Codify — Article

Designates portion of SR‑94 in San Diego as Border Patrol Agent Daniel H. Salazar Memorial Highway

Concurrent resolution names a segment of State Route 94, asks Caltrans to price and install signs paid for by nonstate donations — a ceremonial designation with practical signage steps.

The Brief

Assembly Concurrent Resolution 81 names the stretch of State Route 94 between Potrero Valley Road and Bell Valley Truck Trail in San Diego County as the Border Patrol Agent Daniel H. Salazar Memorial Highway.

The text memorializes Agent Salazar’s biography and service, then directs the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to determine sign costs and to erect signs if nonstate donations cover those costs.

The measure is ceremonial: it does not appropriate state funds or change traffic rules, but it creates a concrete implementation pathway for roadside signs. That makes the bill immediately relevant to Caltrans project managers, local transportation officials, private donors who fund memorial signs, and organizations that track highway naming and sign inventory on state routes.

At a Glance

What It Does

The resolution designates a defined SR‑94 segment as a memorial highway and asks Caltrans to determine the cost of appropriate signs consistent with state highway signing standards. Caltrans may erect the signs only after receiving nonstate donations sufficient to cover the cost.

Who It Affects

Primary actors include Caltrans (which must estimate costs and erect signs), nonstate donors who would fund the signage, the family of Agent Salazar and Border Patrol stakeholders who will be publicly recognized, and San Diego County officials responsible for the corridor.

Why It Matters

Although ceremonial, the resolution creates an implementation trigger — a funding and installation pathway — so it matters to compliance officers, transportation planners, and potential donors who will carry the practical burden of memorialization and permit Caltrans to alter sign inventory on SR‑94.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The resolution begins with multiple “whereas” clauses that set out Daniel H. Salazar’s life, training, service, and the circumstances of his death.

Those recitals form the legislative justification for the naming but have no operational effect beyond documenting the Legislature’s intent to honor him.

The operative language designates the portion of State Route 94 from Potrero Valley Road (postmile 41.393) to Bell Valley Truck Trail (postmile R44.96) in San Diego County as the Border Patrol Agent Daniel H. Salazar Memorial Highway.

It then makes a specific request to the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of signs consistent with state signing requirements and to erect those signs once donations from nonstate sources cover the cost.Because the measure is an Assembly Concurrent Resolution, it is a legislative expression of sentiment and a mechanism to request action from Caltrans; it does not create a binding appropriation of state funds or change statute. The resolution concludes by instructing the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies to the Director of Transportation and the author for distribution, which is the standard administrative step to notify Caltrans and interested parties.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The resolution designates SR‑94 from Potrero Valley Road (postmile 41.393) to Bell Valley Truck Trail (postmile R44.96) in San Diego County as the Border Patrol Agent Daniel H. Salazar Memorial Highway.

2

Caltrans is asked to estimate the cost of signs that must comply with state highway signing requirements and to erect them only after receiving sufficient nonstate donations.

3

The measure is an Assembly Concurrent Resolution — a ceremonial act that requests action but does not appropriate state funds or alter traffic law.

4

The text includes detailed biographical 'whereas' recitals documenting Salazar’s education, training, service, and the circumstances of his on‑duty death.

5

The resolution directs the Chief Clerk to transmit copies to the Director of Transportation and to the author, which initiates Caltrans’ internal review and any subsequent donor solicitation or permitting steps.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Whereas clauses

Legislative findings and biographical recitals

This opening set of clauses summarizes Daniel H. Salazar’s background, training, public service, and the circumstances of his death. Practically, these recitals explain the Legislature’s rationale for the naming; they do not create obligations for state agencies but are the record that supports the memorial designation.

Operative designation

Defines the memorial highway segment

This provision specifies the exact stretch of SR‑94 to be named, using postmile references (41.393 to R44.96). Using postmiles provides technical precision for sign placement and helps Caltrans identify the maintenance and permitting jurisdiction for that stretch of state highway.

Signage and funding request

Requests Caltrans cost estimate and conditions for sign erection

The resolution asks the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs consistent with state signing rules and states that Caltrans should erect the signs only after nonstate donations cover the cost. That puts the onus for funding on private donors while requiring Caltrans to follow its existing design and safety standards when adding signs to the state system.

1 more section
Administrative transmittal

Notifies Caltrans and provides distribution instructions

The final operative clause directs the Chief Clerk of the Assembly to transmit copies of the resolution to the Director of Transportation and the author. That is the administrative trigger that notifies Caltrans so it can estimate costs, assess sign placement logistics, and coordinate any donor arrangements or permitting needed to proceed.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.

Explore Transportation in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • The Salazar family and personal network — receives formal public recognition and a durable roadside memorial acknowledging Agent Salazar’s service.
  • United States Border Patrol and related organizations — gains a named public tribute that can support morale and public visibility for federal agents in the region.
  • Local community in Potrero and nearby San Diego County residents — sees a locally situated memorial that signals legislative recognition and can function as a place of remembrance.
  • Organizations or individuals who donate for the signs — gain a clear channel to underwrite and direct a specific, visible commemoration on state property.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Nonstate donors — must provide the funds Caltrans requires before signs may be erected, placing the financial burden of memorialization on private sources rather than the state treasury.
  • Caltrans — picks up administrative tasks: cost estimating, design review to ensure compliance with signage standards, permitting, and scheduling installation; those activities consume staff time and agency resources even if state funds are not used for the signs themselves.
  • Local transportation and maintenance crews — will assume ongoing maintenance and eventual replacement costs for any signs added to the state highway system unless separate arrangements are made.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is between honoring a public servant through a visible, permanent memorial and the practical limits of highway signage: who should pay, who should manage ongoing maintenance, and how to balance commemorative intent against safety, sign proliferation, and agency resource constraints.

Two implementation frictions stand out. First, the requirement that signs be paid for with nonstate donations shifts the financial hurdle to private actors but leaves open who solicits and holds funds and how long Caltrans will wait for donations.

Caltrans has internal policies about privately funded signs, but the resolution does not specify a timeline, a donor acceptance process, or who will be responsible for long‑term maintenance or replacement costs once the signs become part of the state inventory.

Second, adding memorial signage to an active state route raises design, safety, and inventory trade‑offs. Signs must meet the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Caltrans’ own standards; extra memorial signs can contribute to roadside clutter and create incidental maintenance liabilities.

The bill uses precise postmiles (including an 'R' prefix at the upper bound), which helps technically but may require on‑the‑ground verification where realignments or local real estate boundaries complicate exact placement.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.