AB 610 amends Government Code Section 65583 to require that, beginning with the seventh and all subsequent housing element revisions, jurisdictions include a “potential and actual governmental constraints disclosure statement” in the constraints analysis. That disclosure must identify each new or amended potential or actual governmental constraint (or any increase in stringency) adopted after the prior element’s due date and before the current draft is submitted to HCD, and must identify constraints the governing body can reasonably anticipate adopting during the first three years after the element is certified as substantially compliant.
The change forces municipalities to surface regulatory changes during the housing-element review process and ties the “anticipate adopting” standard to whether the local legislative body published an agenda item under the Brown Act. The bill also declares the matter one of statewide concern (applying to charter cities), includes conditional text to incorporate related amendments from SB 340 and AB 650 if enacted, and states that no state reimbursement is required for the new local duties.
This raises new compliance work for planning staffs, a new transparency tool for HCD and advocates, and a potential new pressure point for litigation and administrative review.
At a Glance
What It Does
For the seventh and later housing element revisions, the bill requires a disclosure statement that lists every new or amended governmental constraint (or any increase in stringency) adopted after the previous element’s due date and before submission to HCD, and it requires identification of constraints the jurisdiction ‘anticipates adopting’ during the first three years after HCD finds the element in substantial compliance.
Who It Affects
All California cities and counties preparing 7th-and-later housing elements (including charter cities), their planning departments and city/county legislative bodies, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), housing developers, and housing advocates who review and challenge housing-element compliance.
Why It Matters
The requirement makes local regulatory changes visible during the state review process, reducing the ability to adopt constraints out-of-cycle without scrutiny. That increases administrative burdens on local governments, likely changes how councils schedule Brown Act agenda items, and gives HCD, developers, and advocates a clearer factual record for certification or enforcement.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 610 builds on existing Housing Element Law’s constraints analysis by adding a discrete disclosure step for later-cycle housing elements. Specifically, when a jurisdiction prepares its seventh (and later) housing element, it must append a potential and actual governmental constraints disclosure statement to the constraints analysis.
That statement must list every new or amended local regulatory measure — including changes that increase stringency — that was adopted after the due date of the previous housing element and before the current draft was submitted to HCD.
The bill also requires jurisdictions to identify any new or amended constraints that the governing body can reasonably anticipate adopting during the first three years of the planning period that begins when HCD considers the element to be in substantial compliance. The statutory definition of “anticipate adopting” is procedural: the legislative body must have identified an action to consider adoption, amendment, or increased stringency in a publicly posted Brown Act agenda during the interval between the prior element’s due date and the draft’s submission to HCD.
Importantly, the disclosure requirement does not prevent a jurisdiction from later adopting or amending constraints that were not disclosed.AB 610 further includes legislative findings that the change addresses statewide, not purely municipal, concerns and therefore applies to charter cities. The bill contains conditional text to incorporate amendments proposed in SB 340 and AB 650 — those alternate versions become operative only if those bills are also enacted and AB 610 is the last to be enacted.
Finally, the bill declares the new obligations a state-mandated local program but states no reimbursement is required under the state constitution because local agencies can levy fees to cover the costs.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires a potential and actual governmental constraints disclosure statement in the housing element’s constraints analysis for the 7th and later cycles, listing each new or amended constraint adopted after the prior element’s due date and before submittal to HCD.
Jurisdictions must identify any new or amended constraint they can “anticipate adopting” in the first three years after the element is certified; “anticipate adopting” is defined by whether the action appeared on a Brown Act agenda in the relevant interval.
The disclosure duty does not bar later adoption or amendment of constraints; it only requires public identification during the housing element review window.
The bill’s operative text includes conditional alternatives that will incorporate changes from SB 340 and AB 650 only if those bills are also enacted and AB 610 is enacted last, creating mutually exclusive operative paths.
AB 610 declares the matter a statewide concern (so it applies to charter cities) and labels the requirement a state-mandated local program while stating no state reimbursement is required.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Legislative findings on statewide interest and process gaps
This section explains the Legislature’s reasoning: HCD guidance already expects thorough constraints analyses, the state invests heavily in housing element reviews, and undisclosed local rulemaking during the update window can undercut the department’s ability to certify an element. The findings assert that preserving the integrity of certified housing elements is a statewide concern and justify applying the new disclosure duty to all cities, including charter cities.
