The Women, Peace and Security Bill requires the Secretary of State to have regard to the United Kingdom’s national action plan (NAP) on women, peace and security when formulating or implementing foreign, defence or related policy. It adds an annual requirement to lay a progress report before Parliament (the NAP annual report) and expressly links reporting to the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative.
The bill enumerates specific policy expectations — from inclusion of women in delegations and mediation teams to pre-deployment gender training, survivor‑centred responses to conflict-related sexual violence, and support for local women’s peacebuilding organisations — and obliges the Secretary of State to press multinational organisations to follow the same standards. The Act extends to all UK jurisdictions and takes effect on enactment.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the Secretary of State to ‘have regard’ to the UK national action plan on women, peace and security and enumerated UN Security Council resolutions when making or implementing foreign, defence and related policy; it also mandates an annual parliamentary report on NAP progress that must refer to the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative. The Secretary of State must seek to ensure multinational organisations in which the UK participates do the same.
Who It Affects
Primary obligations fall on the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and the Ministry of Defence, plus UK diplomatic missions, peace-process delegations, and agencies that fund or deploy personnel to conflict-related work. It also affects civil society recipients of UK funding and multilateral partners the UK engages through peace processes.
Why It Matters
The bill embeds the NAP into domestic policymaking processes and creates a parliamentary oversight vehicle (annual report), while setting specific operational expectations—training, delegation composition, survivor-centred responses and funding priorities—that can reshape how the UK designs and resources peace and security interventions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill defines the “national action plan” as the UK’s living plan for implementing Security Council Resolution 1325 and a list of subsequent women, peace and security resolutions, plus any future related resolutions. It makes that plan a formal reference-point for ministers by obliging the Secretary of State to have regard to the plan and the annual progress report when developing or executing foreign, defence and related policy.
Practically, the bill does two concrete things: it requires the Secretary of State to lay an annual NAP progress report before Parliament — and that report must refer to the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative — and it sets out a catalogue of policy priorities ministers must in particular have regard to. Those priorities range from embedding systematic gender consideration across diplomacy, development and security to ensuring justice and reparation for survivors of conflict-related sexual violence.The bill also targets operational practice: it requires appropriate numbers of women to be included in policy formulation and delegations to peace processes (explicitly naming women from minority ethnic groups, women with disabilities and those discriminated against for sexual orientation or gender identity), the inclusion of gender and inclusion mediation experts in diplomatic missions, and appropriate pre-deployment training for staff on human rights and gender issues.
It obliges ministerial action beyond the UK: where the UK participates in multinational organisations the Secretary of State must seek to ensure those organisations have regard to the same matters.The Act extends to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland and comes into force on the day it is passed. The statutory standard imposed—'have regard'—creates a duty to consider the NAP and listed matters in policymaking and reporting, but it does not prescribe detailed operational thresholds or specific budget allocations; those follow-on choices remain for departments and ministers to implement.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Secretary of State must lay an annual NAP progress report before Parliament that must refer to the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative.
The Secretary of State must ‘have regard’ to the UK national action plan and listed UN Security Council resolutions when formulating or implementing foreign, defence or related policy.
Subsection (4) lists nine specific policy priorities ministers must in particular consider, including systematic gender mainstreaming, inclusion of women in delegations, pre-deployment gender training, survivor-centred responses and funding for local women’s peacebuilding organisations.
When the UK participates in multinational organisations (including the UN), the Secretary of State must seek to ensure those organisations also have regard to the NAP priorities.
The Act applies across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland and comes into force on the day it is passed (short title: Women, Peace and Security Act 2024).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definition: national action plan and covered UNSC resolutions
This subsection defines the “national action plan” as the UK plan for meeting commitments under Security Council Resolution 1325 and a specified list of subsequent women, peace and security resolutions, plus any future related resolutions. The list anchors the NAP to an explicit set of UN instruments and makes future related resolutions part of the statutory reference framework.
Annual NAP progress report (laying before Parliament)
The Secretary of State must lay an annual report before Parliament on progress against the NAP and that report must refer to the Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative. Mechanically, this creates a recurring parliamentary accountability instrument; the bill does not, however, prescribe report format, metrics or timelines beyond annual laying.
