AB 2607 amends the CalSavers Retirement Savings Trust Act to widen who must and can participate in California’s auto‑IRA program and to add a temporary emergency‑savings feature tied to payroll deposits. The bill explicitly treats household employers who issue W‑2s as "eligible employers," directs the board to establish IRAs for participants eligible for federal or state retirement benefit deposits, and creates a payroll‑deposit emergency savings account (capped at $1,000) with a default employee contribution and limited adjustment authority for the board.
The measure also removes the board’s authority to invest in federal myRAs, repeals the statutory retirement investments clearinghouse and vendor registration process (replacing them with vendor contracting requirements), delays the universal employer mandate to December 31, 2027 with an annual requirement thereafter, and raises and stages penalties for noncompliant employers. The bill authorizes the board to explore multistate administration and updates outreach language to include information on the Saver’s Match successor incentive.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill expands the definition of "eligible employer" to include household employers who provide W‑2s, requires the board to establish participant IRAs for certain federally or state‑funded deposits and a payroll‑deposit emergency savings account (max $1,000), and eliminates authority to invest in myRAs. It also removes the statutory clearinghouse/vendor‑registration scheme and replaces it with vendor contracting requirements, shifts the employer mandate start to Dec. 31, 2027 with annual triggers thereafter, and adjusts civil penalties for violations.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include household employers and their W‑2 employees (domestic workers), small employers subject to CalSavers compliance, contracted vendors and payroll providers who must supply specified information to the board to contract, and the CalSavers Board and Treasurer who administer investment and trust functions. The Franchise Tax Board remains the collection and enforcement vehicle for penalties.
Why It Matters
This bill broadens coverage into a workforce historically outside mandatory state retirement schemes, creates a near‑term liquid savings bucket intended to reduce retirement account withdrawals, and strengthens enforcement tools that fund the trust. It also removes a public vendor clearinghouse that previously provided comparative product information, shifting vendor engagement toward negotiated contracts and potentially changing market visibility for retirement products.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 2607 makes several practical changes to how CalSavers will operate. First, it changes who counts as an "eligible employer" by adding household employers who issue W‑2s; that means domestic workers paid on payroll become eligible employees who can be auto‑enrolled unless they opt out.
The bill also requires the board, with approval, to set up IRAs for participants who are eligible to receive federal or state retirement deposits and to notify participants at least 30 days before creating those accounts. Those notifications must summarize benefits, risks, opt‑out mechanics, coordination with other CalSavers accounts, and withdrawal rules.
The bill creates a payroll‑deposit emergency savings account intended to protect retirement assets from small‑scale, short‑term withdrawals. The account is capped at $1,000 per participant (or a lower amount if the board decides), and the statute sets a 3 percent default employee contribution, but authorizes the board by regulation to set a floor of 0.5 percent and a ceiling of 3 percent.
Employers may contribute to these emergency accounts if doing so complies with the Internal Revenue Code and does not push the program into ERISA treatment. Like the IRAs, the board must provide 30‑day notice to participants before establishing the emergency accounts and disclose the account’s purpose, withdrawal mechanics, and the current annual percentage yield.On investment and program administration, the bill removes the board’s authority to use or invest in federal myRAs and makes related conforming edits.
It preserves the trust’s two‑fund structure (program and administrative funds), restates continuous appropriation language, and keeps procedures requiring an investment policy, fiduciary standards, and public reporting of investment activity. The statutory requirement to maintain a public Retirement Investments Clearinghouse and vendor registration process is repealed; instead, vendors wishing to contract with the board must provide specified information the board requires for contracting.
Finally, the bill delays and makes recurring the employer mandate schedule (beginning Dec. 31, 2027, for employers with 1+ employees), tightens the penalty ladder for noncompliance with limits on frequency, and authorizes the board to study multistate administration and to include Saver’s Match outreach in its materials.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill expands "eligible employer" to include household employers who provide a W‑2 to domestic workers, bringing those employees into CalSavers eligibility.
