emergency contraception and any male contraceptives approved by Health Canada.
To expand points of access, the Minister may run pilot projects that delegate activities reserved to physicians — including prescribing, dispensing and administration — to other professionals, and the bill authorizes midwives to prescribe, dispense and administer contraception. The measure also mandates regionally run condom distribution programs for schools and requires the Minister of Education to consider emotional, relational and sexual education when approving curricula.
The text removes certain regulatory limits on pharmacists and updates midwifery regulations to reflect the expanded contraceptive role.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates a RAMQ‑administered Free Access to Contraception Program with a mandated minimum list of covered methods and defined eligible groups, removes some regulatory caps on pharmacists, and authorizes pilot projects to let non‑physicians perform prescribing/dispensing/administration. It also empowers public health directors to distribute condoms in educational institutions and requires curriculum consideration of emotional/sexual education.
Who It Affects
RAMQ beneficiaries (insured persons), minors (explicit solo consent), homeless people, students in high schools/CEGEPs/universities, midwives, pharmacists, public health authorities, and professional regulators including the Collège des médecins and Office des professions.
Why It Matters
The bill codifies access to contraception as a right and pairs that right with concrete delivery mechanisms and scope‑of‑practice changes that could significantly reconfigure how Quebecers obtain contraceptives — shifting delivery away from physician‑centric models and creating new operational, regulatory and funding obligations for provincial health actors.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill first places rights on the statute book: people must be informed about contraceptive options, can freely use them, and may receive them free of charge according to rules set by regulation. Critically, it overrides specific Civil Code and governance provisions to allow any minor to consent alone to prescription, dispensing and administration of contraception, removing the usual formalities that can require parental involvement.
Operationally, the government must set up a Free Access to Contraception Program administered by RAMQ under an indefinite agreement with the Minister. That agreement must at minimum define who is covered (including insured persons and specific groups such as minors consenting alone, people needing emergency contraception, and homeless persons) and list covered products.
The bill names a broad baseline of methods the program must include and expressly allows inclusion of male contraceptives once Health Canada approves them.To broaden clinical access points, the Minister may launch pilot projects that delegate physician‑reserved acts (prescribing, dispensing, administration) to other licensed professionals after consulting the Collège des médecins and the Office des professions. Pilots last up to five years with a possible two‑year extension, are subject to Ministerial modification or termination, require annual reporting and a post‑pilot evaluation, and can be structured so breaches constitute professional offences under the Professional Code.Public health directors must create regional condom distribution programs that factor in local social determinants and provide free, confidential access through distribution devices in high schools, colleges and universities; the text also requires culturally safe arrangements for First Nations and Inuit communities.
Finally, the bill amends several professional regulations: it authorizes midwives to prescribe/dispense/administer contraception and removes an initial six‑month limitation in the pharmacist medication‑initiation regulation, while making related technical changes to midwifery prescribing rules.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Any minor may consent alone to the prescription, dispensing or administration of a contraceptive despite Civil Code and governance‑act provisions.
RAMQ must administer a Free Access to Contraception Program with an agreement specifying covered people (including homeless persons and minors who consent alone) and a minimum list of contraceptive methods, including Health Canada‑approved male contraceptives.
The Minister may authorize pilot projects (up to 5 years, extendable 2 years) that delegate physician‑reserved acts to other professionals; pilots require annual reports, a six‑month post‑pilot evaluation and may make specific violations offences under section 188 of the Professional Code.
Public health directors must install regional condom distribution programs supplying high schools, colleges and universities with free condoms via distribution devices that preserve a minimum level of confidentiality and include culturally safe arrangements for First Nations and Inuit populations.
The bill amends professional regulations to (a) allow midwives to prescribe, dispense and administer contraception; (b) remove a six‑month initial period limitation in the pharmacist medication‑initiation regulation; and (c) adjust midwifery order‑form requirements regarding contraception.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statutory rights and minor consent
Sections 2–4 convert access and information about contraception into statutory rights and set the structural baseline for later implementation. The most consequential legal change is that minors can consent alone to contraceptive care: the bill explicitly disapplies conflicting Civil Code and governance rules to prevent those provisions from blocking a minor’s ability to receive contraception without parental involvement. This creates an express legal shield for providers who dispense or administer contraceptives to self‑consenting minors.
RAMQ‑administered benefit with mandatory minimums
Section 5 establishes the program and section 6 assigns administration to RAMQ under an indefinite agreement that must set coverage terms. The bill prescribes the minimum elements that agreement must contain — who is eligible and what products are included — which reduces ministerial discretion over the program’s core scope. Section 23 forces a timetable: the first agreement must be signed within six months after assent or the Government must step in and fix the terms, preventing open‑ended delays in launching benefits.
