AB 2226 repeals Article 2 (commencing with Section 42281.2) of Chapter 5.3 of Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code — the statutory provisions that restrict which precheckout grocery bags stores may provide. Under the current (now-repealed) text, stores could only give customers precheckout bags that were compostable and met specific criteria or that were recycled paper.
The repeal removes that state-level restriction and the statutory definition of “precheckout bag,” restoring discretion to stores and leaving unresolved how state, local, and private actors will fill the regulatory gap. For retailers, bag manufacturers, waste managers, and municipalities, the change alters procurement, waste handling, and compliance choices with practical and environmental consequences.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill eliminates the state law that restricted stores from providing precheckout bags unless they were compostable (meeting statutory standards) or recycled paper. It deletes the statutory definition of “precheckout bag.”
Who It Affects
Grocery stores and other retailers that provide precheckout bags, manufacturers and distributors of retail bags, municipal waste and composting programs, and consumers who use checkout services. Local governments and agencies that implemented complementary rules may also see downstream effects.
Why It Matters
The repeal removes a uniform state standard for precheckout bags and shifts the regulatory baseline: retailers regain discretion over bag types and operations, while waste-management systems and environmental advocates face new uncertainty about litter, contamination, and material streams.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 2226 is a narrow, single-action bill: it repeals the entire Article 2 of Chapter 5.3 in the Public Resources Code that created state rules for precheckout grocery bags. Those prior rules both limited what a store could hand a customer before the point of sale and defined what counted as a “precheckout bag” for regulation.
With the Article removed, there is no longer a state-level statutory prohibition restricting precheckout bags to compostable or recycled-paper options.
Practically, the repeal permits stores to provide whatever precheckout bags they choose (subject still to any other law or ordinance). That can include reusable fabric bags, paper, compostable certified bags, or conventional plastic bags if no other law forbids them.
The bill itself creates no alternative standard, certification process, labeling requirement, or state enforcement mechanism to replace the repealed rules.The change will be operational for retailers and suppliers: procurement specifications, point-of-sale procedures, and inventory mixes may shift quickly if retailers opt for lower-cost bag types. Waste and composting operators will need to reassess contamination risks: if noncompostable plastics reappear in the precheckout stream, those materials can undermine composting and sortation systems.
Local ordinances (city or county bans or fees) and other state provisions that address carryout or checkout bags will still matter; AB 2226 merely removes the specific Article 2 state restriction.Because the bill does not include transition rules, labeling, or enforcement authority, questions remain about who will provide guidance to retailers and how cross-jurisdictional retailers will handle differing local rules. The repeal reassigns policy choices about bag types from a uniform state standard back to market actors and local regulators, with attendant operational and environmental trade-offs.
The Five Things You Need to Know
AB 2226 repeals Article 2 (commencing with Section 42281.2) of Chapter 5.3 of Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code — removing the statutory provisions that regulated precheckout bags.
Under the prior Article 2, stores could not provide a precheckout bag to a customer unless the bag was a compostable bag meeting statutory criteria or a recycled paper bag; those statutory prohibitions are deleted by this bill.
The bill also eliminates the statutory definition of “precheckout bag” (the term describing a bag given before the point of sale to protect items or contain unwrapped food).
AB 2226 contains no replacement standards, labeling requirements, certification processes, penalties, or enforcement provisions — it is a straight repeal without affirmative regulatory text.
Because the repeal removes only the Article 2 state rule, other state laws or local ordinances that address checkout or carryout bags remain relevant and may determine what retailers may provide in specific jurisdictions.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Repeal of Article 2 of Chapter 5.3 (Precheckout bag rules)
This section removes Article 2 (commencing with Section 42281.2) from the Public Resources Code. The practical effect is to strip the statutory prohibition that limited precheckout bags to certain compostable products or recycled paper, and to remove the statutory language that defined which bags fell under that regulatory regime. Because the bill contains no replacement text, the deletion creates an absence of state-level requirements on precheckout bags.
Eliminates the statewide ban on noncompostable precheckout bags
The deleted language is the source of the statewide rule forcing stores to provide only compostable (meeting specified criteria) or recycled paper precheckout bags. With that language removed, stores are no longer constrained by that particular state requirement; they may, subject to other law, supply alternative bag types at the precheckout point. For compliance teams, this means a previously mandatory procurement spec ceases to exist under state statute.
Removes the statutory definition that framed enforcement and scope
Article 2 also defined “precheckout bag” to mean a bag provided before the point of sale designed to protect purchases or contain unwrapped food — a definitional anchor for the prohibition. Repealing the definition both broadens ambiguity about which bag distributions fall under other statutes and reduces the clarity enforcement agencies previously relied on. Retailers operating across local boundaries will need to map the remaining applicable laws without that uniform statutory definition.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Grocery retailers and other stores that provide precheckout bagging: regain discretion to choose lower-cost or more familiar bag types and simplify procurement and point-of-sale operations.
- Manufacturers and distributors of conventional plastic and non-certified bag products: stand to regain market demand for precheckout-style bags in jurisdictions without local bans.
- Retail supply-chain managers and small independent stores: avoid the need to source specific certified compostable bags or recycled paper models mandated by the prior Article 2, reducing ordering complexity and potential cost premium.
Who Bears the Cost
- Municipal waste and composting programs: may face increased contamination from noncompostable materials reappearing in the precheckout stream, raising processing costs and reducing diversion quality.
- Environmental and litter-abatement programs: could see higher volumes of discarded lightweight bags and associated cleanup costs if fewer compostable/paper alternatives are used.
- Local governments and regulatory staff: will inherit policy and enforcement burdens as stakeholders press for local ordinances or guidance to fill the regulatory gap, potentially creating uneven rules across jurisdictions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward: the bill returns flexibility and lower immediate costs to retailers and suppliers but shifts environmental and waste-management risks to public systems and communities. Policymakers must weigh near-term operational and price benefits for businesses and consumers against longer-term costs to municipal waste infrastructure, litter, and recycling/composting effectiveness.
The bill is narrowly drafted as a straight repeal, which simplifies the legislative change but creates practical gaps. It removes a uniform state standard without specifying what should replace it, leaving retailers, waste managers, and local governments to sort out appropriate practices.
That lack of replacement language raises operational questions: will statewide guidance be needed, or will municipalities adopt diverse rules that increase compliance costs for chains operating in multiple jurisdictions?
Implementation challenges center on cross-jurisdiction consistency and waste-stream integrity. Composting and organics programs rely on predictable inputs; reintroduction of noncompostable plastics at the precheckout point increases the risk of contamination and additional sorting expense.
The repeal may also prompt legal and logistical friction where local ordinances already ban or regulate bag types differently from the former state standard, producing a patchwork of requirements and potential confusion for consumers and retailers.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.