AB 1597 amends Government Code section 8211 to increase the statutory maximum fees that California notaries may charge for a set of routine services and adds legislative findings about inflation and notary operating costs. The change targets common transactions—acknowledgments, jurats, deposition-related fees, and certifying certain copies—by raising the ceiling on what a notary can lawfully charge.
The bill matters to commissioned notaries (including mobile and agency-employed notaries), businesses and professions that consume large volumes of notarizations (title companies, law firms, real‑estate and financial services), and consumers who pay per‑notarization fees. It also preserves statutory no‑fee exceptions for specific voting materials and certain veteran benefits, which shapes who will see direct price effects and who will not.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill revises the fee ceiling language in Government Code §8211, replacing the existing numeric caps with higher maximums for several enumerated notarial services and restating legislative findings about cost pressures on notaries. It leaves in place statutory exemptions that bar charging for certain voting materials and veteran benefit applications.
Who It Affects
All California notaries commissioned under the Secretary of State, employers that pay for notary work (courts, hospitals, title companies), mobile notaries whose revenue depends on per‑act fees, and consumers and businesses that purchase notary services.
Why It Matters
Raising statutory caps shifts where compensation pressure falls: it gives notaries more room to charge but does not mandate higher fees, so market and contracting decisions will determine who actually pays. The change also creates administrative and compliance questions about existing price lists, contracts, and whether fee increases are sufficient for higher operational costs like travel and insurance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 1597 changes California law by rewriting the specific subsection of the Government Code that sets maximum allowable charges for a handful of common notarial acts. Instead of leaving the existing caps in place, the bill replaces them with higher statutory ceilings for acknowledgments, jurats, deposition services, and certifying copies in certain circumstances.
The text enumerates the services subject to caps rather than creating a catch‑all fee rule, so the statute still reads as an itemized price ceiling law.
The bill also inserts a short legislative findings section explaining the rationale: California inflation and rising operating costs for notaries—supplies, travel, insurance, training—justify increasing the caps. That statement is purely declarative; it does not create a new subsidy, licensing change, or indexing mechanism tied to future inflation.Notably, the statute keeps existing carveouts: notaries may not charge for notarizing vote‑by‑mail envelopes or specified voting materials, and the existing no‑fee rule for U.S. military veterans applying for certain benefits remains.
Practically, that means some high‑volume public or civic transactions remain free even as the allowable private charges rise.On implementation, the amendment is a straightforward substitution of numbers and does not create new licensing duties, reporting requirements, or enforcement mechanisms. That simplicity leaves several practical issues to be resolved outside the text: whether notaries will update posted fee notices and websites, how fee increases interact with preexisting contracts that specify older maximums, and whether court or agency practices—particularly around deposition administration—need to adapt to the new statutory ceilings.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill increases the statutory per‑signature cap for acknowledgments and proofs from $15 to $20.
It raises the maximum charge for administering an oath and executing a jurat (including the seal) from $15 to $20.
For deposition work the bill increases the base per‑deposition cap from $30 to $35 and raises the additional amounts for administering the witness oath and the deposition certificate from $7 each to $12 each.
The maximum fee for certifying a copy of a power of attorney under Probate Code §4307 is raised from $15 to $20.
The bill expressly preserves no‑fee rules: no fee may be charged to notarize vote‑by‑mail envelopes or other voting materials, and the existing prohibition on charging U.S. military veterans for specified benefit applications remains.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Legislative findings on inflation and notary costs
This opening section lists the Legislature's determinations that recent inflation increased the cost of living and doing business in California and that notaries incur rising expenses (supplies, transportation, insurance, education). The clause is declaratory; it supplies the policy rationale that the drafters use to justify adjusting statutory fee caps but it does not create an implementation mechanism such as an index or automatic adjustment.
Acknowledgments and proofs — higher per‑signature ceiling
Subsection (a) replaces the prior maximum for taking an acknowledgment or proof and issuing the certificate with a higher cap and restates that the amount includes the seal and certificate writing. The practical effect is to broaden the legal room for notaries and their employers to charge more per signature without changing how a signature is counted or how the certificate must be worded.
Jurat and certifying copies of powers of attorney
Subsection (b) adjusts the jurat fee ceiling (oath/affirmation plus jurat), and subsection (e) raises the cap for certifying copies of powers of attorney under Probate Code §4307. These changes preserve the statutory structure—each fee is an all‑inclusive cap covering the notary's seal and certificate—so compliance remains about charging no more than the stated maximum per act.
Deposition fee structure updated
Subsection (c) continues to treat deposition work as a compound fee category: a base amount for services rendered in connection with a deposition plus separate per‑item charges for administering the oath and for the deposition certificate. The amendment raises the statutory ceilings for the base and the two add‑ons, which changes how total permitted compensation for a single deposition is calculated but leaves court procedures and reporter fees outside the statute's scope.
Carveouts: voting materials and veterans remain free
Subsection (d) keeps the prohibition on charging to notarize vote‑by‑mail envelopes or voting materials, and subsection (f) reiterates the rule from §6107 that notaries cannot charge U.S. military veterans for notarizing certain benefit applications. These are explicit exemptions in the fee statute, preserving access for electoral and veteran benefit processes even as other caps rise.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Commissioned notaries (including mobile notaries) — the higher statutory ceilings give them legal authority to charge more per act, improving potential revenue per transaction and making it easier to cover travel and insurance costs.
- Independent notary businesses and gig‑economy notaries — increased maximums provide pricing flexibility when negotiating contracts with corporate clients or consumers, helping marginally improve profitability on low‑margin jobs.
- Employers that rely on in‑house notaries (title companies, law firms, escrow businesses) — explicit higher caps reduce the need to subsidize notarial work internally and enable better pass‑through pricing to clients.
Who Bears the Cost
- Consumers and small businesses that obtain one‑off notarizations — individuals needing single documents will see their maximum out‑of‑pocket per notarization rise, which aggregates if they require multiple notarizations.
- Frequent users of deposition services (litigants, law firms) — although professional buyers may negotiate rates, the raised ceilings permit higher billing for deposition administration and related add‑ons.
- Organizations with fixed budgets for notarial services (public agencies, non‑profits) — higher allowed fees increase procurement costs where agencies pay per‑act rather than employing staff notaries, potentially straining limited budgets.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing fair compensation for notaries—who face higher operating costs—against preserving affordable, equitable access to basic civic and legal transactions; raising statutory caps gives notaries financial room but risks shifting costs onto individuals and small organizations that rely on frequent notarizations without solving underlying access disparities.
The bill is numerically simple but leaves several important implementation and policy questions unresolved. It increases statutory ceilings but does not create any indexation mechanism or mandate that notaries raise their prices; whether the change improves notary incomes depends on market dynamics, contractual arrangements, and how quickly notaries update posted fees and disclosures.
The amendment also leaves untouched procedural domains that affect notarization costs in practice: travel charges, minimum call‑out fees, and remote online notarization pricing are not addressed, so disparities between urban and rural or in‑person and online services could widen.
Another tension arises around overlap with other fee regimes. Deposition administration can implicate court rules, reporter charges, and discovery cost‑shifting; raising the notary component of deposition fees may increase litigation costs without any corresponding rule change in court procedure.
The statute also does not specify an effective date, transition rules for existing posted prices or contracts, or an enforcement or notice regime—practical gaps that courts or the Secretary of State may have to resolve if disputes arise over appropriate charges under the new ceilings.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.