This bill inserts a new Part IVA into the Road Traffic Act 1988 to require cycling licences, expands the statutory definition of “cycle” to cover e‑scooters, self‑balancing transports and cargo bikes, and makes sections of the Act that govern helmets applicable to cycles. It also creates an offence for using a cycle without appropriate insurance, requires registration of cycles under the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994, and adjusts penalties and points for cycling offences.
Why it matters: the proposal brings a wide range of micromobility into the formal motor‑traffic regulatory apparatus rather than treating them as informal or experimental devices. That change touches training providers, insurers, micromobility operators, schools and local authorities — and it creates new administrative and enforcement responsibilities under delegated powers granted to the Secretary of State.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes two classes of cycling licence (Class A for non‑motorised pedal cycles and Class B for mechanically propelled or power‑assisted cycles), makes driving licences include those cycling classes, and allows issuance of separate cycling licences by accredited instructors and certain public bodies. The bill also mandates third‑party insurance for cycles, creates a registration requirement, broadens the statutory definition of cycle, and imports helmet rules to cycles.
Who It Affects
Every person who rides a cycle as newly defined (including e‑scooter and self‑balancing transporter users), Bikeability instructors and qualifying issuers (schools, post offices, public libraries), insurers and micromobility operators, plus police and courts that will enforce endorsements and penalty points—particularly in England, Wales and Scotland.
Why It Matters
By folding micromobility into established road‑traffic law the bill changes liability allocation and opens a market for cycle insurance and registration services, while creating administrative points of contact for skills verification and licensing. It also centralises substantial implementation discretion in the Secretary of State, which determines how disruptive or burdensome the measures become in practice.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill builds a licensing dimension into cycling by creating two classes: Class A for traditional pedal cycles and Class B for mechanically propelled or power‑assisted cycles. It treats an existing driving licence as including both cycling classes; otherwise, people who do not hold a driving licence can obtain a separate cycling licence after completing Bikeability Level 2 (or an equivalent accredited course).
The unusual operational choice here is to let a wide range of community actors — Bikeability instructors, school staff, post office staff or public library staff — issue those separate licences, with the Secretary of State responsible for prescribing licence forms and supplying issuers with the means to issue them. The separate licences require only basic identity details and a passport‑standard photo, there is a two‑year fee moratorium, and any separate licence is cancelled automatically if the holder later receives a driving licence.
On compliance and sanctions, the bill amends the Road Traffic Offenders Act to slot many cycling offences into the points and endorsement framework. For a set of specified offences the bill sets discretionary disqualification and endorsement and prescribes 1–3 penalty points for many cycling offences; dangerous cycling attracts an obligatory endorsement and 4–11 points.
The effect is to make cycling misconduct feed into the broader endorsement ecosystem used for motor vehicles, although the text leaves a number of calibration choices to the Secretary of State by way of regulations.The insurance and registration elements transfer more of the motor‑vehicle world onto cycles. The bill makes it an offence to use a cycle on a road or public place without a policy of insurance that meets the Part’s requirements, creates a summary offence for use while uninsured punishable at Level 5, and preserves three statutory defences (not owner/not hired; acting in course of employment; genuinely unaware and without reason to believe there was no insurance).
It also requires the Secretary of State to register cycles on application by the keeper, with no registration fee for the first two years, and applies multiple Parts of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act to cycles with modifications as needed.Definitions and age rules are handled through targeted insertions: the statutory definition of “cycle” is broadened to include power‑assisted pedal cycles, mechanically propelled personal transporters (explicitly listing electric scooters and self‑balancing transporters), multi‑wheel cycles, rickshaws and cargo bikes, while excluding non‑motorised scooters and skateboards. The bill disqualifies children under certain ages from holding Class A or Class B licences (under‑16 exempt, under‑14 disqualified for Class B) but gives the Secretary of State power to vary ages and other details by affirmative regulation.
Territorial extent is England, Wales and Scotland and there is a six‑month window for making regulations before wider commencement.
The Five Things You Need to Know
A driving licence will automatically include Class A and Class B cycling licences, so most existing licence‑holders gain cycling permission without a separate document.
Separate cycling licences can be issued by Bikeability instructors or staff at schools, post offices or public libraries, require evidence of Bikeability Level 2 (or an equivalent accredited course), and must be issued without fee for two years from commencement.
Using a cycle without a qualifying policy of insurance becomes a summary offence under a new RTA section (listed as RTA section 143A) punishable by a Level 5 fine; people under 16 and users of invalid carriages are excluded from this Part.
The Road Traffic Offenders Act is amended so many cycling offences carry discretionary disqualification and endorsement with 1–3 penalty points; dangerous cycling carries an obligatory endorsement and 4–11 penalty points.
The statutory definition of “cycle” is expanded to include electric scooters, self‑balancing transporters and mechanically propelled personal transporters generally, but it expressly excludes non‑motorised scooters and skateboards.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Apply motorcycle helmet rules to cycles
The bill instructs that sections 16–18 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which cover wearing of protective headgear and authorisation of head‑worn appliances for motor cycles, will apply to cycles as the Secretary of State specifies. Practically, that puts helmet requirements on a statutory footing applicable across the broadened “cycle” category, but the Secretary of State’s power to make regulations means the government will define the precise scope and any device‑specific exceptions.
Cycling licences: classes, issuance and form
This new Part creates two licence classes (A and B), makes a driving licence automatically include both classes, and permits separate cycling licences for non‑driving‑licence holders who demonstrate completion of Bikeability Level 2 or an approved equivalent. The mechanics are notable: the Secretary of State prescribes licence forms and supplies issuers, while a diverse set of issuers (Bikeability instructors, schools, post offices, libraries) may grant licences. Identity requirements are minimal (name, address with evidence, passport‑style photo), no fee for two years, and an automatic cancellation mechanism if the holder later obtains a driving licence.
