AB 1032 establishes a targeted insurance benefit to speed access to behavioral health care after wildfire emergencies. The bill requires large-group health plans to make a specified number of behavioral health visits available to insureds who suffer loss, trauma, or displacement because a county is under a state or local wildfire emergency declaration, and it sets rules for payment, cost sharing, and continuity of care.
This is aimed at removing two common post-disaster barriers: network limits and utilization review. The statute also prescribes notice duties for insurers and creates a mechanism for resolving payment disputes between providers and plans.
For insurers, regulators, and benefits administrators, the bill standardizes short-term disaster response coverage while raising operational and payment questions that carriers must address quickly after an emergency declaration.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires large-group policies issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, to cover up to 12 behavioral health visits for insureds who experience loss, trauma, or displacement due to a Governor-declared or locally declared wildfire emergency. These visits are exempt from utilization review and are available regardless of the provider’s network status.
Who It Affects
Large-group insurers and self-insured employers offering large-group plans, members of PERS and STRS covered under the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act, behavioral health providers (including out-of-network clinicians), and insureds in counties subject to wildfire emergency declarations. High-deductible health plan enrollees are treated differently under a deductible-satisfaction rule.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a discrete, replicable post-disaster benefit that prioritizes rapid access over traditional network restrictions, shifting near-term operational burdens onto carriers while limiting insureds’ exposure to balance billing. It also crystallizes payment and dispute pathways for out-of-network care that insurers and providers will need to operationalize during emergencies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1032 sets up an emergency behavioral health pathway that activates when a wildfire emergency is declared at the state or local level. Eligibility for the benefit is tied to an insured’s experience of loss, trauma, or displacement resulting from that emergency — the bill leaves the practical verification process to insurers and regulators but requires carriers to provide notice to affected members rapidly.
The statute makes clear the benefit is additive to any existing rights to medically necessary mental health care under California law.
When active, the emergency pathway allows insureds to receive behavioral health services from any provider — network status won’t block access. The bill expressly bars utilization review for the emergency visits, so prior authorization and similar reviews cannot be used to deny or delay the short-term benefit.
To preserve continuity of care, the carrier must follow existing continuity rules in Section 10133.56 and associated regulations, an obligation that can include arranging out-of-network care when in-network providers cannot meet time or distance standards.The law controls patient financial exposure for care delivered by noncontracting providers: insurers must limit what an out-of-network provider can collect from the insured to the in-network cost-sharing amount, and that cost sharing must count toward the insured’s annual deductible. The statute permits providers or plans to bring payment disputes to court and does not foreclose use of any existing insurer dispute resolution processes.
For high-deductible health plans that meet the federal HDHP definition, the emergency benefit is conditioned on the insured having satisfied the deductible for the year.AB 1032 applies explicitly to PERS and STRS members and excludes narrowly tailored products like dental-only, vision-only, Medicare supplement, and Medicare Advantage plans. It also preserves all existing behavioral health access rights in California law — the emergency benefit cannot be read to limit medically necessary care standards or time-and-distance obligations.
The Department of Insurance may issue implementation guidance while the emergency lasts, and the bill specifies that that guidance is not subject to the state Administrative Procedure Act.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The statute requires large-group health policies issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026 to make a short emergency behavioral health benefit available to wildfire-affected insureds.
Insureds in declared wildfire emergency counties may receive up to 12 behavioral health visits that are not subject to utilization review and are available whether the provider is in-network or out-of-network.
Noncontracting providers may collect only the in-network cost-sharing amount from the insured, and any cost sharing paid counts toward the insured’s annual deductible.
For plans that qualify as federal high-deductible health plans, the emergency visits apply only after the insured’s annual deductible has been satisfied.
The Department of Insurance may issue implementing guidance during the emergency that is explicitly exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act, and providers or plans may seek judicial relief to resolve payment disputes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Emergency behavioral health benefit for wildfire-affected insureds
This subsection creates the core benefit: when a wildfire emergency is declared, eligible insureds who have suffered loss, trauma, or displacement may access a set number of behavioral health visits regardless of the treating provider’s network status. Practically, carriers must build a process to identify impacted members and honor out-of-network claims or reimbursements for these short-term services.
Definitions of state and local emergency
The bill ties activation to existing emergency-declaration frameworks: a Governor declaration under Government Code §8625 or a local declaration under §8630 et seq. That linkage avoids creating a new emergency trigger but makes the benefit contingent on official declarations, which determines geographic scope and timing.
