AB 104 (Budget Act of 2025) appropriates $5.848 billion for the California Community Colleges system under Proposition 98, distributed across apportionments and 25 categorical schedules. The item combines conventional apportionment funding with targeted one-time and ongoing investments — including COLA and enrollment growth, incentives for hiring full‑time faculty, major student basic‑needs and equity dollars, workforce and nursing grants, and substantial technology and cybersecurity funding.
This is both an operating budget and an implementation bill: it sets allocation formulas, authorizes intra‑item transfers and a monthly deferral schedule, prescribes reimbursement rates for apprenticeship programs, and imposes new reporting and compliance steps on the Chancellor’s Office and districts. For district administrators, CFOs, and compliance officers, the act changes cashflow timing, ties specific policy conditions to several pots of money, and creates new accountability on technology, data, and student‑support outcomes.
At a Glance
What It Does
Appropriates $5.848 billion for community college apportionments and categorical programs and adjusts the Section 84750.4 budget formula for 2025–26 to reflect a 2.30% COLA and a 0.57% FTES growth target. The act authorizes deferrals, permits transfers among schedules under conditions, sets an apprenticeship reimbursement rate ($10.32/hr), and directs one‑time investments in technology, cybersecurity, and a Common Cloud Data Platform.
Who It Affects
The Chancellor’s Office, all California Community College districts, part‑time and full‑time faculty, students (including foster youth, veterans, Dreamers, and incarcerated students), technology vendors and contractors, and state review agencies (Controller, Department of Finance, Department of Technology).
Why It Matters
It combines policy priorities—faculty hiring, access and equity, workforce training, student basic‑needs, and digital modernization—with stringent reporting and conditional funding. The act will reshape district budget planning (due to deferrals and designated backfills), change administrative priorities (cybersecurity and data platform work), and link state investments to measurable program implementation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Budget Act allocates a large, structured package of funds for California Community Colleges split across an apportionment schedule and multiple categorical programs. Schedule (1) is the primary apportionment bucket and is adjusted by formula changes: a 2.30% cost‑of‑living adjustment and a small targeted enrollment growth augmentation.
The act explicitly authorizes the Chancellor’s Office to implement a monthly deferral schedule and to shift money among the item’s schedules when categorical funds are deferred, while directing that apportionments be deferred first if transfers are used.
Beyond base funding, the Legislature earmarks money for specific policy aims. The act creates two faculty‑hiring incentive pots ($50 million and $100 million) intended to accelerate district hiring toward the 75% full‑time faculty target and requires consultation with the Department of Finance, the Legislature, and the LAO before distribution.
It funds part‑time faculty health insurance and raises part‑time compensation with rules that allow districts to redirect funds for other educational purposes once parity is achieved. The bill also continues and expands student supports: a substantial package for basic needs and mental health, dedicated funds for foster youth and veterans, homeless‑student wraparound services, and targeted programs such as Rising Scholars, Umoja, MESA, and Puente.Workforce and apprenticeship programs receive explicit treatment: apprenticeship and apprenticeship training schedules carry a $10.32/hour reimbursement rate, and Strong Workforce receives significant multiyear support, including a $60 million annual nursing‑infrastructure grant planned to be renewed through 2028–29.
Technology funding is both systemic and conditional: the bill provides funds for systemwide technology tools, e‑transcript and credential portability, a Common Cloud Data Platform (one‑time), and $25 million specifically for local and system cybersecurity measures. Those cybersecurity funds come with compliance conditions — annual NIST CSL self‑assessments, biannual remediation updates, incident reporting, and fraud tracking tied to CCCApply.Finally, the act imposes reporting and program‑management obligations.
The Chancellor’s Office must deliver multiple reports — including a Common Cloud Data Platform progress report by January 15, 2026 (subject to Department of Technology and DOF review by March 31, 2026) — and provide an annual list of statewide or regional projects administered in partnership with districts. Several allocations are available on a multi‑year encumbrance basis, and some are explicitly subject to matching or local dollar requirements, creating ongoing compliance and budgetary responsibilities for districts.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The item authorizes a $408,363,000 deferral from Schedule (1) (apportionments) into the 2026–27 fiscal year and permits the Chancellor’s Office to transfer funds among schedules to implement the monthly deferral timetable, but requires apportionment deferrals be used before categorical transfers.
