AB 779 authorizes counties to run a voluntary, three-year pilot that pairs county child welfare social workers with a domestic violence consultant drawn from a certified victim service organization. The consultant role is defined by Evidence Code reference and is intended to strengthen social workers’ knowledge of domestic violence dynamics and to improve engagement and intervention strategies for parent survivors and their children.
The law requires participating counties to evaluate the pilot and report specific data to the Legislature by October 31, 2031, and the entire section automatically repeals on January 1, 2032. For county leaders, DV providers, and child welfare professionals, the bill sets up a time-limited test of co-located DV expertise without creating a permanent statewide program or providing direct state funding in the text of the statute.
At a Glance
What It Does
The statute permits (but does not compel) counties to run a three-year pilot in which a qualified domestic violence counselor from a victim service organization works with child welfare social workers to provide education, case-specific guidance on safety planning and protective measures, resource navigation, and coordination with law enforcement. Participating counties must produce a comprehensive evaluation and send a report to the Legislature by October 31, 2031.
Who It Affects
County child welfare agencies and their social workers, domestic violence victim service organizations that supply consultants, parent survivors and their children who are involved in child welfare assessments, and local law enforcement that responds to DV reports. The State Department of Social Services is listed as a consultation partner for the evaluation design.
Why It Matters
By formally embedding DV expertise in child welfare cases, the pilot could change how investigators assess risk, design safety plans, and make removal decisions. The mandated data collection could provide the empirical basis for future statewide policy, but the pilot’s voluntary nature and sunset limit guarantees of uniform rollout or continued funding.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 779 creates a voluntary, county-level three-year pilot that pairs child welfare social workers with a domestic violence consultant supplied by a domestic violence victim service organization. The consultant must qualify as a domestic violence counselor under Evidence Code section 1037.1.
The statute frames the consultant’s role primarily as an advisory and educational resource to increase social workers’ understanding of domestic violence dynamics and to inform tailored engagement with parent survivors and their children.
The bill lists core activities the consultant must perform: educating social workers about domestic violence-related dynamics and available services; discussing complicating factors such as children witnessing violence, homelessness, and substance or alcohol use; advising on protective measures including safety plans and restraining orders and when removal might be appropriate; helping families access resources; and navigating law enforcement responses. The consultant may, at the county’s discretion, also provide direct assistance to survivors—such as facilitating shelter access or referring children to therapy—although the statute leaves the scope of direct services flexible.Participating counties must conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the pilot and report findings to the Legislature by October 31, 2031.
The law requires counties to involve the State Department of Social Services and stakeholders, including people with lived experience, in designing and implementing the evaluation. The report must include specified data elements—records of safety-plan or restraining-order use and outcomes, outcomes for recommended resource access, and law enforcement response data—and must be submitted in compliance with Government Code section 9795.
AB 779 is explicitly time-limited: the authorizing section sunsets on January 1, 2032.
The Five Things You Need to Know
AB 779 authorizes a voluntary, three-year county pilot in which a domestic violence consultant partners with child welfare social workers.
The consultant must meet the definition of a qualified domestic violence counselor in Evidence Code section 1037.1.
Consultant duties specified in statute include education on DV dynamics and services; addressing complicating factors (e.g.
children witnessing violence, homelessness, substance use); advising on protective measures and potential child removal; resource navigation; and law enforcement coordination.
Participating counties must produce a comprehensive evaluation and deliver a report to the Legislature by October 31, 2031, including specified data on protective measures used, resource referrals and outcomes, and law enforcement responses.
The pilot authority sunsets and is repealed as of January 1, 2032.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Authorization and purpose of the pilot
This provision gives counties the choice to establish a three-year pilot that pairs child welfare social workers with a domestic violence consultant from a victim service organization. It sets the pilot’s purpose: to improve social workers’ knowledge of domestic violence and their ability to apply that knowledge in cases involving parent survivors and children. Practically, this means counties decide whether to start a pilot and how to structure day‑to‑day collaboration between social workers and the consultant.
Minimum core duties for the domestic violence consultant
This section enumerates the consultant’s minimum responsibilities: educating staff about DV dynamics and services; discussing complicating factors such as witnessing violence, homelessness, and substance use; advising on safety plans, restraining orders, and child removal decisions; recommending resources; and helping navigate law enforcement responses. These are mandatory baseline tasks a consultant must perform if the county implements the pilot, so counties can expect these activities to be central to any partnership agreements and job descriptions.
