AB1016 requires owners of thermal power facilities exempted under Section 25541.2 to contractually require that all onsite work in apprenticeable building and construction trades be performed by a “skilled and trained workforce.” The bill defines that workforce, creates reporting and transparency duties for owners, and gives the Labor Commissioner authority to assess civil penalties for noncompliance.
The measure matters because it extends apprenticeship-style staffing standards into a narrow class of energy projects that currently sit outside routine public-work statutes. That creates new compliance obligations for owners, general contractors, and subcontractors, and shifts enforcement and disclosure burdens onto both industry and state labor regulators while carving limited exceptions for emergencies, local hiring shortfalls, and projects covered by project labor agreements.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires owners to include a contract clause obligating each contractor and subcontractor to use a skilled and trained workforce for all onsite apprenticeable occupations; it defines the term and sets a 60% apprenticeship-graduate threshold among journeypersons. Owners must file monthly compliance reports with the commission, and the Labor Commissioner can impose civil penalties for violations.
Who It Affects
Owners and operators of geothermal and other thermal power facilities exempted under Section 25541.2, plus the general contractors and subcontractors they hire for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance. State apprenticeship programs, unions, and the Division of Labor’s enforcement offices will also see new responsibilities.
Why It Matters
AB1016 imports apprenticeship-based labor controls and transparency into a slice of private-sector energy construction that previously avoided public-work-style oversight, raising compliance, staffing, and hiring-hall logistics issues for contractors and prompting data-collection and enforcement work for regulators.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB1016 attaches a workforce-composition rule to facilities that are exempted under Section 25541.2: every contractor and subcontractor working onsite in any occupation the state recognizes as apprenticeable must use a ‘‘skilled and trained workforce.’’ The owner must put that requirement into every contract, and the obligation applies to each contractor’s own onsite crew rather than only at the project level.
The bill supplies a precise definition: every worker must be either a registered apprentice or a skilled journeyperson, and at least 60 percent of the skilled journeypersons must be graduates of an apprenticeship program. A skilled journeyperson can also qualify by having the equivalent hours of on-the-job training to match an apprenticeship, but they must be paid at least the prevailing hourly wage for the occupation and location.To show compliance, the owner must send a monthly report to the commission listing each worker the owner relied on to meet the apprenticeship-graduate percentage, together with the apprenticeship program name, program location, and the worker’s graduation date.
Those monthly reports are public records under California’s Public Records Act, making worker-level information available to the public.Enforcement falls to the Labor Commissioner. After investigation, the commissioner may impose civil penalties on contractors or subcontractors that fail to use the required workforce composition: the bill caps the penalty for a single violation at $5,000 per month of work performed in violation and doubles that cap to $10,000 per month for repeat violations within three years.
The Labor Commissioner can reduce or waive penalties based on proportionality and remedial steps; penalty assessments follow existing civil wage-and-penalty procedures and are reviewable as provided in the Labor Code.AB1016 includes practical exceptions and carve-outs. Owner employees are not swept into the contractor obligations, and owners may use their own employees for unassigned tasks.
An apprenticeship program approved by the chief may grant advanced standing to applicants with relevant prior facility experience. The bill excludes certain narrow activities from ‘‘onsite work,’’ exempts projects already covered by a project labor agreement, allows emergency and local-hiring-shortage exceptions (with a 48‑hour rule for dispatch shortages, excluding weekends and holidays), and specifies that the statute does not convert the work into a public work under prevailing-wage public-work statutes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires that at least 60% of skilled journeypersons on covered onsite work be graduates of an apprenticeship program approved by the state chief of apprenticeship.
Owners must file monthly compliance reports to the commission that identify each worker relied on to meet the apprenticeship-graduate percentage, including the worker’s full name, apprenticeship program name, program location, and graduation date; those reports are public records.
The Labor Commissioner may assess civil penalties up to $5,000 per month of work for a first violation and up to $10,000 per month for a second or subsequent violation within three years, with limited discretion to reduce or waive fines.
Contractors may be excused from the skilled-workforce requirement when local hiring halls cannot dispatch sufficient qualified workers within 48 hours of a request (Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted) or when an immediate emergency threatens public health, safety, or the environment.
A prehire project labor agreement that requires a skilled and trained workforce and enforces it through arbitration removes the project from the statute’s civil-penalty enforcement regime.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Contractual requirement that contractors use a skilled and trained workforce
This subsection creates the core obligation: owners must include a clause in all contracts stating that contractors and subcontractors performing initial and subsequent construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance work on covered facilities must use a skilled and trained workforce for all onsite apprenticeable occupations. The provision makes clear the obligation applies at the level of each contractor’s onsite crew, which prevents a single contractor from meeting a project-level quota while subcontractors fall short.
Apprenticeship capacity consideration under Labor Code Section 3075
The bill directs that a covered facility be counted when the Division of Apprenticeship Standards assesses whether existing apprenticeship programs have the capacity or are dispatching apprentices adequately under Labor Code Section 3075. That language ties these facilities into the state’s formal capacity-assessment framework and can influence determinations about expanding apprenticeship slots or dispatch practices.
