The Climate and Nature Bill requires the UK Government to secure two parallel national objectives: (1) reduce UK greenhouse gas contributions to net zero in line with its Paris Agreement NDCs and (2) halt and reverse nature loss at home, overseas and in the oceans. It makes the Secretary of State legally responsible for publishing a Climate and Nature Delivery Strategy within 18 months setting annual interim targets and complementary measures to meet those objectives.
The Bill creates a citizen-led Climate and Nature Assembly whose recommendations (if supported by two-thirds of members) must be reflected in the strategy unless the Committee on Climate Change and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee jointly advise otherwise, or the Secretary of State gives stated exceptional reasons. It also assigns monitoring duties to the CCC and JNCC, requires parliamentary approval and devolved-legislature assent for measures in devolved areas, and sets rules for reporting, metrics and financial provision.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Bill binds the Secretary of State to produce a cross-government Climate and Nature Delivery Strategy within 18 months, with annual interim targets and measures spanning emissions (including imports) and biodiversity. It requires a procured, representative Climate and Nature Assembly to feed recommendations into the strategy, and gives the CCC and JNCC formal duties to review and report annually on progress.
Who It Affects
Central government departments, devolved administrations, the Committee on Climate Change, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, the Office for Environmental Protection, community energy projects, large-scale energy developers, and businesses with significant embedded emissions in imports.
Why It Matters
The Bill pairs binding domestic duties with citizen engagement and independent expert oversight, while attempting to fold imports, international aviation/shipping and biodiversity into a single statutory framework—shifting how policy makers, regulators and businesses will need to measure and plan climate and nature action.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Bill sets two statutory objectives: align UK greenhouse gas contributions with the UK’s Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and halt and reverse nature loss across UK territory, overseas activity and the oceans. It treats climate and nature as intertwined outcomes rather than separate policy streams, asking for complementary actions and requiring the Secretary of State to take “all reasonable steps” to meet annual interim targets.
To generate public legitimacy and practical recommendations, the Bill requires procurement of an independent body to assemble a Climate and Nature Assembly made up of a representative sample of the UK population. That Assembly must hear from scientific experts and publish recommendations.
The CCC and JNCC must review the Assembly’s output and publish a joint proposal; recommendations supported by at least 66% of Assembly members must be included in the strategy when both expert committees endorse them, unless exceptional reasons are stated.The strategy must cover territorial emissions, the UK share of international aviation and shipping, and an explicit mechanism to reduce carbon dioxide emissions embodied in imports at the same annual percentage rate as domestic emissions reductions. It also directs the strategy to include ecosystem management measures, financial support and retraining for workers affected by the transition, and gives a clear policy tilt: a presumption in favour of community energy projects up to 100MW and a presumption against projects over 100MW unless local residents have been consulted and express support.Parliamentary and devolved-legislature checks are built into the process.
The Secretary of State must lay the strategy before the House of Commons for a motion approving the strategy; the Bill also conditions the application of targets and inclusion of measures in devolved competence on explicit motions in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The CCC and JNCC must report annually to Parliament on implementation, and the Secretary of State must revise the strategy if scientific evidence or parliamentary resolution shows the measures are unlikely to meet the objectives.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary of State must publish the Climate and Nature Delivery Strategy within 18 months of the Act and take ‘all reasonable steps’ to meet annual interim targets included in it.
Within six months of the Act the Secretary of State must procure an independent body to establish a representative Climate and Nature Assembly, and that body must secure the Assembly within six months of appointment.
Assembly recommendations that win support from 66% or more of members must be included in the strategy when jointly proposed by the Committee on Climate Change and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, unless exceptional and stated reasons prevent implementation.
The strategy must aim to reduce carbon dioxide emissions embodied in imports at the same percentage rate each year as the UK’s domestic total carbon dioxide reductions and require reporting on a range of biodiversity metrics including ecosystem integrity, species richness, and genetic diversity.
The Bill creates a statutory presumption: favour community energy projects up to 100MW and presume against projects over 100MW unless local residents have been consulted and express support, shifting local consent into the statutory calculus.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statutory twin objectives for climate and nature
Section 1 establishes the Act’s twin obligations: that the UK reduce its greenhouse gas contribution to net zero consistent with its NDCs and that it halt and reverse nature degradation at home, overseas and in oceans. The practical effect is to make these policy aims statutory objectives against which future strategy and implementation must be judged; they are framed by international instruments and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, which will influence how measures aimed overseas are justified.
Climate and Nature Delivery Strategy and required content
Section 2 obliges the Secretary of State to publish a delivery strategy within 18 months and to include annual interim targets and complementary actions. It specifies coverage (territorial emissions, UK share of aviation and shipping, and emissions embodied in imports) and requires measures to minimise ecosystem harm, support restoration, and provide financial support and retraining for affected workers. The section also introduces the 100MW/over-100MW presumption rule for energy projects—an operational detail that will affect consenting and planning decisions.
Procurement and role of the Climate and Nature Assembly
Section 3 requires open tender to appoint an independent body to assemble a representative citizen panel, and sets timelines for establishment. The Assembly must hear scientific advice and publish recommendations. That design creates a formalized route for public deliberation to feed directly into statutory policy, but it also delegates design choices—selection method, representativeness criteria and expert selection—to the procuring body, which will be significant for legitimacy and defensibility.
