AB 1426 directs the Wildlife Conservation Board to establish the Diablo Range Conservation Program, administer it through “the department,” and operate a Diablo Range Conservation Fund to receive bond proceeds, appropriations, donations, and other monies. The program’s stated objectives are land acquisition, restoration and management, species recovery, wildfire and climate resilience, water and air quality improvement, and expanded public access and education.
The bill creates a grant framework: the board may award grants to local public agencies, nonprofits, and California Native American tribes for acquisition, restoration, recreation infrastructure, interpretive facilities, invasive species control, and related work. It adds an ad hoc, unpaid advisory committee, a continuously appropriated Donation Account, a statutory preference for using the California Conservation Corps and Community Conservation Corps, and clear operational limits on the board’s authority (for example, it may not own land, levy taxes, or act on land without owner consent).
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates the Diablo Range Conservation Program administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board through the department, and establishes the Diablo Range Conservation Fund and a Donation Account to finance projects. The board may award grants to public agencies, nonprofits, and tribes for acquisition, habitat restoration, public access, invasive species control, and related activities.
Who It Affects
The Wildlife Conservation Board and the unnamed administering department, local counties and cities within the Diablo Range, conservation nonprofits, California Native American tribes (including nonfederally recognized tribes on the state list), the California Conservation Corps and Community Conservation Corps, and private landowners within the defined Diablo Range.
Why It Matters
AB 1426 centralizes funding and grant-making for a geographically large, ecologically important landscape and prioritizes wildfire resilience and connectivity. The bill creates a new dedicated fund and donation account with continuous appropriation for donated goods and services, which alters how projects can be financed and sustained across multiple jurisdictions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill sets up a program specifically focused on the Diablo Range, defined geographically in statute, and charges the Wildlife Conservation Board with establishing and administering it "through the department." The program’s goals are broad: preserve and restore natural and cultural resources; recover threatened and endangered species; build climate resilience, including wildfire risk reduction and invasive species control; and expand public access and education. The text ties these goals to landscape‑scale benefits such as groundwater recharge, flood attenuation, and carbon storage.
To implement those goals, the board may approve and fund projects consistent with department‑approved conservation strategies. Rather than a direct landowner regulator, the board acts as a grantmaker: it can provide grants to counties, cities, nonprofits, and California Native American tribes to acquire, restore, enhance, and maintain habitat; improve trails and recreational facilities; build interpretive and educational infrastructure; and remove invasive species.
The bill directs the board to coordinate its work with other state agencies and to treat preservation and restoration of Diablo Range habitat as a primary concern when state actions affect the area.The statute creates an advisory architecture and financing mechanism to support program activities. The board may form an ad hoc advisory committee composed of local elected officials or their representatives, state agency representatives, and public experts; meetings must comply with the Bagley‑Keene Open Meeting Act and members serve without pay.
On financing, the Diablo Range Conservation Fund will accept bond proceeds, appropriations, and other statutory monies; the bill also establishes a Donation Account within the fund that the board can accept and continuously appropriate for program purposes, and authorizes use of donations in kind. The fund may be spent for capital projects, land acquisition (through grantees), program operations, and other chapter‑consistent purposes.The bill also sets bright‑line limits on the board’s powers: it may not own or acquire land itself, levy taxes or special assessments, or fund projects on private or public land without the landowner’s written consent.
It gives the board discretion to prefer projects that use the California Conservation Corps or Community Conservation Corps, signaling an operational preference for workforce‑driven implementation rather than direct state land management.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The board may award grants to local public agencies, nonprofit organizations, and California Native American tribes for acquisition, restoration, maintenance, public access, interpretive facilities, and invasive species control within the Diablo Range.
The Diablo Range Conservation Fund will accept bond proceeds, appropriations, and other statutory monies, and the board may expend those funds for capital improvements, land acquisition (through grantees), and program operations upon appropriation.
The bill creates a Donation Account inside the Fund; donations of money, goods, or services are continuously appropriated to the board for program use, and donated goods and services may be used directly.
The advisory committee may include county supervisors and city council members (or their reps), representatives from specified state agencies, and public experts; committee meetings must comply with the Bagley‑Keene Open Meeting Act and members serve without compensation.
Operational constraints: the board may not own or acquire land, levy taxes or special assessments, or fund projects on land without the landowner’s written consent—meaning acquisitions and land management must be effectuated through willing grantees or partners.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Chapter title and legislative findings
This section names the chapter and compiles the Legislature’s findings about the Diablo Range’s geography, public benefits, development pressures, and the need for landscape‑scale conservation and fire risk reduction. The findings ground the program’s scope—3.5 million acres spanning multiple counties—and justify state intervention by tying conservation to climate resilience, water and air quality, agriculture preservation, and public recreation.
Key definitions
The statute defines core terms: the advisory committee, the Board (the Wildlife Conservation Board), the Diablo Range geographic boundary, the Fund, the Program, and Tribe (broadly defined to include federally recognized and nonfederally recognized tribes on the state list). These definitions matter because they determine eligibility for grants, who participates in consultation, and the spatial limits for projects the board may fund.
