The Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill makes it illegal to bring specified hunting trophies into Great Britain where the item is of a species listed in Annex A or B of the Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation, was hunted on or after the Act’s commencement date, and is brought into Great Britain by or on behalf of the hunter in the course of transferring it from the place it was hunted to the hunter’s residence. The bill defines "hunting trophy" as the body or a readily recognisable part or derivative obtained by hunting for the hunter’s personal use (excluding consumption).
The measure redirects how the UK handles trophy imports by creating a domestic prohibition that interacts with existing Wildlife Trade Regulations, establishes limited advisory capacity (an Advisory Board of up to three members) and includes a targeted Northern Ireland carve‑out for “qualifying Northern Ireland goods.” The practical effect will touch hunters, freight carriers and Border Force procedures, and raise implementation questions about enforcement, penalties and cross‑border movement between Northern Ireland and Great Britain.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill prohibits bringing hunting trophies of species listed in Annex A or B of the Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation into Great Britain when four conditions are met: the item is a hunting trophy as defined, it is brought by or on behalf of the hunter, it is in transit to the hunter’s residence, and the animal was hunted on or after commencement. It disapplies overlapping operation of specified EU-derived Wildlife Trade Regulations for cases covered by the prohibition.
Who It Affects
Directly affects individual hunters bringing trophies into Great Britain, hunting outfitters and their clients, freight carriers and airlines that handle personal effects, and UK border/customs authorities responsible for import checks. It also affects stakeholders in source countries that export trophies to UK clients and conservation organisations tracking trade flows for Annex A/B species.
Why It Matters
The bill establishes a UK‑level import ban for a defined subset of species and circumstances rather than relying solely on CITES/Wildlife Trade Regulations, creating a new domestic compliance regime and a potential enforcement burden for Border Force and carriers. Its Northern Ireland exception and limited advisory architecture create practical and legal frictions that will matter to customs, legal advisers and operators in the trophy‑hunting supply chain.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a focused criminal prohibition (phrased as "it is prohibited to bring") on bringing hunting trophies into Great Britain in a narrow set of circumstances. A "hunting trophy" is the animal’s body or any readily recognisable part or derivative obtained by hunting for the hunter’s personal use (explicitly not for consumption).
The prohibition only applies where the hunter (or someone acting for them) is moving the trophy from where it was taken to where the hunter lives, and only if the animal was hunted on or after the date sections 1 and 2 come into force by statutory instrument.
The species scope is not enumerated in the bill itself but is tied to Annex A and Annex B of the Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation; those international/administrative listings therefore determine which animals are covered. The bill also says that, in circumstances where this domestic prohibition applies, the listed EU‑derived Wildlife Trade Regulations "do not operate to prohibit, or impose restrictions or conditions on," bringing the trophy into Great Britain—an attempt to avoid overlapping regulatory effects where both regimes might otherwise apply.Special rules govern movement from Northern Ireland: bringing a trophy from Northern Ireland to Great Britain can fall within the prohibition, and the bill instructs that the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 should apply to such removals as it does to imports.
However, the prohibition does not apply to "qualifying Northern Ireland goods" as that term is defined under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, preserving the Northern Ireland Protocol’s goods regime. The Secretary of State must set the commencement date for sections 1 and 2 by regulation, may make transitional or saving regulations, and must appoint an Advisory Board on Hunting Trophies (up to three members) to advise on matters referred to it and on species that appear endangered or likely to become endangered.Taken together, the bill replaces part of the practical regulatory architecture for certain trophy imports with a simple, condition‑based domestic ban tied to established species lists, while leaving open significant implementation questions (penalties, operational customs procedures and how the NI carve‑out will operate in practice).
The advisory board is small and purely consultative; the Secretary of State retains wide regulatory discretion over timing and transitional arrangements.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill prohibits bringing a hunting trophy into Great Britain only where the trophy is of a species listed in Annex A or B of the Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation, is brought by or on behalf of the hunter, is being transferred to the hunter’s residence, and the animal was hunted on or after the Act’s commencement.
It defines "hunting trophy" as the body or a readily recognisable part or derivative obtained by hunting for the hunter’s personal use (explicitly excluding consumption), whether processed or not.
The bill disapplies the specified Wildlife Trade Regulations (the Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation and three implementing EU instruments) from operating to prohibit or impose conditions in circumstances covered by the new domestic prohibition, aiming to avoid overlapping regulatory effects.
Movements from Northern Ireland to Great Britain are treated specially: the prohibition can apply to removals, the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 applies to such removals, but "qualifying Northern Ireland goods" are exempt under the Withdrawal Act’s definitions.