Duties for the CCC and JNCC
Section 4 gives the Committee on Climate Change and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee a joint statutory duty to evaluate and report annually on strategy implementation and to handle specific tasks tied to the Assembly’s recommendations. Practically, the CCC also must recommend annual emissions budgets broken down by greenhouse gas and by nation (UK, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland). This creates a new, joint science-policy reporting obligation and further embeds expert committees into the statutory governance chain.
Devolved legislature approval thresholds
Section 5 conditions the application of the Act into devolved areas on explicit motions from the Scottish Parliament, Senedd Cymru and the Northern Ireland Assembly agreeing to the targets or to specific strategy measures. That makes the Bill’s reach into devolved competence dependent on political assent in each jurisdiction rather than being automatic and creates a two-tier implementation pathway for measures that touch devolved matters.
Parliamentary approval, reporting and revision mechanics
Section 6 requires the Secretary of State to lay the strategy before the House of Commons for a motion of approval and makes the Secretary of State responsible for implementing the strategy and any Commons amendments. It mandates annual reporting using specified biodiversity metrics and a requirement that, where relevant actors or the House conclude the strategy is unlikely to meet objectives, the Secretary of State must revise the strategy or publicly explain why not—triggering a recurring review process backed by scientific opinions from the CCC, JNCC and OEP.
Finance, definitions and extent
Sections 7–9 cover standard enabling provisions: parliamentary funding for costs incurred by the Act, interpretive definitions (for example of nature, greenhouse gases, imports emissions and the Mitigation and Conservation Hierarchy), and territorial extent (England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) plus immediate commencement on passage. The defined terms will guide regulation and measurement choices used in reporting and enforcement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Community energy groups and local co-operatives — the statutory presumption in favour of community-led projects up to 100MW creates a planning and political advantage for locally-owned generation and demand-reduction schemes.
- Conservation NGOs and ecological restoration practitioners — the statute elevates biodiversity metrics into statutory reporting and links finance and support to habitat restoration, strengthening funding and policy attention for on-the-ground projects.
- Workforce development and retraining providers — the Bill mandates financial support and retraining for workers displaced by transitions, creating demand for vocational training, redeployment programmes and related services.
- Climate and biodiversity scientists and advisory bodies — CCC, JNCC and expert reviewers gain formal, recurring roles in recommending budgets, vetting Assembly proposals, and producing mandatory annual assessments that shape policy choices.
Who Bears the Cost
- Fossil fuel companies and upstream extractors — the Bill requires an end to fossil fuel exploration, extraction, export and import “as rapidly as possible,” which risks stranded assets and regulatory constraints on existing investments.
- Large-scale energy developers and consenting authorities — projects larger than 100MW face a statutory presumption against consent absent demonstrable local support, complicating project financing and consenting strategies.
- Businesses with carbon-intensive imported supply chains — the obligation to cut carbon dioxide embodied in imports at the same percentage as domestic reductions pushes importers, retailers and global supply-chain managers to pursue faster decarbonisation or bear regulatory/compliance costs.
- Devolved administrations and their legislatures — the Bill conditions its application to devolved competences on explicit legislative assent, forcing additional political and administrative negotiation and potential resourcing to assess, adapt or reject measures.
- Public bodies and regulators (CCC, JNCC, OEP) — the Bill adds monitoring, reporting and advisory burdens without specifying new ringfenced funding, potentially stretching existing capacities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The Bill’s central dilemma is between making climate and nature goals legally firm and measurable versus preserving political and practical flexibility: it locks in targets, citizen recommendations and expert oversight to raise ambition and legitimacy, but leaves significant operational discretion (measurement of imports, ‘exceptional reasons’ to depart from recommendations, and devolved consent), creating a trade-off between enforceable standards and adaptability in the face of technical, economic and constitutional constraints.
The Bill combines climate and biodiversity obligations into one statutory framework and makes several technical choices that raise implementation challenges. First, attributing and measuring carbon dioxide ‘in respect of imports’ at the level required—reducing those emissions at the same percentage rate as domestic reductions—depends on robust, agreed methods for embedded emissions accounting, trade attribution and data availability; without clear methodology and enforcement tools, that obligation could be aspirational rather than operational.
Second, the Bill’s interaction with devolution is complex. Targets and measures in devolved areas only apply where the respective devolved legislature passes an agreeing motion.
That preserves devolved consent but also creates the prospect of uneven coverage across the UK and legal friction if Westminster pursues measures that devolved legislatures reject. Relatedly, the Secretary of State retains discretion to refuse Assembly or committee recommendations if ‘exceptional and compelling reasons’ are stated, a subjective standard that may prompt judicial review or political contestation.
Finally, the legislative architecture emphasizes reporting, citizen engagement and expert advice but provides limited direct enforcement remedies (no civil penalties or criminal sanctions tied to missed targets). The real pressure point for compliance will therefore be political: reputational reporting, parliamentary scrutiny and the procedural requirement to revise strategies.
That structure leans heavily on the capacity—financial and institutional—of public bodies and on the quality of choices the Secretary of State makes when procuring the Assembly and designing implementation mechanisms.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.