Assembly Concurrent Resolution 25 declares February 2025 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month in California and urges education about teen dating violence across the state. The text collects findings on prevalence and forms of abuse—including digital harms—and asks local partners to run events and an online campaign.
ACR25 is a symbolic, nonbinding resolution: it does not authorize spending, create new regulatory duties, or change substantive law. Its practical effects are limited to visibility, encouragement of local programming, and a named San Francisco partnership that will host an event and online awareness activities.
At a Glance
What It Does
The resolution proclaims February 2025 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month and encourages education about the signs and harms of teen dating violence. It names two San Francisco nonprofits and the San Francisco Youth Commission to organize a local event and online campaign.
Who It Affects
Adolescents across California (as the intended beneficiaries), schools and youth-serving organizations that may be asked or choose to run awareness activities, and the two named nonprofits plus the San Francisco Youth Commission tasked with coordinating local outreach. State agencies receive no new mandates.
Why It Matters
This measure elevates teen dating violence in public conversation and directs visibility toward both traditional and technology-facilitated abuse, but it stops short of creating funding, reporting requirements, or legal remedies—so its significance will depend on what local actors do with the recognition.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR25 is a short, declarative resolution that collects a set of findings about the scope and harms of teen dating violence—citing prevalence, mental health and substance-use consequences, the risk of future revictimization, and the reality of digital forms of abuse such as cyberstalking and nonconsensual image sharing. The core operative language is limited: the Assembly and Senate ‘‘proclaim’’ February 2025 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month and encourage the education of young people about the signs of abusive relationships.
The text also identifies two named advocacy organizations—Black Women Revolt Against Domestic Violence and the Asian Women’s Shelter—and instructs them to partner with the San Francisco Youth Commission to host a Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month event and run an online awareness campaign. Separately, it records that the San Francisco Youth Commission will recognize the month in the city and county of San Francisco.Because ACR25 is a concurrent resolution, it creates no binding duties, appropriations, or regulatory changes.
The only administrative step contained in the text is a direction for the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. Practically speaking, the resolution's impact will be determined by whether local governments, school districts, and nonprofits use the designation as a launchpad for events, curricula, or outreach—and whether they can do so without additional funding.The resolution is narrow in time and scope: it designates a single month (February 2025) and spotlights teen dating violence as an education and awareness issue rather than creating a statewide prevention program, data collection requirement, or new services.
That means stakeholders looking for statutory change—funding, mandatory school curricula, or expanded legal protections—will not find them here; they would need separate legislative or budgetary action.
The Five Things You Need to Know
ACR25 proclaims February 2025 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month for the State of California.
The resolution cites a prevalence claim—"one in three adolescents"—and explicitly mentions physical, sexual, psychological, stalking, and technology-facilitated forms of dating abuse.
It directs Black Women Revolt Against Domestic Violence and the Asian Women’s Shelter to partner with the San Francisco Youth Commission to host a month-long event and an online awareness campaign.
The San Francisco Youth Commission is named to recognize the month locally in the city and county of San Francisco; the measure does not require other cities or counties to take similar action.
ACR25 is a nonbinding concurrent resolution that contains no appropriation, no new regulatory obligations, and only asks the Chief Clerk to transmit copies to the author for distribution.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings on prevalence and harms of teen dating violence
The preamble compiles the resolution's factual predicates: prevalence, health and behavioral consequences, risk of adult revictimization, and the inclusion of digital and technology-facilitated abuse. Those findings function as framing devices to justify the proclamation, but they impose no legal standards or evidentiary burdens on agencies, schools, or courts. Practically, these clauses signal the Legislature’s priorities and can be cited by advocates when seeking funding or policy changes later.
Proclamation of Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month
This single operative line formally proclaims February 2025 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month and urges the education of young people about dating violence. The language is hortatory: it encourages action rather than commanding it. Because it is a concurrent resolution, the clause has no force to create statutory duties, allocate funds, or require curriculum changes.
Named organizations and local awareness campaign in San Francisco
The resolution specifically appoints Black Women Revolt Against Domestic Violence and the Asian Women’s Shelter to partner with the San Francisco Youth Commission to host an event and an online campaign. Naming organizations in the text directs public attention and can increase legitimacy and visibility for the partners but also concentrates responsibility geographically—this is a San Francisco-centered effort rather than a statewide implementation plan.
Transmission for distribution
The final clause instructs the Assembly Chief Clerk to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for distribution. This is an administrative step: it ensures the text reaches stakeholders and press outlets but does not create reporting, oversight, or implementation requirements.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Adolescents and survivors of teen dating violence — the proclamation increases public visibility and may improve access to information and referrals if local groups use the month to amplify prevention and support resources.
- Named advocacy organizations (Black Women Revolt Against Domestic Violence; Asian Women’s Shelter) — they receive a state-level spotlight and an explicit role in organizing awareness activities, which can translate into partnerships, volunteers, or private donations.
- San Francisco Youth Commission — gains an official platform to lead local outreach and can leverage the recognition to coordinate schools, nonprofits, and city services.
- Schools and youth-serving nonprofits willing to run voluntary programming — the resolution provides political cover to host awareness events or integrate materials into existing health education without new statutory authorization.
Who Bears the Cost
- The named nonprofits and the San Francisco Youth Commission — responsibility for organizing events and an online campaign typically requires staff time and operating resources, none of which the resolution funds.
- Local school districts and educators who choose to act on the encouragement — they may need to reallocate class time, staff resources, or materials to produce effective programming without earmarked state support.
- Small community organizations across California that try to mount local activities — they may face unequal capacity to respond, potentially entrenching disparities between well-resourced areas and communities with fewer services.
- Local government agencies coordinating outreach — city or county staffs that assist with events or public information will absorb coordination costs absent new appropriations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is visibility versus capacity: the resolution raises awareness about a real and serious problem but provides no funding, enforcement, or statewide implementation plan—so it can both validate advocacy and create expectations the state does not commit to meet.
ACR25 is an example of symbolic policymaking: it elevates an issue and directs public attention without creating funding streams, reporting obligations, or enforcement mechanisms. That creates two practical challenges.
First, naming specific organizations and a single local commission (San Francisco) concentrates visibility and responsibility in one city; stakeholders elsewhere may expect similar state support but the resolution provides no mechanism to scale the effort statewide. Second, the resolution highlights technology-facilitated abuse and a range of harms but does not create legal or technical tools to address those problems (no new mandates for schools, no changes to criminal statutes, and no funding for counseling or hotlines), so awareness may not translate into improved services or measurable prevention.
Implementation will therefore depend on voluntary uptake by local governments, schools, and nonprofits—and their capacity to act. That raises equity concerns: better-resourced communities can convert a proclamation into substantive programs, while under-resourced areas may only receive the symbolic recognition.
Finally, naming organizations in the text can speed outreach but may also be perceived as favoritism or limit the field of partners if other groups expect inclusion; the resolution includes no selection criteria or process for expanding partnerships.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.