AB24 turns the consolidated San Diego Association of Governments into an agency governed by a statutory board of directors and makes that board the vehicle for exercising the agency’s powers and duties. The bill also authorizes the board to delegate executive, administrative, and ministerial functions to officers, offices, and committees it creates.
The measure codifies which local policymaking bodies may appoint directors and sets rules for alternates and advisory, nonvoting representatives. Those changes reallocate decision‑making authority within the region and formalize how member jurisdictions participate in the agency’s governance.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a board of directors as the central governing body and authorizes that board to exercise and redelegate all agency powers. Prescribes board composition, requires appointment of directors and alternates by the representing governing bodies, and permits advisory nonvoting representatives.
Who It Affects
City of San Diego officials, mayors and city councils across San Diego County, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors (including a supervisor representing an unincorporated area), the Association of Planning Groups — San Diego County, and governing bodies in Imperial County that may send an advisory representative.
Why It Matters
The bill replaces informal or chartered governance practices with a statutory framework that fixes representation, appointment mechanics, and delegation authority. That matters for regional planning, funding decisions, and how local jurisdictions convert policy preferences into agency action.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB24 makes the board of directors the statutory center of authority for the consolidated agency and gives the board explicit power to act on behalf of the agency. Rather than leaving executive, administrative, and ministerial powers dispersed or implicit, the board may create offices, officers, and committees and then delegate — and redelegate — those powers to carry out the agency’s work.
The bill lays out who may sit on the board: it ties representation to existing governing bodies (mayors, councils, boards, authorities, trustees, commissions, or similar policymaking entities). Directors are selected by those governing bodies; each governing body also selects alternates who step in and wield the same powers and are bound by the same restrictions when serving.
Vacancies are filled by the same appointing body, and directors remain in office until recalled by that body, creating a direct line of accountability to local legislatures rather than the regional agency itself.The measure also addresses continuity and wider regional input. It permits each city or county to name a second alternate at its discretion to cover consecutive absences, allows the board to seat advisory representatives who cannot vote, and preserves existing advisory seats at the pleasure of their home governing bodies.
Finally, it provides a mechanism by which the County of Imperial and its cities may collectively designate an advisory representative to participate in board meetings without a vote.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The board is statutorily set at 21 members for the consolidated agency.
Each director is appointed by the governing body they represent and serves until that governing body recalls them.
The City of San Diego’s delegation includes the mayor and the city council president split into a primary and a secondary representative.
Each governing body must name at least one alternate with full voting powers when serving; a second alternate may be named at the governing body’s discretion to cover additional absences.
The board may seat advisory (nonvoting) representatives, current advisory reps may continue at their governing body’s discretion, and Imperial County’s governing bodies may collectively designate one advisory representative.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Board as the governing body
This clause fixes the board size at 21 directors and makes that board the formal governing organ for the consolidated agency. Practically, setting a numeric board size removes flexibility to alter membership by internal bylaws and anchors voting math for quorums and majorities to a fixed denominator.
Who counts as a appointing governing body
The statute defines 'governing body' broadly to include boards of supervisors, city councils, councils plus mayors where the mayor is not a council member, authorities, trustees, directors, commissions, and similar policymaking bodies. That definition determines which local institutions get the appointment power and ties representation on the regional board to local elected policymaking entities rather than to unelected staff or ad hoc committees.
Powers and delegation
All powers, privileges, and duties of the agency must be exercised through the board, and the board is expressly authorized to delegate executive, administrative, and ministerial powers to offices, officers, or committees created under the chapter or by the board. This grants the board both centralized authority and the ability to distribute operational responsibility — including the power to redelegate — which affects how control over programs and staff is structured.
Board composition and appointment mechanics
The statute prescribes specific seats: two for the City of San Diego (mayor and city council president, assigned primary/secondary roles), one primary for each other city in the county, one county supervisor from an unincorporated area, and one representative from the regional Association of Planning Groups. It then requires that each director be selected by the governing body they represent and that vacancies be filled by that same governing body, establishing direct local appointment and recall control rather than fixed statutory terms.
Alternates and substitution rules
Each governing body must select at least one alternate who has the same powers and restrictions when serving in place of the primary or secondary representative. The statute also allows, at the governing body’s discretion, a second alternate to cover simultaneous absences; that second alternate carries identical authority while substituting. Those rules formalize continuity of voting and limit gaps in local participation.
Advisory representation and Imperial County
The board may appoint advisory representatives who may attend and sit with the board but may not vote. The bill preserves existing advisory positions for current San Diego Association of Governments advisors at the discretion of their governing bodies and explicitly allows the County of Imperial and its cities to collectively designate a single advisory representative. This creates a path for external input without expanding voting membership.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- City and county governing bodies — Appointment and recall authority keeps control over which local officials represent their jurisdiction, giving local legislatures direct leverage over regional representation.
- Unincorporated area residents — A seat is reserved specifically for a county supervisor representing an unincorporated area, ensuring direct representation for communities outside city limits.
- Association of Planning Groups — Receives a defined representative role on the board, institutionalizing the planning groups’ voice in regional decisions.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local governing bodies (cities and county) — Must manage selection, alternates, vacancies, and potential recalls, increasing administrative and political workload for local councils and boards.
- Advisory representatives and their constituencies — Advisory seats are explicitly nonvoting, so stakeholders relying on influence rather than formal votes may find their leverage limited.
- The consolidated agency’s staff and committees — Broad delegation authority could shift operational burdens onto staff and newly created offices or committees as the board reallocates responsibilities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
AB24 pits the need for a single, authoritative regional decision‑maker (to coordinate planning and funding) against local control and democratic responsiveness: centralizing authority in a statutorily composed board improves clarity and coordination but limits flexibility and may concentrate power in a way that unsettles smaller jurisdictions and advisory stakeholders.
The bill trades flexibility for predictability: fixing board membership and tying selection to specific governing bodies clarifies who speaks for each jurisdiction, but it also freezes a particular representational scheme that may not reflect changing population, transportation patterns, or future annexations. Because directors serve until recall rather than for defined statutory terms, local political turnover and intra‑body politics (recall votes, council bargains) become the primary mechanism for change, which can produce abrupt shifts in regional policy alignment.
Delegation language is broad: the board may delegate and redelegate executive, administrative, and ministerial powers to offices, officers, or committees it creates. That allows efficient operational design but raises questions about checks, transparency, and accountability when authority is pushed down to entities the statute does not specifically regulate.
The statute also leaves open several implementation details — quorum and voting rules tied to the 21‑member number, conflict‑of‑interest policies for alternates, the selection criteria for the Association of Planning Groups representative, and dispute resolution between governing bodies — which will matter in practice and could be the source of litigation or interlocal friction.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.