AB 746 would require the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to run an Inmate Cooperative Program that allows groups of incarcerated people to form, incorporate, and operate certified worker cooperatives inside state prison facilities with support from outside cooperative partners.
The bill sets up a Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve funded by a mandatory 40% gross-wage deduction taken by the cooperative community partner; directs the California Employee Ownership Hub to pick a cooperative institution to help select a financial steward for the reserve; prescribes wage-withholding rules (including restitution and tax withholding) and a formula for distributing net wages; and imposes operational rules, PIECP compliance support, reporting requirements, and a prohibition on CDCR staff holding governance or financial interests in the cooperatives.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a program within CDCR that certifies inmate-run worker cooperatives, requires applicants to submit governance and business plans to the warden, mandates a contract between CDCR and each certified cooperative, and establishes a reserve funded by mandatory wage deductions that a designated financial institution will steward.
Who It Affects
Impacts incarcerated people who want to form worker cooperatives, nonprofit cooperative community partners that provide technical and financial support, the California Employee Ownership Hub and a selected cooperative institution, CDCR facility wardens and administrators, and financial institutions that will manage the reentry reserve.
Why It Matters
This bill changes how prison labor can be organized by embedding democratic cooperative governance inside facilities, routing a significant share of wages into an externally managed reentry fund, and tying in state cooperative-development infrastructure and PIECP compliance — creating new operational, financial, and legal responsibilities for corrections and cooperatives alike.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 746 builds a new, formal channel for incarcerated people to form worker cooperatives inside California state prisons. A group of inmates (an “applicant”) submits an application and a plan of operation to the facility warden; that plan must include draft cooperative bylaws, a business plan focused on environmentally sustainable industries or services that improve conditions, a safety plan, and a named cooperative community partner to provide ongoing support.
If the warden approves the plan, the inmates must incorporate as a worker cooperative under California’s Corporations Code and then obtain certification through the new Inmate Cooperative Program.
Once certified, each cooperative must enter a formal contract with CDCR defining operational responsibilities and compliance requirements. The cooperative community partner plays a continuing role as liaison and support provider during contract negotiations and afterward.
CDCR must make necessary equipment, materials, and space available to certified cooperatives but is not required to pay for those resources. The statute explicitly requires certified cooperatives to meet labor, safety, and governance standards and directs CDCR to help them meet Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (PIECP) requirements when relevant.The bill redirects a portion of inmate wages into a purpose-built fund.
A cooperative’s community partner must withhold a substantial portion of each inmate worker’s gross wages and deposit it into the Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve managed by a financial institution selected with input from a cooperative institution chosen by the California Employee Ownership Hub. The stewarded reserve is limited to supporting system-impacted individuals and survivors of crime through grants, low-interest loans, and technical assistance for environmentally sustainable cooperative projects, and the steward must report annually to the Governor on allocations and outcomes.The statute also prescribes how the department will process cooperative payroll: after withholding taxes and mandatory restitution-related deductions (set between 5% and 20% of gross wages), the law requires that portions of the net wages be set aside in a trust account and a passbook savings account to be released on parole; the remaining net pay is available for other uses under departmental rules.
AB 746 removes certain statutory limits on the sale of inmate-produced goods when sold through a certified cooperative, disqualifies participating inmates from claiming unemployment benefits on release based on program participation, and bars CDCR employees from holding governance roles or financial interests in those cooperatives.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The cooperative community partner must deduct 40% of each inmate worker’s gross wages and deposit it into the Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve before CDCR handles other withholdings.
The California Employee Ownership Hub selects a cooperative institution (10+ years’ cooperative development experience) to help choose the financial steward for the reserve; that steward must use funds only for grants, low-interest loans, or technical assistance supporting system-impacted individuals and survivors of crime and must report annually to the Governor.
After federal, state, and local tax withholdings and restitution deductions (which the bill caps between 5% and 20% of gross wages), the statute requires 20% of the net wages to go to an inmate cooperative worker’s trust account and another 20% to a passbook savings account released on parole.
CDCR must contract with each certified inmate cooperative and provide access to equipment, materials, and space without an obligation to fund them; the cooperatives must comply with labor, safety, governance, and PIECP-related federal standards.
An inmate’s participation in the program makes them ineligible for unemployment benefits after release based on that program, and CDCR employees are prohibited from serving as officers, board members, or having any direct or indirect financial interest in a certified inmate cooperative.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and scope
This section collects definitions the program uses: applicant, certified inmate cooperative, cooperative community partner, cooperative institution, Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve, and system‑impacted individual. Those definitions set boundaries for who can participate, who can provide outside support, and what the reserve can be — which matters because the statute restricts how reserve funds may be used and who may steward them.
Application, warden approval, and incorporation
The bill requires a formal application to the facility warden and makes approval contingent on a plan of operation that includes draft bylaws, a business plan with capital and resource projections, a safety plan, and a letter naming a cooperative community partner. Approval triggers an obligation for the group to incorporate as a worker cooperative under the Corporations Code, with the partner providing incorporation support — shifting initial governance and legal formation costs and responsibilities onto the applicants and their partner.
