AB 2775 declares the Legislature's intent to evaluate the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners through the joint legislative sunset review oversight process and to implement any recommendations from that review. It mainly amends Business and Professions Code Section 1001 to change how the board compiles, distributes, and sells its annual directory of chiropractic certificate holders.
Under the bill the board must compile a directory containing standard credential and contact information, may publish and sell copies, and must deliver one copy electronically to each certificate holder without charge; if a certificate holder requests a mailed copy, the board must provide it and may not charge that holder for publication or distribution costs. AB 2775 also makes a grammatical/clarifying change to Section 1056 governing income allocations for chiropractic corporations when a shareholder is a disqualified person.
The changes shift the default to digital access, preserve a free mailed option, and leave open questions about funding, privacy, and administrative workload.
At a Glance
What It Does
Declares legislative intent for a sunset review of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners and revises Section 1001 so the board compiles a directory that it may sell but must distribute one electronic copy free to each certificate holder and mail a free copy on request. It also amends Section 1056 to clarify that income from professional services while a shareholder is disqualified cannot benefit that shareholder or their shares.
Who It Affects
All California chiropractors who hold active certificates (the directory's subjects), the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (administration, publication, and IT delivery), chiropractic corporations and their counsel (corporate income allocation rules), and third parties who buy or rely on the directory for credentialing or verification.
Why It Matters
The bill modernizes the board's distribution model by making digital delivery the default while preserving a no-cost mailed option, which affects board budgets and licensee access. It also tightens a corporate-income provision that may influence how chiropractic practices structure ownership and compensation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 2775 installs two modest but consequential changes to the Chiropractic Act. First, it expresses legislative intent that the Board be reviewed under California’s joint legislative sunset oversight process; that doesn't itself change operations but signals an upcoming structured evaluation and potential reforms.
Second, and practically, it rewrites the statute governing the board’s annual directory.
The directory must continue to list basic credential and contact details for each person holding an active, nonforfeited certificate to practice chiropractic: name, address, telephone number, email, titles and symbols, school of qualification, and the date the certificate issued, along with the board’s prior-year annual report, selected legal materials, Attorney General opinions, and statutory provisions cited in the chapter. The statute preserves the board’s authority to require licensees to supply and promptly update this information and makes the directory conclusive evidence of the right to practice unless a certificate has been canceled, suspended, or revoked.Practically, the board may publish and sell copies of the directory and recover publication and distribution costs from voluntary purchasers.
But the bill sets distribution defaults: the board must deliver one copy electronically to each certificate holder at no charge; if a certificate holder requests a mailed copy, the board must mail one free of charge as well. Those two lines shift the default to electronic access while prohibiting per-holder charges for receiving the official copy by mail.
Finally, the bill tweaks Section 1056 to clarify that when a shareholder is a “disqualified person” under the Professional Corporation Act, income from professional services rendered while that shareholder is disqualified may not in any way benefit the shareholder or their shares—an allocation rule that affects corporate governance and compensation flows.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 1 states the Legislature’s intent to subject the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to a joint legislative sunset review and to implement any recommendations from that process.
Section 2 (amending §1001) requires the board to compile a directory containing names, addresses, telephone numbers, emails, professional titles, qualifying school, and certificate issuance dates, plus the prior-year annual report and selected legal materials.
The board may publish and sell copies and recover publication/distribution costs from voluntary purchasers, but must deliver one electronic copy at no charge to each certificate holder and must mail a copy on request without charging that certificate holder for publication or distribution costs.
The statute makes the directory evidentiary: it serves as proof of the person’s right to practice unless the individual’s certificate has been canceled, suspended, or revoked, and it requires licensees to report contact-information changes immediately.
Section 3 (amending §1056) clarifies that income of a chiropractic corporation attributable to professional services rendered while a shareholder is a disqualified person shall not in any manner accrue to the benefit of that shareholder or their shares.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Legislative intent for joint sunset review
This short provision directs that the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners be evaluated through the Legislature’s joint sunset review oversight process and that any recommendations be implemented through that same process. It does not itself change board authority or impose deadlines, but it formalizes legislative attention and authorizes a structured examination of the board’s performance and statutory framework.
