AB1994 requires every California law enforcement agency investigating a crime and every prosecuting agency to provide immigration-related rights information to crime victims, their next of kin (if deceased), a minor’s parent or guardian, and key witnesses. Agencies must give verbal notice about possible relief (U and T visas, VAWA, and other qualifying options) and, at no cost, hand out an “Immigrant Victims Rights and Resources” card within 14 days of the crime report or at initial contact.
The Attorney General must design the card by June 1, 2027 and supply a PDF or image file in English and Spanish. The card must explain eligibility basics, the U‑visa cooperation requirement, how to consult an immigration attorney, list EOIR-recognized legal service organizations with contact details, and summarize Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights during encounters with immigration agents.
The measure standardizes frontline communication about immigration relief and shifts concrete implementation tasks—training, printing, and referrals—onto local agencies and the AG’s office.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires law enforcement and prosecutors to verbally inform victims (and certain relatives/witnesses) about potential immigration relief and to provide a free “Immigrant Victims Rights and Resources” card at initial contact or within 14 days. The Attorney General must produce an English and Spanish card by June 1, 2027 and distribute a digital file to agencies.
Who It Affects
Local police departments, sheriff’s offices, district attorneys’ offices, victim advocates, and immigrant legal service providers are directly affected; victims, deceased victims’ next of kin, parents/guardians of minor victims, and key witnesses are the immediate recipients.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a uniform, statewide disclosure and a curated referral list from EOIR‑recognized organizations, which could increase awareness and uptake of immigration relief among qualifying victims while imposing new training, printing, and referral workload on public agencies.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB1994 creates two parallel obligations for frontline criminal justice actors: a required verbal notification and a required written resource. At the time a crime is first reported, during follow-up, or within 14 days, officers, investigators, and prosecutors must tell crime victims (and specified relatives or key witnesses) that they may be eligible for immigration relief such as U visas, T visas, or protections under VAWA, and that they can consult an immigration attorney.
The statute explicitly warns victims that U‑visa eligibility depends on remaining cooperative with the investigation or prosecution.
Separately, the bill requires agencies to provide, without charge, an “Immigrant Victims Rights and Resources” card. The Attorney General must design that card and deliver a downloadable PDF or image file to agencies by June 1, 2027, in both English and Spanish.
The law allows the card to be integrated into the Marsy Rights card (Section 679.026) but does not force an agency to combine them.The card’s required content is detailed: a plain‑language statement about possible immigration remedies, the U‑visa cooperation rule, a note that victims may consult an attorney, a list of organizations recognized under EOIR’s Recognition and Accreditation program with addresses, phone numbers, and email contacts, an explicit statement that those organizations offer free or low‑cost services, and concise explanations of Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights and the right to counsel in encounters with immigration agents. Because the list must reference EOIR recognition, the bill channels referrals toward accredited organizations rather than informal helpers.Operationally, the obligation reaches beyond the immediate victim to next of kin, parents or guardians of minors, and “key witnesses.” Agencies will therefore need to adopt simple workflows—deciding who hands out the card, when verbal notices are documented, and how to record that notifications occurred.
The mandate is silent on penalties for noncompliance, leaving enforcement to administrative oversight, public accountability, or litigation risks tied to failure to inform.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Attorney General must design and distribute an English and Spanish PDF/image of the “Immigrant Victims Rights and Resources” card to agencies by June 1, 2027.
Agencies must provide the card free of charge to victims, a deceased victim’s next of kin, a minor victim’s parent or guardian, or any key witness at initial contact, follow‑up, or within 14 days of report.
The card must list local organizations recognized under the EOIR Recognition and Accreditation program and include each organization’s address, main phone number, and contact email.
The card must explain victims’ Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights in encounters with immigration agents, including the right to deny home entry without a signed judicial warrant and the right to remain silent.
