Assembly Concurrent Resolution ACR47 designates a week in March 2025 as National Surveyors Week and collects a set of findings about the profession’s history, techniques, and public uses. The text notes national and in‑state counts of professional surveyors and catalogs modern survey types and technologies.
The resolution is purely declarative: it offers official recognition that professional groups and public agencies can use for outreach and advocacy but does not create new obligations, funding, or regulatory authority. The Legislature directed that copies of the resolution be transmitted for distribution.
At a Glance
What It Does
The measure compiles legislative 'whereas' findings describing surveying’s historical role and technical breadth, then issues an official recognition in the form of an Assembly Concurrent Resolution. It contains no authorizations of spending, no changes to law, and includes an administrative instruction to distribute copies of the resolution.
Who It Affects
Professional surveyors and state and local surveying associations can leverage the resolution for public engagement and recruitment; academic programs and equipment vendors can use it for promotional activities. State and local agencies engaged in land records, public works, and mapping may reference the recognition in outreach but face no new compliance duties.
Why It Matters
Although symbolic, the resolution gives industry groups an official legislative document to anchor events, workforce outreach, and public messaging. It also signals legislative goodwill toward surveying professions—useful for advocacy—but it does not change procurement, licensing, or funding frameworks.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
ACR47 is a short, ceremonial concurrent resolution that frames surveying as both a historical and modern technical profession. The body of the text walks through a series of factual findings—legal, technical, and historical—about the ways surveyors contribute to construction, transportation, mapping, and the delineation of land boundaries, and it lists types of surveys and techniques that illustrate the field’s scope.
Rather than directing state agencies to act or creating new statutory duties, the resolution uses those findings to justify a formal recognition. The operative language is a legislative declaration rather than an instruction to implement new programs: it communicates the Legislature’s appreciation and encourages commemoration, but it stops short of establishing any new authority, funding stream, or regulatory change.The bill includes routine administrative text common to legislative resolutions: it is filed with the Secretary of State and ends by directing the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the measure to the author for distribution.
It also carries the bill-drafter’s fiscal notation indicating the matter was not referred to the fiscal committee, reflecting the drafters’ view that the measure creates no fiscal impact.Practically, the resolution functions as a tool for professional associations, educators, and vendors who want an official imprimatur to stage events, promote workforce development, or draw public attention to surveying issues; it creates no legal entitlements or obligations for private parties or government entities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The resolution’s findings invoke notable historical figures who were surveyors, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Meriwether Lewis, William Clark, Daniel Boone, and Henry David Thoreau.
It enumerates multiple survey specialties—hydrographic, design, geodetic, cartographic—and highlights practices such as photogrammetry, satellite remote sensing, and automated positioning and plotting.
The text explicitly describes surveying as an interdisciplinary practice that draws on engineering, physics, mathematics, law, and history to establish positions and boundaries.
The legislative digest records a fiscal committee notation of 'NO,' indicating the resolution was not expected to have a fiscal impact or require referral to a fiscal committee.
The resolution directs the Assembly Chief Clerk to transmit copies to the author for appropriate distribution, a standard administrative step that enables professional groups to obtain official copies for outreach.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Formal identification and filing information
This opening portion provides the bill number, chamber designation (Assembly Concurrent Resolution), and filing notations, including the date placed with the Secretary of State. It establishes the document’s procedural posture as a nonbinding legislative expression rather than a statute or appropriation.
Legislative findings about surveying’s history and techniques
A string of 'whereas' clauses lays out the resolution’s factual basis: counts of professional surveyors, the historical role of surveying in land development, and the modern technical range from hydrographic to geodetic and cartographic work. Those findings are descriptive—intended to justify recognition and to provide talking points for associations, educators, and agencies that will publicize the week.
Official recognition (ceremonial declaration)
The operative language issues the official recognition of a named week as 'National Surveyors Week.' Because this is a concurrent resolution passed by both houses, it represents the Legislature’s position or sentiment but does not amend the California Code, change regulatory authority, or authorize expenditure. Its legal effect is expressive rather than prescriptive.
Transmission and distribution instruction
The concluding clause directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the author for appropriate distribution. That administrative step is how professional associations and other recipients obtain certified or official copies for use in publicity or events; it carries no implementation mandate for state agencies.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- California professional surveyors and small surveying firms — receive an official legislative recognition they can cite in marketing, recruitment, and community outreach to raise the profession’s profile.
- State and local surveying associations and professional societies — gain a legislative document to anchor events, membership drives, and public education campaigns.
- Academic and vocational training programs in surveying and geomatics — can leverage the recognition to promote student recruitment, grantsmanship, and partnerships with industry.
- Surveying equipment and software vendors — stand to benefit commercially from increased publicity, training events, and industry gatherings tied to the commemorative week.
- Public works and mapping divisions in local governments — can use the resolution as a public-facing tool to highlight the role of surveying in infrastructure projects without taking on new statutory duties.
Who Bears the Cost
- Legislative and administrative staff — face minimal clerical costs to file and transmit copies and to process the resolution; these are routine but nonzero administrative efforts.
- Professional groups and employers that stage events — may incur event, marketing, or staffing expenses to capitalize on the recognition if they choose to participate.
- Local government offices responding to outreach requests — might allocate time or modest resources to coordinate proclamations or participate in observances at the request of constituent groups.
- Advocacy groups — could invest resources to convert symbolic recognition into substantive policy or funding requests, creating opportunity costs when advocacy priorities compete.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension in the bill is between symbolic recognition and substantive change: the resolution offers a useful, low-cost way to elevate a profession and aid outreach, but it cannot substitute for the concrete funding, workforce development, or regulatory reforms that professionals might actually need—so it risks raising expectations the Legislature did not authorize.
ACR47 is symbolic by design, which creates both utility and limits. Its primary strength is providing an official, shareable legislative text that industry groups can use as a banner for events, education, and recruiting.
The flip side is that it creates expectations without accompanying resources or mandates: stakeholders who see the resolution as a platform for change must still pursue separate legislative, regulatory, or budgetary routes to secure funding, workforce development programs, or statutory reforms.
Implementation questions are straightforward but real: the resolution does not establish an annual recurring mechanism, a designated coordinating agency, or any reporting requirement, so whether the recognition becomes an ongoing fixture depends entirely on voluntary action by associations and local governments. There is also a modest risk that the symbolic recognition will be used in advocacy messaging to imply state endorsement of regulatory or procurement changes that do not exist, potentially confusing the public or vendors operating under different legal requirements.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.