AB 537 lets community colleges that the Chancellor certifies use California College Promise funding to waive some or all statutory student fees for eligible first‑time and returning students who submit a FAFSA or California Dream Act application. The waiver is subject to eligibility rules — including an "eligible workload" requirement — excludes students who already hold a postsecondary degree or certificate, and does not apply to students charged tuition under Section 76140.
The bill caps fee-waiver eligibility at two academic years per student, creates procedural requirements for colleges to notify students when a waiver is first issued, and empowers the Chancellor’s Office to require annual reporting and withhold future funds from colleges that fail to document compliance with the program’s conditions.
At a Glance
What It Does
Permits certified community colleges to use College Promise funds to waive fees for qualifying first‑time and returning students who complete a FAFSA or Dream Act application, limited to two academic years and conditioned on students maintaining an "eligible workload." The Chancellor may require annual reporting and tie future funding to timely compliance.
Who It Affects
California Community Colleges that seek certification under Section 76396.2, first‑time and returning students who meet unit and application requirements, and campus offices (financial aid, DSPS, and registrars) that must implement eligibility checks and notifications.
Why It Matters
This bill channels state Promise funding into explicit fee waivers with defined limits and monitoring, creating both a targeted student benefit and new compliance obligations for colleges. It clarifies who receives fee relief and how the Chancellor’s Office will condition ongoing funding on demonstrated program administration.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 537 operates through a conditional funding flow: the Chancellor certifies colleges under an existing standard (Section 76396.2), and certified colleges can use College Promise money to waive some or all student fees for eligible students. The waiver is only available to first‑time and returning community college students who submit a FAFSA or California Dream Act application; students who already earned a postsecondary degree or certificate cannot receive the waiver.
The law explicitly excludes students charged tuition under Section 76140 from the waiver program.
The bill defines key eligibility mechanics and exceptions. It treats an "academic year" as the summer term immediately preceding fall plus the two subsequent semesters or three quarters; an "eligible workload" is generally nine or more semester units (or equivalent).
Colleges may, at their discretion, deem a student taking fewer than nine units to have an eligible workload if DSPS staff certify that the student’s circumstances and a commitment are analogous to the nine‑unit threshold. The statute also defines a "returning" student as one who has taken a break of at least one semester.Two administrative guardrails aim to manage expectations and oversight.
First, any initial fee waiver must be accompanied by a written notice to the student that explains the two‑year eligibility limit, specifies unit‑completion targets needed to finish an associate degree or certificate within two academic years, and points to other financial aid options for students who outlast the waiver. Second, the Chancellor’s Office may require annual reporting on fund use and can withhold the next academic year’s disbursements from colleges that fail to submit required information or show compliance with Section 76396.2 and this provision.Finally, the bill includes two practical exceptions.
Military service called under certain Title 10/14/32 provisions or state‑ordered active duty pauses a student’s eligibility clock: students who withdraw for such duty can resume and retain their entitlement to the two‑year waiver, with the duty period excluded from the two‑year limit. High school pupils who took college courses while in high school are not counted as first‑time community college students until they enroll in college after graduating high school.
The bill also contains an intent clause tying the use of funds to goals listed in Section 76396.1 and a Section requiring the Chancellor’s Office to evaluate use of funds and whether those goals are being met in a report to the Legislature.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The fee waiver lasts only two academic years per student and covers the summer term plus subsequent semesters/quarters when the student maintains an eligible workload.
An "eligible workload" is generally 9 or more semester units (or quarter equivalent); DSPS staff may certify some students taking fewer units as eligible.
Students who previously earned a postsecondary degree or certificate are ineligible for the waiver, and students charged tuition under Section 76140 cannot receive it.
Active duty military service called under federal Title 10/14/32 or state‑ordered active duty pauses the two‑year eligibility clock so the duty period does not count against the limit.
The Chancellor’s Office must produce an evaluation report (statute references a July 1, 2024 deadline) and may require annual compliance reports from colleges; future funding can be withheld for failure to timely report or demonstrate compliance.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Certification triggers eligibility for Promise funding
Only community colleges that the Chancellor certifies under Section 76396.2 become eligible to receive funding under Section 76396. This creates a gatekeeping role for the Chancellor’s Office: certification is the condition precedent that opens access to the College Promise funds intended for fee waivers and associated program activities.
Who can get fee waivers and what they cover
Colleges may use the funds to waive some or all fees for first‑time and returning students who complete a FAFSA or California Dream Act application and who maintain an eligible workload. The waiver cannot be given to students who already hold a degree or certificate and does not apply to any student charged tuition under Section 76140. Waivers apply to the summer term and each semester or quarter during which the student maintains the eligible workload.
