The bill designates a corporate body — Great British Railways (GBR) — to manage, operate, maintain and improve railway infrastructure and to provide or secure passenger services, including setting fares and selling tickets. It reorganises how services are designated and contracted, creates an expanded passenger watchdog, reforms access to tracks and timetabling, and provides broad powers for transferring assets and staff into the new regime.
Practically, the measure centralises strategic planning and day-to-day infrastructure control while preserving a role for devolved administrations (Scotland and Wales) through designation, memoranda of understanding and consent mechanics. It also establishes a five‑year funding process tied to Secretary of State objectives, requires GBR business plans and gives the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) monitoring and levy powers — with novel limits on ORR enforcement against GBR itself.
The result reshapes procurement, regulatory lines, and dispute routes that operators, local transport bodies and passenger representatives will need to navigate.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorises the Secretary of State to designate a corporate Great British Railways with statutory functions spanning infrastructure, passenger services, fares and ticketing; it empowers GBR to set charges, issue timetables and make charging/performance schemes. It also creates or updates governance tools: licence rules for GBR, ORR monitoring and a statutory Passengers’ Council with investigatory and standard‑setting powers.
Who It Affects
National operators and any GBR companies, train operators seeking track access, franchising/contracting authorities (Secretary of State, Scottish and Welsh Ministers), the ORR, mayoral combined authorities and Transport for London, plus passengers (particularly disabled, young and elderly users) and freight customers. Private owners of rolling stock and holders of existing access agreements face potential transfer or modification of rights.
Why It Matters
The bill replaces a fragmented managerial architecture with a single infrastructure operator and a tighter funding‑plan loop that links political objectives to business plans and payments. That changes the commercial bargaining space for operators (direct awards under the 2023 public‑service rules), constrains regulatory remedies deliverable against GBR, and creates new appeal and consultation channels that will determine how quickly services, investment and disruption are managed.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates Great British Railways by regulation and defines its statutory functions: running and improving infrastructure, providing passenger services, setting fares, selling tickets, supporting innovation and publishing standards. GBR may exercise those functions itself or through subsidiaries and can set charges and terms for activities it controls.
The legislation expressly clarifies GBR’s legal status (not Crown employment or a Crown agent) while enabling the Secretary of State to confer additional functions by regulation.
Operationally, the bill gives GBR responsibility for access policy, an infrastructure capacity plan and a working timetable. GBR must invite applications for non‑GBR train movements, publish the working timetable, and keep capacity to prioritise GBR passenger services and essential maintenance.
GBR must publish charging and performance schemes that can impose penalties, bonuses or compensation on train operators; operators and other aggrieved parties may appeal decisions to the ORR, which is directed to apply judicial‑review‑type principles when hearing appeals.Passenger oversight is beefed up. The Passengers’ Council gains investigation, complaint, reporting and standard‑setting powers and can require improvement plans where providers breach licence conditions; unresolved issues can be referred to the ORR.
The London Transport Users’ Committee receives parallel powers for London services. The bill requires discounted‑fare schemes for young, elderly and disabled travellers and makes participation or specified arrangements mandatory in public‑service contracts.Funding runs on a multi‑step, five‑year cycle.
The ORR sets a timetable for the process; the Secretary of State issues a statement of objectives and an indication of funds available; GBR must produce an approved business plan for the period; the Secretary of State may then provide financial assistance (grants, loans, asset transfers, contracts) to carry out the plan. The ORR must monitor delivery and may levy GBR for its own non‑safety railway regulatory work, but the bill curtails some ORR enforcement powers against GBR itself, creating an asymmetric enforcement landscape.Finally, the bill provides broad transfer‑scheme powers to move property, rights and liabilities between government, GBR, jointly owned companies and other specified entities; it enables Scottish and Welsh Ministers to arrange for functions to be exercised by GBR or joint companies; and it gives the Secretary of State powers to implement the Cape Town Convention and Luxembourg Protocol for railway rolling stock.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary of State may designate a body as Great British Railways by regulation (s.1) and GBR may exercise its statutory functions directly or via GBR companies (s.3(5)).
