AB1009 amends Education Code section 44270 to add a valid California license to practice occupational therapy or physical therapy as one of the routes that satisfies the “possession” requirement for the preliminary administrative services credential. The bill preserves existing pathways (teaching credentials, pupil personnel/health/rehabilitative services credentials, and older credentials) and makes clear that an administrative credential based in part on an OT or PT license does not automatically authorize supervision or evaluation of teachers unless the hiring local educational agency (LEA) determines the candidate has additional qualifying experience, leadership training, or an advanced degree.
The statute keeps the existing experience, preparation, internship, and employment mechanics: a minimum of five years of qualifying experience (with a potential two-year waiver in limited circumstances), completion of approved administrative preparation or an approved one-year internship, current employment in an administrative role after preparation, and a five-year, nonrenewable preliminary credential. The change broadens the candidate pool for school leadership but creates new implementation questions for LEAs, the Commission on Teacher Credentialing, and employer HR practices.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a valid California occupational therapy or physical therapy license as a qualifying credential for the preliminary administrative services credential and retains the statute’s existing experience, internship, and employment requirements. It bars automatic teacher supervision/evaluation authority for those whose admin credential is based in part on an OT or PT license unless the LEA confirms additional qualifications.
Who It Affects
School-based occupational therapists and physical therapists, school district and county office HR and hiring officials, the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC), and administrator preparation programs and internship providers will be affected. Charter schools and regional accrediting institutions that run internships will also see impacts.
Why It Matters
This creates an alternative pipeline into school administration for allied-health professionals who work in schools, potentially easing administrator shortages and changing the composition of school leadership. It also shifts responsibility to LEAs to assess whether license-based candidates are prepared to evaluate teachers, raising implementation and equity questions across districts.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB1009 changes who counts as having the prerequisite “possession” to apply for a preliminary administrative services credential by explicitly listing a valid California occupational therapy or physical therapy license alongside existing teaching and services credentials. Practically, that means a licensed OT or PT who meets the other statutory requirements can pursue the preliminary admin credential without first acquiring a traditional classroom teaching credential.
The statute, however, does not make them full substitutes for classroom experience in every respect: there are explicit limits on evaluation authority tied to local determinations.
The bill preserves the statute’s experience requirement: candidates must have five years of qualifying experience, which can include full-time school-based occupational or physical therapy work. Districts can request a waiver of up to two of those years if the candidate completes an approved administrative services program, holds an appropriate clear or life prerequisite credential or license, and has an offer for an administrative position.
That creates a defined fast-track for candidates who pair education-focused preparation with an LEA job offer.On preparation, AB1009 keeps the two routes: completion of a commission-approved entry-level administrative services program or a one-year, commission-approved supervised internship provided by a district, county office, or accredited institution. The bill instructs the Commission to review internship preservice, professional development, and supervision requirements the next time it examines administrative credential pathways, signaling potential future changes to oversight and program standards.Finally, the statute requires current employment in an administrative role after completing preparation and sets the preliminary credential’s validity at five years from initial administrative employment; it is not renewable.
The bill also defines “local educational agency” to include school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools, which shifts the practical authority for assessing evaluation qualifications to those employers rather than to the credentialing commission.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a valid California occupational therapy or physical therapy license as a qualifying ‘possession’ for the preliminary administrative services credential (Ed. Code §44270(a)(1)(D)).
A preliminary admin credential issued partly on the basis of an OT or PT license does not authorize supervision or evaluation of teachers unless the employing LEA determines the candidate possesses additional educational/job experience, leadership training, or an advanced degree (§44270(a)(1)(D)(ii)).
The statute retains a minimum of five years of qualifying experience—explicitly listing successful, full‑time school‑based occupational or physical therapy as allowable experience (§44270(a)(2)(A)(iii)).
An LEA may request a waiver of up to two years of required experience if the candidate completes an approved administrative services program, holds a clear or life prerequisite credential/license, and has been offered an administrative position (§44270(a)(2)(B)).
The preliminary administrative services credential is valid for five years from initial administrative employment and is not renewable; candidates must be currently employed in an administrative position after completing professional preparation (§44270(a)(4); (b)).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Adds OT and PT licenses as qualifying 'possession'
This subsection inserts a new option allowing a valid California occupational therapy or physical therapy license to satisfy the possession requirement for the preliminary administrative services credential. Practically, it creates a statutory pathway for allied‑health professionals to pursue administration without first holding a traditional teaching credential. The text is careful to treat that pathway as distinct from other credentials by attaching a later limitation on evaluation authority.