Certification, contracts, and mandatory wage deduction to the reserve
After incorporation, the program issues certification and CDCR must contract with the cooperative to define operational and compliance duties. The statute requires certified cooperatives to include a bylaw provision directing the cooperative community partner to deduct 40% of inmate gross wages into the Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve, making that deduction a contractual and governance condition for operating inside a facility.
Cooperative institution selection and reserve stewardship
The California Employee Ownership Hub picks a cooperative institution with at least 10 years’ experience; that institution assists in selecting a financial institution to steward the Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve, appoints cooperative community partners, and provides technical and financial support. The steward is restricted to using reserve funds for recidivism‑reduction and economic‑opportunity activities targeted at system‑impacted people, and must file an annual report to the Governor describing activities and measurable outcomes — introducing a public accountability mechanism for the fund.
Wage handling, mandatory deductions, and net‑wage distribution
This section governs compensation logistics. It ties inmate pay to California minimum‑wage law, requires the 40% prepayment into the reserve, and directs CDCR to withhold taxes and restitution-related deductions (5%–20% of gross wages). After those withholdings, it prescribes that 20% of net wages go to a worker’s trust account and 20% to a passbook savings account releasable on parole, with remaining net wages handled under departmental rules. The structure creates multiple concurrent claims on limited inmate income and sets specific priorities for distribution.
Operations, training, and PIECP compliance
CDCR must provide access to equipment, materials, and space but is not required to fund them; certified cooperatives must meet labor, safety, and governance standards and receive CDCR assistance to meet PIECP requirements. The statute also mandates financial‑literacy and teamwork training and states that cooperative work counts toward assigned prison work obligations, which integrates the program into existing classification and labor systems but raises questions about resource allocation and oversight.
Exemptions, unemployment ineligibility, and conflict-of-interest prohibition
The bill exempts inmate cooperatives from statutory restrictions on selling inmate‑produced goods when operating as a certified cooperative, disqualifies program participants from claiming unemployment benefits on release based on their participation, and forbids any CDCR employee from serving in governance roles or holding direct or indirect financial interests in a certified cooperative — measures designed to expand market access, limit post‑release benefit claims tied to program work, and reduce institutional conflicts of interest.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Incarcerated applicants who gain structured opportunities to develop governance, technical, and green‑economy skills and accumulate savings earmarked for postrelease use and enterprises.
- Cooperative community partners and nonprofit developers who can scale cooperative development services and receive a clearer pathway to support prison‑based enterprises, including opportunities to access and deploy Green Reserve funds.
- System‑impacted individuals and survivors of crime designated as beneficiaries of the Green Cooperative Reentry Reserve, who may receive grants, low‑interest loans, or technical assistance to start or expand sustainable cooperative projects.
Who Bears the Cost
- California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation: added administrative duties (plan review, certification oversight, contracting, equipment provisioning) with no dedicated funding in the text — an implementation and staffing cost risk.
- Cooperative community partners: responsibility for withholding 40% of gross wages, ongoing compliance support, and potential fiduciary or reputational exposure tied to managing participants’ funds and operations inside secure facilities.
- Financial institution steward and cooperative institution: reporting, fiduciary duties, programmatic oversight of how reserve funds are deployed, and measurable‑outcome reporting to the Governor — all carrying administrative and legal obligations that require capacity and due diligence.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill’s central tension is between pooling a large share of inmate wages into a centralized reentry fund to finance collective, sustainable cooperative opportunities for system‑impacted people, and preserving individual wage autonomy and immediate financial support for incarcerated workers and their families — a trade‑off between long‑term communal investment and short‑term individual economic agency.
Two design choices in AB 746 create implementation and policy frictions. First, the mandatory 40% gross‑wage deduction funnels a large share of scarce income into an externally managed reserve intended for long‑term reentry supports.
That creates a trade‑off between financing pooled reentry capital and preserving immediate, usable income for incarcerated workers — a tension with implications for incentives, family support, and prisoner morale. The statute partially addresses distribution priorities (taxes, restitution, trust, and savings allocations) but leaves open many operational questions: how the reserve interacts with victim restitution claims, how trust and passbook accounts are administered and protected, and how disputes over withheld wages will be resolved.
Second, the bill layers new governance and compliance duties on CDCR, cooperative partners, and financial stewards without dedicated funding or explicit enforcement resources. Requiring CDCR to provide equipment and assist with PIECP compliance while not obligating it to fund equipment shifts startup costs to partners and potentially limits program scale.
The mandate that the financial steward use funds only for certain recidivism‑reduction activities and report annually introduces public accountability, but the statute is vague about performance metrics, recapture remedies for misuse, and long‑term oversight — all points that will determine whether the reserve achieves stated outcomes or is administratively burdensome.
Finally, the statute’s carveout that exempts certified cooperatives from general restrictions on selling inmate‑produced goods, combined with making participants ineligible for unemployment benefits, raises legal and ethical questions about labor protections, market competition, and postrelease safety nets. The interaction with federal PIECP rules and California labor law (including criminal penalties embedded in the Cooperative Corporation Law for certain violations) adds legal complexity that will require careful regulatory design and close interagency coordination.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.