The ORR can require GBR to pay a levy to cover the ORR’s expected non‑safety railway costs for a charging period; the ORR sets, revises and may refund levies (s.14).
Passenger services that authorities designate can be provided by direct award of public‑service contracts under the 2023 Regulations (s.31); the bill limits open procurement for designated services and allows contracts to require operation of additional railway assets (s.32).
Funding is structured in five‑year periods: the Secretary of State issues objectives and an indication of funds, GBR must produce an approved business plan, and the Secretary of State may provide targeted financial assistance (grants, loans, asset transfers) aligned to that plan (Sched.2 paras 1–7).
The Passengers’ Council can investigate, set standards (with ORR/SoS consent), require improvement plans and refer licence contraventions to the ORR; the Council may publish reports but must coordinate with referring authorities (Ch.2 of Part 2).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishing Great British Railways and central powers
This chapter creates GBR by regulation, defines its core statutory functions (infrastructure management, passenger services, fares and ticketing, R&D and standards) and allows the Secretary of State to add functions. The text clarifies GBR’s employment and property status and permits GBR to delegate functions to GBR companies. Practically, this is the legal foundation for centralised operational control of the network and the hooks for subsequent regulation, charging and contractual arrangements.
Directions, guidance and devolved consents
The Secretary of State and Scottish Ministers may issue directions and guidance to GBR on exercising statutory functions; directions can make functions contingent on consultation or consent. The bill embeds consent rules: the Secretary of State must obtain Scottish/Welsh consent before directing on matters that directly affect devolved arrangements, and Scottish Ministers must consult the Secretary of State before issuing directions. Directions, guidance and their publication are mandatory, and compliance is enforceable in civil proceedings — creating a formal channel for political oversight while requiring transparency.
Licensing and financial powers
Schedule 1 amends the 1993 licensing regime: GBR cannot receive licence exemptions; the Secretary of State grants an initial licence to GBR under an amended process with required consultation and notification, while the ORR retains licensing functions for other operators but may need SoS consent or general authority. GBR can set charges and terms in exercising functions; Schedule 2 sets out the legally structured funding loop and the Secretary of State’s power to provide grants, loans or asset transfers tied to approved business plans.
Designation and delivery of passenger services
Ministers (SoS, Scottish and Welsh) must designate the passenger services they may secure; the bill confines the Secretary of State from designating Scotland‑only or Wales‑only services. Designated services may be secured only by direct awards under the 2023 Regulations; contracts can require operation of additional assets and can specify fare structures. The bill also mandates discounted‑fare arrangements for young, elderly and disabled travellers and enables both ministers and GBR to prescribe fare policy via directions, guidance or contractual terms.
Passengers’ Council and London committee powers
The Passengers’ Council receives expanded investigatory, complaint handling, standards and improvement‑plan powers. It can require operators to prepare remediation plans and refer non‑compliance to the ORR; it must consult and coordinate with the ORR and may publish reports, although publication may be limited where reports originate from government referrals. The London Transport Users’ Committee receives similar powers in Greater London, creating distinct but overlapping user‑representation regimes.
Access, working timetables, charging and appeals
GBR must issue access and use policies, an infrastructure capacity plan and a working timetable that lists planned movements. The bill prescribes application and consultation steps before including non‑GBR movements and obliges GBR to retain capacity for GBR passenger services and maintenance. GBR must publish charging and performance schemes; affected parties may appeal access, charging and performance decisions to the ORR, which is required to apply High Court (judicial‑review) principles and may quash or remit decisions or, in restricted cases, substitute its own.
ORR’s monitoring, transfer schemes and other powers
The ORR acquires an express monitoring function over GBR and must publish related material; it may investigate how GBR is delivering its approved business plans. The bill provides wide transfer‑scheme powers allowing property, rights and liabilities to move between government bodies, former/proposed GBRs and jointly owned companies; schemes can override third‑party rights subject to compensation rules. The Secretary of State also gets delegated powers for driver‑licensing regulations and to implement the Cape Town Convention for rolling stock.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Disabled, elderly and young passengers — the bill requires GBR and contracting authorities to provide discounted‑fare schemes and to have particular regard to disabled passengers when exercising functions, improving affordability and access arrangements.
