This bill replaces the current text of Internal Revenue Code section 74(d) to categorically exclude the value of any Olympic or Paralympic medal and prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee from federal gross income. It removes the existing income-based limitation on that exclusion and applies for prizes and awards received after December 31, 2025.
The change narrows tax liability for medalists and athletes who receive prize distributions through the USOC, trimming reported income and potentially affecting eligibility for income‑based calculations. Because the exemption is limited to federal gross income and specifically references the USOC, it leaves many commercial payments and non‑USOC awards untouched while creating administrative and equity questions for tax authorities and policy planners.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends IRC §74(d) to state that federal gross income does not include the value of any medal awarded in the Olympic or Paralympic Games or prize money paid by the United States Olympic Committee on account of those competitions. It removes any income ceiling that previously limited that exclusion.
Who It Affects
Directly affects athletes who win Olympic or Paralympic medals and athletes who receive prize money via the United States Olympic Committee, plus the USOC itself. Indirectly affects tax preparers, the IRS (enforcement and guidance), and federal revenue figures.
Why It Matters
It creates a targeted, federally enforceable tax exclusion for elite athletes that can reduce adjusted gross income and change means‑tested calculations, while leaving commercial and endorsement income taxable and potentially incentivizing routing payments through the USOC.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill rewrites the federal tax treatment of Olympic and Paralympic awards by removing the income restriction that used to limit an exclusion for medals and prize money. Under the new language, the federal tax code will not treat the 'value of any medal awarded in, or any prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee on account of, competition in the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games' as gross income.
That exclusion applies only at the federal level and only to payments that originate with or are received from the USOC in connection with the Games.
Practically speaking, the change means athletes who receive prize distributions from the USOC and who are awarded medals will not count those amounts when calculating gross income on their federal returns for awards received after December 31, 2025. The bill does not rewrite tax treatment of endorsement deals, sponsorship payments, appearance fees, or prize awards paid by private sponsors or foreign committees; those remain taxable unless separately excluded by law.Because the exclusion reduces federally taxable income, it can affect other calculations that use adjusted gross income or taxable income as inputs—such as eligibility for certain tax credits, income‑based phaseouts, and means‑tested federal programs.
The bill does not address state conformity (many states use federal taxable income as the starting point) or how the IRS should treat payments that are routed through third parties, so implementing guidance and administrative rules will be crucial.Finally, the bill is narrowly drafted: it centers on medals and USOC payments tied to Olympic and Paralympic competition. That narrowness simplifies the statutory change but leaves open practical questions about valuation, recordkeeping, and the boundaries between USOC distributions and other forms of athlete compensation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill replaces IRC §74(d) so that federal gross income 'shall not include' the value of Olympic or Paralympic medals and prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee.
The exclusion explicitly applies only to medals awarded in the Olympic or Paralympic Games and prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee on account of those competitions.
The amendment removes any prior income limit on the exclusion—there is no dollar ceiling in the text of the bill.
The effective date is limited: the exclusion applies to prizes and awards received after December 31, 2025.
Commercial payments, endorsements, and prize money paid by parties other than the USOC are not covered by this statutory exclusion.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Amendment to Internal Revenue Code §74(d)
This subsection replaces the existing language of IRC §74(d) with a new, categorical exclusion. The text specifies two categories: the 'value of any medal awarded in' Olympic or Paralympic competition, and 'any prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee' tied to those competitions. Practically, the change converts what was a conditional or limited exclusion into an unconditional federal exclusion for those two items as written.
Narrow subject‑matter scope: medals and USOC prize money only
The statute draws a tight boundary around the relief: it covers medals (their 'value') and prize money paid by the United States Olympic Committee on account of competition in the Olympic or Paralympic Games. That phrasing excludes third‑party sponsor payments, endorsements, or awards from national governing bodies or foreign Olympic committees, unless the payment is routed through the USOC and the IRS accepts that characterization. This narrow drafting reduces ambiguity about covered items but invites disputes over routing and characterization of payments.
Effective date and temporal scope
The bill applies prospectively to prizes and awards received after December 31, 2025. For tax administrators and filers, that means the exclusion first affects tax year 2026 filings (or later) for prize receipts occurring in 2026 and beyond. The prospective effective date avoids retroactive refunds or recharacterizations for earlier tax years, but it raises questions about payments timed around the cutoff and about multi‑year distributions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Olympic and Paralympic medalists who receive medals and USOC prize distributions — they will not include those amounts in federal gross income, lowering AGI and federal income tax on those sums.
- United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC/USOC) — narrower federal tax treatment for distributions can simplify the USOC’s role in awarding prize money and strengthen its ability to deliver net payments to athletes.
- Athlete financial advisers and tax preparers — the change simplifies federal tax treatment of covered awards and reduces the need for complex calculations for those specific receipts.
- National governing bodies and training programs (indirect) — removing federal tax on medals and USOC prize money can improve the net financial incentives available to elite athletes, which may aid recruitment and retention.
Who Bears the Cost
- U.S. Treasury / federal budget — exempting otherwise taxable income reduces federal receipts relative to current law, creating a fiscal cost.
- IRS — the agency will bear administrative and enforcement costs for issuing guidance, auditing characterization disputes, and policing potential structuring to exploit the USOC exclusion.
- Athletes who receive equivalent value from non‑USOC sources — those competitors will not receive the same federal tax benefit, producing a distributional disparity among athletes.
- Taxpayers and policymakers concerned with tax equity — the provision targets a tiny, high-profile group with a tax break that other similarly compensated individuals (e.g., entertainers receiving sponsorship pools) may not receive.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances a narrow, high‑visibility tax break for Olympic and Paralympic athletes against broader tax‑policy concerns: targeted relief for a tiny, elite group reduces federal revenue and risks creating structuring opportunities, while its narrow scope produces fairness questions for athletes who earn similar compensation outside USOC channels.
The bill’s narrow drafting creates implementation questions that tax administrators will need to resolve. It excludes 'the value of any medal' and 'prize money received from the United States Olympic Committee,' but it does not define 'received from' or describe how to treat payments routed through intermediaries, reimbursements, or multi‑year distributions.
That gap invites disputes about whether private sponsorships can be funneled through the USOC to achieve tax‑free treatment, and it will force the IRS to draw lines through guidance or audits.
The change also raises equity and fiscal trade‑offs. The exclusion targets elite athletes and medal winners — a very small population — while leaving endorsement and commercial income taxable.
That creates uneven treatment among people with similar economic returns from sports performance. Additionally, the bill says nothing about state tax conformity; many states start from federal taxable income, so benefits may flow automatically in some states but not in others, creating cross‑jurisdictional inconsistencies.
Finally, because the statute removes any income ceiling, it eliminates a limiter that tracked progressive tax principles, increasing the fiscal cost without an explicit offset or thresholding mechanism.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.