H.R. 7610 adds section 25F to the Internal Revenue Code to create a Multigenerational Home Caregiver Credit: a $2,000 tax credit per qualified relative for adult children who live with and provide at least 10 hours of care weekly to older relatives with functional limitations. The bill defines eligibility tests for the caregiver and the cared-for relative, requires a licensed health-care provider attestation, caps the number of claimable relatives, and phases the credit down based on adjusted gross income.
This is a targeted tax incentive to encourage in-home family care and reduce nursing-home transitions. For tax and compliance officers, the bill creates new documentation and verification responsibilities for filers and for the IRS, and it raises questions about equity because the credit operates through the tax code (not as a direct payment) and includes an income-based reduction and nonrefundable structure.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates section 25F: a $2,000 nonrefundable tax credit per qualified relative for eligible adult-child caregivers, subject to a two-relative cap, AGI-based reduction, and coordination with the child-and-dependent-care credit. Claimants must submit a licensed health-care provider attestation.
Who It Affects
Individual taxpayers who provide home-based care to older relatives (adult children, in-laws, certain other family members), licensed health-care providers who must sign attestations, and the IRS (for verification and enforcement). State and local programs that pay for home care may see behavioral effects but are not directly altered.
Why It Matters
It channels federal tax policy toward supporting family-provided eldercare rather than institutional care, potentially lowering long-term care costs and shifting care burdens to unpaid family members. It also creates new compliance and administrative tasks around verification, coordination with existing credits, and AGI-based phaseouts.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a new tax credit into the Internal Revenue Code that subsidizes adult children (or similar relatives) who live with and regularly care for older relatives. The headline benefit is $2,000 per qualified relative; taxpayers may claim the credit for up to two qualifying relatives in a year.
To claim it, the caregiver must be at least 18 (or 16 and emancipated), a U.S. citizen, share the same primary residence with the cared-for person for most of the year, perform at least 10 hours of required assistance weekly, and attach a signed attestation from a licensed health-care provider confirming the beneficiary’s functional needs.
The bill tightly defines who counts as a qualified relative: they must be at least 55, have specified functional limitations (at least one activity of daily living and three instrumental activities of daily living) that together justify at least 10 hours per week of assistance, and the condition must be expected to persist for at least 180 days (with a special three-month rule if the relative dies during the year). The statute lists examples of instrumental activities (meal prep, managing finances, shopping, household chores, communication, and travel) and directs the Treasury to coordinate definitions with HHS where practicable.Claiming the credit is limited in several ways.
The $2,000 amount is reduced according to an adjusted-gross-income rule (the text ties the reduction to 1 percent of the excess over specified AGI thresholds), only one taxpayer may claim a given qualified relative (the bill allocates the right to the claimant with the highest AGI when multiple taxpayers are eligible), married couples must file jointly to claim the credit, and any amount claimed for a relative is reduced by any credit already claimed under section 21 (the child-and-dependent-care credit). The provision becomes effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2026.Operationally, the bill relies on the tax return and a provider attestation for verification rather than an ongoing benefits program.
That design keeps the mechanism within existing IRS filing systems but also hands the IRS and health-care professionals specific verification roles. The combination of residence, hours threshold, attestation, relationship limits, and AGI phaseout shapes who will practically benefit from the credit and who will not—important for compliance planning and for anticipating revenue and administrative impacts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Credit amount: $2,000 per qualified relative, up to 2 qualified relatives per taxpayer for a taxable year.
Eligibility proof: the taxpayer must include with their return a signed attestation from a licensed health-care provider certifying the relative’s functional limitations.
Care and residence tests: the caregiver must live with the qualified relative at the same principal abode for at least 6 months (3 months if the relative dies that year) and provide at least 10 hours per week of assistance.
Qualified-relative threshold: the cared-for person must be age 55 or older and unable to perform at least one ADL and three IADLs, with the impairment expected to last at least 180 days (or the life of the individual).
AGI phaseout and limits: the $2,000 credit is reduced by an amount tied to adjusted gross income above $75,000 for singles ($150,000 for joint returns), only one taxpayer can claim a given relative (priority to the higher-AGI filer), and married taxpayers must file jointly to claim the credit.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Framing the problem: multigenerational care and outcomes
Congressional findings cite research linking multigenerational co-residence to reduced formal care use, lower nursing-home transitions, and better mental and cognitive outcomes for older adults. These findings justify targeting a tax incentive at adult-child co-residence and caregiving rather than broad caregiver supports.