It eliminates the board’s authority to invest in federal myRAs and makes conforming changes to permitted investments for trust moneys.
The bill requires the board to establish a payroll‑deposit emergency savings account for participants with a statutory cap of $1,000 and a 3% default employee contribution (board may set 0.5%–3%).
The employer mandate is moved to begin December 31, 2027 and becomes an annual requirement by December 31 each year for employers with one or more eligible employees who don't offer qualifying retirement programs.
Enforcement penalties are restructured so employers face $250 initially, $500 for continued noncompliance, and an additional $500 after that (penalties cannot be imposed more often than once every 180 days); collected amounts are deposited into the trust.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions—household employers and myRA removal
This section adds a statutory definition of "household employers" as those who hire or contract workers for household benefit and issue a W‑2, and makes them "eligible employers" for CalSavers purposes. It also removes or moves the myRA definition out of practical authority by conforming downstream provisions to eliminate board investment in myRAs. Practically, the amendment brings domestic payrolls under CalSavers’ coverage and requires administrative systems to identify and onboard these small, often informal, employers and employees.
Board powers and fiduciary duties; multistate feasibility
The board retains its nine‑member structure and fiduciary rules but the bill expressly authorizes assessing multistate or regional administration agreements. That gives the board statutory authority to explore shared back‑office models and economies of scale with other jurisdictions. The provision leaves intact public‑reporting and investment‑policy obligations, meaning any multistate approach still must meet California’s fiduciary and disclosure standards.
Trust structure and investment limits
The trust remains split into program and administrative funds with continuous appropriation language preserved. The bill removes myRA as an investment option and reemphasizes board discretion to invest funds via contracts with public retirement systems or private managers. Practically, trustees must revise investment policy statements, update reporting, and consider how removing myRAs affects the menu of default or low‑risk options available to participants.
New participant IRAs and payroll‑deposit emergency accounts
This is the operational heart of the bill: it requires the board, with approval, to create IRAs for participants eligible for federal or state deposits and to stand up a payroll‑deposit emergency savings account to preserve retirement investments. The statute caps the emergency account at $1,000, sets a default employee contribution rule (3%), and grants the board narrow regulatory authority to lower the floor to 0.5% or adjust within 0.5%–3%. It also mandates at least 30‑day advance notices to affected participants and specifies required notice content.
Vendor engagement—clearinghouse repealed; contracting required
The bill repeals the statutory requirement to operate a public Retirement Investments Clearinghouse and the formal vendor registration system. Instead, vendors who want to contract with the board must provide specified information to the board as part of contracting. That shifts the mechanism from a publicly searchable listing and comparative tool to a contractual procurement model, changing how vendors gain visibility and how employers or participants access comparative product information.
Employer mandate timing, contribution mechanics, and automatic escalation
The statutory staged employer schedule is replaced by a recurring December 31, 2027 trigger for all employers with one or more eligible employees who do not offer a qualifying plan. The bill keeps the default employee contribution and automatic escalation tools in place (default 3%, board‑set ranges and caps on escalation), while giving the board discretion to adjust contribution parameters by regulation. Employers who already offer qualifying plans remain exempt, preserving options for employer‑sponsored plans.
Enforcement, penalties, and collection process
The board’s penalty ladder is clarified: initial notice, $250 per eligible employee, $500 if noncompliance continues, and an additional $500 after those penalties have been assessed; penalties may not be imposed more than once every 180 days. The Franchise Tax Board continues to issue notices and collect assessed penalties, and the board must reimburse FTB for administrative costs. The statute also preserves an employer appeal right to FTB pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code.
Inclusion of in‑home supportive services workers—certification criteria
This provision keeps the existing gateway by which the board can include providers of in‑home supportive services (IHSS) if the board and state agencies certify legal, payroll, and cost conditions are met. The bill leaves that certification path intact, meaning IHSS inclusion still requires interagency certification on employer‑of‑record, payroll feasibility, and absence of state liability.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Household workers and domestic employees — They become eligible for automatic payroll deduction IRAs and the new emergency savings account if their employer issues a W‑2, creating a retirement savings pathway previously unavailable for many domestic workers.
