AB 1680 amends the California statute governing the FAIR Plan Association by prescribing a commissioner-reviewed plan of operation, formalizing mandatory membership for insurers that write basic property coverage, and expanding the association’s administrative and reinsurance authorities. The bill also establishes clearinghouse programs to move residential and commercial risks back to the admitted market and requires concrete steps to encourage consumers to seek coverage through normal channels.
The measure significantly increases Department of Insurance supervision: the commissioner may approve, withdraw, or promulgate the plan, examine association operations, and impose fines for failure to take corrective action. The bill adds specific privacy requirements for the clearinghouses, including notice to policyholders and an opt-out right for sharing nonpublic personal information.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires the FAIR Plan Association to submit a commissioner-approved plan of operation, authorizes the association to assume and cede reinsurance, sets a premium-based allocation formula for insurer participation, and mandates residential and commercial clearinghouse programs to move eligible policies to admitted insurers.
Who It Affects
All insurers licensed to write basic property insurance in California (membership required); the FAIR Plan Association; admitted and potentially nonadmitted insurers participating in clearinghouses; agents and brokers listed on FAIR Plan policies; and policyholders whose personal data may be shared to facilitate offers.
Why It Matters
It formalizes mechanisms to reduce FAIR Plan concentration and pushes more business into the admitted market while giving the commissioner stronger supervisory tools. The clearinghouses and privacy rules create new operational, compliance, and data-sharing obligations for insurers and the association.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill compels the FAIR Plan Association to file a detailed plan of operation with the California insurance commissioner within 30 days of the chapter’s effective date and makes membership mandatory for every insurer that directly writes basic property coverage in the state. The plan must let the association buy and cede reinsurance, and it ties each insurer’s financial participation—writings, expenses, profits, and losses—to a formula based on that insurer’s premiums written during the second preceding calendar year relative to the program’s aggregate premiums.
Governance is centralized in a governing committee that adopts rules subject to the commissioner’s approval; voting power on administrative questions is weighted by the same second-previous-year premium measure. The statute clarifies that earthquake premiums issued through the California Earthquake Authority will be attributed to the insurer writing the underlying residential property policy for purposes of that formula.
The association must also run outreach to encourage consumers to obtain coverage through normal admitted channels.The commissioner gets broad supervisory powers: tentative or final approval of the association’s plan, authority to withdraw or revoke approval, and the power to promulgate a plan if the association fails to submit an acceptable revision. The commissioner (or designee) may examine the association and facility, access all records, and compel testimony.
Where an examination identifies statutory, regulatory, or accounting violations, the association must implement corrective actions within an agreed timeframe or face fines up to $20,000 per violation, in addition to other penalties.To migrate policies out of the FAIR Plan, the bill requires two clearinghouse programs: a residential homeowners clearinghouse (deadline stated in the statute) and a commercial policy clearinghouse with its own statutory date. Participating insurers must sign agreements specifying terms for offering replacement policies through the policy’s listed agent or broker of record; the clearinghouses may, where authorized, permit nonadmitted insurers only after admitted insurers have the first option.
Finally, the association must comply with California privacy law for the clearinghouses, notify policyholders how their nonpublic personal information will be shared, and provide a mechanism for policyholders to opt out of that information sharing.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The association must file a proposed plan of operation with the commissioner within 30 days after the chapter’s effective date, and membership in the association is mandatory for insurers that write basic property insurance in California.
An insurer’s share of participation—writings, expenses, profits, and losses—is calculated using that insurer’s premiums written during the second preceding calendar year as a proportion of aggregate program premiums.
The bill requires a residential clearinghouse (statutory implementation deadline: July 1, 2021) and a commercial clearinghouse (statutory implementation deadline: July 1, 2024) to facilitate offers from admitted insurers to FAIR Plan policyholders.
The commissioner can tentatively approve, withdraw, or revoke approval of the association’s plan and may promulgate a plan if the association fails to submit an acceptable revision; the commissioner also has full examination and visitation powers.
If the association fails to adopt agreed corrective actions, the law authorizes fines up to $20,000 for each violation, and the clearinghouse must comply with California’s Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Act while giving policyholders an opt-out for data sharing.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Plan submission and mandatory membership
This subsection requires the association to submit a proposed plan of operation to the commissioner within 30 days of the chapter’s effective date and makes association membership a condition of an insurer’s authority to write basic property insurance in the state. Practically, that converts the FAIR Plan into a compulsory, statewide pooling mechanism for all admitted writers of basic property coverages and forces companies to participate in governance and financial results tied to the association’s operations.
Reinsurance authority and allocation formula
The plan must authorize the association to assume and cede reinsurance, allowing it to manage risk across the facility. The bill fixes how costs and benefits flow back to members: each insurer’s share of writings, expenses, profits, and losses is proportional to that insurer’s premiums written during the second preceding calendar year. The statute also attributes premiums for California Earthquake Authority residential earthquake endorsements to the underlying property insurer, a detail that affects how participation shares are calculated.
