AB 1136 requires employers in California (except those with 25 or fewer employees) to provide targeted unpaid leave and reinstatement protections for workers dealing with immigration-related matters. The bill gives employees up to five unpaid working days in a 12‑month period to attend immigration appointments and directs employers to place employees who are detained for immigration reasons on unpaid leave—up to 12 months—while preserving reinstatement rights in specified circumstances.
The measure also creates immediate reinstatement and rehiring rules for postintroductory employees terminated because they could not provide work-authorization documents, prohibits discipline or discharge based solely on immigration proceedings or status (subject to legal compliance), preserves collective bargaining seniority provisions, and assigns enforcement to the Labor Commissioner. The chapter sunsets in mid-2029 and is repealed in 2030, making these rights temporary unless renewed by future legislation.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires employers (over 25 employees) to release employees for up to five unpaid working days per 12 months for immigration-related appointments or proceedings, to place detained employees on unpaid leave up to 12 months, and to reinstate certain workers terminated for lack of documentation once they produce proper work authorization. It bars discipline or discharge based solely on immigration proceedings or status, subject to compliance with law.
Who It Affects
Private and public employers with more than 25 employees, human-resources and compliance teams, labor unions where collective bargaining agreements exist, and employees who are engaged in immigration, visa, or work-authorization processes—including those temporarily detained.
Why It Matters
This bill creates state-level procedural protections that intersect with federal I-9 and immigration enforcement regimes, imposing new retention and rehiring duties on mid‑size and large employers while carving out small‑employer relief and preserving collective-bargaining terms. Employers, HR professionals, and counsel will need policies to manage leave, reinstatement, documentation timing, and Labor Commissioner enforcement.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1136 adds a short, targeted chapter to the Labor Code that aims to protect employees who are navigating immigration-related processes. First, the bill gives each employee the right to be released from work, upon request, for up to five unpaid working days within any 12‑month period to attend appointments, interviews, adjudications, legal proceedings, detainment-related events, or other meetings where their presence is required related to immigration status, work authorization, or visa matters.
The leave is unpaid and triggered by the employee’s request; the bill does not create a new paid‑leave entitlement.
Second, the bill addresses separations and rehiring. It requires employers to immediately reinstate a postintroductory employee who was terminated because they could not produce proof of work authorization, provided the worker subsequently produces proper documentation; the reinstatement is into the former classification without loss of seniority unless an exception applies.
If the employee demonstrates they need more time, the employer must rehire the worker into the next available opening in the former classification as a new hire (without prior seniority), again contingent on producing proper authorization and meeting other conditions the bill sets.Third, the bill creates a procedural rule for detention: when an employer is notified that an employee has been detained or incarcerated because of pending immigration or deportation proceedings, the employer must place that employee on an unpaid leave of absence pending release, not to exceed 12 months. If the employee is released during that leave and provides appropriate authorization within the leave period, the employer must return the worker to the former job classification without loss of seniority, subject to specified exceptions.Finally, AB 1136 prohibits employers from disciplining, discharging, or discriminating against workers because of national origin or immigration status, or solely because they are subject to immigration or deportation proceedings, except as necessary to comply with other laws.
The bill explicitly preserves any broader or differing rehiring, reinstatement, or leave rights agreed to in collective bargaining agreements or memoranda of understanding and does not override contractual seniority terms. The Labor Commissioner is the enforcing authority, and the chapter expires: it becomes inoperative on July 1, 2029 and is repealed January 1, 2030.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill grants each employee up to five unpaid working days per 12‑month period to attend immigration-related appointments or proceedings upon request.
If an employer is notified that an employee is detained due to immigration or deportation proceedings, the employer must place the employee on unpaid leave for up to 12 months pending release.
A postintroductory employee terminated for failing to provide work-authorization documents must be reinstated immediately to the former classification without loss of seniority once they present proper authorization; if more time is needed, the employer must rehire into the next available opening as a new hire (no seniority preserved).
Employers cannot discipline, discharge, or discriminate against employees because of national origin, immigration status, or solely due to being subject to immigration proceedings, except to the extent required by law; employees authorized to work may not be fired solely because they are in proceedings.
The chapter is enforceable by the Labor Commissioner, exempts employers with 25 or fewer employees, and is explicitly time‑limited—becoming inoperative July 1, 2029 and repealed January 1, 2030.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Unpaid leave for immigration‑related appointments
This section requires employers to release employees for up to five unpaid working days in any 12‑month period to attend immigration-related appointments, interviews, adjudications, legal proceedings, detainment events, or any meeting where the employee’s presence is required concerning immigration or visa matters. Practically, HR must accept employee requests and schedule coverage; the leave is unpaid and does not create a separate paid‑leave benefit. Employers will need procedures to verify that the leave relates to covered immigration activities without forcing employees to disclose sensitive case details.
