This bill creates a Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) that, if adopted by memorandum of understanding and following board regulation, lets eligible California state peace officers (State Bargaining Unit 5) and firefighters (State Bargaining Unit 8) stop accruing additional service credit while returning to work and instead accumulate a program account that pays out as a one‑time lump sum when they finally terminate and retire.
The statute conditions implementation on the CalPERS Board adopting implementing regulations and on an actuarial determination that the program is cost neutral; it caps participation at 60 consecutive months, preserves participant payroll contributions to the program account, makes employer contributions optional and negotiable, sets a floor on credited interest, and requires quinquennial actuarial reviews with Department of Finance oversight. The changes create a new payroll/benefit structure for a narrow class of safety employees with operational and actuarial trade‑offs compliance teams and labor negotiators will need to manage.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill authorizes a DROP-style program that freezes a participant’s service accrual at the election date, credits normal employee contributions, optional employer contributions (if negotiated), interest, and selected leave balances into a program account, and pays that account as a lump sum on a defined deferred retirement date (or sooner if the participant elects). Participation is limited to specified peace officers and firefighters and to a maximum 60‑month program period.
Who It Affects
Directly affects state peace officers in Bargaining Unit 5 and firefighters in Bargaining Unit 8, the Department of Human Resources, CalPERS (the Board), and the state employers that represent those units in collective bargaining. Indirectly affects actuaries, payroll administrators, and labor negotiators who must implement MOUs and the Board’s regulations.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a narrow but potentially precedent‑setting DROP within CalPERS for safety members, shifting some retirement value into a lump‑sum account and introducing negotiation levers (employer contributions and leave conversion) that can change pension cash‑flow timing. It requires actuarial gates and periodic review, so the design choices will determine whether it stays actuarially neutral or imposes long‑term cost risk.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill authorizes a Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) for specified California state safety employees: peace officers in State Bargaining Unit 5 and firefighters in State Bargaining Unit 8. A member who meets normal retirement age and service requirements may elect, once and irrevocably, to enter the program.
On election the member returns to employment but stops accruing additional service credit and ceases to earn retirement benefits under the regular part; instead the member’s deferred retirement benefits accumulate in a program account. Participation cannot exceed 60 consecutive months.
While in the program the participant continues to make the normal employee retirement contributions, and those contributions (together with any employer contributions negotiated in an MOU) are credited monthly to the program account. The account also accrues interest credited semiannually at a board‑determined rate that cannot be less than 5 percent annually.
Participants may irrevocably elect to transfer accrued sick leave (and select other leave accrued prior to or during the program) into the program account. On the deferred retirement date the account pays out as a one‑time lump sum to the participant, survivor, or designated beneficiary; death before the deferred retirement date converts the account into a lump‑sum payable to eligible survivors or the estate.The bill makes clear that the program must be cost neutral before either bargaining unit can implement it: CalPERS must perform an actuarial analysis and adopt regulations, and the Department of Human Resources must reach agreement with the bargaining unit under the State Employer‑Employee Relations Act.
CalPERS must then perform a follow‑up actuarial analysis every five years after implementation and report to the Department of Finance, which can recommend legislative modifications if the program increases costs materially. The statute includes operational rules on irrevocability, spousal acknowledgment, forfeiture of disability claims upon election, loss of employer contribution credit unless negotiated, and forfeiture of negotiated employer contribution interest on certain felony convictions.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The program applies only to peace officers in State Bargaining Unit 5 and firefighters in State Bargaining Unit 8 who meet normal retirement age/service requirements and elect participation (once, irrevocable except for a 30‑day withdrawal right).
Participation is limited to a maximum of 60 consecutive months; during that time the member stops accruing retirement service credit under the regular system and instead accumulates a program account.
Participants must keep making normal employee contributions; employers are not required to make employer normal contributions during the program but may do so if agreed in an MOU—such negotiated contributions are treated separately in the actuarial analysis. , Accounts receive semiannual interest at a board‑determined rate with a statutory floor of 5% annually, and members may irrevocably elect to convert eligible pre‑election sick leave and leave accrued during the program into the account.
CalPERS must certify the program cost neutral via an actuarial analysis before implementation; the board must perform quinquennial actuarial reviews beginning July 1, 2027, and the Department of Finance can recommend legislative changes if the program materially increases costs.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Program creation and scope
This section names and creates the Deferred Retirement Option Program and ties its operability to collective bargaining and CalPERS rulemaking. Practically, it means the statute does not unilaterally impose the program on agencies; the employer and recognized union must adopt it in a memorandum of understanding after CalPERS certifies cost neutrality and finalizes regulations. That sequencing gives CalPERS and bargaining parties explicit control over timing and design.
Key definitions and program limits
This section establishes critical definitions—election date, deferred retirement date, program account, program period (max 60 months), and participant. Those definitions drive the program’s mechanics: election freezes service accrual, defines the payout trigger, and caps exposure. Compliance teams will need to rely on these definitions when coding payroll, calculating balances, and communicating to members.
