The Racing Industry (Closure of Greyhound Racing Industry) Amendment Bill removes domestic greyhound racing from the Racing Industry Act 2020 by creating a statutory process to wind down the New Zealand greyhound sector. It establishes a Greyhound Racing Transition Agency to manage the dissolution of the New Zealand Greyhound Racing body (GRNZ) and local greyhound clubs, take custody of residual assets, and oversee tracing and rehoming of affected greyhounds.
The bill also changes the betting and regulatory landscape: TAB NZ must revoke and stop issuing betting licences for greyhound racing from 1 August 2026, offshore operators are prohibited from taking New Zealand bets on greyhound races, and the Agency is funded through TAB NZ subject to Ministerial approval. For practitioners, the bill creates new administrative obligations, a concentrated asset-transfer regime, and explicit animal-welfare reporting requirements tied to the Agency’s annual report.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill inserts a new subpart that sets up the Greyhound Racing Transition Agency with powers to develop and implement a transition plan, take over GRNZ’s functions and assets, dissolve clubs, and manage rehoming and welfare of specified greyhounds. It also prohibits offshore operators from accepting bets from people in New Zealand on domestic or overseas greyhound races and bars TAB NZ from issuing or maintaining betting licences for greyhound clubs from 1 August 2026.
Who It Affects
Directly affected are GRNZ and local greyhound racing clubs (which the bill declares no longer racing on 1 August 2026), TAB NZ (which must fund the Agency and revoke licences), offshore betting operators, rehoming agencies and animal-welfare bodies, and former participants who may be eligible for transitional support or residual asset distributions.
Why It Matters
The bill centralises closure responsibilities in a Crown-appointed Agency, shifting control of assets and responsibilities away from voluntary industry bodies and into a statutory process. That creates immediate compliance demands for industry participants, redefines betting flows and code funding, and places measurable welfare-accountability obligations on the Agency.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates the Greyhound Racing Transition Agency as a Crown-established, standalone corporate body whose statutory tasks are to design and run the wind-down of the greyhound racing code, take custody of assets and contracts, and manage rehoming and welfare for the dogs affected. The Agency will have all necessary powers to act inside and outside New Zealand, must produce a transition plan for GRNZ, and can carry out GRNZ’s functions where the plan provides for that.
The Agency is formally a legal entity separate from its members and the Crown.
Greyhound racing clubs that exist on 1 August 2026 are declared to be "no longer racing" on that date. GRNZ must cooperate with the Agency’s transition plan, disclose information, and assist with transferring functions, assets, and employees.
The Agency may determine when GRNZ has no further functions and may ask the Registrar of Incorporated Societies to dissolve or remove GRNZ from the register; after creditor claims are satisfied, residual assets vest in the Agency, which must consider whether to recognise community interests in racing venues.Betting and funding rules change in parallel. TAB NZ must not issue new betting licences to greyhound clubs on or after 1 August 2026, and must revoke existing licences for race dates on or after that date.
The bill also bars offshore betting operators from taking bets from persons in New Zealand on either domestic or overseas greyhound races. TAB NZ is the statutory funding source for the Agency; the Agency prepares budgets and consults TAB NZ, but the Minister approves funding levels.The Agency is subject to Ministerial directions and must comply.
Its governing body is a Minister-appointed chair plus up to three members, whose statutory term runs to 31 July 2029 (with reappointment possible). The Agency must report annually to the Minister with audited financials and a detailed welfare and rehoming outcomes section (including numbers of rehomed dogs, those awaiting rehoming, euthanasias or deaths, and which agencies rehomed dogs).
The bill also provides transitional arrangements for the Racing Integrity Board to finish outstanding investigations and adjudications started before 1 August 2026 and contemplates the Agency’s disestablishment by Order in Council no later than 31 July 2031, with rules for residual asset distribution.
The Five Things You Need to Know
On 1 August 2026 all greyhound racing clubs in existence on that date are declared to be "no longer racing," and TAB NZ must revoke betting licences for race dates on or after that date and may not issue new greyhound licences after that date.
The Agency’s governing body is a Minister-appointed chair and up to three members; appointments are notified in the Gazette and member terms run until the close of 31 July 2029, subject to reappointment.
After the Registrar dissolves GRNZ or removes it from the register, any assets remaining after satisfying creditors vest in the Agency, which must consider community interests (for example, payments relating to racing venues) before disposing of them.
TAB NZ must provide funding to the Agency in amounts approved by the Minister; the Agency prepares a budget tied to a business plan, must consult TAB NZ on that budget, and the Minister must approve funding for each racing year.
The bill proscribes offshore betting operators from taking bets from people in New Zealand on domestic or overseas greyhound races and removes greyhound racing from several statutory definitions and funding distributions, reducing the number of racing codes used for distribution from three to two.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishing the Greyhound Racing Transition Agency and its governance
Sections 53B to 53E create the Agency as a body corporate with full capacity to act, define its objectives (efficient closure, rehoming, and participant support), and set out a small governing body: a Minister-appointed chair and up to three members. Practical implications: the Agency sits outside GRNZ and the Crown, but members are public appointees whose terms, appointment notices, and reappointment requirements are tightly prescribed; Schedule 1A supplies detailed governance rules (conflicts, meetings, delegations, indemnities).