The bill sets the apprenticeship and apprenticeship training reimbursement rate at $10.32 per hour and allows Schedule (2) and (3) funds to be encumbered through June 30, 2028, with $30,000,000 of Schedule (2) reserved for the California Apprenticeship Initiative (available until June 30, 2031).
It creates two separate faculty‑hiring incentive pots — $50,000,000 and $100,000,000 — that the Chancellor must administer after consulting the Department of Finance, the Legislature, and the LAO, and it signals intent that the $100,000,000 be used to increase hiring above baseline levels.
The act provides $25,000,000 for district cybersecurity and conditions receipt on an annual NIST CSL self‑assessment, twice‑yearly remediation updates, detailed after‑action reports for incidents that involve PII or service disruption, and annual reporting on suspected fraudulent CCCApply applications.
It funds a $12,000,000 one‑time Common Cloud Data Platform and requires the Chancellor’s Office to report progress by January 15, 2026, with the Department of Technology and Department of Finance delivering a review and recommendations to policy and fiscal committees by March 31, 2026.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Apportionments, deferral authority, and formula adjustments
Schedule (1) is the central apportionment line and is governed by the Education Code formula (Section 84750.4) but adjusted here for 2025–26. The act designates specific amounts for FTES growth and a 2.30% COLA, and it earmarks $91.207 million for the California College Promise. Mechanically, the provision allows the Chancellor’s Office to implement a monthly deferral schedule and to move funds from categorical schedules into apportionments when necessary — but it requires apportionments to be deferred before tapping categorical funds. For district CFOs, the practical result is an authorized change in cashflow timing coupled with legally defined priorities for how shortages or timing shifts are managed.
Apprenticeship and apprenticeship training rules and rates
Schedules (2) and (3) fund apprenticeship and training activities and set a uniform reimbursement rate of $10.32 per hour, applicable to covered services. The budgets include encumbrance windows (available through June 30, 2028) and carve out $30 million for the California Apprenticeship Initiative with a longer encumbrance period to 2031. Those deadlines and rates set predictable unit costs for district program managers and create multi‑year planning horizons for apprenticeship partners and employers.
Student financial aid administration, outreach, and technology modernization
Schedule (6) funds financial aid administration and includes granular allocations: minimum per‑unit reimbursements for College Promise Grants, a Board Financial Assistance Program reimbursement slice, a $5.3 million outreach and paid media campaign (including a $2.5 million bilingual/non‑English‑household expansion), and up to $5 million for financial aid technology maintenance and subscriptions. The act specifies minimum campus allocations and explicit supplement/not‑supplant language tied to historical administration funding, which affects how campuses budget their aid offices and when they may treat state funds as additive rather than replacement dollars.
Tech‑enabled course delivery, distance education, and materials for incarcerated students
Schedule (15) dedicates $20 million to expand technology‑delivered courses (including a statewide learning management system option) with explicit conditions: courses should be articulable systemwide, degree‑applicable, and prioritized by demand and prerequisites. The provision also authorizes up to $3 million (disbursed annually) to provide textbooks or digital content to incarcerated and detained students and waives standard competitive bidding for those contracts, signaling an expedited procurement path for prison education materials.
Fund for Student Success: basic needs, mental health, and targeted student programs
Schedule (19) is a broad aggregation of student supports: $75.754 million for basic needs (including $32.466 million for mental health and $43.288 million to establish basic needs centers), set‑asides for veteran centers, Dreamer liaisons, homelessness wraparound services, and targeted program funding (Puente, MESA, Umoja, Rising Scholars). The schedule establishes data and reporting obligations — for example, the chancellor must report on mental‑health spending and program metrics and must file an annual report on homelessness coordinators and student outcomes — which will drive monitoring and state oversight of how those funds translate to services.
