AB 318 sets a state-level licensing fee framework for child daycare facilities, tying initial and annual fees to facility type and licensed capacity. The bill also authorizes a suite of additional administrative charges (moves, corporate control changes, orientation, probation monitoring, late fees, plan-of-correction fees and payment-processing costs), and bars local governments from imposing business fees on small family daycare homes.
The measure is significant because it converts several licensing activities into user-funded functions for the state licensing program while imposing a predictable fee burden on providers. For providers and compliance officers this is a straightforward cost-shift: it clarifies what the state will charge, how revenues may be used, and what triggers nonrenewal or forfeiture of a license for nonpayment.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes capacity-adjusted initial and annual licensing fees for family day care homes and day care centers and authorizes a set of additional administrative fees tied to specific events and failures to comply. It also requires periodic fee review by the department and places limits on local fees for small family daycare homes.
Who It Affects
Licensed family day care providers and child daycare centers operating in California, the Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing program, and local jurisdictions that currently assess business-license fees on family daycare homes.
Why It Matters
It makes licensing enforcement and monitoring partially self-funded, creates new discrete compliance costs for providers, and formalizes procedural safeguards for how the department must justify and deploy fee revenue.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a graded fee schedule for licensing based on whether a facility is a family day care home or a daycare center and on the number of children the license covers. For family day care homes the law establishes two capacity bands; for daycare centers it establishes multiple capacity bands with larger fees as capacity increases.
Licenses have an initial application charge and an annual anniversary fee thereafter; the schedule assigns a specific dollar amount to each capacity band.
Beyond the baseline schedule, AB 318 lists event-driven charges. If an existing licensee moves a facility or a corporate licensee changes the entity with authority to select a majority of its board, the department charges half the established application fee.
Changing a facility's licensed capacity triggers a $25 fee. The bill sets orientation fees for attendees at department-sponsored orientation sessions, a plan-of-correction fee when a licensee misses a correction deadline, a late-payment surcharge, a fee to recover payment-processing costs, and a probation-monitoring fee that adds to the annual fee for each year a license remains on probation under administrative adjudication.The bill ties revenue use to the licensing program.
Collected fees are to be used to ensure health and safety and to support licensing activities, including monitoring and administrative support; the department must adjust fees so total collections do not exceed the cost of those activities. Before using revenues, the department must provide written notification of purpose and use, with approval by the Department of Finance, to the Chair of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the appropriations chairs.
The department is also required to prepare a fee-analysis at least every five years and recommend legislative adjustments when necessary.On payments and enforcement the statute allows applicants and licensees to pay by check and directs the department to accept credit card payments no later than January 1, 2027, 2028 (the text lists both dates). Failure to pay applicable fees and accrued civil penalties is explicit grounds for denial or forfeiture of a license, making fee collection a direct compliance lever for the department.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill sets explicit dollar amounts for initial and annual fees by capacity band (family day care and multiple center tiers), with higher capacities facing substantially larger charges.
If a license is placed on probation after adjudication, the department charges a probation monitoring fee equal to the current annual fee in addition to the ordinary annual fee for each year of probation.
The department must charge a late fee equal to an additional 50 percent of the current annual fee when a licensee misses the postmarked due date for the annual licensing fee.
Local jurisdictions are prohibited from imposing any business license, fee, or tax on a small family daycare home licensed under this act.
The department must analyze initial and annual fees at least every five years and recommend legislative adjustments to keep fees appropriate and aligned with program costs.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Capacity-adjusted initial and annual fee schedule
This subsection lays out the baseline fee table: two bands for family day care homes and multiple capacity tiers for day care centers, each assigned a specific original application fee and a matching or reduced annual fee charged each anniversary. Practically, it converts licensing into a predictable, capacity-scaled revenue stream and creates immediate budget planning inputs for both providers and the licensing program.
Legislative finding and mandatory five-year fee review
The Legislature declares that fee revenues used for their intended purposes are not subject to Article XIII B restraints, and the department must analyze fees at least every five years. The analysis requirement obliges the department to monitor cost-recovery and to recommend statutory fee adjustments rather than unilaterally changing amounts, preserving legislative control over fee levels while formalizing an evidence-based review cycle.