The statute requires verbal notice that U‑visa eligibility generally depends on continued cooperation with the investigation or prosecution of the qualifying crime.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Required verbal notification to victims and witnesses
Subdivision (a) imposes a mandatory verbal notice at initial contact, during follow‑up, or within 14 days. The list of verbal items is explicit and limited: potential eligibility for U/T visas and VAWA, the ability to consult an immigration attorney, and the U‑visa cooperation requirement. Practically, agencies must decide who on the responding team delivers this notice and how to document that the notice occurred to protect both the agency and the victim’s access to relief.
Obligation to provide a printed or electronic resource card free of charge
Subdivision (b) requires agencies to hand victims (and the specified relatives/witnesses) the card without cost. That creates budgetary and logistical needs: agencies must stock the card, distribute it consistently, and potentially integrate the distribution step into victim‑service or records workflows. The provision does not prescribe a format beyond allowing the AG’s PDF or imaging file to be used.
Optional inclusion with Marsy Rights card
Subdivision (c) allows agencies to incorporate the immigrant victims card into the Marsy Rights card created under Section 679.026. This gives agencies flexibility to consolidate materials for victims but also raises design and space trade‑offs—if combined, the immigrant‑rights content must remain clear and accessible among other statutory victim‑rights information.
Attorney General design mandate and required content
Subdivision (d) sets a deadline—June 1, 2027—and requires the AG to produce an English and Spanish PDF or image and distribute it to all covered agencies. It then enumerates eight content elements, from immigration relief summaries to EOIR recognized organization lists and constitutional rights statements. The EOIR reference channels referrals to accredited providers and creates an administrative dependency: agencies and advocates will rely on the AG’s list to ensure accuracy and to avoid directing victims to unauthorized practitioners.
Specific referral and constitutional‑rights language
Paragraphs (4)–(8) demand concrete contact information for referral organizations and short explanations of Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections and the right to counsel in immigration encounters. That specificity benefits victims by offering actionable contacts, but it also raises accuracy and updating questions—who will refresh the list, and how will agencies handle organizations that change status between AG updates?
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.
Explore Immigration in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Undocumented crime victims: receive standardized, plain‑language information about immigration relief options and concrete referral contacts, lowering the information barrier to seeking legal relief.
- Family members and guardians of victims (including next of kin and parents): get the same resource when the primary victim is deceased or a minor, helping them navigate relief or immigration‑related steps on the victim’s behalf.
- EOIR‑recognized legal service organizations: gain a statewide referral pipeline from law enforcement and prosecutors, likely increasing client intake and enabling targeted outreach.
- Victim advocates and nonprofit service networks: benefit from a consistent statewide tool to coordinate support, reducing variability in what victims are told at point of contact.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local law enforcement agencies and prosecutors’ offices: must train staff, add distribution and documentation steps, and procure printed materials or digital access, creating recurring administrative burdens.
- California Attorney General’s office: must design the card, compile the EOIR contact list, publish and distribute files, and maintain accuracy—an unfunded operational task unless budgeted.
- EOIR‑recognized legal providers and nonprofit clinics: may face increased demand for limited pro bono or low‑cost services and the need to scale intake capacity.
- Local governments and community partners providing multilingual services beyond English and Spanish: may incur translation, interpretation, or outreach costs because the bill only requires English and Spanish design.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding usable information and referrals to protect immigrant victims and the operational and legal burdens the requirement places on public agencies: the law advances access by forcing uniform disclosure, but it creates exposure to inaccurate or outdated legal information and imposes training, printing, and referral capacity challenges that can blunt the policy’s intended protections.
The bill standardizes information but leaves key implementation choices and upkeep unexplained. It mandates the AG file and a hard deadline but does not establish a refresh schedule, error‑correction process, or liability scheme if a listed organization’s status changes.
Agencies will therefore rely on the initial AG list but need local protocols to handle stale contact information or capacity limits at receiving clinics.
The statute requires plain‑language constitutional advisories about encounters with immigration agents, which is useful but legally delicate. Short summaries of Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights risk being over‑simplified in practice; victims may rely on a one‑page card for complex constitutional and immigration questions.
The bill does not require training standards, documentation forms, or data collection about distribution, so compliance quality will likely vary and could expose agencies to criticism if victims later claim they were not adequately informed or were misled about their options.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.