Integrated technology, cybersecurity, and Common Cloud Data Platform
Schedule (23) bundles systemwide infrastructure (e‑transcript, e‑planning, multimedia hosting), ongoing technology product development, and a $25 million cybersecurity allocation with specific compliance steps tied to funding receipt: annual NIST CSL self‑assessments, twice‑yearly remediation updates, incident after‑action reporting, and fraud metrics for CCCApply. It also provides $12 million one‑time for a Common Cloud Data Platform and requires the Chancellor’s Office to report on milestones and a scaling plan by January 15, 2026, subject to review and recommendations from the Department of Technology and Department of Finance by March 31, 2026.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Low‑income and Promise‑eligible students — targeted California College Promise funding, outreach and paid media to increase awareness, expanded financial aid administration resources, textbook and basic‑needs assistance reduce out‑of‑pocket barriers to enrollment and persistence.
- Foster youth, juvenile justice‑impacted students, and incarcerated students — prioritized allocations for foster care education, the Rising Scholars Network grants, and dedicated textbook/digital content for incarcerated learners expand pathways and reentry supports.
- Part‑time faculty — large allocations for part‑time health insurance incentives and compensation increases aim to improve benefits and pay equity; funds permit districts to move toward parity and then repurpose funds for other educational uses if parity is achieved.
- Districts that run workforce programs and nursing pipelines — Strong Workforce funding and a multiyear Rebuilding Nursing Infrastructure grant provide capital and programmatic dollars to expand capacity and employer‑connected training, amplified where private match is available.
- The Chancellor’s Office and systemwide technology initiatives — new investments in shared platforms, e‑services, and the Common Cloud Data Platform increase system functionality and create economies of scale for colleges that adopt shared tools.
Who Bears the Cost
- Community college districts — must manage cashflow impacts from deferrals, meet reporting requirements, provide local matches where required, contribute local dollars for some program conditions (e.g., 1:4 spending requirement for certain disability services), and implement cybersecurity improvements at local expense beyond state grants.
- Chancellor’s Office — inherits significant administrative, procurement, oversight, and reporting duties (distribution consultations, platform implementation, annual and ad hoc reports) without a separate administrative appropriation tied to each new duty.
- Department of Technology and Department of Finance — assigned review responsibilities for the Common Cloud Data Platform project that will demand technical and fiscal evaluation resources.
- Private businesses and industry partners — performance‑based Strong Workforce awards require at least a $1 private match for each $1 state funds in some grants, shifting part of program financing to employers.
- Vendors and contractors — accelerated procurement (e.g., textbook/digital content to incarcerated students exempt from normal competitive bidding) and multi‑year contracts for technology and platform work will redistribute market opportunities and compliance obligations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is urgent: the Legislature funds ambitious expansions in access, student supports, faculty hiring, and digital modernization while simultaneously shifting budget timing through deferrals and relying on one‑time allocations for activities that require sustained investment — forcing districts and the Chancellor’s Office to choose between short‑term program expansion and long‑term operational stability.
The act assembles a broad policy agenda into a single funding vehicle, but it leaves several practical questions unresolved. The monthly deferral authority and the $408 million deferred apportionment create real cashflow pressure: districts without large reserves will have to manage timing gaps, and the statutory requirement to defer apportionments before categorical funds could shift program delivery unpredictably.
The faculty hiring incentives ($50M and $100M) depend on district willingness and human‑resources capacity; the bill signals intent but provides no enforcement mechanism to ensure hiring yields the targeted change in full‑time faculty percentages.
Technology and data investments — the Common Cloud Data Platform and expanded online infrastructure — promise better analytics and portability but carry implementation risk. One‑time funding will not cover ongoing operating or staffing costs for a statewide platform; the Department of Technology/DOF review is meant to vet expansion plans, but if ongoing funding isn’t secured, the platform could remain incomplete or impose maintenance burdens on districts.
Cybersecurity conditions are onerous but necessary; smaller districts may struggle to meet the NIST CSL and reporting requirements even with grant dollars, potentially creating uneven risk reduction across the system. Lastly, multiple provisions use supplement/not‑supplant language anchored to historical baseline years; districts will need careful accounting to avoid clawbacks or disputes over whether state funds replaced rather than augmented prior local or federal spending.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.