The Secretary of State decides the commencement date for sections 1 and 2 by statutory instrument, may make transitional/saving regulations, and must appoint an Advisory Board on Hunting Trophies of up to three members to provide advice on referrals and endangered species concerns.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Primary import prohibition and four‑part test
Section 1 sets out the core legal bar: it is a categorical prohibition to "bring a hunting trophy into Great Britain" when four factual predicates are met. Practically that turns compliance into a fact‑finding exercise at the border: whose item it is (the hunter or someone acting for them), the purpose (transfer to hunter’s residence), the species listing, and the timing of the hunt (on/after commencement). Because the prohibition is phrased around the act of "bringing" rather than specific licensing conditions, enforcement will depend on how Border Force identifies and proves those four facts at import or on arrival.
Species scope tied to Annex A and B of Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation
Rather than listing species in primary legislation, section 2 imports the species scope by reference to Annex A or B of the Principal Wildlife Trade Regulation. That keeps the list administratively flexible (it changes with the Regulation) but delegates a key policy decision to an external instrument. Advisers and importers will need to monitor the Annex lists to know whether a given trophy falls within the ban.
Definitions, Northern Ireland movement and Customs Act linkage
Section 3 clarifies that "bringing into Great Britain" includes both imports into the UK where entry results in arrival in Great Britain and removals from Northern Ireland to Great Britain. It expressly applies the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 to NI‑to‑GB removals in contravention. Crucially, the prohibition does not apply to "qualifying Northern Ireland goods" as defined under the Withdrawal Act, creating a carve‑out that preserves protocol arrangements but also creates a potential route for trophies to move to GB under different legal status.
Advisory Board with narrow remit and small membership
Section 4 requires the Secretary of State to appoint an Advisory Board on Hunting Trophies of up to three members to advise on referred questions and matters relating to species that appear to be or likely to become endangered. The board is consultative only; the Secretary of State controls referrals and appointments and must have regard to expertise in "matters relating to the import of hunting trophies," meaning the board is expected to provide technical or conservation input rather than operational enforcement.
Extent, commencement powers and transitional regulations
Section 5 confirms the Act’s territorial extent (England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and gives the Secretary of State power to appoint the commencement day for sections 1 and 2 by statutory instrument and to make transitional or saving regulations. That regulatory power permits phased implementation or carve‑outs, but places timing and detailed transitional design fully within ministerial discretion rather than setting binding statutory triggers.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Conservation and animal‑welfare organisations campaigning to stop trophy imports—because the bill erects a clear domestic barrier to certain trophy flows and reduces the UK market for Annex A/B specimens.
- UK public audiences and consumer groups opposed to trophy imports—who gain a legally enforceable prohibition that aligns imports with prevailing public policy views on such trophies.
- Border Force and HMRC (potentially)—because a single domestic prohibition clarifies a legal basis for refusal or seizure in specified cases, simplifying decision‑making when the four‑part test is met.
Who Bears the Cost
- Hunters and private individuals who would import trophies—because the prohibition removes a lawful route to bring covered trophies into Great Britain under the bill’s conditions.
- Hunting outfitters, guides and commercial operators in source countries who rely on clients exporting trophies to the UK—because UK demand for Annex A/B trophies is likely to fall and clients face additional logistical hurdles.
- Freight carriers, airlines and professional shippers—because they must update handling and declarations for personal effects and may face greater seizure risk or the need for additional compliance checks.
- UK enforcement agencies and customs services—because the Act increases the scope of items requiring inspection and fact‑finding at the border, and the bill does not itself specify a detailed offences/penalties framework.
- Businesses and individuals operating across the Northern Ireland–Great Britain corridor—because the "qualifying Northern Ireland goods" exception and the Customs Act linkage add legal complexity to movements and record‑keeping.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill sets a clear conservation‑oriented rule to remove a domestic market for certain trophies, but it does so in a way that concentrates discretion with the Secretary of State and leaves major operational and legal questions unresolved—forcing a trade‑off between a straightforward policy signal and the messy, resource‑intensive reality of proving, enforcing and policing the ban at ports and across the Northern Ireland–Great Britain corridor.
Two implementation issues stand out. First, the bill does not create a standalone criminal offence with specified penalties in the text beyond instructing that the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 applies to certain NI removals.
For imports arriving directly to Great Britain the statutory enforcement and sanctions architecture is left implicit: enforcement agencies will need detail in secondary regulations or operational guidance about what penalties, seizures or civil sanctions apply and how evidential questions (who is the hunter, proof of where the animal was hunted, and when) are to be established at the border.
Second, several definitions create practical ambiguity. "Personal use" is expressly distinguished from consumption but is otherwise undefined; that raises edge cases (gifts, commercial sale after import, taxidermy processing, third‑party couriers bringing items on behalf of hunters) where behaviour could either fall inside or be engineered to fall outside the prohibition. The Northern Ireland carve‑out for qualifying goods protects the protocol but also risks creating a legal channel that could be exploited to move trophies into Great Britain under a different legal status.
Finally, tying species scope to Annex A and B delegates a major policy lever to an external regulatory instrument: that provides flexibility but reduces parliamentary control and can complicate compliance when listings change rapidly.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.