Permissive direct support to survivors
The statute explicitly allows—without requiring—the consultant to provide direct assistance to parent survivors, including helping them access shelter, referring children to therapy, and supplying information on resources. Because the provision is permissive, counties and DV providers must negotiate whether consultants will take on casework functions or remain strictly advisory, and how to handle confidentiality, mandatory reporting, and funding for direct services.
Evaluation and legislative reporting requirements
Participating counties must conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the pilot and report to the Legislature by October 31, 2031. The statute requires counties to seek input from the State Department of Social Services and stakeholders—including people with lived experience—when designing and implementing the evaluation. The law identifies specific data elements the report must include (use and outcomes of protective measures, outcomes for recommended resource access, and law enforcement responses) and mandates compliance with Government Code section 9795 for report submission, which carries administrative and data-handling implications for counties.
Sunset / repeal
The authorizing statute is temporary: it remains in effect only until January 1, 2032, when it is automatically repealed. The limited duration focuses attention on the pilot’s evaluation timeline but also means any continuation or statewide rollout would require further legislation based on the pilot results.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Parent survivors engaged in child welfare cases — They gain access to DV-specific expertise that can produce safer, trauma-informed engagement strategies, more informed safety plans, and referrals to shelters and therapeutic services.
- Children in households affected by domestic violence — They may benefit from better-targeted safety measures and referrals (for example, therapy) and from social workers who can distinguish between abuse dynamics and safe caregiving alternatives.
- County social workers and supervisors — They receive on-demand technical assistance and continuing education about domestic violence dynamics, which can sharpen risk assessments and case planning.
- Domestic violence victim service organizations — They obtain a formalized role in child welfare practice that can strengthen cross-sector relationships and highlight service gaps, potentially positioning them for future funding or expanded contracts.
- Policymakers and researchers — The mandated evaluation and required data elements create a structured evidence base that can inform whether and how to expand DV-informed practices across the state.
Who Bears the Cost
- County child welfare agencies — Counties must cover the costs of hiring or contracting with consultants, integrate the role into workflows, and conduct the mandated evaluation, which creates budget, staffing, and administrative burdens.
- Domestic violence service providers — Providers supplying consultants may incur staffing and operational strain if their staff take on advisory or direct-support roles without additional resources, and they may face liability and confidentiality tensions.
- Local law enforcement and courts — The statute requires documenting and analyzing law enforcement responses to DV reports, which may increase coordination demands and data-sharing expectations with child welfare.
- State Department of Social Services — The department is asked to provide input on evaluations and may face informal pressure to guide implementation without receiving dedicated resources, stretching its advisory capacity.
- Families and survivors — While benefits are anticipated, some families may experience inconsistent access across counties depending on local capacity, and survivors could face privacy trade-offs if data collection is not carefully managed.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing enhanced domestic-violence expertise in child welfare decisions—intended to reduce misinformed removals and improve survivor safety—against the need to preserve child-protection authority, protect confidentiality, and ensure rigorous, comparable evaluation: adding external DV expertise can improve decisions, but without funding, clear role definitions, and standardized metrics, it risks uneven implementation that either overpromises benefits or masks harms.
AB 779 leaves several practical and policy questions open that will shape whether the pilot produces usable lessons. The statute requires counties to run evaluations and report specific data, but it does not appropriate funds or specify who pays for consultants, shelter access, or evaluation costs.
That omission creates significant implementation risk: counties with limited budgets may offer a lighter-touch pilot, skewing comparative outcomes and limiting generalizability. Similarly, the permissive language on direct support allows flexibility but also produces variation in service models that complicates cross-county analysis.
Role clarity and confidentiality create additional trade-offs. The domestic violence consultant is drawn from victim service organizations and may provide direct survivor support; that proximity to clients raises questions about client confidentiality, mandatory reporting obligations, and whether consultants act as independent advocates or as extensions of the county case team.
The statutory requirement to collect data on protective measures and law enforcement responses is useful, but data quality and comparability will depend on how counties operationalize those categories and how they reconcile privacy rules under Government Code section 9795 with the needs of researchers and policymakers. Finally, the pilot’s short, three-year window plus a January 1, 2032 sunset constrains the ability to observe long-term outcomes for families and may encourage an emphasis on process metrics rather than sustained child and family wellbeing measures.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.