Allowance of credit — $2,000 per qualified relative
Subsection (a) creates the tax credit and specifies the headline dollar amount: $2,000 for each qualified relative, claimed against income tax. The provision does not state the credit is refundable; by default it reduces tax liability but does not generate payments beyond tax owed, which affects low- or no-tax caregivers.
Eligible individual (caregiver) rules
This subsection sets caregiver eligibility: age 18 (or 16 and emancipated), U.S. citizen, co-residence with the qualified relative for at least 6 months of the year, and provision of not less than 10 hours weekly of the relative’s required assistance. It also requires the caregiver to attach a licensed health-care provider’s attestation to the tax return certifying the relative’s functional limitations, creating a documentation point on the return.
Qualified relative: age, functional tests, relationships, and IADL definition
Defines a qualified relative as someone age 55+ who cannot perform at least one activity of daily living and three instrumental activities of daily living, where those deficits together require at least 10 hours per week of assistance and are expected to last at least 180 days. The bill enumerates IADLs (meal prep, finances, shopping, household chores, communication, community mobility) and cross-references existing relationship definitions in section 152(d)(2), with a limited inclusion of parents-in-law.
Limitations, AGI reduction, coordination, and filing rules
Multiple constraints narrow the credit’s reach: it phases down based on adjusted gross income (text ties reduction to 1 percent of AGI exceeding thresholds), caps claimable relatives at two, prohibits multiple taxpayers from claiming the same relative (allocating the right to the individual with the highest AGI), requires joint filing for married claimants, and reduces the credit for amounts already claimed under section 21 (child-and-dependent-care credit). These mechanics determine both revenue exposure and likely claimant behavior.
Code table update and start date
The bill inserts the new section into the Code’s subpart table and makes the amendments effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026. That timing gives the IRS limited lead time to issue guidance and update forms for 2027 filings.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Adult-child caregivers who co-reside with older relatives — they receive a direct tax reduction for in-home caregiving, lowering the cost of unpaid family care.
- Older adults with functional limitations — by making co-residence financially more attractive, the credit may help some older adults remain at home and avoid institutionalization.
- Families with moderate incomes below the AGI phaseout thresholds — these households are most likely to be able to claim the full credit and see immediate tax savings.
- Tax preparers and compliance vendors — new rules and required attestations create demand for tax advice, new form fields, and verification services.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal Treasury — the credit will reduce federal income tax revenue; the size depends on take-up, which the bill does not estimate.
- IRS and tax administration — enforcing residence, hours, and attestation requirements imposes administrative and audit costs and will require guidance and form changes.
- Licensed health-care providers — they must provide attestations on functional status, creating time demands and potential liability exposure.
- Low- or no-tax caregivers — because the bill does not specify refundability, caregivers with little tax liability may receive little to no benefit despite meeting the caregiving tests.
- Caregivers above the AGI thresholds — the AGI-based reduction can materially shrink the credit for higher-earning caregivers, and ambiguity in the reduction rule may create uncertainty in planning.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to subsidize family caregiving through the tax code—efficient for administration and likely to reduce institutionalization—while accepting that a tax-credit approach advantages those with tax liability and imposes verification burdens on providers and the IRS; the policy trades broad, direct support to caregivers for administrability and fiscal control.
The bill mixes caregiver policy with tax administration, which produces several practical tensions. First, the attestation model centralizes medical verification on a one-time signed statement attached to a tax return; that is administrable but raises questions about who qualifies as a ‘licensed health-care provider,’ the format of attestations, and liability for providers.
The IRS will need clear standards to limit fraud while avoiding onerous documentation for families. Second, the AGI-based reduction is written as a reduction “by 1 percent of the excess” over specified thresholds.
As drafted, this phrase is ambiguous about the unit and rate of reduction (1 percentage point per dollar, per $1,000, or otherwise), creating significant uncertainty about how quickly the credit phases out unless Treasury issues clarifying regulations.
Third, the credit’s nonrefundable posture (the statute does not convert it to a refundable credit) means the lowest-income caregivers—who are often those with the least ability to hire formal care—may not receive full value, undermining an equity objective. The coordination with existing section 21 helps prevent double-dipping but also requires claimants and preparers to sequence credits correctly.
Finally, the cap of two qualified relatives and the 6-month co-residence rule do not map neatly onto all caregiving patterns (rotating caregiving, part-year residence, siblings sharing care), so the law will shift some care arrangements rather than comprehensively subsidize family caregiving.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.