- Lower‑ and moderate‑income participants eligible for Saver’s Match successor incentives — The board must disseminate information about the Saver’s Match, and the establishment of IRAs for accounts that may receive federal or state deposits makes participants easier to identify and enroll for matched incentives.
- Participants who need short‑term liquidity protection — The payroll‑deposit emergency savings account gives savers a small, dedicated buffer intended to reduce the need to dip into longer‑term retirement accounts.
- Payroll processors and third‑party administrators that contract with CalSavers — Vendors that secure contracts under the new procurement approach can capture CalSavers flows and servicing revenue previously mediated through the clearinghouse model.
- CalSavers Board/Treasurer — The board gains statutory authority to explore multistate administration and to deploy new account types, expanding program reach and potentially increasing assets under management.
Who Bears the Cost
- Household employers — Individuals who employ domestic workers will face new compliance obligations if they provide W‑2s, including enrollment mechanics, remitting payroll deductions, potential penalties, and unfamiliar payroll reporting requirements.
- Small employers and microbusinesses — The push to an annual compliance trigger and stepped penalties increases exposure for small employers who do not already offer qualifying plans and may struggle with payroll system changes and penalty risk.
- CalSavers administrative apparatus and state vendors — Implementing new account types, notice regimes, regulatory adjustments, and contract procurement in place of a public clearinghouse will require operational work and potential up‑front costs borne by the program (offset by continuous appropriation and vendor fees where applicable).
- Vendors and financial services firms that relied on the public clearinghouse for visibility — Removing the searchable clearinghouse shifts marketing and access to negotiated contracts, reducing some vendors’ market access while advantaging firms that can win procurement terms.
- Franchise Tax Board — FTB administers notices and collections and may incur administrative overhead (the board must reimburse FTB, but timing and adequacy of reimbursement are implementation questions).
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances inclusion—bringing domestic and low‑income workers into an auto‑IRA system and adding a small emergency savings vehicle—against administrative complexity and preservation of retirement capital: expanding access increases operational and compliance friction (and potential harm if implemented poorly), while features intended to protect savings (a separate emergency account and limits on withdrawals) could still produce leakage or unintended tax and ERISA consequences if the program’s design, vendor relationships, and enforcement are not tightly aligned.
The bill stitches together three policy aims—expanded coverage, emergency liquidity, and stronger enforcement—into a single statutory package, but those aims pull in different directions operationally. Adding household employers increases coverage but creates practical identification and remittance challenges: many households use informal payrolls, occasional help, or nonpayroll arrangements; the statute’s W‑2 threshold helps clarify coverage but does not eliminate enforcement complexity or privacy concerns about compelling household compliance.
Regulators will need clear guidance and simple onboarding tools for micro‑employers to avoid undue burden or noncompliance spikes.
Integrating a capped emergency savings account with retirement infrastructure is innovative but legally and tax‑wise tricky. The statute ties contributions to payroll, caps balances at $1,000, and limits board flexibility, yet the interaction with tax treatment, distribution penalties, and ERISA avoidance (for employer contributions) will require careful design.
There is also a trade‑off between preserving retirement capital and offering liquidity: a separate emergency bucket reduces leakage but could encourage marginal saving behavior that substitutes for more robust retirement saving unless the mechanics and communications are tightly controlled.
Repealing the public Retirement Investments Clearinghouse and moving to a contracting model changes market transparency. The clearinghouse provided standardized fee and performance comparisons; the contract approach gives the board procurement leverage but reduces searchable, vendor‑provided comparisons for employers and participants.
That shift may streamline procurement but could also entrench incumbent vendors that win contracts and make it harder for smaller providers to gain visibility. Finally, the escalated penalties fund the trust but raise equity issues for tiny employers; enforcement discretion, outreach, and appeal processes will materially affect how burdens fall in practice.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.