Military leave and dual‑enrollment carveouts
If a student is called to active duty under federal Title 10/14/32 or state‑ordered active duty, the student can withdraw and later resume participation in the Promise program without losing eligibility; the period of duty does not count toward the two‑year cap. Also, students who took college courses while in high school are treated as first‑time community college students only after they enroll following high school graduation, preventing dual‑enrollment from starting the two‑year clock prematurely.
Required written notification at initial waiver
When a college issues an initial fee waiver it must provide a written notice telling the student about the two‑year limit, describing the unit load required to finish a degree or certificate in two academic years, and explaining other financial aid options if the student exceeds the waiver period. This imposes an operational task on colleges’ financial aid and counseling offices to produce and track these notices.
Key definitions that determine eligibility
The statute defines "academic year" to include a preceding summer term plus two semesters or three quarters, sets an "eligible workload" at 9+ semester units (with DSPS discretion for fewer units), and defines "returning" students as those who took at least one semester off. These definitions fix the measurement units for eligibility and for enforcement of the two‑year limit.
Intent language, evaluation, and conditional reporting
The bill expresses legislative intent that Promise funding support goals in Section 76396.1, directs the Chancellor’s Office to submit an evaluation report to the Legislature (the text sets a July 1, 2024 deadline), and authorizes the Chancellor to require annual reporting from colleges on fund use. The Chancellor can condition future disbursements on timely submission of these reports and on demonstrated compliance with Section 76396.2 and this section.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Education across all five countries.
Explore Education in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- First‑time community college students who submit a FAFSA or Dream Act application, because they can receive a waiver of some or all statutory fees for up to two academic years while meeting unit requirements.
- Returning students who re‑enroll after at least one semester away and who meet the application and unit conditions, since they regain access to fee relief for up to two academic years.
- Students with disabilities who need a reduced course load, because DSPS staff can certify that a lighter schedule counts as an eligible workload and preserve access to the waiver.
- Community colleges that increase enrollment of low‑income students, since Promise funds can be used to reduce fee barriers and may help institutions meet completion or access goals tied to Section 76396.1.
- Military service members called to duty, who can pause their eligibility clock and resume fee waiver benefits on return without penalty.
Who Bears the Cost
- Community colleges and campus offices (financial aid, DSPS, registrars, counseling) that must implement eligibility checks, produce required written notices, track two‑year limits, and submit compliance data—adding administrative workload and potential IT/reporting costs.
- The California state budget, which must appropriate College Promise funds for these waivers and support the Chancellor’s Office oversight; withholding rules may complicate budget stability for districts.
- Students who already hold a degree or certificate and students charged tuition under Section 76140, who are explicitly excluded from the waiver and thus receive no benefit under this program.
- The Chancellor’s Office, which faces an operational burden to certify colleges, process evaluation and annual reports, and enforce funding conditions; this may require increased staffing or new reporting systems.
- Students who need more than two academic years to complete credentials (including many part‑time students) may bear indirect costs if they exhaust their waiver and must pay fees thereafter.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is straightforward: the bill concentrates limited state funds into a narrowly targeted, time‑bound waiver to encourage on‑time completion, but California’s community college population includes many part‑time, working, and interrupted‑enrollment students for whom a strict two‑year cap (with limited discretionary relief) may undermine access rather than promote completion.
The bill balances a targeted, time‑limited subsidy against administrative controls, but several implementation questions could blunt its effectiveness. The two academic‑year cap prioritizes timely completion but does not reflect the reality that many community college students attend part‑time, work, or experience life interruptions; relying on DSPS certification for reduced workloads helps some students but leaves discretion—and potential inconsistency—at the campus level.
The written notice requirement clarifies expectations but requires local capacity to calculate and communicate unit targets tied to completing credentials in two years.
Enforcement relies on the Chancellor’s Office certification and reporting authority. Conditioning future disbursements on timely reports creates a leverage point to enforce program rules, but it also raises practical risks: if the Chancellor withholds funds from districts for late or incomplete reporting, that action could reduce services or supports the program aims to expand.
The bill also contains a curious timing element: it directs an evaluation report to the Legislature by July 1, 2024, a date that may be earlier than when program rules are finalized or funding is deployed, creating potential mismatch between evaluation timing and program implementation. Finally, excluding students with prior degrees and those charged Section 76140 tuition narrows the pool of beneficiaries in ways that could have unintended equity or pathway consequences for transfer or returning students.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.