Bill 626 amends The Lobbyists Act to increase public visibility into who is lobbying provincial decision‑makers and on what. It adds a broad definition of “communicate,” creates a mandatory monthly activity‑log regime with named participants and subject matter, requires disclosure of political contributions by client organizations, removes a low‑hours exemption for internal lobbyists, and inserts an employee‑count threshold for non‑profit treatment.
For compliance officers and in‑house counsel, the bill shifts Saskatchewan’s transparency baseline: lobbying work that was previously informal or exempt may now trigger registration and monthly reporting, and organizations must disclose political donations tied to clients or employers. The changes raise practical questions about confidentiality, recordkeeping, and the administrative capacity of the registry to receive and publish more granular data.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires any registered lobbyist who conducted lobbying in the prior month to file a detailed activity log within 15 days after the month ends, listing targeted public office holders, participants, dates, subject matter, related legislative or policy instruments, communication modes (including grassroots), and any relevant political contributions. It also expands the Act’s coverage by removing a 30‑hour exemption for officers/directors/employees and by qualifying certain non‑profits by employee count, and it bars public office holders from accepting gifts defined by the Members’ Conflict of Interest Act (with an MLA exception).
Who It Affects
Registered in‑house and consultant lobbyists and the organizations that retain them, non‑profit organizations meeting the employee threshold, provincial public office holders and MLAs, political parties and constituency associations that receive contributions, and the provincial office that maintains and enforces the registry. PR firms, law firms, and government relations shops will face new recordkeeping and disclosure obligations.
Why It Matters
The measure pushes Saskatchewan toward near real‑time public transparency of lobbying interactions and funding ties, making it possible to map who is attempting to influence which decision and whether contributions coincide with lobbying. That visibility matters to watchdogs, competitors, and public servants, but it also raises compliance costs and confidentiality tensions for advocacy and commercial actors.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill changes several parts of The Lobbyists Act to require more granular, timely disclosure of lobbying activity. First, it broadens the statutory meaning of “communicate” to include virtually any form of information exchange — emails, phone calls, meetings (in person or remote), and other electronic or informal methods — which expands the types of interactions caught by the Act.
It also introduces a definition of “gift” by reference to the Members’ Conflict of Interest Act.
A central new obligation is the monthly activity log. Any registered lobbyist who carried out lobbying during a month must file a log within 15 days after the month’s end.
The log must name the public office holder targeted and their position, identify the lobbyist(s) and all attendees, give the date and a concise description of the subject matter, and link the interaction to any relevant bills, regulations, orders, programs, grants, contracts or decisions. The log must also list the communication modes used (explicitly including grassroots tactics) and report any financial contributions to political parties, candidates or constituency associations made by the lobbyist’s employer (for in‑house lobbyists) or by the client (for consultant lobbyists) during the period covered by the log.Coverage of the Act is tightened in two ways.
The bill removes an exemption that excluded officers, directors or employees from registration when their combined lobbying totaled less than 30 hours a year, which will pull more internal advocacy into the registration and reporting regime. It also amends the treatment of non‑profit organizations by adding an employee threshold — the text inserts “with more than 5 employees” — so that the rule for non‑profits now depends on size.
Finally, the bill prohibits public office holders from accepting gifts as defined in the Act, except that MLAs may accept gifts in accordance with The Members’ Conflict of Interest Act. The Act comes into force on assent, so the timing risk for implementation is immediate once the bill becomes law.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Monthly logs: registered lobbyists must file an activity log within 15 days after each month in which they conducted lobbying.
Log contents: each log must name the targeted public office holder and position, list lobbyists and all attendees, give dates and the subject matter, identify related bills/regulations/programs/contracts, record communication modes (including grassroots), and report relevant political contributions made during the period.
Political contributions disclosure: organizations that employ in‑house lobbyists, or clients of consultant lobbyists, must have contributions to parties/candidates/constituency associations disclosed if made on or after the date the writ was issued for the last provincial election.
Exemptions tightened: the bill removes the combined 30‑hour annual exemption for officers/directors/employees — those activities can now trigger registration and reporting.
Gift ban: public office holders are prohibited from accepting gifts as defined by the Members’ Conflict of Interest Act, but MLAs remain subject to that Act’s existing gift rules.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Broadens 'communicate' and imports 'gift' definition
This amendment explicitly defines “communicate” to capture formal and informal exchanges across all common channels — phone, email, electronic messages, meetings and more. That breadth reduces ambiguity about whether a particular interaction is a lobbying communication. The bill also defines “gift” by reference to subsection 7(1) of The Members’ Conflict of Interest Act, tying the Lobbyists Act to the existing ethics framework for MLAs and other public office holders.
