The HSA’s For All Act amends Internal Revenue Code §223 to remove the requirement that a taxpayer be covered by a high‑deductible health plan (HDHP) to qualify for a health savings account (HSA). Instead, the bill defines an HSA‑eligible plan as any “covered health plan,” explicitly including qualified health plans offered through ACA Exchanges and any group health plan under section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act.
This change would let people enrolled in many employer plans and Exchange plans make and receive tax‑favored HSA contributions even when those plans lack HDHP design features. That widens access to HSAs but raises implementation questions for employers, insurers, and the IRS and creates trade‑offs between expanding tax‑preferred savings and preserving HSA design incentives that encourage high deductibles and consumer cost‑sharing.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill replaces the statutory HDHP requirement for HSAs with a new definition, “covered health plan,” which includes ACA Exchange qualified health plans and group health plans. It updates cross‑references throughout §223 and related Code sections to reflect the new term.
Who It Affects
The change directly affects individuals covered by employer group plans and by Exchange QHPs, employers that sponsor health coverage, insurers selling Exchange and group plans, and financial institutions that administer HSAs. The Treasury/IRS will need to issue guidance and adjust enforcement and reporting systems.
Why It Matters
By uncoupling HSAs from HDHPs, the bill broadens who can use HSAs and may shift how plans are designed and marketed. The move alters tax expenditures and could change consumer incentives around cost‑sharing, with implications for premiums, risk pools, and federal revenue.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
At present, federal law limits HSA eligibility to people covered by a high‑deductible health plan. This bill strikes that condition and substitutes a new statutory concept — “covered health plan.” Under the bill’s text, a covered health plan includes any qualified health plan sold through an ACA Exchange and any group health plan as defined by the Public Health Service Act.
Practically, that means enrollees in many employer plans and Exchange plans could establish and contribute to HSAs even if their plan lacks HDHP deductible thresholds.
The bill implements that change by amending §223(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code and then sweeping through §223 and other provisions to replace “high deductible health plan” with “covered health plan.” It also drops one existing paragraph in §223(c) and renumbers others, and it updates cross‑references in §223(g)(1) and §408(d)(9) so the statute’s indexing and headings align with the new terminology. The bill does not change HSA contribution limits, the prohibition on HSA contributions for individuals enrolled in Medicare, or other longstanding HSA eligibility rules unless those rules rely on the old HDHP language.Implementation will require IRS and plan‑sponsor action.
Employers and insurers will need to decide whether to treat their current non‑HDHP products as HSA‑compatible, and payroll systems must be adjusted to allow pre‑tax HSA contributions where they were previously disallowed. The Treasury will likely need to issue regulations or guidance clarifying how existing HSA rules — including coordination with other coverage (e.g., flexible spending accounts, HRAs), permissible preventive benefits, testing for disqualifying coverage, and interaction with premium tax credits — apply when an HSA is paired with a plan that does not meet prior HDHP standards.Because the bill’s effective date applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026, stakeholders have a window to prepare but should expect substantive operational questions: how insurers price expanded HSA pairing, whether employers redesign benefits to capture the HSA tax advantage, and how the IRS enforces anti‑abuse rules where first‑dollar coverage coexists with an HSA.
Those practical details will determine whether the change produces broader access to tax‑advantaged savings or creates new distortions in insurance markets.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces the statutory phrase “high deductible health plan” with “covered health plan” throughout Internal Revenue Code §223.
It defines “covered health plan” to include (A) qualified health plans offered through an ACA Exchange and (B) any group health plan as defined in PHSA §2791.
The bill removes paragraph (3) of §223(c) and renumbers the following paragraphs, creating a small structural change in the HSA statute.
It amends cross‑references in §223(g)(1) and §408(d)(9) to conform indexing, headings, and language to the new “covered health plan” term.
The amendments take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026 (i.e.
starting in 2027 tax years).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s short name, “HSA’s For All Act.” This is administrative but matters for citation and bill drafting; it signals the bill’s policy purpose to broaden HSA access.
Eligibility: removes HDHP requirement
Strikes the current statutory requirement that an “eligible individual” be covered by a high‑deductible health plan and replaces it with coverage under a plan as of the first day of the month. That change eliminates deductible‑based gating for HSA eligibility and makes plan enrollment the trigger for HSA eligibility, subject to other existing HSA rules (for example, Medicare enrollment or dependent status remain relevant unless separately modified).
