ACR 103 is a ceremonial concurrent resolution that designates July 14–18, 2025 as "California Western Monarch Protection Week." The text assembles background findings about the western monarch’s long-distance migration, population declines, drivers of harm (habitat loss, climate change, and pesticides), and existing overwintering sites in California.
The resolution does not create new regulatory obligations or funding; it instead intends to raise public awareness, encourage community conservation activities, and signal legislative attention to the species amid federal-level recovery actions. For practitioners, the measure is a policy signal that may be used by NGOs, parks, and tourism organizations in outreach and grant narratives, but it imposes no compliance duties on private actors or state agencies.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill proclaims a one-week observance — July 14–18, 2025 — named California Western Monarch Protection Week and records findings about monarch biology, population trends, threats, and notable overwintering sites. It also directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Who It Affects
The resolution primarily affects stakeholders engaged in monarch conservation, coastal park managers, tourism promoters around overwintering groves, environmental NGOs, and educators who may use the observance for outreach. It places no legal or fiscal obligations on regulated entities.
Why It Matters
Although ceremonial, the resolution aggregates scientific and economic claims about monarch decline and tourism value and references federal recovery activity, creating a documented legislative posture that groups can cite in advocacy, fundraising, and local outreach campaigns.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR 103 is a short, nonbinding declaration. It collects a series of 'whereas' paragraphs that summarize the western monarch’s migratory behavior, the timing and location of overwintering clusters on California’s central coast, the steep population decline recorded over the past 25 years, and the main threats identified by scientists and agencies.
The text also notes that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is proposing protections and identifying critical habitat in California.
The operative language consists of two brief resolves: first, to proclaim the week of July 14–18, 2025 as California Western Monarch Protection Week; and second, to instruct the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. There are no directives to state agencies, no funding authorizations, and no changes to permitting, land use, or pesticide regulation.Because the resolution is ceremonial, its practical effect is reputational and programmatic rather than regulatory.
Conservation groups, local governments, interpretive centers, and tourism offices can lean on the proclamation to organize events, public education, and fundraising. Conversely, the text does not create a legal basis to require habitat protection or to compel agency action; it functions instead as a documented expression of legislative concern that stakeholders may reference in grant applications, partnership agreements, and advocacy letters.The resolution also lists specific overwintering locations by way of examples — Pacific Grove Monarch Sanctuary, Natural Bridges State Beach, Goleta Monarch Butterfly Grove, and Point Mugu State Park — which both highlights geographic focal points for outreach and signals where promotional or conservation activity is most likely to be concentrated during the observance week.
The Five Things You Need to Know
ACR 103 is a concurrent resolution that proclaims July 14–18, 2025 as California Western Monarch Protection Week; it is ceremonial and does not create enforceable law.
The text documents an 81% decline in peak-season western monarch counts over the past 25 years, citing drop from 1,235,490 to 233,394 monarchs.
The resolution cites habitat loss, climate change, and herbicide/insecticide use as primary threats and references the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2024 proposal and critical-habitat mapping (over 4,300 acres identified).
It names specific California overwintering sites — Pacific Grove, Natural Bridges, Goleta, and Point Mugu — focusing attention and local outreach on those groves.
The only administrative action is a transmittal instruction: the Chief Clerk of the Assembly must send copies of the resolution to the author for distribution.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Statement of facts supporting the proclamation
This opening block compiles scientific and contextual findings: monarch migratory behavior, overwintering ecology, timing of breeding migration, population trend data, and identified threats such as habitat loss and pesticides. Practically, these clauses do the work of justifying the observance and provide quotable language for stakeholders and media; they also anchor the resolution to the federal recovery conversation by citing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed protections and acreage identified for critical habitat.
Proclamation of California Western Monarch Protection Week
The core operative sentence proclaims July 14–18, 2025 as the designated week. Because the vehicle is a concurrent resolution rather than statute, this section conveys legislative sentiment but carries no regulatory force, funding, or new statutory duties for state agencies, local governments, or private parties.
Administrative transmittal instruction
This short clause requires the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. It’s a purely clerical step: the clause sets no distribution targets, reporting duties, or follow-up requirements, but it does formalize the resolution’s availability for the author to share with stakeholders and partners.
Document chaptering and public record
The bill text includes standard filing language and chapter identification (Chapter 166). That creates a formal legislative record that organizations can cite when referencing the state’s position on monarch conservation. The record status may help proponents who want to point to a named, chaptered legislative action in outreach and grant materials.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Conservation NGOs — The proclamation offers a legislative citation they can use in outreach, fundraising, and to coordinate volunteer events focused on milkweed planting and habitat stewardship.
- Coastal tourism offices and local businesses near overwintering groves — The resolution highlights the tourism value of monarch migration and gives local promoters an official hook for mid-summer campaigns and slow-season marketing.
- State and local interpretive centers and parks — Named sites (e.g., Pacific Grove) receive renewed visibility that can drive visitation, volunteer recruitment, and partnerships.
- Environmental educators and school programs — The observance week supplies a dated occasion for curriculum modules, citizen science drives, and community events tied to monarch biology and conservation.
Who Bears the Cost
- Legislative staff and the author’s office — Minimal clerical and distribution work to publish and circulate the resolution and to coordinate any events or partner communications.
- Local governments and park managers who choose to participate — If municipalities or parks organize events tied to the week, they will absorb staffing, event, or outreach costs without new state funding.
- Nonprofits that respond to increased public interest — While benefiting from the proclamation, organizations may face demand for programs, materials, or stewardship opportunities that require resources and coordination.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between symbolic recognition and practical impact: the resolution raises awareness and provides a useful citation for advocates, but it stops short of funding, regulatory change, or enforceable protections — leaving stakeholders to convert visibility into concrete conservation outcomes with their own limited resources.
The resolution balances visibility against substantive effect: it creates a legislative marker without altering statutes, budgets, or agency duties. That makes it useful as a signaling device but weak as a lever for direct conservation outcomes.
Groups seeking regulatory change, habitat protection, or pesticide restrictions will find no enforcement authority in this text; they must still pursue statutory or administrative pathways.
Timing and optics create additional practical questions. The chosen week (mid-July) corresponds with the monarch breeding/migration season inland rather than the overwintering congregations seen on the central coast in late fall and winter.
That mismatch may help engage educators and citizen scientists during summer field season, but it could also reduce the visibility of iconic overwintering clusters that draw tourism during cooler months. Finally, because the resolution names specific sites, it can concentrate attention and visitation on a handful of groves — a benefit for fundraising and outreach, but a potential management challenge if visitation spikes without accompanying capacity or stewardship funding.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.