AB 1249 mandates that each campus of the California Community Colleges and the California State University — and requests the same of University of California campuses — deliver targeted election information to students. The bill specifies timing (first month of each term and one month before statewide elections), required content (registration deadlines, early‑voting start dates including satellite locations, links to Secretary of State pages and the Students Vote Project), and inclusion of specified dates in printed and electronic academic calendars.
The measure also requires campuses to post social‑media reminders, allows the Secretary of State to furnish social content, and obliges each campus to appoint a nonpartisan Civic and Voter Empowerment Coordinator. That coordinator must develop an action plan with student and faculty input and ensure at least three annual outreach events, including events timed within the final 30 days before statewide primary and general elections in even‑numbered years.
The bill centralizes campus–Secretary of State coordination and creates operational duties for campus administrations and student organizations that aim to increase student turnout and civic engagement.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires CCC and CSU campuses (UC requested) to send predefined election emails during the first month of each term and again one month before statewide elections, include certain election dates in academic calendars, post social media reminders, and designate a nonpartisan Civic and Voter Empowerment Coordinator to run outreach and an action plan.
Who It Affects
Directly affects California Community Colleges and California State University campuses (required) and University of California campuses (requested), campus communications and student affairs offices, student organizations, and county elections offices that operate early‑voting satellite locations.
Why It Matters
This bill creates a standardized, campus‑level conduit for county‑specific election information and formalizes campus responsibilities for student voter outreach. Compliance increases administrative and coordination work for campuses and requires ongoing liaison with the Secretary of State and county elections officials.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1249 prescribes a communication schedule and content requirements for public higher‑education campuses to make students aware of voter registration, early voting, and election dates. At the start of each academic term, campuses must email students a short package of civic dates and links: National Voter Registration Day, registration deadlines, the date counties may begin offering early voting (including satellite locations), primary and general election dates, information about vote‑by‑mail and where vote‑by‑mail ballots can be cast in person, and a link to the Secretary of State’s Students Vote Project.
A separate, more detailed email is required one month before every statewide election. That pre‑election message must include direct links to the Secretary of State’s online voter registration page, the office’s election information and voter guide pages, the voter registration status tool (or a similar county‑directing page), and a clear disclaimer that the information applies to the county where the campus sits and that counties may vary.
Campuses must also print those key dates in both paper and digital academic calendars so the information is visible in two administrative places.The bill extends beyond passive email: campuses must post social media reminders at least one day before events such as early voting and Election Day, and the Secretary of State may supply or request the social content. Each campus must appoint a nonpartisan Civic and Voter Empowerment Coordinator who implements these notices, convenes faculty, student, and administrative leadership to draft a campus action plan, and ensures a minimum of three outreach events per academic year — including events timed within 30 days before statewide primaries and general elections in even‑numbered years.
The action plan is to be shared with the Secretary of State and periodically updated.Operationally, the statute ties campus communications to county election rules (via explicit disclaimers and links) rather than attempting to override county authority on satellite voting. It also makes clear most duties fall to campus administrations and their designated coordinator, with students explicitly invited to participate in planning and execution.
The bill does not create enforcement penalties or funding sources within the text; it relies on campus compliance and coordination with the Secretary of State for templates and links.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires California Community Colleges and California State University campuses to send a campuswide email during the first month of every academic semester or quarter listing key civic dates and early‑voting information; University of California campuses are "requested" to do the same.
One month before each statewide election campuses must send a follow‑up email containing Secretary of State URLs for online voter registration, the voter guide, election information, and the voter registration status tool, plus a county‑specific disclaimer.
Campuses must include specified civic and election dates in both printed and electronic academic calendars and post social‑media reminders at least one day before listed events; the Secretary of State can supply social content.
Each campus must designate a single, nonpartisan Civic and Voter Empowerment Coordinator who will implement the section, convene faculty/students/administrators to draft an action plan, and ensure at least three outreach events per academic year, including events within the final 30 days before statewide primary and general elections in even‑numbered years.
