Codify — Article

Crown Estate Act 2025: borrowing powers, seabed sales ban, and new governance

Rewrites Crown Estate finance and governance—expands Treasury lending control, bars permanent seabed disposals without Treasury consent, and adds regional commissioners.

The Brief

The Crown Estate Act 2025 amends the Crown Estate Act 1961 to (1) give the Treasury explicit power to provide loans and other financial assistance to the Crown Estate Commissioners from the National Loans Fund, (2) increase the number of Commissioners and change how they are remunerated, (3) add a statutory duty to keep under review sustainable development impacts, and (4) prohibit permanent disposals of the territorial seabed without Treasury consent while requiring new reporting around partnerships with Great British Energy.

Those changes re-shape the Crown Estate’s financial relationship with the Treasury, tighten central control over the UK territorial seabed, and introduce regional advisory commissioners for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The bill shifts more funding mechanics into the public finance architecture and creates new reporting and governance obligations that will matter to marine developers, energy projects, devolved administrations and the Treasury itself.

At a Glance

What It Does

The Act inserts a new section allowing the Treasury to issue loans to the Crown Estate Commissioners from the National Loans Fund and to provide other financial assistance; it restricts permanent disposals of the territorial seabed without Treasury consent; it increases the number of Commissioners to 12 and creates regionally focused commissioner roles; and it adds duties on sustainable development review and partnership reporting.

Who It Affects

Directly affected parties include the Crown Estate Commissioners, the Treasury (as lender and gatekeeper for seabed dispositions), Great British Energy where a partnership exists, marine and offshore developers seeking seabed interests, and devolved administrations in Wales and Northern Ireland through consultation rights on appointments.

Why It Matters

The Act embeds Treasury control into Crown Estate finance and blocks certain transfers of seabed assets—shifting where commercial and strategic decisions are taken. That matters for offshore energy deployment, marine leasing markets, devolved governance interactions, and the Crown Estate’s balance sheet and governance.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The Act first expands what the Crown Estate Commissioners can do operationally and financially. It authorises the Treasury to issue loans to the Commissioners out of the National Loans Fund and to provide other forms of financial assistance from parliamentary money.

For loans from the National Loans Fund, the Treasury may set the interest rate (bringing in the National Loans Act 1968 reference) and must pay receipts into the Fund. The statutory change also amends prior language on taking security or borrowing, routing such activity through the new section or subject to explicit Treasury consent.

On governance, the Act increases the number of Commissioners from eight to twelve and removes the statutory reference to a second Commissioner as deputy chairman. It clarifies that Commissioners’ salaries and expenses—including pay for people they appoint—are to be met from Crown Estate income rather than by separate parliamentary vote.

The Act also creates three named commissioner responsibilities: one for advising on England, one for Wales, and one for Northern Ireland, and requires consultation with the Welsh Ministers and the Northern Ireland Executive Office before appointments to the Wales and Northern Ireland advisory roles respectively.The Act introduces operational duties and reporting changes. Commissioners must keep under review the impact of their activities on achieving sustainable development in the UK.

When a partnership with Great British Energy is in operation during a year, the annual report must include a specific account of activities under that partnership and any effects or benefits resulting from it. Separate from reporting, the Act inserts a hard restriction: the Commissioners may not permanently dispose of any part of the territorial seabed that belongs to the Crown Estate, nor any interest over it, without Treasury consent, and any purported disposal without consent is void.

The Act defines “territorial seabed” as the seabed and subsoil within UK territorial waters.The Act’s reach is UK-wide (England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and comes into force two months after passage. Taken together, the measures increase Treasury influence over Crown Estate financing, limit the Commissioners’ ability to transfer seabed assets permanently, and add governance and transparency requirements around sustainability and energy partnerships.

Those changes change who decides on financing, how seabed interests can move in the market, and how regional conditions must be reflected inside the Crown Estate’s board.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The Treasury may issue loans to the Crown Estate Commissioners out of the National Loans Fund and set the interest rate on such loans; receipts from those loans must be paid into the National Loans Fund.

2

The Act raises the statutory number of Commissioners from eight to twelve and removes the statutory reference to a second Crown Estate Commissioner as deputy chairman.

3

The Commissioners’ salaries and expenses, including remuneration for appointees, are to be paid out of Crown Estate income rather than by an alternative supply route.

4

The Act prohibits the Commissioners from permanently disposing of any part of the territorial seabed or any interest over it without Treasury consent, and declares any such disposal void without that consent.

5

When a partnership between the Commissioners and Great British Energy operates in a reporting year, the annual report must include a dedicated account of partnership activities and any resultant effects or benefits.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1 (inserted s.3A)

Treasury power to lend and provide financial assistance

This provision authorises the Treasury to arrange loans from the National Loans Fund to the Commissioners and to provide financial assistance (including loans) from parliamentary funds. For loans from the National Loans Fund the Treasury may determine the interest rate and must pay receipts back into the Fund; the text also ties the mechanics to the National Loans Act 1968. Practically, this brings Crown Estate borrowing squarely within central public-finance mechanisms and gives the Treasury discretion over pricing and accounting.

Section 1 (amendments to s.3)

Borrowing and security subject to new route or Treasury consent

The Act deletes and replaces existing language that allowed the Commissioners to borrow “on security.” Going forward, borrowing on security must either follow the new s.3A process (Treasury loans/assistance) or proceed only with explicit Treasury consent. That narrows the Commissioners’ autonomous options to use Crown Estate assets as security without Treasury sign-off.