Endorsements, disqualification and points for cycling offences
The bill inserts cycling into the Schedule that governs prosecution and punishment: specified cycling offences become capable of disqualification, endorsement and penalty points. For a range of offences the bill sets discretionary disqualification and 1–3 penalty points; for dangerous cycling the bill makes endorsement obligatory and sets 4–11 penalty points. Administratively this imports cyclists into the same point‑based monitoring framework used for drivers, but many operational details (appeals, exact interaction with driving licence records, and how points combine across device classes) are left to secondary regulations.
Mandatory third‑party insurance for cycles
A new provision makes it an offence to use a cycle on a road or public place without an insurance policy complying with the Part’s requirements. The text retains three defences (vehicle not owned or on hire; use in the course of employment; lack of knowledge or reason to believe no insurance existed) and adds a specific summary offence entry into the schedule with a Level 5 penalty. The clause excludes persons under 16 and invalid carriages from the insurance requirement.
Cycle registration regime and fee moratorium
The Secretary of State must register cycles on application by the keeper, with registration formalities set by the Secretary of State and no fee for the first two years. Several Parts of the Act (registration, offences, legal proceedings and supplementary provisions) apply to registered cycles with necessary modifications, which means registration processes, offence notices and enforcement remedies in existing vehicle law can be adapted to cycles.
Age exemptions and delegated exemptions procedure
The bill exempts children under 16 from needing a Class A licence and disqualifies under‑14s from obtaining a Class B licence, while empowering the Secretary of State to amend those ages and to create categories, conditions or exemptions by affirmative regulation. This creates a flexible delegated‑legislation mechanism for sensitive age‑based rules, but it also puts key policy choices (e.g., lower or higher age thresholds, staged rights) outside primary legislation.
Expanded device definition, territorial extent and commencement
The definition of “cycle” is replaced with a broad list that includes non‑motorised pedal cycles, power‑assisted pedal cycles, mechanically propelled personal transporters (explicitly electric scooters and self‑balancing devices), multi‑wheel cycles, rickshaws and cargo bikes, while excluding non‑motorised scooters and skateboards. The Act extends to England, Wales and Scotland and provides a six‑month period for making regulations before full commencement. Those choices frame the universe of devices caught by licensing, insurance and registration obligations and leave the Secretary of State significant leeway on detailed implementation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Bikeability instructors and accredited training providers — the bill creates an official role for them to issue separate cycling licences and validate training, potentially creating new revenue and institutional importance for accredited providers.
- Insurers and brokers offering third‑party liability products — mandatory insurance across a broadened class of cycles opens a new market for tailored micromobility policies and product innovation (short‑term, device‑specific, or pay‑per‑use cover).
- Local authorities and schools — registration and formal licences give these bodies clearer records of significant micromobility use in their areas, assist safety education, and create touchpoints (schools as issuers) to integrate training into existing road‑safety curricula.
- Employers whose staff use cycles for work — clearer insurance rules and licensing requirements can reduce ambiguity around employer liability when staff use employer‑provided or employee‑owned cycles in the course of employment.
- Road safety advocates and some insurers — the insertion of points and endorsements for dangerous cycling creates enforcement and deterrence tools that may improve compliance and accountability.
Who Bears the Cost
- Police forces and courts — new enforcement duties, processing of summary offences, endorsement handling, and potential increases in low‑level offences will increase workloads without dedicated funding in the bill.
- Micromobility operators and private keepers — registration, insurance procurement and compliance verification will impose administrative costs and potentially higher operating overhead on rental providers and private owners.
- Post offices, public libraries and schools acting as issuers — these bodies must take on new administrative roles, identity checks and record‑keeping without explicit funding or operational detail on how issuance will be supported.
- Small‑scale cyclists and low‑income users — if insurers price risk‑adjusted premiums or operators pass administrative costs to users, the measures risk increasing the cost of everyday cycling and micromobility, disproportionately affecting those on tight budgets.
- Departmental budget and the Secretary of State — the breadth of delegated powers shifts implementation complexity to central government, which will need systems, supplier relationships and oversight to operationalise registration, licence issuance and cross‑database checks.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill tries to reconcile two legitimate objectives — improving safety and accountability by treating a broader set of cycles like motor vehicles, versus preserving low‑friction, affordable active travel and micromobility — but any stricter, motor‑style regime will raise costs and administrative barriers that could deter use and shift behaviour away from cycling, undermining the public‑policy goals it seeks to advance.
Major tensions arise from the bill’s choice to fold micromobility into a motor‑traffic style regulatory system rather than create a bespoke, proportional regime. Licensing and registration reduce ambiguity and may improve accountability, but they also erect administrative hurdles at every step: issuing authorities must check identities, hold records and cancel licences on driving‑licence acquisition; registration will require a keeper database and matching to insurance; and police will need guidance to apply driver‑style endorsements to low‑speed device users.
The bill leaves many of those operational decisions to the Secretary of State, so the practical impact depends heavily on the content and timing of regulations and on whether implementation funding follows.
Another tension concerns the fit of a third‑party insurance model to low‑speed personal transporters and occasional users. Insurers will need to price products for devices with widely varying risk profiles and use patterns; absent micro‑products (short‑term or per‑ride cover) mandatory insurance could price out casual users or push demand toward unregulated rental schemes.
The bill’s exclusion of non‑motorised scooters and skateboards while including many powered devices raises classification questions that could produce disputes, transitional confusion and uneven enforcement across localities. Finally, the reliance on non‑traditional issuers (post offices, libraries) anticipates convenient access but creates logistical and training needs that are not addressed in the text, risking inconsistent application and potential inequities in access to licences.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.