Owner-employee exception and advanced standing for apprentices
Subdivision (c) excludes owner or operator employees from the contractor-focused requirement and allows owners to use their employees for tasks not assigned to contractors while contractor crews are on site. Subdivision (d) permits state‑approved apprenticeship programs to give advanced standing to applicants who have relevant prior work experience at the covered facility, meaning experienced hires can receive credit toward program completion under the program’s approved standards.
Limited exceptions: local hiring shortages and emergencies
Two narrow exemptions relax the skilled-workforce mandate. First, if a contractor requests qualified workers from local hiring halls and cannot obtain enough within 48 hours (excluding weekends and holidays) due to workforce shortages, the contractor is not prevented from hiring from other sources. Second, immediate emergency work needed to prevent harm to public health, safety, or the environment can justify noncompliance during the emergency; the criteria resume once the emergency ends or compliance becomes practicable.
Non‑public‑work status and alternative workweek
The statute expressly states that covered work is not a "public work" under California’s public‑works definitions, which limits triggers that typically flow from public project status. The subsection also clarifies that alternative workweek schedules adopted under Labor Code Sections 511 or 514 remain available to employers on these projects.
Monthly public reporting and enforcement by Labor Commissioner
Owners must submit a monthly compliance report to the commission identifying each worker used to meet the apprenticeship‑graduate percentage, including program and graduation details; those reports are public under the California Public Records Act. The Labor Commissioner may investigate and assess civil penalties—up to $5,000 per month for a first violation and up to $10,000 per month for repeat violations within three years—subject to reduction or waiver for proportionality and remedial steps. Penalty assessments follow existing civil wage-and-penalty procedures and have limited reviewability.
Project labor agreement carve‑out and PLA definition
If all construction and maintenance on a project is covered by a prehire project labor agreement (PLA) that requires a skilled and trained workforce and enforces that obligation through arbitration, the civil-penalty enforcement mechanism in this section does not apply. The bill adopts the federal definition of a PLA consistent with 29 U.S.C. § 158(f).
Definitions—apprenticeship, skilled workforce, and prevailing wage tests
This subsection supplies the operative definitions: which occupations are "apprenticeable," who counts as a 'graduate' (including out-of-state federal apprenticeships), and what constitutes a 'registered apprentice.' Critically, it defines a "skilled and trained workforce" as one where every worker is a registered apprentice or skilled journeyperson and at least 60% of skilled journeypersons are apprenticeship graduates. It also requires that skilled journeypersons be paid at least the prevailing hourly wage or demonstrate equivalent OJT hours to qualify as journeypersons.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Registered apprentices and recent apprenticeship graduates — the bill increases demand for apprentices and gives priority to workers with formal apprenticeship credentials, improving career-ladder opportunities at covered facilities.
- State-approved apprenticeship programs — the facility‑counting mechanism under Section 3075 can justify expanding program capacity and provide a predictable source of placements and graduation candidates.
- Owners seeking predictable, credentialed labor pools — owners who favor a trained workforce and lower error/safety risk may see reduced rework and improved site safety when contractors hire journeypersons and registered apprentices.
Who Bears the Cost
- Contractors and subcontractors that rely on non‑registered or informal workers — they must recruit, hire, or upgrade crews to meet the registered-apprentice or journeyperson composition and ensure journeypersons meet the 60% graduate threshold.
- Owners and operators of covered facilities — owners must amend contracts, collect worker-level apprenticeship data monthly, and manage public-records disclosure obligations, creating administrative and compliance costs.
- Labor enforcement agencies — the Labor Commissioner and Division of Apprenticeship Standards will absorb investigative, assessment, and review work, potentially stretching enforcement resources without additional funding.
- Smaller specialty subcontractors — firms that cannot quickly prove journeyperson graduation rates or pay prevailing wages may lose work or face higher labor costs to meet the skilled‑workforce definition.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate aims against each other: raising workforce skill, safety, and apprenticeship throughput on covered thermal projects versus preserving contractor flexibility and limiting administrative, privacy, and enforcement burdens; the statute favors credentialed labor and transparency, but doing so risks higher costs, staffing gaps, and contentious enforcement fights where the labor market cannot instantly supply registered apprentices.
AB1016 advances a clear policy goal—raising the baseline skill level on certain thermal power projects—but it creates several operational tensions. The requirement that each contractor’s onsite workforce meet the skilled-workforce definition can be administratively granular: project-level compliance is fragmented across prime and multiple subcontractors, raising coordination and verification challenges.
Owners must collect detailed personal and credential data every month and publish it under the Public Records Act, which creates privacy risks for workers and practical burdens for owners and state records offices.
The enforcement design mixes blunt monthly civil penalties with discretionary mitigation factors; the per‑month penalty structure can produce steep aggregate exposure for extended projects and may drive contractors to seek workarounds (using owner employees, urgent‑work exceptions, or PLAs). The 48‑hour local‑hiring-hall exception narrows marketplace responsiveness — in tight labor markets, the 48‑hour window (excluding weekends/holidays) may be too short to source apprentices legitimately, but making it longer would undercut the statute’s purpose.
Finally, several verification points invite litigation and administrative disputes: proving equivalent OJT hours, authenticating out‑of‑state apprenticeship credentials, and determining when an emergency justifies noncompliance are all fact‑intensive questions that will fall to investigators and potentially courts.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.