Codify — Article

Crime and Policing Bill (HL Bill 167) — new tools for anti‑social behaviour, online weapons and child protection

Wide package of criminal, civil and regulatory measures: new respect orders, platform duties and child‑protection reporting rules that reshape enforcement and online obligations.

The Brief

This bill is a large, cross‑cutting criminal law and policing reform. It creates new civil and criminal instruments (notably “respect orders” for adults and expanded youth/housing injunctions), a platform‑facing enforcement regime for unlawful weapons content and reporting duties for online intermediaries, and a set of child‑protection reforms including a statutory duty to report suspected child sexual offences and new offences and prevention orders for child criminal exploitation.

Taken together the measures expand police and judicial prevention powers, push online intermediaries into operational roles (appointment of UK‑based content managers, takedown and reporting duties, and civil penalties), and introduce new reporting and removal powers aimed at child sexual exploitation and online weapons. The bill also makes substantial changes to confiscation and enforcement (enforcement plans, provisional discharge, new Crown Court enforcement powers) and includes narrower but politically significant measures such as removing women from the criminal law on abortion.

At a Glance

What It Does

Creates new “respect orders” for adults (civil orders with criminal sanctions for breach), confines youth injunctions to under‑18s and creates housing injunction powers for landlords; sets a regulatory framework for online weapons content (content managers, removal notices, civil penalties up to £60,000); establishes CCE (child criminal exploitation) offences and prevention orders; creates a duty on certain professionals to report suspected child sexual offences; authorises IP and domain suspension orders and strengthens police powers to extract online account data from seized devices.

Who It Affects

Local authorities, social housing providers and police forces (new civil enforcement duties and case‑review obligations); online platforms, search providers and registrars (content manager and removal requirements, reporting duties and civil penalties); legal professionals and courts (new procedures and enforcement routes); healthcare, education and regulated professionals (new duty to report); retailers and delivery businesses (new knife/crossbow sales and delivery offences).

Why It Matters

This is a broad package that shifts prevention upstream: it imposes operational duties on tech platforms, creates new civil prevention tools for police and housing providers, and places statutory reporting duties on professionals working with children. That combination elevates enforcement levers but also raises questions about capacity, cross‑border reach and civil‑liberty trade‑offs for protests, speech and privacy.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill is an omnibus of offence‑creation, prevention and enforcement measures grouped around five themes: anti‑social behaviour, offensive weapons (online and offline), retail and public‑order protections, child sexual exploitation/child criminal exploitation, and strengthened policing/confiscation powers. Many of the tools are preventive: civil orders backed by criminal sanctions, mandatory platform procedures and time‑limited suspension powers designed to disrupt unlawful activity quickly.

On anti‑social behaviour the bill introduces “respect orders” for adults — a civil court order made on the balance of probabilities that may prohibit or require behaviour with a criminal penalty for breach. It also reworks youth injunctions and gives registered social housing providers new closure powers.

Respect orders include an architecture for “activity requirements” (supervised interventions) with a statutory supervisor role, a written‑warning regime and a 12‑month window before breach of an activity requirement may attract prosecution; exclusion from the home is tightly constrained (only local authority, police or housing provider applicants and only where there is violence or significant risk of harm).The offensive‑weapons / online regime takes two tracks. First, it creates a notice‑based compliance regime for ‘unlawful weapons content’ hosted or surfaced by search and user‑to‑user services: a coordinating officer (police/NCA) can require platforms to appoint a UK‑based content manager, issue content‑removal notices with a 48‑hour compliance window, and impose civil penalties (up to £60,000 on platforms; up to £10,000 on content managers in some cases).

Second, the bill tightens material‑rules for knives and crossbows sold remotely, adds courier/collection‑point offences, and expands seizure powers for bladed articles.Child safety measures are extensive. The bill creates a new offence of child criminal exploitation and a regime of prevention orders that can be made on application or on conviction; they can include notification and activity conditions, and run for multi‑year periods.

It creates an offence of possessing or supplying ‘CSA image‑generators’ (tools that produce child sexual abuse images) with specific defences for law‑enforcement and approved testing. Critically, the bill introduces a statutory duty on adults who, in specified activities, are given reason to suspect a child sexual offence — they must notify the police or relevant local authority as soon as practicable, subject to narrow exceptions for child‑on‑child consensual activity and immediate safety concerns, and it criminalises preventing or deterring compliance with that duty.To make these prevention measures operational the bill also strengthens policing and border‑security powers: judges may order IP or domain suspension of services used for serious crime (12‑month maximum), courts and authorised officers gain new powers to extract online account data from seized devices (with specific rules on confidential material and a code of practice), and confiscation enforcement gets a revamp (enforcement plans, initial enforcement hearings, provisional discharge and clearer Crown Court enforcement routes).

