AB 1114 creates a statutory pathway for marked California emergency vehicles to avoid paying tolls on toll roads, bridges, vehicular crossings, and high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes when specific conditions are met. The bill ties the exemption to vehicle markings and plates, the nature of the response, and the driver's judgment that using the toll facility will improve response time.
The measure also establishes operational rules: agency-head certification can be accepted by a toll operator in lieu of payment; toll operators can request dispatch records if they reasonably believe a vehicle did not qualify; and toll facility operators must negotiate use agreements with local emergency providers upon request. The changes shift verification and administrative burdens between public safety agencies and toll operators and create compliance, privacy, and fiscal questions for both public and private toll owners.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill exempts properly identified California emergency vehicles from paying tolls when responding to or returning from urgent or emergency calls, subject to vehicle markings and a driver determination that toll use will likely improve response. It authorizes agency certification to substitute for payment, allows toll operators to demand dispatch records when they suspect noncompliance, and requires operators to negotiate use agreements with emergency providers on request.
Who It Affects
Local fire departments, police departments, county sheriffs, ambulance corporations, and other local emergency service providers; public and private toll facility owners and operators (including HOT lane managers); and dispatch centers responsible for maintaining logs and records.
Why It Matters
The bill clarifies a common billing dispute but also reallocates administrative work and potential revenue loss to toll operators and agencies. It creates a statutory floor for exemptions that can affect concession contracts, toll revenue forecasting, and agency recordkeeping and privacy practices.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1114 sets a conditional exemption: an authorized emergency vehicle that displays an exempt California plate and visible emergency markings (including surface-mounted red or blue warning lights and agency identification such as “Fire Department,” “Sheriff,” “Police,” or “Ambulance”) may use toll facilities without paying, but only when the vehicle is responding to or returning from an urgent or emergency call, engaged in an urgent or emergency response, or performing a fire-station coverage assignment tied directly to emergency response. The driver must also determine that using the toll will likely improve response time or availability of services.
The bill defines "urgent" narrowly: it covers incidents requiring an immediate public-safety response but not situations that warrant emergency lights; it expressly excludes personal use, commuting, training, and administrative activities. A key carve-out: when an authorized vehicle is returning from an urgent or emergency call or related assignment, it is not exempt from tolls charged while traveling on HOT lanes.
That creates a specific, operational difference between general toll facilities and HOT lane billing.On process, AB 1114 lets the toll operator send a bill to the public agency; the agency’s chief (fire, police, sheriff, head of agency, ambulance CEO, or designee) may then certify in writing that the trip was exempt, and the toll operator must accept that certification in lieu of payment. If a toll operator believes an exempt vehicle was noncompliant, the operator can ask the relevant agency to provide dispatch records or log books for the period in question, and the agency must provide or make them accessible.
The statute also requires toll owners/operators to negotiate a written agreement setting mutually agreed terms for emergency-provider use, including exemption policies, if requested by a local emergency service provider.AB 1114 limits its reach in two practical ways: it does not apply to vehicles that fail to meet the statutory markers and conditions, and it preserves toll operators’ ability to adopt policies that are equal to or more generous than the statute. The bill’s definition of "toll facility" is broad — covering toll roads, bridges, vehicular crossings, HOT lanes, and other toll infrastructure — which brings both publicly run systems and private concessionaires under its framework.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Exemption requires an exempt California license plate and conspicuous emergency markings or identification (e.g.
“Fire Department,” “Police,” or “Ambulance”).
The statute defines an “urgent” response to require immediate public-safety action and explicitly excludes personal use, commuting, training, and administrative trips.
Vehicles returning from an urgent or emergency call are not exempt from tolls charged while traveling on HOT lanes (the HOT-lane exception applies only to returning trips).
A toll operator’s invoice may be satisfied by a written certification from the agency head or designee that the vehicle was responding and qualifies for exemption; the toll operator must accept that certification instead of payment.
If a toll operator reasonably believes a vehicle did not comply with the exemption rules, the relevant public agency must provide or make accessible dispatch records or logbooks for the relevant time period upon the operator’s written request.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Conditions for statutory toll exemption
Subdivision (a) lists the triad of conditions that create an exemption: (1) the vehicle must have an exempt California plate and visible emergency markings/identification, (2) the vehicle must be responding to or returning from an urgent or emergency call (or engaged in fire station coverage tied to response), and (3) the driver must determine toll use will likely improve availability or response time. The subdivision also narrows “urgent” responses and inserts the operationally important exception that returning vehicles are not exempt from HOT lane charges, which will require dispatch and operations staff to track trip purpose and lane type.