Time‑limited delegation of physician functions with reporting and sanctions
These sections give the Minister the power, after consultation with professional bodies, to set up pilots that let other professionals carry out activities reserved for physicians, explicitly including prescribing and administering contraception. The mechanics matter: pilots are capped at five years with a two‑year extension option, are reportable annually to government, require a six‑month post‑pilot evaluation, and may designate specific contraventions as professional offences enforceable under the Professional Code — a lever to discipline participating practitioners.
Regional distribution programs and confidentiality safeguards in schools
Public health directors must design and implement regional condom distribution that takes local social determinants into account. Institutions serving students must install distribution devices that provide simple, free access while maintaining a minimum level of confidentiality. The provision also mandates collaboration mechanisms for First Nations members and Inuit, signaling that programs must be culturally adapted and delivered through appropriate community partners.
Curriculum consideration for emotional, relational and sexual education
Section 16 requires the Minister of Education to factor education on emotional, relational and sexual life into the development or approval of compulsory subject programs and institutional study programs. The language stops short of prescribing specific curriculum content or standards, leaving the substance and scope to the Minister’s consultation and approval processes under existing education statutes.
Scope‑of‑practice and technical regulatory fixes
The bill inserts an express power for midwives to prescribe, dispense and administer contraception into the Midwives Act and removes specific technical limits from related regulations — notably striking an “S” restriction for oral contraceptives in the midwife drugs schedule and deleting a six‑month initial limit in the pharmacist medication‑initiation regulation. It also tweaks a midwife‑order regulation to exclude contraception from an existing restriction, aligning regulatory wording with the expanded clinical role granted by the statute.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Minors seeking confidential contraception: the explicit solo‑consent rule reduces legal uncertainty and lowers barriers for adolescents to obtain contraceptives without parental involvement.
- People with low or no access to primary care (including homeless persons and those seeking emergency contraception): the RAMQ program and broader distribution measures create cheaper, more proximate access points.
- Students in high schools, CEGEPs and universities: mandated distribution devices and regional programs increase on‑campus availability of condoms and related prevention materials.
- Midwives and other non‑physician clinicians: statutory authorization and regulatory changes expand their clinical scope and create new practice opportunities in primary sexual health care.
- Indigenous communities: the bill requires culturally safe distribution arrangements and encourages collaboration with local Indigenous health providers, which can improve acceptability and access.
Who Bears the Cost
- Provincial budget / RAMQ: the Free Access program creates a new coverage obligation and the agreement‑driven design shifts financial risk to the public insurer unless the Government specifies otherwise.
- Health institutions and school boards: they must install and maintain distribution devices and enter agreements with public health directors, creating modest infrastructure and administrative costs.
- Professional regulators and participating professions: regulators will need to design oversight, continuing competence and discipline mechanisms for delegated prescribing/administration, and professionals taking on new acts face liability, training and documentation burdens.
- Physicians and their professional associations: task‑shifting may reduce visit volumes for contraceptive services and requires rethinking referral and shared‑care arrangements.
- Public health directors and regional health authorities: charged with program design and culturally adapted delivery, they face added operational workload without explicit new resourcing in the text.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate aims that pull in opposite directions: expand timely, low‑barrier access to contraception (through RAMQ coverage, task‑shifting and school distribution) versus ensuring clinical safety, regulatory clarity and sustainable public financing; speeding access by broadening provider roles and rights increases practical availability but shifts complex regulatory, training and fiscal decisions downstream, where uncertainty can either stall implementation or produce uneven quality of care.
The bill creates rights and prescriptive program elements but leaves many implementation levers to agreements and regulation. RAMQ is the program administrator but the statutory requirement that the agreement include minimum elements does not set explicit benefit levels, dispensing limits, prescription lengths or reimbursement rates — all of which will determine real access and cost.
The six‑month backstop for concluding the first RAMQ‑Minister agreement forces a start date but not a funding formula, so fiscal choices during implementation will shape whether services are practically free and widely available.
Scope‑of‑practice pilots and the new midwife authority accelerate access by expanding who may provide contraceptives, but the bill relies on separate professional consultations and Ministerial orders to set clinical boundaries, training requirements and liability rules. That creates a regulatory sequencing problem: access can expand only after regulators produce detailed protocols and oversight mechanisms.
The bill’s criminal/professional enforcement hook (making certain pilot breaches offences under the Professional Code) adds discipline but may deter providers from participating if indemnity, training and clear practice standards are not concurrently established.
Finally, the combination of explicit minor consent and school‑based distribution raises confidentiality and parental‑rights tensions in practice. The statute removes legal obstacles to minors’ autonomous consent, but operationalizing confidential dispensing in institutional settings — while meeting reporting obligations and safeguarding against coercion — will require careful policy design and clear guidance to schools, health workers and families.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.