AB 1416 amends Revenue and Taxation Code §4222.5 to broaden eligibility for a one-year deferral of installment payments on tax‑defaulted property in counties declared disaster areas. Where previous law required an installment plan already be in existence to qualify for a deferral, the bill adds that a taxpayer who has submitted an application for an installment plan may also obtain the one‑year deferral.
The change is narrowly targeted but meaningful: it shortens the gap between a disaster and access to temporary tax relief for owners who have applied for redemption installment plans but whose plans were not yet active. Counties remain able to assess interest on deferred amounts and retain discretion over proof of disaster damage, so the law shifts eligibility without eliminating revenue or evidentiary controls.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill allows a one-year deferral of installment payments on tax-defaulted property in Governor-declared disaster counties when either an installment plan already exists or the taxpayer had submitted an application for such a plan at the time the deferral is requested. The deferral is conditioned on evidence of substantial disaster damage under §194 and an application filed with the tax collector by September 1 of the following fiscal year.
Who It Affects
Property owners with tax-defaulted property in counties designated by the Governor after a major misfortune or calamity, county tax collectors and treasurers who administer installment plans and deferral requests, and tax attorneys or consultants who prepare plan applications. Local budgets and cash flow are also affected because deferrals delay payments to counties.
Why It Matters
The bill removes a timing barrier that could leave disaster-impacted owners without short-term relief while their installment applications were pending. For counties, it increases the pool of eligible deferrals while preserving interest collection and administrative discretion, creating a tradeoff between taxpayer relief and revenue timing and workload.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Under current law a taxpayer could pause installment payments only if an installment plan was already active when disaster relief was sought. AB 1416 changes that trigger: a taxpayer who has already submitted an application for a redemption installment plan qualifies for the same one‑year deferral as someone whose plan is active, provided the other statutory conditions are satisfied.
The bill leaves in place the requirement that the county be a Governor-designated disaster area and that the applicant demonstrate substantial disaster damage as defined in §194.
Operationally, the change matters at two moments. First, it expands who can file a timely deferral request immediately after a disaster — applicants who may still be waiting for the county to approve or process their installment plan no longer have to wait for approval to seek the deferral.
Second, it preserves county-side safeguards: the applicant must file a deferral application by September 1 of the following fiscal year, cannot be receiving other disaster relief for the same issue, and must satisfy the tax collector on the existence of substantial disaster damage. That ‘‘satisfaction’’ standard keeps discretion with local officials and makes evidence and timing central to successful applications.The statute also clarifies fiscal consequences: counties may still assess interest on deferred installments, and any interest becomes due when the deferred payment is later made.
Practically, that means relief is a timing shift rather than a forgiveness of tax or interest. For county administrators, expect more initial paperwork and potentially more short-term revenue volatility; for taxpayers, the change reduces the risk that a pending application leaves them ineligible for immediate short-term relief after a disaster.
The Five Things You Need to Know
AB 1416 amends §4222.5 to allow a one-year deferral of installment payments when the taxpayer had submitted an application for an installment plan at the time the deferral is requested, not only when a plan was already in effect.
The deferral is limited to counties designated by the Governor as disaster areas and requires the applicant to establish substantial disaster damage as defined in §194.
An application for deferral must be filed with the tax collector on or before September 1 of the following fiscal year.
The bill preserves the county's right to assess interest on deferred installments; any interest assessed is due together with the deferred payment.
Applicants are ineligible for the deferral if they are receiving any other disaster-related relief for the same property or damage.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Eligible counties and one-year deferral authority
This subsection continues to limit the deferral to counties designated by the Governor as being in a state of emergency or disaster. It authorizes the county tax collector to defer installment payments for one year when the statutory conditions are met, so the decision to offer relief remains a county-level administrative action rather than a mandatory statewide payment holiday.
Change to the plan‑existence trigger
The bill replaces the old single trigger (an installment plan already in existence) with a two-part trigger: either the plan already exists or the taxpayer had submitted an application for the plan at the time the deferral is requested. That modification captures taxpayers who initiated the redemption process but whose plans had not yet been finalized when disaster struck.
Proof, timing, and exclusion for other relief
The statute requires the assessee to show 'substantial disaster damage' as defined in §194 and to file the deferral application by September 1 of the following fiscal year. It also bars the deferral where the assessee is receiving other disaster relief. Together these provisions create a conditional, time-limited relief path and force claimants to coordinate multiple relief sources.
Interest remains payable
Subsection (b) explicitly permits counties to assess interest on deferred installments and makes any assessed interest payable at the time the deferred installment is paid. The provision makes clear the deferral suspends payment timing but not the accrual or ultimate collection of interest.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Taxpayers who have filed for a redemption installment plan but were not yet approved — they can obtain a one-year pause in payments immediately after a Governor-declared disaster, avoiding default or foreclosure risk during plan processing.
- Small property owners and homeowners in disaster zones — especially those displaced or with damaged property who may lack the bandwidth to complete installment plan steps but who submitted applications before or during the disaster.
- Tax consultants and attorneys who prepare and submit redemption installment applications — the change increases demand for timely filings and advisory services to secure deferrals.
Who Bears the Cost
- County treasurers and tax collectors — they must process more deferral applications, apply the proof standard, and manage delayed receipts, increasing administrative workload and short-term cash-flow management challenges.
- Counties' operating budgets and cash‑flow-sensitive programs — delayed property tax receipts can create timing gaps, potentially requiring temporary borrowing or reallocation of funds to maintain services.
- Program administrators of overlapping relief (e.g., state or federal disaster programs) — they must coordinate benefits to determine whether an applicant is 'receiving other relief,' adding verification burdens and potential interagency disputes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing timely relief for disaster‑impacted property owners who have initiated, but not yet secured, redemption installment plans against the fiscal and administrative burden imposed on counties: expand eligibility to prevent unnecessary defaults, or preserve tight, administrable safeguards to protect local revenue timing and prevent fraud or inconsistent outcomes.
The bill expands eligibility but leaves critical discretion and procedural constraints in place, which creates several implementation questions. First, the statute requires applicants to establish 'substantial disaster damage' as defined in §194 and to satisfy the tax collector — a subjective standard that counties will interpret variably.
That discretion can produce uneven outcomes across counties and invite appeals. Second, while interest remains collectible, the timing of accrual and assessment (and how interest interacts with other post-disaster payment arrangements) may complicate repayment plans and borrower counseling.
Another unresolved area is coordination with other relief programs. The statute bars deferral where the assessee is 'receiving any other relief relating to the disaster,' but it doesn't define which programs count (state grants, FEMA assistance, loan forbearance, nonprofit aid).
County collectors will need clear interagency guidance to avoid denying relief erroneously or double-compensating claimants. Finally, the law shifts risk from individual taxpayers to county cash flow and operations without providing new funding for administrative capacity, which could slow processing or push counties to adopt conservative verification practices that blunt the law's intended benefit.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.