Continuity-of-care obligations
Insurers must ‘‘assure continuity of care’’ consistent with Section 10133.56 and the attendant regulations. That means carriers carry their preexisting duty to arrange timely care when network capacity is insufficient; in a wildfire setting this could require active outreach, arranging transportation, or contract facilitation to meet time-and-distance standards for medically necessary behavioral health services.
Payment limits and dispute resolution for noncontracting providers
A noncontracting provider may only collect from the insured the same cost sharing an in-network provider would require, and that amount must count toward the insured’s deductible. The provision preserves the provider’s right to pursue a payment dispute in court and does not bar use of existing insurer dispute processes. Operationally, insurers and out-of-network clinicians will need a rapid-track reconciliation and notice workflow to settle claims and prevents balance billing the insured beyond the capped cost sharing.
Treatment of high-deductible health plans
The bill carves out federal HDHPs: for plans meeting the §223(c)(2) definition, the emergency benefit applies only once the insured satisfies the annual deductible. That preserves tax-advantaged HDHP mechanics but means some enrollees with HDHPs may not get immediate, insurer-paid access to the emergency visits unless their deductible is met.
Scope, exclusions, and preservation of existing rights
The statute extends to PERS and STRS members covered under the Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act and narrowly excludes dental-only, vision-only, Medicare supplement, and Medicare program contracts. It also reiterates that nothing in the section limits existing statutory rights to medically necessary behavioral health treatment or the time-and-distance protections under Section 10144.5, preventing the emergency benefit from being used to chip away at baseline access standards.
Notice, departmental guidance, and preserved emergency powers
Insurers must notify affected members upon implementation or within 30 days of a wildfire emergency declaration, and the bill supplies a model notice. The Department of Insurance may issue guidance during the emergency that is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act, and the law expressly preserves the Governor’s and agency officials’ existing emergency authorities. Carriers will need to integrate the model messaging and any department guidance into member communications and operational playbooks.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Insureds displaced or traumatized by wildfire emergencies — get fast access to behavioral health care from any provider with limited financial exposure and without prior authorization hurdles.
- Out-of-network behavioral health providers — gain a defined pathway to treat disaster-affected patients and claim payment under an insurer obligation rather than relying on ad-hoc charity care.
- Public employee beneficiaries (PERS and STRS members) — the statute specifically folds these populations into the emergency benefit, removing ambiguity about public-plan coverage after wildfire events.
- Mental health response coordinators and disaster-relief organizations — can more reliably refer affected individuals to covered services knowing insurers have an explicit emergency benefit and notification duty.
Who Bears the Cost
- Large-group insurers and self-insured employers — face near-term claim and administrative costs to honor out-of-network visits, process rapid notifications, and manage continuity obligations during disasters.
- Plan networks and contracted providers — may experience capacity strain as the emergency benefit draws patients to out-of-network clinicians or increases demand on in-network resources.
- Enrollees in qualifying high-deductible health plans — may need to meet their deductible before receiving insurer-funded emergency visits, potentially delaying access for those with unafforded deductibles.
- State agencies and carrier compliance teams — bear additional administrative and oversight work because the Department of Insurance can issue guidance outside APA processes and insurers must implement new notice, billing, and dispute workflows.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between rapid, barrier-free access to behavioral health care after wildfires and the need to control costs and set fair payment terms for clinicians: the bill prioritizes immediate patient access and caps insured financial exposure, but it stops short of prescribing provider reimbursement, pushing payment fairness into disputes and potentially shifting financial risk onto insurers and providers during high-demand disaster periods.
The bill balances access with payment controls, but leaves several operational questions unresolved. First, verification of ‘‘loss, trauma, or displacement’’ is necessary to prevent both under- and over-inclusion; the statute does not prescribe documentation standards, leaving carriers to design eligibility rules under time pressure.
Second, capping insured liability at in-network cost sharing does not set reimbursement rates for providers. If insurers refuse reasonable payment for out-of-network services, providers can litigate, but litigation is an inefficient mechanism during a disaster and may result in protracted unpaid care or surprise billing disputes despite the insured’s capped exposure.
A second implementation tension concerns high-deductible plans: conditioning the benefit on deductible satisfaction preserves HDHP tax rules but creates unequal access in practice. Disaster-affected enrollees who have not met a large deductible may be left to pay upfront or forgo timely care.
Finally, the Department of Insurance’s authority to issue guidance outside the Administrative Procedure Act speeds interpretation but narrows public transparency and formal stakeholder input, which may complicate consistent enforcement and produce uneven insurer practices across emergencies.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.