New disclosure statement requirement for constraints analysis
This is the operative change to Section 65583: for the seventh and subsequent housing element cycles the constraints analysis must include a potential and actual governmental constraints disclosure statement. It must (1) identify each new or amended governmental constraint — or any revision increasing stringency — adopted after the prior element’s due date and before the current draft is submitted to HCD; and (2) identify constraints the governing body can anticipate adopting during the first three years of the planning period that begins when HCD finds the element in substantial compliance. The provision ties the timing of anticipated actions to Brown Act agenda publication, creating an objectively checkable trigger for what counts as “anticipated.”
Conditional incorporation of SB 340 and AB 650 text
AB 610 contains alternate amendment blocks (labeled 2.1, 2.2, 2.3) that would incorporate language proposed in SB 340 and AB 650. Those alternate blocks become operative only under narrow circumstances: the other bill(s) must also be enacted on or before a stated date and AB 610 must be enacted last. Practically, the bill creates mutually exclusive versions of the amended Section 65583 that depend on whether the related bills clear the Legislature and on enactment order.
Application to charter cities
This short section declares the changes in Section 2 address a statewide concern rather than a municipal affair, and therefore the disclosure requirement applies to charter cities as well as general-law cities and counties. That removes an avenue for charter cities to avoid the disclosure duty on home-rule grounds.
Fiscal note and reimbursement declaration
The bill characterizes the disclosure as a state-mandated local program but states that no constitutional reimbursement is required because local agencies have the authority to raise service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to cover the costs. This flags that while local duties increase, the state explicitly declines to allocate new reimbursement under Article XIII B.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Housing across all five countries.
Explore Housing in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD): gains clearer documentation of post‑update local regulatory changes, which improves its factual basis for certifying elements and evaluating whether jurisdictions have considered constraints in their analysis.
- Housing advocates and nonprofit watchdogs: receive a structured, statutory disclosure that makes it easier to spot and challenge regulatory changes that could reduce housing capacity or affordability during the element cycle.
- Developers and investors: get earlier visibility into recently adopted or pending local rules that affect project feasibility, helping them assess entitlement risk before committing capital.
Who Bears the Cost
- Local planning departments and city/county staff: must track, compile, and document any relevant rule changes adopted in the specified window and produce the disclosure statement as part of the housing element submittal, increasing workload and recordkeeping requirements.
- Local legislative bodies (mayors, councils, boards): face constraints on timing and political strategy because the Brown Act agenda being used to define “anticipate adopting” makes draft agenda placement consequential and potentially litigable.
- Small and resource‑constrained jurisdictions: will feel disproportionate compliance burden and may need to buy consultant time or reallocate staff to prepare the disclosure and defend it during HCD review.
- HCD: will see increased review work to evaluate the new disclosure statements and may need to develop guidance or templates to ensure uniformity across jurisdictions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill forces a trade-off between two legitimate objectives: preserving statewide housing‑element integrity by making post‑update regulatory changes transparent, and preserving local legislative flexibility and procedural sovereignty. Transparency reduces the ability to enact stealth constraints that undermine a certified plan, but it also constrains how and when local governments deliberate, increases administrative costs, and creates new avenues for litigation that can slow housing production.
Several implementation and practical issues are unresolved in the statutory text. First, tying the “anticipate adopting” standard to the Brown Act agenda provides an objectively verifiable trigger, but it also invites strategic behavior: jurisdictions could delay placing an item on the agenda until after draft submission to avoid listing it, or conversely place placeholder items to force disclosure.
The statute does not direct HCD to judge the good‑faith nature of agenda scheduling, leaving enforcement to contested administrative review.
Second, the disclosure obligation increases administrative costs at the local level while the bill explicitly declines state reimbursement. The lack of funding or a detailed implementation timetable means smaller jurisdictions may struggle to meet the new documentation standard without diverting planning capacity.
Third, the conditional alternative texts that incorporate SB 340 and AB 650 introduce legal uncertainty about which version of Section 65583 will be operative in jurisdictions where related bills are moving through the Legislature; that complicates local legal review and counsel advice during the next update cycle. Finally, while the statute says disclosure doesn’t prohibit later adoption, the new record will likely sharpen grounds for challenge and litigation over whether HCD should withhold certification if a newly adopted constraint was not adequately analyzed — a dispute the statute does not resolve in detail.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.