AB 989 revises California’s state holiday statute to explicitly identify the fourth Friday in September as “Native American Day,” add elective leave options for certain cultural observances, and adjust how some holidays apply across employee categories. The bill keeps the core holiday list but layers new mechanics for how and when selected observances are taken or paid.
The change matters for state human resources, payroll, and labor negotiators: it creates a named, recurring holiday on the state calendar, authorizes an employee election to use eight hours of leave for several cultural observances (including a lunar-date definition for Lunar New Year), and inserts procedural conditions that affect when March 31 becomes effective for certain employee groups. Those mechanics intersect with collective bargaining and the Department of Human Resources’ administrative decisions, which is where most implementation risk and fiscal effect will arise.
At a Glance
What It Does
Designates the fourth Friday in September as Native American Day and amends holiday entitlements for state workers; permits eligible employees to elect to use eight hours of vacation, annual leave, or comp time for Lunar New Year, April 24 (Genocide Remembrance Day), June 19 (Juneteenth), and Native American Day. It also preserves weekend substitution rules and pay/compensating-time entitlements for those required to work on holidays.
Who It Affects
California state employees (including special rules that touch Unit 5 and excluded/non–civil-service executive-branch employees), state HR and payroll offices, and exclusive bargaining representatives involved in memoranda of understanding.
Why It Matters
Naming an additional cultural holiday and authorizing elective leave formalizes workplace recognition of several observances and creates new scheduling, pay, and bargaining consequences for agencies. The bill also embeds conditional mechanics — notably for March 31 — that tie implementation to administrative agreement and statutory changes, producing uneven application unless agencies and unions act.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
AB 989 keeps the familiar structure of California’s state holiday statute but rewrites parts of it to make certain cultural observances explicit and to create a limited elective-leave pathway for employees. Practically this means one weekday every year will be labeled “Native American Day” (the fourth Friday in September) on the state calendar, and employees may use eight hours of vacation, annual leave, or compensating time for a short list of observances that includes Lunar New Year, Genocide Remembrance Day (April 24), Juneteenth (June 19), and Native American Day.
The bill preserves and clarifies operational rules employers use daily: if a listed holiday falls on Sunday, the following Monday becomes the day observed; if November 11 (Veterans Day) lands on a Saturday, the statute treats the preceding Friday as the holiday. Employees required to work on a holiday keep their existing entitlement to extra pay or compensating time off, but the statute defers the exact pay/comp time calculation to the employee’s classification-specific assigned workweek group.
Part‑time staff follow Department of Human Resources rules for holiday crediting.There is a separate set of provisions addressing employees who are excluded from the Ralph C. Dills Act or who are nonelected, non–civil-service executive‑branch employees.
Those employees receive an explicit list of paid holidays and a specific accrual rule: when a holiday (other than a personal holiday) falls on a Saturday, the employee accrues exactly eight hours of personal holiday credit that must be used within the same fiscal year. The statute also requires that memoranda of understanding that conflict with the statute prevail, except when a conflict would require new expenditures—those provisions only take effect if the Legislature approves funding in the annual Budget Act.Finally, the bill conditions a March 31 holiday’s activation on administrative steps: the Department of Human Resources must notify the Legislature that all exclusive representatives agreed to the language and must authorize applying the holiday to excluded employees; necessary statutory amendments also must be made.
That creates a time-limited administrative gate rather than immediate, across‑the‑board implementation for that particular date.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill designates the fourth Friday in September, explicitly, as “Native American Day” in the state holiday statute.
If a listed holiday falls on Sunday the following Monday is observed; if November 11 falls on a Saturday the preceding Friday is observed.
A memorandum of understanding that conflicts with the statute controls without further legislative action — except any MOU provision that requires new spending must be approved in the annual Budget Act before taking effect.
For Lunar New Year the statute ties the date to a lunar rule: employees may elect eight hours of leave for the date corresponding to the second new moon after the winter solstice—or the third if an intercalary month intervenes.
The March 31 holiday becomes effective for some employee groups only after the Department of Human Resources confirms unanimous agreement among exclusive representatives, authorizes application to excluded employees, and related statutes are amended.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Unit 5 applicability carve‑out
This short clause makes the rest of the section explicitly apply to state employees in State Bargaining Unit 5 notwithstanding Section 19853. Operationally, that ensures the holiday language reaches Unit 5 employees unless a different rule is written into a bargaining agreement. For labor negotiators, the clause signals a specific targeting of a bargaining unit rather than a general administrative action.
Core holiday list, weekend substitution, and work‑on‑holiday pay
Subdivision (b) enumerates the holidays covered, names Native American Day (fourth Friday in September), and sets weekday substitution rules when holidays fall on weekends. It also preserves the rule that employees required to work on holidays are entitled to extra compensation or compensating time off, but defers the mechanics for calculating that entitlement to the employee’s classification-assigned workweek group. HR and payroll systems must therefore keep classification‑level workweek mappings current to calculate holiday pay correctly.
