AB 1402 amends California's earned income tax credit statute to require that, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, the CalEITC amount be reduced by any Fresh Start Grant received under Welfare and Institutions Code section 18946.2(a)(1). The bill does not eliminate the tax credit; it offsets credit amounts by grant receipts and leaves intact the existing framework for computing the credit, inflation adjustments, and reporting obligations.
The practical effect is twofold: (1) some low‑income Californians who received Fresh Start Grants will see smaller CalEITC refunds beginning in 2027, and (2) the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) gains explicit authority and expedited rulemaking powers to verify claims, require identification documents from ITIN filers, and report annually on the credit’s reach and poverty impacts. Those operational authorities aim to make offsetting enforceable but raise administrative and data‑sharing questions for counties, tax preparers, and FTB.
At a Glance
What It Does
For tax years starting Jan 1, 2027, the bill reduces the California Earned Income Tax Credit by any Fresh Start Grant amount received under WIC 18946.2(a)(1). It also clarifies identification rules for taxpayers using ITINs, requires FTB reporting on the credit’s impacts, and authorizes emergency regulations and other verification procedures.
Who It Affects
Low‑income taxpayers eligible for CalEITC who also received Fresh Start Grants, the Franchise Tax Board, county agencies that distribute Fresh Start Grants, paid tax preparers, and programs that determine public‑benefit eligibility under Welfare and Institutions Code Division 9.
Why It Matters
The change directly alters how state cash assistance and a major refundable tax credit interact — shifting benefits away from stacked supports and imposing new verification and coordination tasks on FTB and counties. For compliance teams and tax preparers, it creates a new source of reduced refunds and new documentation requests for ITIN filers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1402 inserts a targeted offset into California’s earned income tax credit: beginning with taxable years on or after January 1, 2027, the CalEITC an individual may claim must be reduced by any Fresh Start Grant amount received under Welfare and Institutions Code section 18946.2(a)(1). The bill does not change how the credit is otherwise calculated — percentages, phase‑in and phase‑out thresholds, inflation adjustments, and the credit’s name remain governed by the existing provisions — but it places a direct dollar‑for‑dollar subtraction between a specific state cash grant and the refundable tax credit.
To implement and enforce that offset, the bill strengthens the Franchise Tax Board’s operational toolkit. FTB may issue rules, guidelines, and regulations to prevent improper claims and improper payments; the bill explicitly authorizes emergency regulations that take effect immediately and exempts certain FTB guidance from standard administrative rulemaking constraints.
The statute also requires ITIN users to provide identity documents on FTB’s request and to notify FTB if they later receive a Social Security number.The statute maintains and expands several administrative features that shape the credit’s fiscal profile. Refunds under the CalEITC are treated the same as the federal earned income refund for determining eligibility for public benefits under Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
FTB must also annually report detailed metrics that measure uptake, average credit amounts, distribution by dependents and income ranges, and estimates of how many families are lifted out of “deep poverty” by the state credit alone and in combination with the federal credit. Those reporting duties create a feedback loop for policymakers to evaluate the offset’s anti‑poverty effects.Finally, AB 1402 leaves intact existing funding and operational constraints embedded in the CalEITC law: the statute ties the credit’s operability to budget authorization for FTB oversight (an ‘‘earned income tax credit adjustment factor’’ defaulting to zero absent Budget Act action) and preserves recomputation rules that adjust thresholds annually by the California Consumer Price Index or specified floors tied to minimum wage milestones.
Together, these provisions mean the offset will operate within an already conditional and administratively intensive regime, not as an isolated change.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Starting with taxable years beginning on or after Jan 1, 2027, the CalEITC must be reduced by any amount a taxpayer received as a Fresh Start Grant under WIC section 18946.2(a)(1).
The Franchise Tax Board may require ITIN users (taxpayer, spouse, or qualifying child) to provide identity documents acceptable for California driver’s licenses upon request and must be notified when a valid Social Security number is later issued.
FTB can adopt emergency regulations to implement the credit and anti‑fraud measures and those emergency regs become effective immediately upon filing without Office of Administrative Law review.
Refunds from this California credit are to be treated like the federal earned income refund when assessing eligibility for Welfare and Institutions Code Division 9 benefits.
FTB must prepare an annual written report with counts of claims and recipients, average credit amounts, distribution by dependents and income ranges, and estimates of how many families are lifted out of deep poverty by the state credit alone and combined with the federal credit.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Offset: CalEITC reduced by Fresh Start Grants starting 2027
This is the operative change: for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, the credit allowed under the section is to be reduced by any Fresh Start Grant amount received under Welfare and Institutions Code section 18946.2(a)(1). Practically, FTB will need a mechanism to identify grant recipients and apply a dollar‑for‑dollar reduction to a taxpayer’s CalEITC for the relevant tax year. The provision does not specify a recovery mechanism if the grant is received after a return is filed, leaving implementation details to FTB rulemaking.