Section 2 (Schedule 1 amendments)

Board size, leadership and remuneration source

Schedule 1 changes increase the board to 12 members and remove the statutory ‘second Commissioner’ deputy-chair role. The schedule also mandates that salaries and expenses—covering the Commissioners and people they appoint—be met from Crown Estate income. The practical effect is a larger board with pay coming from estate receipts rather than a separate funding vehicle, which can affect internal budgeting and the signal the Commissioners send about reinvestment vs. running costs.

5 more sections
Section 3 (inserted s.1(3A))

Sustainable development review duty

The Commissioners must keep under review how their activities affect the achievement of sustainable development in the United Kingdom. This is framed as an ongoing review duty rather than a prescriptive rule, leaving room for the Commissioners to determine scope and metrics but creating a statutory hook for sustainability considerations in decisions about land and marine management.

Section 4 (reports amendment)

Partnership reporting with Great British Energy

When a formal partnership with Great British Energy exists in a year, the Commissioners’ annual report must include a section describing partnership activities and any effects or benefits that arose. This does not mandate specific disclosures beyond activity and effect but creates an accountability channel for the Crown Estate’s role in that partnership and makes the arrangement visible to Parliament and stakeholders.

Section 5 (inserted s.3B)

Ban on permanent disposals of the territorial seabed without Treasury consent

This is a substantive constraint: the Commissioners may not permanently dispose of any part of the territorial seabed or any interest over it that forms part of the Crown Estate without Treasury consent, and any purported disposal without consent is void. The section defines territorial seabed as the seabed and subsoil within UK territorial waters, creating a clear statutory boundary for the prohibition and a blunt legal remedy—voidness—for non-compliance.

Section 6 (Schedule 1 further amendments)

Regional advisory commissioners and consultation requirements

The Act requires that among the commissioners there be named responsibilities for advising about England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It also creates a consultation requirement: the Welsh Ministers must be consulted before appointing the Wales adviser and the Northern Ireland Executive Office before appointing the Northern Ireland adviser. These are advisory and consultative steps rather than delegation of appointment power to the devolved institutions.

Section 7

Extent, commencement and short title

The Act applies across the whole UK and comes into force two months after passage. It also sets the short title. The specified commencement interval gives administrative time for the Treasury and Commissioners to prepare for loan arrangements, board appointments and the new reporting and seabed-disposal rules.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.

Explore Government in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Treasury — gains formal tools to fund and control Crown Estate financing (loans from the National Loans Fund, interest-setting power) and a statutory veto over permanent seabed disposals, centralising strategic discretion.
  • Crown Estate Commissioners — obtain clearer, routable access to public finance and an expanded board, which can increase capacity to undertake larger projects subject to Treasury terms.
  • Great British Energy and other public energy partners — the reporting requirement and explicit partnership recognition increase transparency and may legitimise joint projects with the Crown Estate.
  • Regional interests (Wales and Northern Ireland) — gain guaranteed commissioners responsible for advising on local conditions and a statutory consultation role in those appointments, improving visibility of sub-national concerns.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Marine and offshore developers seeking permanent seabed interests — face a new legal barrier to acquiring permanently disposed seabed rights; transactions without Treasury consent will be void.
  • Crown Estate operational teams — will carry additional compliance and reporting duties and must adapt governance to a larger board and new pay sourcing rules, increasing administrative complexity.
  • Taxpayers/Treasury balance sheet — while loans come from the National Loans Fund and receipts return to it, large Treasury-backed lending or write-downs could create fiscal exposure or crowd out other uses of the Fund.
  • Devolved administrations — consultation rights are modest; they do not receive appointment powers, so they bear the political cost of limited influence despite stronger expectations for regional representation.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is between centralised Treasury control (and protection of national strategic assets) and the Crown Estate’s operational independence and market-facing flexibility: the Act secures national oversight and financing routes but does so by concentrating decision-making and financial terms at the Treasury, while only offering limited, consultative recognition of regional interests.

The Act trades the Crown Estate’s standalone financial autonomy for a Treasury-centred model of public finance. Authorising loans from the National Loans Fund gives the Commissioners access to capital but embeds Treasury discretion over interest and the accounting of receipts; that discretion can lead to faster mobilisation of funds for strategic projects but also to Treasury-imposed commercial terms that limit project economics.

The text is silent on creditworthiness tests, repayment responsibilities, or whether the Commissioners can still grant long leases that function economically like disposals — all practical issues that will need administrative or secondary-legislative clarification.

The prohibition on permanent disposal of the territorial seabed is stark: it blocks permanent transfers without Treasury consent and makes non-consensual transfers legally void. That protects strategic oversight of the seabed but raises questions about the definition of “permanent disposal” versus long leases, licences and other tenure arrangements commonly used in marine development.

It will also interact with existing marine licensing and leasing regimes and could slow commercial transactions unless the Treasury establishes clear criteria and processes for consenting. Finally, the devolution-related changes create a tension: the Act provides named advisory commissioners and consultation on appointments but stops short of giving appointment or consent rights to devolved governments, which may generate political friction and practical limits on how regional advice is weighed in Crown Estate decisions.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.