Statutory functions—closure, rehoming, and asset management
Section 53D lists the Agency’s core functions: develop and implement a GRNZ transition plan, carry out GRNZ functions as the plan allows, manage assets and liabilities, and oversee tracing and rehoming of specified greyhounds until they’re successfully rehomed. The Agency also retains powers to maintain tracing systems, hold records, and investigate non-compliance—giving it operational control over both organisational closure and animal-welfare operations.
Transition plan, GRNZ cooperation, and dissolution mechanics
The Agency must produce a transition plan that covers transfer of functions, assets, employees, overseas arrangements, and the dissolution of clubs. GRNZ is legally required to cooperate and disclose information. Once the Agency determines GRNZ has no further functions it must notify the Registrar and request dissolution or removal; upon Registrar action, residual assets vest in the Agency after creditors are paid. That sequence converts an industry body’s remaining estate into statutory hands and centralises decision-making about asset recognition for communities.
Declaring clubs no longer racing and betting licence changes
Section 53O declares greyhound clubs in existence on 1 August 2026 to be no longer racing on that date. GRNZ must follow the transition plan to notify clubs and the Registrar and consult on surplus-asset treatment. Critically, Section 53R prevents TAB NZ from issuing betting licences to greyhound clubs on or after 1 August 2026 and requires revocation of licences for race dates on or after that date—effectively ending licensed domestic greyhound betting through TAB NZ.
Ministerial directions and funding model
The Minister may issue letters of expectation and written directions to the Agency, including instructions to use resources so closure occurs in an orderly manner; the Agency must comply. Funding comes from TAB NZ in Minister-approved amounts; the Agency prepares a budget and must consult TAB NZ before submission. The practical consequence is a funding stream that is dependent on a Crown-approved budget process but sourced from the bookmaker’s statutory entity.
Reporting, welfare metrics, and governance detail
The Agency’s annual report to the Minister must include audited financial statements and a specific welfare-and-rehoming report listing numbers rehomed, awaiting rehoming, euthanasias or deaths awaiting rehoming, and rehoming agencies involved. Schedule 1 and the inserted Schedule 1A set out member duties, conflict-of-interest processes, meeting procedures, delegation powers, employment arrangements, indemnities, and the mechanics of contracting—framing how the Agency will operate administratively and legally.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Specified greyhounds and animal-welfare organisations — the bill requires active tracing, welfare oversight, and a statutory rehoming process with mandatory reporting of rehoming outcomes and deaths, which directs resources and visibility toward animal welfare.
- Former participants who receive transition support — the Agency must provide advice and assistance to people leaving the greyhound industry or transferring to other codes, creating a statutory pathway for retraining, re-registration, or other support.
- Harness and gallop racing codes — with greyhound racing removed from several definitions and funding formulas, distributions from betting profits and consumption charges shift to two remaining codes rather than three, concentrating financial flows.
- Rehoming agencies and veterinarians — the Agency’s rehoming obligations and reporting create contracted opportunities and a centralised demand for rehoming services and welfare interventions.
Who Bears the Cost
- GRNZ and greyhound racing clubs — the statutory dissolution process transfers their functions, records, liabilities, and after-creditor surplus assets to the Agency, effectively terminating their independent control and creating administrative and financial wind‑down burdens.
- TAB NZ — required to fund the Agency in Minister‑approved amounts and to revoke/cease issuing greyhound betting licences; TAB will absorb funding costs and altered betting product mix, with attendant financial and operational consequences.
- Offshore betting operators and licensees — the ban on taking New Zealand bets on domestic or overseas greyhound races restricts market offerings and creates compliance and enforcement issues for offshore platforms that have previously accepted such bets.
- Regulators and the Racing Integrity Board — responsible for transitional adjudication and enforcement work that continues into the wind‑down, adding case-completion costs and administrative complexity for matters started before 1 August 2026.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill forces a trade-off between a state-directed closure that prioritises animal welfare and orderly wind‑down, and the disruption of private organisational autonomy and financial entitlements: it solves welfare and regulatory-coordination problems by moving control to a short‑lived public agency, but in doing so concentrates contentious decisions about assets, creditor rights, and funding in a political and administrative process that may not satisfy all stakeholders.
The bill centralises closure authority in a Minister‑appointed Agency but leaves several important implementation questions open. It requires the Agency to “consider” recognising community interests in venues and to “consider” payments, but it does not set criteria or formulas for valuing community claims or distributing residual assets; those decisions are left to the Agency and, ultimately, an Order in Council process.
That creates potential dispute risk between local communities, clubs, and other racing codes over land and legacy assets.
Funding and operational capacity are conditioned on TAB NZ payments approved by the Minister and a budget process that requires TAB consultation but not concurrence. That linkage may produce tension if TAB NZ resists levels of funding needed for large-scale rehoming or long-tail liabilities.
The prohibition on offshore bets is clear as a rule, but enforcement against offshore operators raises cross-border legal and practical challenges. Finally, the Agency’s power to take over GRNZ contracts and obligations transfers contingent liabilities to a statutory body with limited duration (disestablishment no later than 31 July 2031), creating questions about long-term obligations, litigation risk, and how ongoing liabilities will be met after disestablishment.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.