Duty to have regard in foreign, defence and related policy
This provision imposes a legal duty on the Secretary of State to have regard to the NAP, the annual report and the listed UN resolutions when formulating or implementing relevant government policy. The statutory language requires ministers to consider these materials as part of policy decisions, establishing a clear point of reference for departmental planning and parliamentary oversight.
Specified policy priorities the Secretary of State must consider
Subsection (4) lists concrete expectations ministers must in particular have regard to: systematic gender mainstreaming across diplomacy, development, security and humanitarian work; inclusion of an appropriate number of women in policy formulation and delegations (explicitly including minority ethnic women, women with disabilities and those facing discrimination on sexual orientation or gender identity); guarantee of women’s human rights; justice and reparation for survivors of conflict-related sexual violence; inclusion of gender/inclusion mediation experts; pre-deployment training on human rights and gender; funding support for local women’s peacebuilding organisations; and survivor‑centred responses. These items guide practical choices about delegation composition, training, personnel roles and funding priorities.
International influence, territorial extent and commencement
Section 1(5) requires the Secretary of State to seek to ensure that multinational organisations in which the UK participates have regard to the same NAP matters — a soft power lever rather than a direct control. Section 2 makes the Act applicable across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, brings the law into force on enactment, and gives the Act its short title. There is no grant-authority or ring-fenced funding attached to these duties in the text.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Foreign Affairs across all five countries.
Explore Foreign Affairs in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Survivors of conflict-related sexual violence — the bill elevates justice, reparation and survivor‑centred responses as explicit policy priorities, which could drive referrals, services and accountability measures in UK‑supported processes.
- Local women’s peacebuilding organisations — the statute explicitly prioritises support through funding, increasing the likelihood that UK programmes will channel resources and capacity-building to local gender-focused actors.
- Women from underrepresented groups (minority ethnic groups, women with disabilities, LGBTI+ individuals) — the requirement to include an appropriate number of women in delegations and decision-making aims to broaden representation in peace processes and diplomatic teams.
- Parliament and oversight bodies — the annual NAP report creates a recurring information flow that MPs and peers can use to scrutinise policy choices, funding priorities and operational practice.
Who Bears the Cost
- Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and Ministry of Defence — departments will face operational and administrative costs to adjust delegation composition, commission gender/inclusion experts, design and deliver pre-deployment training, and produce the mandated annual report.
- UK diplomatic missions and peace-process teams — missions may need to alter selection processes, recruit mediation experts and reconfigure staffing to meet inclusion and training expectations, with potential impacts on deployment timelines.
- Departmental budgets and programme pipelines — the bill signals funding priorities (support for local women’s organisations, survivor services) but provides no spending authority, so departments must reprioritise existing funds or seek new allocations.
- Multilateral partners and coalition operations — the UK’s push to have multinational organisations ‘have regard’ to the NAP could create negotiation costs and friction where partner states or organisations have different policies or operational constraints.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between embedding gender equality and survivor‑centred obligations as consistent, government-wide priorities and preserving the flexibility and resourcing discretion ministers need to manage fast-moving, security-sensitive foreign and defence operations; ‘have regard’ codifies intent and oversight without prescribing the operational trade-offs or funding needed to guarantee outcomes.
The bill uses the statutory standard ‘have regard’, which legally requires consideration but stops short of mandating particular outcomes or resource levels. That creates a twofold implementation challenge: ministers must demonstrably integrate the NAP into decision-making while retaining operational flexibility in fast-moving foreign and defence contexts.
The Act lists detailed priorities (inclusion targets, training, funding, survivor‑centred approaches) but does not set quantitative thresholds, metrics, or enforcement mechanisms, leaving significant discretion to departments on how to translate those priorities into practice.
Practical questions follow from the bill’s design. What counts as an “appropriate number of women” in delegations?
How will departments measure and report progress in the NAP annual report beyond narrative description? The requirement to press multinational organisations to have regard to the NAP is a diplomatic tool, not a command; success depends on political influence and coalition-building.
Finally, the bill identifies funding priorities but contains no appropriation mechanism, meaning delivery will hinge on departmental budgeting decisions and cross-government coordination.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.