Governing committee and weighted voting
Administration by a governing committee is required, with committee rules subject to commissioner approval. Voting on administrative matters is weighted according to each insurer’s premium share as disclosed in filings to the commissioner, which concentrates operational control with the larger premium writers and formalizes the premium-based governance model.
Market outreach to encourage normal channels
The plan must include a program to steer eligible buyers toward the ordinary admitted market and explain to consumers what steps are needed to secure coverage from admitted insurers or licensed surplus line brokers. This is an affirmative marketing and consumer-education obligation aimed at reducing reliance on the FAIR Plan.
Commissioner approval, examination powers, and enforcement
The commissioner must approve the association’s plan for it to take effect and may withdraw or revoke tentative or final approval. If the association fails to resubmit acceptable revisions, the commissioner can promulgate a plan. The Department’s examination authority is broad—examining books, summoning witnesses, and supervising the facility—and the association must implement corrective actions identified in examinations or face fines up to $20,000 per violation.
Notice requirement for denied applicants and canceled or nonrenewed policies
An insurer that denies coverage or cancels or nonrenews a policy must provide the applicant or policyholder with the FAIR Plan’s website and statewide toll-free phone number. This creates a direct consumer handoff to the FAIR Plan for those who cannot secure coverage in the normal market and standardizes the communication pathway.
Residential clearinghouse program
The association must develop and implement a residential clearinghouse program to reduce FAIR Plan residential policy concentration and allow admitted insurers to offer replacement homeowners policies; participating insurers sign an agreement defining terms to offer coverage through the policy’s listed agent or broker. The statutory language permits inclusion of nonadmitted insurers only if admitted insurers do not exercise the first option, which provides a market-priority mechanism for admitted carriers.
Commercial clearinghouse and privacy protections
A separate commercial policy clearinghouse must be established to move commercial FAIR Plan policies to admitted markets under similar agent-of-record terms. Both clearinghouses must comply with California’s Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Act and state privacy regulations; the association must explain how it will share policyholders’ personal information and provide a clear opt-out mechanism for that sharing, creating a paired compliance obligation of operational design and data governance.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.
Explore Housing in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- FAIR Plan policyholders seeking admitted-market options — the clearinghouses create opportunities to receive offers from admitted insurers, increasing choices and potential access to broader coverages.
- Admitted insurers willing to expand book size — the clearinghouses give insurers a structured mechanism and first-option priority to approach FAIR Plan policyholders, subject to signed agreements.
- Agents and brokers listed on FAIR Plan policies — the statute preserves the agent-or-broker-of-record channel for offers, enabling continuity of client relationships and compensation pathways.
- California Department of Insurance and consumers — stronger supervisory powers and mandatory outreach aim to reduce concentration in the insurer of last resort, which can improve market stability and consumer protections.
Who Bears the Cost
- Insurer members of the association — mandatory membership, premium-based allocation of losses and expenses, and clearinghouse participation impose financial and administrative obligations, especially for smaller writers with limited compliance capacity.
- The FAIR Plan Association — responsible for implementing clearinghouses, privacy compliance, and corrective actions identified by examinations; failure risks fines of up to $20,000 per violation.
- Insurers participating in the clearinghouses (admitted and potentially nonadmitted) — must enter agreements, potentially underwrite legacy FAIR Plan risks, and manage onboarding through agents and brokers, which increases operational workload.
- The Department of Insurance — while gaining oversight tools, the department bears increased examination and supervisory workload and may need resources to review plans, monitor clearinghouse compliance, and resolve disputes.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—reducing concentration in the insurer-of-last-resort to protect market stability and consumers, and imposing mandatory, industry-wide obligations that shift costs, governance weight, and operational complexity onto insurers and the association; pursuing one objective (moving policies to admitted carriers and giving the commissioner strong tools) may undercut the other (market competitiveness, voluntary participation quality, data privacy, and administrative feasibility).
Several implementation frictions and policy trade-offs are embedded in the statute. First, the allocation method ties member obligations to premiums written in the second preceding calendar year; that backward-looking formula stabilizes contribution calculations but can entrench the influence of large prior-market participants and penalize fast-growing new entrants.
Second, the clearinghouse concept aims to shrink FAIR Plan exposure by steering policies to admitted insurers, but it risks adverse selection: insurers might cherry-pick better risks from FAIR Plan portfolios while leaving the association with a higher concentration of poor risks, or they may decline to offer meaningful coverage terms, limiting the clearinghouses’ effectiveness.
Data governance is another practical headache. The bill requires compliance with state privacy laws and an opt-out for policyholders, but opt-outs will reduce the clearinghouses’ ability to match and market offers, potentially undermining the objective of migrating policies out of the FAIR Plan.
The agent-or-broker-of-record passthrough preserves distribution relationships but can complicate offers where the agent is not actively engaged or where commissions and conflicts of interest affect placement decisions. Finally, the commissioner’s broad power to promulgate a plan if the association fails to deliver raises questions about the operational interplay between regulator-drafted plans and industry implementation capacity—regulatory fallback avoids paralysis but may produce designs that are administratively onerous or that lack buy-in from carriers.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.