Local determination required for evaluation authority
This clause prevents automatic delegation of teacher supervision/evaluation powers to someone whose admin credential is based in part on an OT or PT license. It requires the employing LEA to affirmatively determine that the individual has additional qualifications—education, leadership training, or job experience—before granting evaluative duties. That shifts gatekeeping from the state credential to local employers and creates variable duties depending on local HR practices.
Experience floor and waiver conditions
The bill keeps the five‑year experience requirement and explicitly counts school‑based OT/PT service as qualifying experience. It also preserves a conditional waiver mechanism: an LEA can seek up to a two‑year waiver if the candidate completes a commission‑approved admin program, holds a clear or life prerequisite credential or license, and has a confirmed job offer. Operationally, this blends a time‑in‑service model with programmatic and employment‑based expedients to accelerate entry into administration.
Preparation routes and Commission review of internships
Candidates must finish either a commission‑approved entry‑level administrative services program or a one‑year, supervised internship approved by the commission and provided by a district, county office, or accredited institution. The statute directs the Commission to examine preservice, professional development, and supervision requirements for such internship programs the next time it reviews administrative credential pathways, which opens the door to revised standards or oversight expectations.
Employment requirement, credential duration, and LEA definition
The law requires current employment in an administrative role after completing professional preparation and encourages districts to weigh the recency of preparation when hiring. It sets the preliminary credential to expire five years after initial administrative employment and makes it nonrenewable. The statute also defines 'local educational agency' to include districts, county offices, and charter schools, clarifying who makes local determinations about supervisory authority and waivers.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- School‑based occupational therapists and physical therapists: the bill opens a direct statutory pathway to preliminary administrative credentials without requiring a prior classroom teaching credential, allowing those with school experience to pursue leadership.
- Local educational agencies facing administrator shortages: districts, county offices, and charters gain access to a wider candidate pool—particularly from allied‑health staff already embedded in schools—potentially easing hiring bottlenecks.
- Administrator preparation programs and internship providers: potential increase in enrollment and demand for tailored pathways that translate OT/PT experience into administrative competencies, including specialized internships and leadership training programs.
- Students with special needs in schools that hire OT/PT‑trained administrators: where those leaders combine clinical knowledge and administrative authority, schools may see stronger coordination between special education services and schoolwide policy.
- California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC): gains statutory direction to review internship supervision and preservice requirements, creating an opportunity to update standards for alternate pathways into administration.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local educational agencies (school districts, county offices, charter schools): responsible for vetting OT/PT candidates’ additional qualifications, potentially funding supplemental leadership training, and deciding whether to grant evaluation authority—administrative and fiscal burdens fall to employers.
- Teacher evaluation and HR systems: districts may need to create new policies, rubrics, or mentoring arrangements for license‑based administrators, which implies training costs and administrative complexity.
- Commission on Teacher Credentialing: increased oversight load to review internship standards and to manage inquiries and program approvals linked to new candidate types without dedicated additional resources.
- Teacher bargaining units and classroom teachers: potential concerns and costs from being evaluated by administrators without traditional classroom teaching experience, which could prompt negotiation disputes or require additional evaluator calibration.
- Preparation programs and higher education providers: obligation to redesign curricula or offer bridge programs to translate allied‑health experience into recognized administrative competencies, incurring development and delivery costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between broadening access to administrative roles to address workforce needs and preserving consistent, defensible evaluator qualifications: the bill widens pathways for skilled allied‑health professionals but delegates the critical judgment about teacher supervision to local employers, producing a trade‑off between flexibility and uniform standards.
The bill deliberately shifts gatekeeping power to local employers: while that gives districts flexibility to judge candidate readiness, it also invites uneven application. The statute lists broad categories—additional educational or job experience, leadership training, or an advanced degree—but it does not standardize what combination or level of those qualifications suffices for granting evaluation authority.
That creates a patchwork in which two similarly qualified OT/PT candidates could be authorized to evaluate teachers in one district but not in another, with implications for equity and liability.
The five‑year, nonrenewable preliminary credential is another tension point. It forces a timebound window for license‑based candidates to convert to a clear credential or otherwise satisfy ongoing requirements, which could destabilize administrative staffing if candidates don’t meet follow‑on criteria.
The waiver mechanism speeds entry for some candidates but risks placing less‑experienced leaders into administrative roles if LEAs rely on waivers without robust mentoring or supervision. Finally, directing the Commission to review internship standards ‘when it next considers’ admin pathways gives the CTC discretion over timing and scope; stakeholders may therefore face uncertainty about future preservice or supervision requirements while LEAs and programs adapt now.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.