Each of these procedural changes is intended to speed recovery of proceeds and to allow faster, proportionate enforcement — but they also shift work from magistrates to Crown Courts and add new disclosure and judicial‑review touchpoints.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill creates a new civil “respect order” for adults (courts apply the balance‑of‑probabilities test); prohibitions and activity‑requirements can be enforced criminally — breach carries up to 2 years’ imprisonment on indictment.

2

Online platforms face a new ‘content manager’ regime: a coordinating officer can demand a UK‑resident content manager and issue removal notices; civil penalties up to £60,000 (providers) and £10,000 (individual managers) are available for non‑compliance.

3

The bill imposes a statutory duty on adults in specified roles to report suspected child sexual offences to police or the relevant local authority as soon as practicable, with narrow safety and consensual‑child exceptions; obstructing or deterring reporting is a serious criminal offence (up to 7 years).

4

It criminalises possession, supply or creation of ‘CSA image‑generators’ (tools to produce child sexual abuse imagery) and creates limited, stated defences for security bodies, OFCOM‑approved testing, and passive intermediary activities by ISPs.

5

Judges can suspend access to an IP address or domain name used for serious crime for up to 12 months on application by specified ‘appropriate officers’; suspension applications can be made non‑public and include non‑disclosure protections during the process.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Part 1 — Chapters 1–2

Anti‑social behaviour: respect orders, youth and housing injunctions, LPB review powers

The bill inserts a new ‘respect order’ power for adults into the ASB framework and refocuses the existing injunction power on people under 18. Respect orders are civil orders available to a defined list of ‘relevant authorities’ (local authorities, housing providers, police and certain agencies) and may prohibit or require behaviours to prevent harassment, alarm or distress. The court must be satisfied on the balance of probabilities; the order can impose supervised “activity requirements” and requires the appointment of a named supervisor. Excluding a person from their home is expressly limited (only local authority, police or housing provider applicants and only where the conduct includes or risks violence). The bill also creates Local Policing Body (LPB) review procedures to give LPBs the power to carry out and confirm local anti‑social behaviour case reviews, and it expands data‑sharing powers so the Secretary of State can gather ASB data from relevant authorities.

Part 2 — Offensive weapons

Online weapons regime, content managers and platform penalties; retail sale and delivery rules

This chapter creates a two‑tier approach to online weapons harms. First, it defines ‘unlawful weapons content’ and empowers police/NCA ‘coordinating officers’ to require providers of relevant user‑to‑user or search services to appoint UK‑based content managers and to comply with removal notices; providers that ignore notices face civil penalties (statutory cap set at £60,000, indexable). The notices have strict timing (initial 48 hours) and a mandatory internal review flow (reviewing officer), with different notice‑to‑respond timeframes. Second, the bill tightens rules on remote sales of knives and crossbows (identity checks, courier/collection‑point offences and new defences for compliance steps) and expands police seizure powers for bladed articles.

Part 4 — Criminal exploitation of children and others

New offence of child criminal exploitation (CCE) and CCE prevention orders

The bill creates an offence of child criminal exploitation (adult conduct intended to cause or facilitate a child to commit offences) and sets out both pre‑conviction and on‑conviction CCE prevention orders. Courts may make prevention orders where the balance of probabilities shows engagement in CCE (or related conduct) and where prevention is necessary to reduce risk; orders can include prohibitions, notification duties and activity conditions, can operate UK‑wide and have a multi‑year minimum duration. Procedures include without‑notice applications, interim orders, variation/appeal routes and criminal sanctions for breaches. The regime builds in special measures for victims and witnesses to reduce re‑traumatisation.

4 more sections
Part 5 — Sexual offences and management of sex offenders

CSA image‑generators, duty to report child sex offences, removal of limitation periods

The bill prohibits creation, possession and supply of child sexual abuse (CSA) image‑generators and criminalises possession and distribution of intimate images in new circumstances. OFCOM/testing/security‑agency defences are carved out, and ISPs retain narrow passive intermediary protections. A new statutory duty requires many professionals to notify suspicions of child sexual offences to police or relevant local authorities, subject to safety and consensual‑child exceptions and a short ‘initial 7‑day’ window for risk‑based delay. The bill also removes limitation periods for child sexual abuse civil claims and tightens procedures for scanning and handling CSA material at borders.

Part 9 & Part 10 — Public order, IP/domain suspension and extraction powers

New protest offences and technical suspension/extraction powers

Public order provisions add new offences linked to protests (concealing identity in designated localities, possession of pyrotechnics at protests, climbing on memorials) and raise procedural powers for senior officers to consider cumulative disruption and designate areas. Critically, the bill creates judge‑issued IP address and internet domain suspension orders (maximum 12 months) on application by appropriate officers; it also extends powers to extract online account data from seized devices, with rules on confidential material and a statutory code of practice for extraction and retention.