Collective bargaining precedence and budget condition
This provision gives priority to memoranda of understanding negotiated under Section 3517.5 when they conflict with the statute, preventing the statute from overriding bargained provisions. However, if an MOU requires additional funds, those provisions won’t take effect unless the Legislature approves the spending in the annual Budget Act. That creates a two‑track treatment: administrative implementation of bargained terms is presumptively allowed, but new fiscal commitments must pass through the Budget Act.
Holidays and accrual rules for excluded and non‑civil‑service executive employees
Subdivision (d) lists paid holidays specifically for employees excluded from certain civil‑service definitions and for nonelected executive‑branch staff who are not civil‑service members, and it adds precise accrual rules. Notably, when a holiday other than a personal holiday falls on Saturday those employees automatically accrue eight hours of personal holiday credit that must be used within the same fiscal year. The Department of Human Resources also governs holiday entitlements for employees on less than full‑time schedules, so agencies must consult DHR rules when computing pro rata credits.
Elective eight‑hour leave for select cultural observances
This clause allows eligible employees to elect, subject to departmental operational needs and collective bargaining, to use eight hours of vacation, annual leave, or compensating time off for Lunar New Year, April 24 (Genocide Remembrance Day), June 19 (Juneteenth), and Native American Day. The Lunar New Year date is defined by an astronomical rule tied to new moons, which imposes an annual calendaring task on HR offices and may require advance scheduling accommodations in unit‑level staffing plans.
Conditional activation of March 31 holiday
Subdivision (f) makes the application of the March 31 holiday contingent on procedural steps: DHR must notify the Legislature that exclusive representatives agreed to the language, authorize the holiday’s application to excluded employees, and necessary statutes must be amended. This is an implementation gate rather than an immediate statutory change — it delays universal effect until administrative and statutory preconditions are satisfied.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State employees who observe Native American Day, Lunar New Year, Juneteenth, or Genocide Remembrance Day — the statute creates either a named holiday or an explicit elective‑leave pathway to observe those dates with paid time.
- Excluded and nonelected executive‑branch employees — subdivision (d) lists paid holidays and a clear accrual mechanism for holidays falling on Saturdays, giving these workers explicit statutory entitlements where prior practice may have been less clear.
- Labor unions and exclusive representatives — the bill preserves the force of negotiated MOUs when they conflict with statute, giving unions leverage to maintain or improve negotiated holiday terms, subject to budget constraints.
- Human resources and payroll professionals who gain statutory clarity — the bill codifies substitution, accrual, and leave‑use rules they must apply, reducing ambiguity about how certain observances are treated.
Who Bears the Cost
- State agencies and departments — adding a named holiday and authorizing elective leave increases scheduling complexity and can raise overtime or compensatory‑time costs, particularly for 24/7 operations.
- The Department of Human Resources — DHR must manage the administrative tasks the bill requires (date calculation for Lunar New Year, authorizations for March 31, rules for part‑time staff), potentially without dedicated funding.
- California taxpayers/state budget — if MOUs implement expanded paid leave or holidays that require new spending, the Legislature must appropriate funds in the Budget Act, creating a potential fiscal impact.
- Payroll and HR systems vendors and administrators — systems must be updated to track classification workweek groups for holiday pay, enforce the eight‑hour accrual rule for Saturday holidays, and accommodate a lunar‑date holiday election.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill attempts to reconcile two legitimate goals—recognizing and enabling observance of cultural holidays for state employees, and maintaining manageable fiscal and operational responsibilities for state employers—but it does so by shifting many hard decisions into administrative processes and bargaining. That trade‑off privileges symbolic recognition while creating potential inequities across employee classes and uncertainty about who ultimately bears the cost.
The bill sits at the intersection of cultural recognition and workplace administration, and that creates multiple implementation challenges. First, naming an additional holiday and authorizing elective leave for several observances increases scheduling and payroll complexity: agencies with continuous operations will need to decide whether to staff holidays, pay overtime, or permit compensating time, and those choices have immediate fiscal consequences.
The statute’s deference to classification‑level workweek groups for calculating holiday pay pushes the concrete math into HR/compensation rules rather than the statute, which reduces legislative precision but raises administrative burdens.
Second, the interplay between MOUs and the Budget Act creates uneven outcomes. Giving MOUs supremacy unless they create new expenses preserves bargaining flexibility, but requiring legislative budget approval for any MOU‑driven spending means that employees covered by the same MOU could experience delayed or partial implementation depending on when the Legislature acts.
That conditionality is amplified by subdivision (f)’s gatekeeping for March 31, which makes application to excluded employees contingent on DHR action and statutory amendments — a recipe for patchwork application across employee classes.
Finally, the Lunar New Year rule (second new moon after the winter solstice, or third if an intercalary month intervenes) is precise but operationally awkward: HR offices must convert an astronomical rule into a calendar date each year and police elective leave requests against that calculation. The elective‑use language is subject to departmental operational needs and collective bargaining, so employees’ practical ability to observe these dates may vary widely by agency and bargaining unit, undercutting some of the bill’s symbolic recognition with uneven access in practice.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.