The coordinator must share the campus Civic and Voter Empowerment Action Plan with the Secretary of State (the text specifies an initial submission date of December 1, 2020) and periodically update it for inclusion in the Secretary of State’s legislative report.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Term‑start and pre‑election email and calendar requirements
Subdivision (a) sets the core communication obligations: a campuswide email in the first month of each term with six enumerated items (National Voter Registration Day; registration deadlines; county early‑voting start dates including satellite locations; primary and general dates; vote‑by‑mail rules; and a Students Vote Project link). It also requires a more detailed pre‑election email one month before statewide elections with direct Secretary of State links and a three‑part disclaimer that the material is county‑specific and variable. Practically this forces campuses to maintain up‑to‑date county mappings for students and to embed Secretary of State URLs into their mailing systems and academic calendars.
Social media reminders and Secretary of State content
Subdivision (b) requires campuses to post social media reminders at least one day before events such as early voting and Election Day, and to republish the voter guide and county sample ballot information after the pre‑election email goes out. It explicitly allows the Secretary of State to furnish or request the social media content, which streamlines messaging but also means campuses may rely on state‑prepared copy and timing rather than producing wholly local content.
Civic and Voter Empowerment Coordinator, action plan, and outreach events
Subdivision (c) creates the operational backbone: one named, nonpartisan coordinator per campus who implements the statute, convenes faculty, students, and administrators to develop a Civic and Voter Empowerment Action Plan, and ensures a minimum of three campus outreach events per academic year. The provision requires student invitation to planning and permits student organizations to sponsor events, and it specifies timing for at least one outreach during the final 30 days before statewide elections in even‑numbered years. It also requires sharing the action plan with the Secretary of State for inclusion in a legislative report and periodic updates, creating a reporting loop between campuses and the Secretary of State’s office.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Elections across all five countries.
Explore Elections in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Matriculated college students — especially first‑time and low‑propensity student voters — who receive consolidated, campus‑tailored registration and early‑voting information and reminders that lower informational barriers to participation.
- Student organizations — gain formal opportunities to sponsor outreach events and participate in action‑plan development, increasing their role in campus civic life and access to institutional communication channels.
- County elections offices — receive a predictable channel to reach student populations through campus communications and social posts and can increase awareness of satellite voting locations and conditional registration sites.
Who Bears the Cost
- Campus administrations (communications, student affairs, registrars) — must produce and send scheduled emails, embed links in calendars, host or coordinate outreach events, and maintain liaison with the Secretary of State and county elections offices, absorbing staff time and possibly new operational expenses.
- Campus Civic and Voter Empowerment Coordinators — an explicit personnel role that campuses must designate; even if combined with an existing position, the coordinator carries documented, recurring duties and reporting obligations.
- Secretary of State’s office — must provide web links, potentially supply social media content, and receive and collate campus action plans for legislative reporting, adding coordination and data‑handling work without an identified funding source.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill’s central tension is between increasing student civic participation through mandated, standardized campus outreach and the administrative burden (and cost) that imposes on campuses — particularly when the law demands neutral, county‑accurate information without providing funding, enforcement clarity, or resolution of calendar and remote‑student complexities.
The bill bundles statewide templates with county‑specific content, but it leaves the hard work of matching students to the correct county, tailoring messages to students registered elsewhere, and handling remote or online students to campuses. That creates operational complexity: campuses will need procedures to identify which students live in which counties on a termly basis or accept that some recipients will receive county‑irrelevant guidance.
The statute leans on Secretary of State links to provide county specificity, which reduces legal exposure for campuses but shifts dependence onto the accuracy and uptime of state web tools.
Two practical ambiguities stand out. First, University of California campuses are only "requested" to comply, while CSU and community colleges are required; the bill does not state enforcement mechanisms or penalties for noncompliance, nor does it provide dedicated funding.
Second, the text specifies an initial action‑plan submission date of December 1, 2020 — a retroactive date that has no operational sense in the 2025 statutory context and will require clarification or amendment to be meaningful. Finally, the nonpartisan requirement for coordinators and campus activity is clear, but the statute does not define boundaries for permissible campus programming versus prohibited advocacy, leaving campuses to balance robust outreach with strict neutrality standards.
Implementation will also raise questions about whether campuses should host satellite voting locations or merely promote county‑run sites, how to accommodate quarter vs. semester academic calendars for timing, and whether mass emails could run afoul of student privacy or institutional marketing rules. The lack of funding, explicit enforcement language, and reliance on external web tools are the main practical frictions that will determine how effectively the bill increases turnout among students.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.