Who is listed and what appears in the directory
Section 1001’s list of required directory contents is carried forward and enumerated in the statute: contact details, professional titles, school attended, certificate issuance date, the board’s previous annual report, selected state and federal laws the board deems relevant, Attorney General opinions, and statutory provisions. That cataloging matters because it fixes the scope of public-facing data the board will collect and publish and makes the directory an official record that courts and private parties may rely on as evidence of licensure.
Digital-first distribution, sale to third parties, and no-charge mailed copies on request
The amendment lets the board publish and sell copies to subscribers or purchasers and recover publication and distribution costs from those buyers. At the same time, the statute mandates that the board distribute one copy electronically to each certificate holder at no cost and, if a certificate holder asks, must mail a copy without charging that holder for publication or distribution costs. That combination creates a revenue path (sales to third parties) while imposing free-delivery obligations for licensees and shifts the operational default to electronic distribution.
Duty to provide and update information; directory as proof of licensure
The board may require licensees to furnish the information necessary to compile the directory and obligates each listed person to report every change of residence or contact information immediately. The statute also states the directory is evidence of the right to practice unless the certificate has been canceled, suspended, or revoked—creating a statutory presumption of licensure that depends on timely and accurate updates.
Corporate income rule for disqualified shareholders
The amendment to Section 1056 is primarily clarifying: it confirms that income from professional services rendered while a shareholder is a disqualified person under the Professional Corporation Act cannot in any way inure to that shareholder’s benefit or the benefit of their shares. That affects how chiropractic corporations must account for income and distribute benefits when ownership includes persons who lose or lack qualifying status.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Certificate holders (licensed chiropractors): They receive an official copy of the board’s annual directory electronically at no cost and can opt for a mailed copy without charge, improving access to the board’s official record.
- Third-party verifiers and employers: Organizations that license, credential, or refer chiropractors will have a clearer, standardized source to confirm licensure and contact information, reducing friction for credentialing.
- Consumers/patients and the public: Easier electronic access to practitioner contact and qualification data supports transparency and informed choices about care.
- Board administration (contingent): The board gains explicit statutory authority to sell copies of the directory to recover costs from external purchasers, providing one potential revenue stream to offset publication expenses.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Board of Chiropractic Examiners: The board must operate or procure an electronic distribution system and absorb the cost of mailing free copies on request, creating new IT, publication, and postage expenses unless offset by sales revenue or budget adjustments.
- Licensees concerned with privacy: Practitioners whose address, telephone, and email are published may face privacy and solicitation risks; updating and redaction requests could impose administrative burdens on both licensees and the board.
- Chiropractic corporations and counsel: The clarified Section 1056 language may prompt reviews of corporate compensation and ownership structures and could require transactional or tax adjustments to ensure disqualified shareholders receive no indirect benefit.
- Compliance and practice managers: Offices that rely on the directory for billing, credentialing, or referral will need to update processes to use the electronic directory and to verify the directory’s accuracy where it becomes the presumptive evidence of licensure.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits two legitimate goals against each other: greater public access and regulatory transparency through an electronic, standardized directory versus the administrative, fiscal, and privacy costs borne by the board and individual practitioners—an unresolved choice between broad availability of official licensure data and the practical limits of funding, data accuracy, and personal privacy.
The bill packs several trade-offs into a short set of changes. Moving the default to an electronic distribution model modernizes access but places actual costs on the board: while the board can sell copies to third parties, it must still provide every certificate holder with a free official copy and mail free copies on request.
The statute contains no appropriation or explicit funding mechanism to cover these added IT and postage costs, so implementation will likely require administrative budget adjustments or a reliance on sales revenue whose sufficiency is uncertain.
The directory’s contents and its statutory status as evidence of the right to practice heighten the stakes of data accuracy. The law requires immediate reporting of contact changes, but it does not create an express administrative timeline, penalties, or verification procedures to ensure the directory’s entries stay current.
That gap creates potential legal risk if the board or a third party relies on outdated information and a licensee contests the record. Separately, publishing email and telephone details increases privacy and solicitation exposure for practitioners; the statute does not provide redaction or limited-access options for contact information.
Finally, the change to Section 1056 tightens the rule preventing disqualified shareholders from deriving benefit from professional-service income, but the amendment is largely textual. Questions remain about enforcement mechanisms and how the board or other agencies will identify and address indirect benefits that flow through corporate bookkeeping or compensation arrangements.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.