Event-driven and administrative fees
This cluster enumerates add-on charges: 50 percent of application fee for facility relocations and corporate control changes, $25 for capacity changes, $25/$50 for orientation attendance (home vs. center), a probation-monitoring fee equal to the annual fee in addition to the annual fee, a 50 percent late-payment surcharge, reimbursement for payment-processing costs, and a $200 plan-of-correction fee. For licensors and compliance officers, these are precise triggers and price points that can materially increase annual compliance costs, especially when combined (for example, probation plus annual fees).
Ban on local fees for small family daycare homes
This short provision prevents cities and counties from levying business licenses, fees, or taxes on small family daycare homes licensed under the act. The clause protects small in-home providers from local fiscal charges but also removes a local revenue source, which has implications for municipal budgeting and local regulatory regimes.
Authorized uses, cost limitation, and procedural safeguards for revenue use
Collected fees must be used to ensure health and safety and support licensing activities when appropriated for those purposes; the department must not use revenues sooner than 30 days after written notification and Department of Finance approval to specified legislative budget chairs. The department must submit budget change proposals to justify ongoing positions tied to the fee revenue. Operationally, the provision ties cash use to an approval and notification process that could create timing and budgeting frictions despite providing program-level funding.
Payment methods and enforcement for nonpayment
The statute permits payment by check and directs the department to accept credit card payments no later than the listed date(s). Nonpayment of fees and accrued civil penalties is explicit grounds for license denial or forfeiture. That makes fee collection an enforceable precondition for licensure and gives the department a statutory lever to compel payment but also raises administrative obligations for processing and tracking payments and managing license status changes.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Department of Social Services – Community Care Licensing: Gains a clearer, user-funded revenue stream and statutory authority to deploy fees to support monitoring and administrative work, improving its ability to resource inspections and enforcement when the Legislature appropriates the funds.
- Small family daycare homes (as a class): Benefit from the prohibition on local business-license fees, which preserves a cost advantage and removes a source of municipal regulatory burden.
- Children and families served by licensed programs: Indirectly benefit from the requirement that fee revenue be used for health, safety, and monitoring activities, assuming the Legislature appropriates the funds and the department deploys them as intended.
Who Bears the Cost
- Family day care providers and daycare centers: Face the direct financial burden of initial, annual, and event-driven fees (including orientation, capacity changes, probation monitoring, late fees, and plan-of-correction charges), which will increase operating costs and potentially be passed to families.
- Licensed providers placed on probation: Bear a particularly steep cost because the probation-monitoring fee equals the annual fee in addition to the regular annual charge, effectively doubling their fee burden during probationary years.
- Local governments: Lose an existing revenue stream where they previously charged business-license fees to small in-home providers, potentially creating budgetary shortfalls or shifting costs to other local taxpayers.
- Department administration: Assumes the operational and compliance cost of running periodic fee analyses, processing new payment types, tracking fund use, and meeting the notice/approval requirements—functions that may require initial investments before fee revenues materialize.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is funding effective, consistent licensing oversight without imposing a fee structure that either forces small providers out of the market or pushes costs onto families: the bill secures program funding through user fees and procedural safeguards, but those same fees and constraints can create financial stress and timing friction that undermine the very stability and access the licensing program is meant to protect.
The bill balances two legitimate priorities—funding licensing activities and protecting small providers—but creates implementation and distributional challenges. First, concrete dollar amounts and stiff penalties (50 percent late surcharges, a $200 plan-of-correction fee, and a probation fee equal to the annual fee) could create cash-flow stress for marginal providers, particularly small family homes that operate on thin margins.
The statutory prohibition on local fees mitigates a local cost, but that benefit may not offset the new state charges and could incentivize consolidation into larger centers.
Second, the bill's procedural safeguards introduce potential friction. The department must not use fee revenues until it provides written notice and obtains DOF approval and must recommend legislative fee adjustments rather than set fees administratively.
Those steps are sensible as legislative oversight, but they create timing gaps between revenue collection and permitted expenditure and limit the department's ability to quickly calibrate fees to changing costs. The text also contains an apparent date ambiguity for the credit card requirement (the provision lists both 2027 and 2028), which creates compliance uncertainty for implementation planning.
Finally, the Legislature's finding that these fees are not subject to Article XIII B removes a common revenue cap check, increasing flexibility to fund licensing but also concentrating fiscal discretion. That raises accountability questions—who decides when fee-funded positions become ongoing budget items—and could complicate audits or budget negotiations if fees outpace documented program costs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.