- Local transport bodies and mayoral combined authorities — statutory consultation, information‑sharing and cooperation duties give combined authorities and Transport for London formal input into GBR decisions affecting their areas.
- Passengers’ Council and London Transport Users’ Committee — enhanced investigatory, standards and reporting powers expand their leverage to shape service quality, complaint handling and accessibility obligations.
- Freight customers — a statutory rail freight target and capacity planning requirements give shippers stronger footing in planning and infrastructure prioritisation, potentially easing modal shift to rail.
- GBR companies and vertically integrated entities — the bill explicitly allows GBR to deliver functions through subsidiaries, creating clearer legal pathways for integrated franchise‑style models and direct awards.
Who Bears the Cost
- Great British Railways — must produce approved business plans, implement capacity and performance schemes, run discount schemes and absorb administrative and capital costs of centralising infrastructure management. Many operational and publishing duties fall on GBR.
- Train operators and new entrants — GBR’s charging and performance regimes, timetable controls and the ability to modify access rights impose operational constraints and uncertainty; smaller operators face compliance and appeals costs.
- UK and devolved government finances — the five‑year funding cycle and optional Secretary of State financial assistance create contingent public commitments; taxpayers carry residual funding risk if plans require extra support.
- Office of Rail and Road — expanded monitoring and timetable‑setting roles increase ORR responsibilities; although the ORR can levy GBR, the bill limits some enforcement levers (for example, the ORR cannot impose certain penalties or require payments from GBR), shifting the resource and political burden.
- Owners of existing access agreements and third‑party rights — transfer scheme powers may modify or extinguish existing rights, generating compensation claims, legal risk and uncertainty for private investors.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill’s central dilemma is whether a single, politically accountable operator (GBR) can deliver more reliable, better‑integrated rail services while preserving competition, devolved autonomy and independent regulatory checks — concentrating control reduces fragmentation and can speed decisions, but it raises hard questions about enforcement asymmetry, protection of third‑party rights and how to insulate operational governance from shifting political priorities.
The bill packs significant redistribution of authority into statutory form, and that raises practical trade‑offs. Centralising infrastructure control under GBR aims to reduce friction between infrastructure and operations, but it also concentrates discretion over access, timetabling and charging into a single public‑designated operator while simultaneously limiting the ORR’s direct enforcement against GBR.
That asymmetry — GBR subject to directions and commercial obligations but shielded in part from ORR financial sanctions — could complicate accountability and change how stakeholders pursue remedies.
Devolution is built into the architecture, but the mechanics are complex: Scottish and Welsh Ministers can designate services and place functions with GBR or joint companies, and the Secretary of State and devolved Ministers must sign memoranda of understanding and secure mutual consents in specified cases. Those interlocking consent and consultation rules create many points where political negotiation will determine outcomes; they also create practical frictions for fast operational decisions (timetabling, capacity responses) that require rapid action.
Transfer schemes are deliberately broad — able to move rights, liabilities and staff, including across borders of devolved competence — and while the bill provides compensation and notice mechanics, the legal and financial fallout for third parties is likely to trigger disputes and litigation.
The funding model ties five‑year political objectives to approved business plans, which improves strategic clarity but concentrates political risk: funding shortfalls or post‑approval changes can force abrupt operational adjustments. The ORR’s role as timetable setter and monitor is new and useful for oversight, but because the Secretary of State remains central to objective‑setting and grant decisions, regulatory independence is partly constrained by political priorities.
Finally, the bill leaves several technical implementation questions open — detailed rules on charge calculations, the ORR’s levy methodology, precise drivers’ licensing standards and the practical interface with international instruments (Cape Town/Luxembourg) will be set by secondary instruments, meaning businesses face a prolonged period of regulatory design risk.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.