Repeals the low‑hours exemption for officers, directors and employees
By striking the clause that exempted combined officer/director/employee lobbying under 30 hours per year, the bill collapses a common de‑minimis carve‑out. Expect more in‑house advocacy — previously handled informally by staff — to require registration and reporting. Organizations will need to track internal time to determine when registration and monthly logs are triggered.
Adds political contribution disclosure and removes selected clauses
Amendments to section 8 remove several existing clauses (j, k, l, m, n and q) and add a new clause requiring disclosure of all financial contributions to provincial political entities made by an organization that an in‑house lobbyist represents, or by a consultant lobbyist’s client, where those contributions were made on or after the writ for the last provincial election. The practical effect is to link financial support for political actors with lobbying activity so that registrants must supply contribution data as part of their registration material.
Mandatory monthly lobbying activity logs — content and deadline
This new provision imposes a strict monthly reporting regime: if a registered lobbyist lobbied during a month, they must file a log within 15 days after month‑end. The list of required fields is detailed: target public office holder (with position), lobbyist names, all attendees, date, subject‑matter particulars, any linked legislative or program instruments, modes of communication (explicitly including grassroots efforts), and any political contributions by the employer or client during the period. The specification of fields reduces ambiguity but also creates discrete recordkeeping obligations that registrants must integrate into case management and CRM systems.
Prohibits public office holders from accepting gifts (MLA exception)
The bill bans public office holders from accepting a gift as defined by the Act, except where an MLA accepts a gift consistent with The Members’ Conflict of Interest Act. This creates a general prohibition while preserving the separate, existing MLA rules. Practically, agencies and public servants will need guidance to interpret the cross‑reference to the Members’ Act, and registrants should expect a narrower tolerance for offering items that could be characterized as gifts.
Repeals an enforcement/administrative clause and sets commencement
The bill repeals subsection 28(c) (the text does not state its content) and provides that the Act comes into force on assent. The absence of transitional language or staged implementation means the registry, lobbyists and employers must be prepared to meet the new rules as soon as the law is in force.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on this topic across all five countries.
Explore this topic in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Members of the public and voters — they gain more timely, detailed information about who is lobbying which public office holders and on what subject, enabling better public scrutiny.
- Journalists and watchdog groups — the monthly, named logs and political contribution disclosures create higher‑frequency data to investigate potential influence or conflicts of interest.
- Competing businesses and interest groups — greater transparency reduces asymmetries about who is advocating for government action and can inform competitive or defensive strategies.
- Ethics and oversight bodies — regulators and the lobbyist registry receive structured data that can improve audits, pattern detection and enforcement targeting.
Who Bears the Cost
- Registered lobbyists (consultants and in‑house) — they must implement monthly reporting, maintain attendee records, and map interactions to specific legislative instruments, increasing administrative time and compliance costs.
- Small non‑profit organizations above the employee threshold — the addition of a “more than 5 employees” qualifier will change which non‑profits fall under the Act and create new registration and disclosure obligations for some charities and associations.
- Employers and clients of lobbyists — organizations must collate political contribution history tied to lobbying periods and provide that information to registrants, creating bookkeeping and disclosure work.
- The provincial registry and enforcement offices — they face a stepped‑up intake and review burden without explicit new funding or staffing in the bill, increasing operational strain.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between the public’s legitimate demand for near‑real‑time transparency about who seeks to influence government and the competing need to protect confidential, privileged, or commercially sensitive advocacy work and to avoid imposing disproportionate administrative burdens on small organizations and the registry itself.
The bill trades greater transparency for new compliance and confidentiality risks. Monthly, named logs improve the public record, but they also capture granular attendee lists and subject matter that may contain commercially sensitive strategy or privileged communications.
The statutory cross‑reference to a separate Act for the definition of “gift” and the preservation of MLA rules creates potential interpretive friction: agencies will need clear guidance on when a transfer is reportable under the Lobbyists Act versus handled under the Members’ Conflict of Interest Act.
Operationally, the monthly cadence and the detailed fields force organizations to change recordkeeping practices and may chill informal or background conversations that previously fell outside the regime. The bill does not add transitional relief, carve‑outs for commercially sensitive details, or explicit resourcing for the registry, so compliance costs fall on lobbyists and their employers while the registry must absorb a higher administrative load.
Finally, several repeals and deletions are left in the text without explanation; those gaps will require administrative interpretation or supplementary regulation to avoid uneven application across registrants.
There's more to this law than the bill.
Codify Laws traces every connection across the legislative lifecycle.