Program establishment and goals
This provision directs the board to establish and administer the Diablo Range Conservation Program through the department and lists its purposes: habitat protection, species recovery, climate resilience (including wildfire risk reduction and invasive species control), air and water quality improvements, and expanded public access and education. Legally, this anchors program activities to those goals and requires alignment with conservation strategies adopted by the department.
Project approval and interagency coordination
The board must approve projects that acquire, preserve, restore, or enhance habitat consistent with department‑approved strategies, and coordinate program activities with other state resource protection efforts. The section elevates Diablo Range preservation as a priority for state agencies whose actions affect the landscape, creating an expectation of cross‑agency collaboration even though the bill does not prescribe a formal interagency governance body.
Grant authority and eligible uses
This section authorizes grants to local public agencies, nonprofits, and California Native American tribes for specific activities: acquisition, restoration, maintenance, expansion of public access and recreational facilities (including trails), interpretive/educational facilities, and invasive species control and native species propagation. It also instructs the board to prefer projects that employ the California Conservation Corps or Community Conservation Corps when feasible, signaling an operational and workforce priority.
Operational limits on the board
The bill places explicit constraints on the board: it cannot fund or implement projects on land without the owner’s written consent, manage use of land owned by another entity except via written agreement, levy taxes or special assessments, or own/acquire land itself. Practically, this means the board will operate primarily as a funder and coordinator rather than as a landholder or regulator, relying on partners to hold title and manage land.
Ad hoc advisory committee
The board may set up an advisory committee with local elected officials or their representatives, state agency representatives, and knowledgeable public members. Membership terminates if the member ceases to hold the qualifying office, members are unpaid, and committee meetings must be open under Bagley‑Keene, which introduces public transparency and disclosure obligations into program advice and prioritization.
Diablo Range Conservation Fund and Donation Account
This section creates the Diablo Range Conservation Fund in the State Treasury to receive bond proceeds, appropriations, and other authorized monies; funds are available upon appropriation for program purposes. It also establishes a Donation Account that the board may accept money, goods, or services into; those donated funds and in‑kind contributions are continuously appropriated to the board for program use, and the board may use donated goods and services directly for project implementation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Conservation projects and habitat: Projects focused on habitat restoration, species recovery, and connectivity benefit from a dedicated state grant stream and a statutory mandate prioritizing Diablo Range preservation.
- Local governments and park operators: Counties and cities within the Diablo Range gain a new funding source for trails, recreational facilities, and interpretive infrastructure aimed at expanding public access.
- California Native American tribes: Tribes—federally and nonfederally recognized on the state list—are explicitly eligible for grants and included in program definitions, improving opportunities for tribal participation in restoration and cultural resource projects.
- California Conservation Corps and Community Conservation Corps: The bill’s preference for Corps labor creates potential job and contract opportunities for corps members and positions them as an implementation priority.
- Conservation nonprofits and land trusts: Organizations that can hold title or manage conservation lands are positioned to receive acquisition and restoration grants and to act as primary implementers.
Who Bears the Cost
- Wildlife Conservation Board and administering department: The board and the unnamed department must stand up program administration, manage a fund and donation account, coordinate with other agencies, and implement public‑facing grant processes—work that requires staff time and oversight.
- State budget and bondholders: Funding depends on bond proceeds, appropriations, or other statutory transfers; state fiscal resources must be allocated to the Fund for projects to move forward, creating competing budgetary priorities.
- Private landowners within the Diablo Range: While the board cannot act without landowner consent, landowners may face negotiation pressures, requests for easements, or proposals for sales and restoration work that carry transaction and compliance costs.
- Other state agencies: Agencies with activities that affect the Diablo Range will be expected to treat preservation and restoration as a primary concern, which could redirect agency program priorities or require coordination resources.
- Applicant organizations: Local agencies, nonprofits, and tribes will need capacity to prepare grant applications, meet program requirements, and manage state funds—burdens that smaller organizations may find costly.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between a desire for ambitious, landscape‑scale conservation and the bill’s explicit limits on state authority: the program must deliver large‑scale acquisitions, habitat connectivity, and wildfire resilience without the board owning land or exercising regulatory control—forcing reliance on grants, voluntary cooperation, and third‑party implementers, which can both enable local buy‑in and slow or fragment outcomes.
The bill adopts a classic state‑grantmaker model rather than direct state landholding: it authorizes funding for land acquisition and restoration but forbids the board from owning land or acting on land without the owner’s consent. That creates an implementation dependency on grantees and willing sellers; success will rely on local partners’ capacity and on negotiating willing transactions across multiple private and public landowners.
The statutory preference for using the California Conservation Corps brings workforce benefits but could constrain procurement flexibility where Corps capacity or skills do not match project needs.
The financing design raises accountability and sustainability questions. The Fund can receive bonds and appropriations, and donations are continuously appropriated via the Donation Account—this continuous appropriation speeds use of donated resources but reduces annual budgetary oversight.
The bill does not nominate the specific “department” that will administer the program in practice, does not set measurable performance metrics, and lacks explicit match or prioritization criteria beyond a general preference language, which may complicate transparent, equitable grant selection across jurisdictions and applicants.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.