Reinstatement and rehiring after termination for lack of authorization
This provision targets postintroductory employees who lost employment because they could not produce documentation of lawful work authorization. It mandates immediate reinstatement into the same classification without loss of seniority once the employee presents proper authorization, subject to narrow exceptions the bill sets out. If the employee cannot return within that reinstatement window but demonstrates need for additional time, the employer must rehire them into the next available opening in the same classification as a new hire (seniority not retained). Employers must reconcile this requirement with existing hiring policies and any safety-sensitive or credentialed positions that require continuous authorization.
Unpaid leave during detainment or incarceration for immigration proceedings
When notified that an employee has been detained or incarcerated as a result of immigration or deportation proceedings, employers must place the employee on unpaid leave pending release, for a period not to exceed 12 months. If the employee is released within that period and provides appropriate work authorization documentation, the employer must return them to the former classification without loss of seniority, except where the bill allows otherwise. The provision forces employers to create mechanisms to accept official notifications and track leave durations while balancing staffing needs.
Protections against discipline, discharge, and discrimination
This section prohibits employers from disciplining, discharging, or discriminating against employees because of national origin or immigration status, or solely because an employee is subject to immigration or deportation proceedings, except as necessary to comply with law. It also clarifies that an employee who is authorized to work cannot be discharged solely because they are in proceedings. Employers must update non-discrimination policies and train supervisors to avoid actions that could be construed as immigration‑motivated adverse employment actions.
Collective bargaining and contractual carve-outs
The bill states explicitly that it does not invalidate collective bargaining agreements or memoranda of understanding that address rehiring, reinstatement, or leave rights, nor does it supersede contractual seniority provisions. Where a CBA or MOU provides different or greater protections, those terms control. Employers and unions should review agreements to determine whether contractual language already provides the same or better protections and to coordinate implementation.
Enforcement and sunset
The Labor Commissioner is assigned enforcement authority for the chapter’s provisions; the bill does not create a new private cause of action but relies on existing enforcement mechanisms. The chapter is time‑limited: its provisions become inoperative on July 1, 2029 and the statute is repealed on January 1, 2030. Agencies and employers must plan for compliance during the active period and consider the implications of a statutory expiration for longer-term workforce policies.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Employees engaged in immigration or visa processes — They gain guaranteed unpaid time off for required appointments and added protection against termination or discipline tied solely to immigration proceedings, and may be reinstated after producing work authorization.
- Authorized workers in proceedings — Workers who are legally authorized to work but subject to deportation or immigration proceedings receive an explicit barrier against discharge solely for being in proceedings.
- Labor unions and represented employees — CBAs that already secure rehiring or leave rights remain effective, and unions can use the statute to bolster bargaining leverage for members affected by immigration matters.
- Immigrant‑serving legal and advocacy organizations — These groups benefit indirectly because the statute preserves employees’ ability to attend legal appointments and pursue proceedings without immediate job loss, facilitating access to counsel and adjudication.
Who Bears the Cost
- Mid‑sized and large employers (26+ employees) — They must absorb operational disruptions from unpaid leaves, manage temporary staffing or overtime, update policies, and process reinstatement or rehiring obligations.
- Human resources and compliance teams — HR will face administrative burdens: tracking leave counts, handling detention notifications, verifying work authorization timely, and documenting reinstatement eligibility while avoiding illegal inquiry.
- Labor Commissioner’s office — Enforcement responsibility will increase caseloads and investigative needs, which could require additional funding or reprioritization of existing enforcement activities.
- Employers with positions requiring continuous authorization or certification — Employers in regulated industries may experience compliance tension when asked to hold or reinstate staff who cannot immediately present required credentials.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate but conflicting priorities: protecting workers’ ability to pursue immigration and authorization processes (and protecting them from immigration‑based reprisals) versus employers’ legal duty to verify authorization and maintain operational continuity. Strengthening one side—by requiring reinstatement or extended leaves—risks imposing compliance and staffing costs and potential conflict with federal requirements; prioritizing the other side risks leaving workers unable to attend proceedings or face termination for matters tied to immigration status.
AB 1136 tries to thread a fine needle between protecting employees’ access to immigration processes and preserving employers’ obligations to verify authorization to work. The statute’s requirement to reinstate postintroductory employees who later produce documentation will force employers to hold positions or rehire individuals even where business needs or staffing plans have moved on.
The alternative rehiring pathway (into the next available opening as a new hire without seniority) mitigates that impact, but it creates potential tension over what counts as the “next available opening” and how to sequence applicants fairly.
Implementation raises several unresolved questions. The bill references postintroductory employees and “proper work authorization” without reproducing a comprehensive definition in the enrolled digest; employers and adjudicators will need to reconcile the text with federal I-9 obligations and any position‑specific licensing rules.
The unpaid nature of the leave reduces direct wage costs but shifts operational costs to employers (coverage, overtime) and to co-workers. Enforcement by the Labor Commissioner centralizes dispute resolution, but resource constraints and evidentiary burdens (for example, proving that a termination was “solely because” of proceedings) could limit remedies or prolong cases.
The small‑employer exemption (25 or fewer employees) reduces burden on the smallest firms but also creates discontinuities in worker protections across otherwise similar workplaces.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.