Agency certification accepted in lieu of payment
Subdivision (b) authorizes toll operators to bill a public agency and then requires acceptance of a written certification by the agency’s chief (or designee) that the trip was exempt. The statute makes that certification a public document and explicitly places the burden on the agency to certify; it does not create an automatic non-billing mechanism but does create an administrative shortcut that prevents toll operators from refusing agency attestations.
Record access when compliance is disputed
Subdivision (c) gives toll operators a remedy when they have a good-faith belief that a vehicle did not meet the exemption conditions: they may request relevant dispatch records or log books from the public agency, and the agency must provide or otherwise make them accessible. This provision creates a formal discovery-like administrative pathway that raises practical questions about timeliness, format, redaction, and data sharing protocols between public safety agencies and toll operators.
Mandatory negotiations for facility-use agreements
Subdivision (d) requires owners or operators of toll facilities to enter into an agreement with a local emergency service provider upon request to establish mutually agreed terms for use — which can include explicit toll exemptions. The provision also clarifies that an agreement can be terminated by either party, in which case the statutory framework will govern future uses, and that agreements apply only to the parties named (they do not automatically extend exemptions to other emergency providers).
Interaction with existing statutory sections
Subdivision (e) states that Sections 23302 and 23302.5 do not apply to vehicles exempt under this new section. That signals the legislature’s intention to carve out a discrete statutory path for emergency-vehicle toll exemptions rather than folding these situations into preexisting toll-violation or citation schemes, which could affect enforcement and administrative-penalty protocols.
Broad definition of toll facility
Subdivision (f) defines “toll facility” to include toll roads, HOT lanes, toll bridges, vehicular crossings, and other toll infrastructure, bringing both public and private toll operators (and a wide variety of lane types) within the statute’s scope. That broad definition increases the statute’s operational footprint and potential points of friction with existing concession contracts.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local fire departments and ambulance services — gains faster, unimpeded access on toll facilities when responding to qualifying calls and reduced out-of-pocket billing if chiefs certify trips.
- Police departments and county sheriffs — receive a clear statutory process for toll exemptions and a mechanism to avoid retroactive billing through agency certification.
- Smaller or rural emergency providers without preexisting toll agreements — benefit from the statutory right to request negotiated terms and immediate access to exemptions under the statute.
- Dispatch centers and agency leadership — gain a defined role in certifying trips, which centralizes dispute resolution at the agency level rather than leaving it to individual vehicle operators.
- Motorists and communities served by faster response times — indirect public benefit from fewer response delays when emergency vehicles can legally use toll facilities without delay for payment.
Who Bears the Cost
- Toll facility owners and operators (public and private) — face potential revenue loss, increased billing disputes, and administrative burdens to process certifications and manage record requests.
- Private concessionaires under long-term contracts — may confront contract conflicts if concession agreements limit transfers of revenue or impose different usage rules, potentially triggering renegotiation or claims.
- Local public agencies — must maintain accessible dispatch records, create certification procedures, and absorb staff time to respond to toll-operator requests, which could strain already lean emergency coordination units.
- HOT lane program managers — will need programmatic changes and monitoring to apply the returning-vehicle exception to HOT charges, adding complexity to lane management and enforcement systems.
- Taxpayers — potentially bear indirect costs if toll revenue declines require increased subsidies or if administrative burdens prompt additional public spending to reconcile billing and privacy obligations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between enabling fastest-possible emergency response (by removing toll-payment friction) and preserving toll-system integrity and revenue plus protecting sensitive dispatch data; the bill privileges operational speed but pushes unresolved verification, privacy, and fiscal burdens onto toll operators and public agencies.
AB 1114 resolves a practical problem—how to let emergency vehicles use toll facilities without paying in situations where doing so aids response—but it creates several thorny implementation issues. First, the statute leaves operational judgments (for example, the driver’s determination that toll use will “likely improve” response) deliberately subjective; that will generate disputes and requires clear local policies and training to avoid inconsistent application.
Second, the record-access requirement forces public safety agencies to produce dispatch logs on demand, raising timing and privacy issues: agencies will need protocols for redaction, retention, and secure transfer, and toll operators will need standards for what constitutes a reasonable request.
There is a fiscal and contractual tension. The law applies broadly to public and private toll facilities and could conflict with concession agreements that allocate toll revenue or set enforcement rules; resolving those contract tensions may require negotiations, amendments, or litigation.
The statute does not create a reimbursement mechanism for toll operators nor a clear timeline for how quickly agencies must certify or produce records, which leaves open disputes over back-billing, late certification, or data-format incompatibilities. Finally, while the statute allows toll operators to adopt policies more generous than the law, it does not provide administrative guidance or model agreements, so the practical outcome will vary across jurisdictions and operators.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.