Defines which plans qualify for HSA pairing
Creates the statutory term “covered health plan” and specifies two categories: qualified health plans sold on ACA Exchanges (section 1301(a)) and group health plans under PHSA §2791. The mechanical effect is to bring most employer‑sponsored group coverage and Exchange products into the pool of plans that can be paired with an HSA, subject to plan design choices and applicable regulatory constraints.
Rewrites cross‑references and headings; deletes obsolete paragraph
Makes a series of textual changes across §223 and related Code sections to replace “high deductible health plan” with “covered health plan,” revises headings, and removes one paragraph in §223(c). It also updates §223(g)(1) indexing language and adjusts §408(d)(9). These are technical edits but necessary to avoid internal inconsistency and to ensure that penalty, contribution, and reporting rules reference the new term uniformly.
Applies to taxable years starting after Dec 31, 2026
Sets the amendments to apply for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026. That timing gives employers, insurers, and the IRS a transition window to adapt forms, payroll systems, and guidance ahead of the statutory change taking effect in 2027 tax years.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Individuals in employer group plans: People enrolled in non‑HDHP employer plans could open and contribute to HSAs, gaining access to tax‑advantaged savings for medical costs without switching to an HDHP.
- Exchange enrollees: Consumers who buy ACA qualified health plans through Exchanges may become HSA‑eligible, expanding tax‑preferred savings to a population previously excluded.
- Employers that want flexible benefits: Employers seeking to offer HSA options without redesigning plans to meet HDHP thresholds can add HSA‑compatible payroll arrangements without moving employees to higher deductibles.
- Financial institutions that administer HSAs: Banks, custodians, and HSA administrators could see new account inflows and product demand as a broader set of enrollees becomes eligible.
- Insurers offering Medicare‑excluded group products: Carriers that sell group or Exchange plans can market those policies as HSA‑compatible (subject to guidance), creating new point‑of‑sale features and potential fee revenue.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal treasury/IRS: Expanding tax‑preferred HSAs to a larger population increases the federal tax expenditure associated with HSAs and will reduce revenue relative to the status quo, absent offsetting changes.
- Employers and payroll administrators: Organizations must modify payroll systems, benefit communications, and compliance procedures to allow HSAs for plans that previously weren’t HSA‑compatible, creating implementation costs.
- Insurers and plan designers: Carriers may need to redesign or reprice products if competitive pressures or employer demand pushes them toward pairing HSAs with lower‑deductible designs, potentially shifting costs across risk pools.
- IRS and regulatory agencies: Agencies must develop interpretive guidance (e.g., how to treat FSAs, HRAs, preventive coverage, and premium tax credit interactions) and update reporting systems, which requires resources and time.
- Lower‑income subsidy recipients (risk of indirect cost): If pairing HSAs with Exchange plans affects eligibility interaction with premium tax credits or encourages plan designs that shift costs up front, low‑income enrollees could face confusing trade‑offs or suboptimal choices.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether widening HSA access promotes fairness and consumer choice by letting more people save tax‑free for medical costs, or whether it undercuts the rationale for HSAs — pairing savings with high deductibles to curb discretionary health spending — and shifts public revenue and insurance market incentives in ways that favor higher‑income and better‑informed households.
The bill expands HSA access by changing the statutory gate from a deductible test to plan enrollment, but it leaves many operational questions unanswered. Key unresolved issues include how existing HSA rules that rely on the HDHP concept — such as permissible preventive benefits, coordination with employer HRAs or FSAs, and the definition of disqualifying coverage — will apply when an HSA is paired with a plan offering richer benefits.
The statute does not explicitly address whether plans with first‑dollar coverage for certain services would still be treated as compatible for HSA purposes, nor does it clarify interactions with employer‑sponsored account limits and nondiscrimination rules.
Another tension concerns interactions with the ACA’s premium tax credit system and program integrity. If Exchange enrollees can make HSA contributions while receiving premium subsidies, the Treasury will need to clarify whether and how HSA contributions affect MAGI calculations, subsidy eligibility, or reconciliation.
The bill also increases the tax expenditure for HSAs, raising distributional questions: HSA tax benefits disproportionately accrue to higher‑income earners who can both contribute and save. Finally, insurers and employers could respond strategically — for example, by redesigning benefits or marketing HSA‑paired plans — which may alter premiums and risk pools in ways the statute does not anticipate.
Those market responses, not addressed in the text, will determine whether the bill expands meaningful access to savings or mainly reallocates tax advantages.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.