ITIN filers: identification and notification requirements
The bill modifies the federal‑basis identification provision to expressly permit use of either a federal individual taxpayer identification number or a Social Security number. It also requires any eligible individual, spouse, or qualifying child using an ITIN to provide, on FTB request, the same identity documents acceptable for a California driver’s license and to notify FTB if they later receive a valid SSN. That creates a new documentation pathway before credits are finalized and is clearly aimed at verification, but it also raises practical questions about outreach, deadlines, and how FTB handles non‑responders.
FTB rulemaking and emergency regulatory authority
FTB may issue rules, guidelines, and other procedures to carry out the section and is explicitly exempted from certain State Administrative Manual special project reporting requirements for implementation. The statute authorizes emergency regulations to prevent improper claims or payments, permits them to go into effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State, and exempts these emergency regs from Office of Administrative Law review. In short, FTB can act quickly and with limited external oversight to operationalize offsets and verification.
Welfare interactions and mandatory FTB reporting
Refunds under this credit are to be treated the same as the federal earned income refund for purposes of determining eligibility and amounts of benefits under Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, preserving established benefit‑counting rules. Separately, FTB must produce an annual evaluation report with specific metrics (returns claiming credit, individuals represented, average credit amounts, distribution by dependents and incomes, and estimates of how many families exit deep poverty because of the credit and in combination with the federal credit) and provide that report to multiple legislative budget and tax committees.
Operative funding condition and inflation/minimum wage adjustments
The statute retains and highlights an administrative control: CalEITC calculations are multiplied by an ‘‘earned income tax credit adjustment factor’’ that defaults to 0 percent for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2015 unless the annual Budget Act specifies otherwise—meaning the credit is only operative for years where Budget Act resources authorize FTB oversight and audits. The bill also keeps recomputation rules for thresholds and phaseouts tied to the California CPI, includes floor percentage adjustments for specific years, and instructs FTB to recalibrate phaseout percentages linked to the state minimum wage reaching $15/hour—mechanisms that could materially alter credit levels irrespective of the Fresh Start offset.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State budget offices and fiscal planners — The Fresh Start offset reduces potential double‑payments from two state sources, lowering gross outlays for refundable credits when grant recipients would otherwise both receive cash grants and full CalEITC refunds.
- Franchise Tax Board — Gains explicit statutory authority to verify claims, require documentation from ITIN users, and to issue emergency regulations, consolidating its operational control and legal cover for rapid implementation.
- Programs concerned with benefit integrity — Agencies focused on preventing improper payments will have a statutory hook to coordinate with FTB on data matching and enforcement strategies.
Who Bears the Cost
- Fresh Start Grant recipients who also qualify for CalEITC — Their combined state supports will be smaller starting in 2027 because the CalEITC will be reduced by the grant amount, potentially lowering refunds they counted on.
- County social services agencies and grant administrators — Must coordinate or disclose grant recipient lists and amounts to FTB (implicitly or via rulemaking) which creates administrative costs, privacy considerations, and new data‑sharing workload.
- Tax preparers and low‑income taxpayer assistance programs — Must track Fresh Start receipt when preparing returns, manage additional document requests for ITIN filers, and advise clients about potential reductions in expected refunds.
- Franchise Tax Board operationally — Although granted emergency rule authority, FTB faces the practical burden of designing verification systems, performing matches, handling disputes, and producing the mandated annual poverty‑impact reports, likely requiring resources if the Budget Act does not provide them.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill confronts a classic policy dilemma: prevent duplicative state benefits to preserve public funds and integrity, or preserve the cumulative anti‑poverty effect of stacking cash grants and refundable tax credits; enforcing the offset favors fiscal discipline but risks reducing the net support low‑income Californians receive and imposes nontrivial administrative and privacy costs to implement verification.
The statute connects a one‑time or programmatic cash assistance stream (the Fresh Start Grant) to an ongoing refundable tax credit, aiming to prevent overlapping state benefits. That linkage creates several practical tensions.
First, timing mismatches: Fresh Start Grants might be issued in a different fiscal year than the tax year in which a taxpayer claims CalEITC, so FTB will need clear rules about which grant receipts map to which tax filings and whether post‑filing grants trigger return adjustments or repayment. The text leaves those details to FTB rulemaking, which is expedient but shifts complex policy choices into administrative guidance.
Second, verification and privacy tradeoffs are unavoidable. Applying the offset requires matching grant payment records (held by counties or other agencies) with tax returns.
The bill authorizes documentation from ITIN users and expedites emergency regulations, which helps enforce the offset but raises data‑sharing, confidentiality, and access issues — especially for immigrants or vulnerable filers who may be reluctant to supply state identification documents. Third, the offset advances fiscal stewardship at the potential cost of reducing aggregate supports to low‑income households.
If the Fresh Start Grant was designed to provide immediate cash relief, subtracting it from CalEITC may cut the net anti‑poverty effect that policymakers originally intended when they layered programs. Finally, the statute’s existing conditional funding mechanism (the adjustment factor defaulting to 0% absent Budget Act authorization) means the offset could operate in a budgetary environment where the credit itself is scaled back or made inoperative, producing uneven results across tax years.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.