Part 11 — Proceeds of crime and enforcement

Confiscation overhaul: enforcement plans, provisional discharge and Crown Court enforcement

Significant procedural changes aim to accelerate recovery: courts must draft enforcement plans when making confiscation orders where default risk is foreseeable; there is an “initial enforcement hearing” tied to those plans; Crown Courts gain clearer enforcement powers (warrants of control/commitment) and flexibility to be the primary enforcing forum. The clause creates provisional discharge and revocation procedures (time‑limited, with safeguards), refines the valuation of sold or destroyed assets and specifies how “hidden” property should be treated when recalculating available amounts. The net effect: more structured Crown Court enforcement and formalised pre‑enforcement planning.

Part 14 — Terrorism and youth diversion

Youth diversion orders for terrorism‑connected conduct and related adult‑risk powers

The bill creates ‘youth diversion orders’ as civil orders available where a young person is doing or at risk of doing terrorism‑connected conduct; orders can include monitoring, notification and electronic monitoring (in England & Wales subject to specified provider arrangements). The orders sit alongside existing youth justice disposals and include notice and review rights; the intent is to give courts a preventive, welfare‑framed tool where diversion or short‑term monitoring better protects public safety than prosecution.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.

Explore Justice in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Victims of child exploitation and sexual offences — the bill creates mandatory reporting duties, a new online facilitation offence, CSA‑generator prohibitions, and civil prevention orders aimed at disrupting exploitation networks and surfacing cases earlier.
  • Front‑line retail and emergency staff — new specific offences (assault of retail worker, enhanced public‑order protections for emergency workers) and expanded seizure/policing powers aim to reduce violence and enable faster intervention.
  • Local policing bodies and senior police decision‑makers — new LPB review powers, coordinating officer roles for online weapons enforcement and expanded investigative powers (IP/domain suspension, online extraction) concentrate tools where operational decisions can be made quickly.
  • Social housing providers and registered landlords — new closure and housing injunction powers give them legal routes to tackle nuisance and serious disorder on their premises.
  • Courts and prosecutors — the bill provides clearer procedural routes (enforcement plans, initial enforcement hearings, and Crown Court enforcement) that, if resourced, can speed confiscation and recovery.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Online platforms and registrars — new obligations to appoint UK‑resident content managers, comply with fast removal timelines and report bulk illicit sales; non‑compliance attracts civil penalties (statutory amounts are capped but material).
  • Police forces and special units — many new duties (coordinating‑officer posts, IP/domain suspension applications, online‑account extraction governance, LPB review engagement) require specialist capacity and will draw budget and forensic resources.
  • Registered social housing providers — new closure powers and additional case‑management responsibilities (including court applications and oversight of exclusions) raise legal and operational costs and potential litigation risk.
  • Courts and legal aid budget — the bill expands Crown Court enforcement, introduces technical interlocutory hearings (EROC/initial enforcement), and creates new prevention‑order processes that will increase judicial time and legal aid demand.
  • Small online sellers and delivery firms — the bill’s remote‑sales and courier/collection‑point rules place new compliance and record‑keeping obligations on e‑commerce operators and couriers, with criminal penalties if standards aren’t met.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is prevention versus proportionality: the bill gives powerful pre‑emptive tools (civil orders, platform removal notices, IP/domain suspensions, mandatory reporting) intended to stop harm before it crystallises — but those tools concentrate discretionary power in police, courts and private platforms and risk curtailing speech, protest or privacy and creating heavy operational loads unless matched by clear legal safeguards and resources.

Trade‑offs and implementation questions run throughout this package. The online weapons/content regime assigns operational duties to platforms (rapid removal, appointed UK content managers) and escalates enforcement with civil penalties; that design increases the pace of takedowns but places a compliance burden on intermediaries whose systems and cross‑border services may not map neatly onto the statutory categories.

Determining what counts as “unlawful weapons content” in borderline cases and implementing the 48‑hour removal/review process will test notice‑handling, cross‑jurisdictional legal standards and platforms’ capacity for rapid human review.

The child‑safety measures — a duty to report suspected child sexual offences and a new online facilitation offence — move responsibility onto professionals and platforms to surface abuse early. That is likely to increase referrals and criminal investigations; it also risks raising confidentiality and data‑protection tensions (health and social‑work settings, for example), and will require clear operational guidance and resourcing to avoid false‑positive churn on police workloads.

The bill attempts to protect reporters (exceptions, limited deferral for safety) but leaves significant discretion to prosecutors and police about how to triage reports.

Two broader tensions are recurrent: first, preventive civil orders and suspension powers trade liberty and economic interruption against the public interest in disruption — the bill builds in judicial review safeguards and review rights but many measures (non‑public applications, nondisclosure orders, domain/IP suspensions) could face legal challenge on proportionality and jurisdictional reach; second, the package expects significant new delivery from a police and court system already under pressure. Many parts of the bill (enforcement plans, IP/domain suspensions, content manager oversight) rely on sustained investment and new specialist resources — without them enforcement may be uneven and litigation burdensome.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.