Eligibility, election mechanics, and spousal acknowledgment
These provisions set eligibility (must meet normal retirement age/service), make the election one‑time and irrevocable (subject to a 30‑day withdrawal window), and require a signed spousal acknowledgement when married. From an operational perspective, employers and CalPERS must build forms and workflows for capturing signed elections, withdrawals, and spouse acknowledgments and for storing those records as the statute requires.
Program accounts, contributions, distributions, and termination rules
These sections describe the account architecture (no separate asset segregation), what flows into the account (employee contributions, negotiated employer contributions, interest, and selected leave balances), distribution mechanics (lump sum at deferred retirement or on death), and termination triggers (including termination for cause and disability). They also clarify that the board discharges obligations upon lump‑sum payment and that participation ends if a participant later takes disability retirement. Administrators must build segregation in recordkeeping even though assets remain commingled in the system.
Finality and non‑integration with regular benefit calculation
The bill makes payment of the DROP account final and releases CalPERS from future obligation relating to those funds. It explicitly prohibits using DROP amounts to enhance or recalculate regular retirement benefits or to circumvent specific Portable/PEPRA provisions; that limits opportunities to double‑count value and binds actuaries to treat the DROP as separate from ongoing benefit formulas.
Actuarial gate and ongoing review
Before any implementation CalPERS must perform an actuarial analysis that identifies all cost elements and finds the program cost neutral (not causing significant negative financial impact). The analysis must exclude unrelated items (e.g., general investment return) but include negotiated employer contributions and changes to anticipated retirement ages. After implementation, CalPERS must run quinquennial analyses and report to the Legislature and Department of Finance; the Department of Finance may recommend statutory modifications if costs materially increase.
Account crediting rules, adjustments, and forfeitures
These sections set monthly crediting mechanics, allow members to transfer sick and vacation leave into the account (irreversible once selected), set a 5% annual minimum interest credit, require beneficiary forms and impose a felony‑based forfeiture of negotiated employer contribution amounts. These are the granular knobs that determine cash‑flow timing and member economics—and the felony forfeiture, in particular, creates a compliance enforcement pathway tied to criminal convictions.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Eligible safety members (Unit 5 peace officers and Unit 8 firefighters): Gain flexibility to remain employed while converting future accruals and leave into an immediately payable lump sum at deferred retirement, which can serve income or debt‑management objectives.
- State employers and agencies: Gain a tool to retain experienced safety staff beyond normal retirement eligibility while capping future pension service accruals during the program period, aiding short‑term staffing continuity.
- Recognized employee organizations (unions) representing affected units: Obtain bargaining leverage—ability to negotiate employer contributions, leave conversion terms, and program design features that can provide members targeted retirement choices.
Who Bears the Cost
- CalPERS (administration and actuarial costs): Must develop regulations, systems to track program accounts, run actuarial analyses, and produce quinquennial reports, all of which require staffing and systems work.
- State employers/taxpayers if negotiated employer contributions are agreed: While the statute requires cost neutrality before implementation, negotiated employer contributions could shift cash‑flow to employers; if assumptions prove wrong, taxpayers can ultimately bear unanticipated costs.
- Participants themselves: Must waive future disability retirement claims based on pre‑election conditions, forgo further service accrual and final‑compensation increases during participation, and accept an irrevocable election with limited withdrawal rights.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between giving safety members and employers flexible workforce and payout options (a lump sum while the member continues working) and protecting the pension fund’s actuarial soundness and cash‑flow. The program moves value from an ongoing defined‑benefit stream into front‑loaded, negotiable cash flows; doing that for operational flexibility risks creating hidden or deferred costs that actuarial gates and periodic reviews may not fully catch.
The bill creates a compact between member choice and actuarial safeguards, but the devil is in the assumptions and the implementation. The cost‑neutrality requirement excludes some items (for example, general investment returns and life expectancy) and allows employer contributions negotiated in MOUs to be considered differently; that framing can mask long‑term shifts in liabilities if negotiated contributions are structured to defer employer costs or if the actuarial window fails to capture later cohort effects.
The 5% minimum interest credit guarantees a floor to members but creates a built‑in liability exposure if the board sets a market‑based crediting rate below the floor in weak markets, forcing employers or CalPERS to absorb the gap or prompting aggressive assumptions elsewhere.
Operationally, payroll and recordkeeping will be complex. Accounts live conceptually within CalPERS but not as segregated assets, meaning systems must accurately track member‑level balances, leave conversions, and the timing of irrevocable elections.
The statute allows termination for cause to halt a payout until final adjudication, which protects employers but introduces administrative delays and potential litigation over what counts as final. The felony‑forfeiture rule targets negotiated employer contribution amounts and could lead to disputes about which contributions are ‘negotiated’ and how forfeiture is applied if criminal proceedings are protracted.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.