Assembly Concurrent Resolution ACR 46 recognizes the life and public service of United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and proclaims March 15, 2025, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day in California. The text recites her biographical background, major legal achievements and opinions, and frames the date as a day of remembrance and education.
This measure is declaratory and procedural: it asks the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution for distribution and carries no appropriation, regulatory mandate, or enforcement mechanism. Its practical effect is symbolic—providing a state-level endorsement that educators, civic groups, and cultural institutions can reference when planning programming or commemorations during Women’s History Month.
At a Glance
What It Does
The concurrent resolution formally honors Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and designates March 15, 2025, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day, described as a day of remembrance and education. It contains extensive WHEREAS clauses recounting her career and jurisprudence and directs the Assembly Chief Clerk to distribute copies of the text.
Who It Affects
Primary audiences are schools, museums, advocacy groups, bar associations, and civic organizations that run commemorative or educational programming; state agencies and local governments are not required to act. The Legislature records a fiscal committee notation of 'NO,' indicating no identified fiscal impact in the resolution itself.
Why It Matters
The resolution codifies a statewide expression of esteem that can be used as an authoritative reference when organizing programming or educational materials about gender equality and civil rights. While symbolic, it can shape public commemoration and serve as a resource for educators and organizations seeking a verified state-level statement on Justice Ginsburg’s legacy.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR 46 is a ceremonial, non-binding instrument that assembles a narrative of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s life, legal career, and major opinions, and uses that narrative to justify a one-day designation in California. The bulk of the text is a series of WHEREAS clauses: birthplace and education, early professional obstacles tied to gender and religion, her work founding the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, and specific Supreme Court cases and dissents the resolution cites as transformative for gender equality, voting rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and disability law.
The operative language is brief. The resolution proclaims March 15, 2025, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day and calls it a day of remembrance and education so that Californians "always honor and remember" her contributions.
It does not create a recurring legal holiday, alter state codes, allocate funds, or impose duties on state agencies or local governments. It also directs the Assembly Chief Clerk to transmit copies of the resolution for distribution.Because the measure is a concurrent resolution rather than a statute, its effects are expressive rather than regulatory.
Schools and cultural organizations may rely on the resolution as an official state statement when building lesson plans or public programs, but the resolution does not require or fund such activities. The Legislative Counsel’s digest and the filing notation make clear the measure did not trigger a fiscal committee review, which aligns with the text’s lack of spending or regulatory provisions.Practically, the resolution provides a ready-made summary of Justice Ginsburg’s record that third parties—educators, bar groups, museums—can quote or reproduce.
The document’s specificity in naming cases and moments in her life increases its utility as a reference, but the absence of implementation guidance or funding leaves follow-through to private, local, or nonprofit actors if they choose to host events or classroom content tied to the day.
The Five Things You Need to Know
ACR 46 is a concurrent resolution that proclaims March 15, 2025, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day in California; it does not amend statute or create a legal holiday.
The text contains extensive WHEREAS clauses listing biographical facts, major cases, and areas of jurisprudence (gender equality, voting rights, LGBTQ+ rights, disability law) as the basis for the proclamation.
The resolution designates the day specifically as one of "remembrance and education," signaling an intent for commemorative programming but includes no funding, curriculum mandate, or agency obligations.
Legislative paperwork notes no fiscal committee referral and no appropriation; the only operational instruction is for the Assembly Chief Clerk to transmit copies of the resolution for distribution.
The proclamation is for a single calendar date (March 15, 2025); the text does not itself establish an annual observance or require future legislative action to repeat the designation.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Biographical and jurisprudential record
The preamble compiles citations to Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s education, career milestones, and landmark opinions and dissents. By enumerating specific cases—Reed v. Reed; U.S. v. Virginia; Olmstead; Ledbetter—the resolution creates a concise, citation-backed portrait that third parties can cite when explaining why the state chose to commemorate her. For program planners and educators, this section functions as an authoritative source list more than as legal language.
Proclamation of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day (single date)
This operative clause proclaims March 15, 2025, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day and frames it as a day of remembrance and education. Its mechanics are declaratory: it signals the Legislature’s view but does not create a regulatory duty, an entitlement, or a public holiday. The specificity to the 2025 date means the resolution itself does not create an ongoing annual observance.
Clerical transmission and distribution
The resolution instructs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for appropriate distribution. That is a routine administrative direction: it ensures the text can be disseminated to schools, organizations, and the public, but it imposes no further obligations on state agencies or local governments and includes no appropriation for dissemination activities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Culture across all five countries.
Explore Culture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- K-12 and higher-education educators — they gain an official, citation-rich state document to incorporate into lesson plans or Women’s History Month programming without needing to compile primary materials themselves.
- Civil rights and advocacy organizations (women’s rights, LGBTQ+ groups, disability advocates) — they can reference the state proclamation to support outreach, commemorate victories cited in the resolution, and raise public awareness.
- Cultural institutions and museums — the resolution provides authoritative language and case references that can be used in exhibits, panels, or public events celebrating judicial history.
- Bar associations and legal clinics — they receive a concise summary of Justice Ginsburg’s jurisprudence that can anchor CLE programming, moot courts, or public legal education.
Who Bears the Cost
- Assembly and legislative staff — minimal administrative time to prepare and transmit copies and to process the concurrent resolution; no new budget is provided.
- Local schools and nonprofit event organizers — any observance or programming they choose to run will require staff time and resources with no state funding attached.
- Organizations expecting formal state-sponsored activities — because the resolution is symbolic, entities anticipating statewide coordination or mandated observance may face disappointment or need to self-fund events.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is symbolic recognition versus substantive action: the Legislature affirms values through a formal proclamation and supplies an authoritative summary of Justice Ginsburg’s record, but it stops short of committing resources, curricular changes, or legal measures that would translate that affirmation into sustained public education or policy change.
The resolution trades concrete policy or funding commitments for symbolic recognition. That makes it useful as a public statement and a source document for programming, but it leaves open who, if anyone, will operationalize the educational aims the text endorses.
There is no appropriation, no curriculum requirement, and no mechanism assigning responsibility to an agency or department to produce teaching materials or co-sponsor events.
Another practical tension stems from the resolution’s temporal scope: it names a single calendar date in 2025 rather than establishing a recurring annual observance. Organizations seeking a durable commemorative day will need either follow-on legislation or local proclamations.
Finally, while the resolution’s detailed recounting of cases and milestones increases its utility as a reference, it also freezes a particular narrative of Ginsburg’s legacy; future discussions about how best to teach or contextualize that legacy — including critiques or broader historical framing — are outside the resolution’s remit.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.