The bill requires the Treasury to lay a draft of regulations under section 153A of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 on or before 1 January 2026. It does not itself set caps or define which bodies are covered; it simply creates a statutory duty for the Treasury to bring forward regulations that will restrict exit payments in the public sector.
Crucially, the bill permits the Treasury’s first set of regulations to have effect in relation to any exit payments made on or after 1 October 2025. The Act would come into force on the day it is passed and extend across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, creating immediate legal and practical questions about retrospective application, contractual rights and the scope of the Treasury’s forthcoming rules.
At a Glance
What It Does
Imposes a statutory duty on the Treasury to lay draft regulations under section 153A SBEE 2015 by 1 January 2026 and authorises the first regulations to operate in relation to exit payments made on or after 1 October 2025. The bill itself does not set numeric limits or list covered employers.
Who It Affects
Public-sector employers and their HR and payroll teams across the UK, departing employees and pension administrators, and the Treasury as the rule-making authority. Legal advisers and compliance teams will need to monitor the content of the draft regulations closely.
Why It Matters
It forces a timetable for rulemaking on exit payments and permits those rules to reach payments made before the regulations are laid, creating potential budgetary, contractual and litigation exposures for employers and recipients.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill does one operational thing and one consequential thing. Operationally, it turns what is presently a power in statute—the Treasury’s authority under section 153A of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 to make regulations restricting exit payments—into an obligation to present a draft regulation to Parliament by a stated date.
That obligation concentrates political and administrative attention and will effectively set the deadline for policy design and stakeholder engagement on limits to redundancy, severance and other exit-related payments in the public sector.
Consequentially, the bill opens the door for the first regulations the Treasury makes under section 153A to apply to exit payments made from 1 October 2025. Practically, that means the scope of the Treasury’s regulations—who they cover, what counts as an exit payment, and whether there are numeric caps or exemptions—will determine whether already-made payments are untouched, subject to clawback, or excluded by design.
The bill does not itself prescribe any of these details; it simply permits retrospective reach for the initial instrument.The Act’s UK-wide territorial extent means its enabling effect will be available across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, but it does not remove or alter devolved competence over public employment where that exists. Finally, the bill brings the duty into force immediately on enactment, so once passed the statutory timetable starts running and affected organisations must monitor the Treasury’s draft and any subsequent regulations closely for operational and legal implications.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Treasury must lay a draft of regulations under section 153A SBEE 2015 before both Houses of Parliament on or before 1 January 2026.
The bill allows the Treasury’s first regulations under s.153A to have effect in relation to any exit payments made on or after 1 October 2025.
The Act does not itself set limits, thresholds, or definitions for ‘exit payments’; it relies on the content of the regulations the Treasury will produce.
The bill extends to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland and comes into force on the day it is passed.
Only the ‘first regulations’ are authorised to reach back to 1 October 2025; the measure distinguishes the initial instrument from any later regulations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statutory duty for Treasury to lay draft regulations by a set date
Clause 1 turns the Treasury’s existing regulatory power under section 153A of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 into a duty to lay a draft of regulations before Parliament on or before 1 January 2026. Practically, this fixes a policy timetable: the Treasury must produce a draft instrument for parliamentary scrutiny by that date, which concentrates the window for consultation and final policy decisions. The clause does not prescribe the content, parliamentary procedure, or whether the instrument will be subject to affirmative or negative resolution—those details remain governed by the parent statute and any associated parliamentary rules.
Permits initial regulations to apply to payments from 1 October 2025
Clause 2 authorises the Treasury’s first regulations under s.153A to have effect with regard to exit payments made on or after 1 October 2025. That drafting choice permits prospective retroactivity: the initial instrument can reach payments made before the regulations are laid. The clause leaves open whether the regulations will claw back sums, deny future entitlements, or operate prospectively from that date; those substantive choices will appear in the text of the regulations themselves and will determine the scale of legal and financial disruption.
Territorial extent, immediate commencement and short title
Clause 3 states the Act extends across the United Kingdom, comes into force on the day it is passed, and sets the short title. Immediate commencement means the statutory duty in Clause 1 is triggered as soon as the bill becomes law, starting the timetable for the Treasury to produce the draft. The UK-wide extent signals Westminster’s intent to provide a single enabling power, but it does not resolve how devolved administrations will respond to any specific regulatory limits that affect their public-sector employers.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- HM Treasury — Gains a clear statutory timetable to produce a draft instrument and therefore the political and administrative cover to impose standardised rules on exit payments across the public sector.
- Departments and central budget holders — Benefit from a potential legal framework that, if restrictive, could limit the size of future exit liabilities and improve fiscal predictability.
- Taxpayers and central government finances — Stand to benefit if the forthcoming regulations succeed in reducing large discretionary exit payments, shrinking contingent public liabilities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Public employers (departments, NHS trusts, local authorities) — Face compliance, policy drafting and administration costs to align payout processes with any new rules, and possible liabilities if regulations require recovery or adjustment of payments already made.
- Employees and former employees receiving exit payments — Risk reduced or clawed-back payments if the Treasury’s first regulations apply to payments from 1 October 2025.
- Legal and HR advisers — Will face increased demand and litigation risk as affected parties challenge retrospective measures or contend with ambiguous definitions in the regulations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between the objective of immediate fiscal restraint—bringing exit payments under uniform limits quickly—and the competing legal and fairness concerns created by allowing a first regulation to reach payments already made; shortening the timeline raises the risk of unfair surprises, litigation and administrative complexity even as it promises faster budgetary savings.
The bill deliberately focuses on process rather than substance: it mandates a deadline for the Treasury to present draft regulations but leaves all difficult definitional and substantive choices to the forthcoming instrument. That design concentrates uncertainty into a short window—affected employers and employees will need to anticipate a variety of outcomes (numeric caps, exemptions, recovery mechanisms) without statutory guidance.
The authorised retrospective effect for the first regulations creates a particular implementation problem: if the Treasury chooses to limit or claw back payments already made from 1 October 2025, employers may face administrative and reputational costs in attempting recoveries, and recipients will face sudden changes to their expectations after the fact.
Devolution and legal risk are other unresolved questions. The Act is UK-wide in extent, but public employment and pay arrangements operate differently across devolved administrations; the bill does not include mechanisms for coordination or carve-outs, so tensions may arise between Westminster regulation and devolved policy.
Finally, the clause permitting retrospective application raises straightforward legal exposure—claims based on legitimate expectation, contract, or human-rights principles are plausible depending on how invasive the regulations are and whether they include transitional or compensation arrangements.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.