SB 1057 rewrites how the state treats criminal histories when issuing or denying certificates and training/exam applications for certified nurse assistants and home health aides. Rather than imposing blanket bars, the bill directs the licensing department to use discretion, limits the ordinary lookback for convictions and professional discipline to seven years, and preserves exceptions for serious felonies and certain sex-offense registrants.
The measure also creates mandatory procedural protections: it forbids denial based on arrests that did not lead to conviction, protects applicants with statutory dismissals or certificates of rehabilitation, permits voluntary submission of mitigating information after the department receives DOJ records, establishes timelines for hearings and decisions, and authorizes diversion and probation options instead of immediate suspension. For facilities, the bill provides liability protections when they act on department notices about applicant or employee suitability.
At a Glance
What It Does
SB 1057 replaces automatic disqualification rules with a discretionary standard: the department may deny certification only for convictions or formal discipline that are substantially related to CNA duties, generally within a seven‑year lookback. It bars denials based on dismissed convictions, certain pardons or certificates of rehabilitation, and on arrests without convictions.
Who It Affects
Applicants for certified nurse assistant and home health aide certificates, current certificate holders facing discipline, the state licensing department that issues those certificates, employers and care facilities that hire CNAs and aides, and reentry/rehabilitation stakeholders.
Why It Matters
The bill changes staffing gatekeeping in a high‑demand health sector by lowering automatic barriers for people with criminal histories while preserving tools to exclude applicants for crimes substantially related to patient care. It introduces operational deadlines and remediation paths that will drive administrative workload and affect hiring practices across long‑term care and home‑care providers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 1057 directs the licensing department to stop treating a criminal conviction as an automatic bar to becoming a certified nurse assistant or home health aide. The department may still deny or discipline applicants and certificate holders, but only after determining that a conviction or prior professional discipline is substantially related to CNA duties.
The bill establishes a default seven‑year lookback for relevant convictions and disciplinary actions, though it allows consideration of serious felonies and crimes requiring sex‑offender registration regardless of when they occurred.
The bill protects people with certain cleanups to their criminal records. Convictions dismissed under a set of Penal Code provisions (the 1203.4 family of dismissals and similar statutes), a certificate of rehabilitation, a governor’s pardon, or comparable executive relief may not be the basis for denial.
Arrests that did not result in conviction, including juvenile adjudications or infractions, are explicitly excluded from grounds for denial. Applicants do not have to disclose criminal history up front; after the state receives DOJ conviction records the department may request voluntary mitigating information to evaluate substantial relation and rehabilitation, but refusal to provide additional material cannot be held against the applicant.On the discipline side, the bill lists specific bases for suspension or revocation such as gross negligence, abuse, misappropriation, fraud, or convictions substantially related to CNA duties.
It builds a process framework: written reasons for denials or discipline, notice to applicants and employers, and appeal rights. The statute establishes expedited administrative hearing timelines (a 20‑business‑day window to request a hearing, hearings to be scheduled promptly and concluded with a written decision within specified timeframes) and allows emergency suspensions when the director finds immediate risk to public welfare.Rather than mandating revocation in every case, SB 1057 gives the department tools to place certificate holders on probation or enter them into diversion agreements with terms like counseling, training, and progress reporting for up to two years.
Successful completion of a diversion ends the matter; failure may lead to formal suspension or revocation. The statute also shields employers from civil, criminal, unemployment, workers’ compensation, or administrative liability when they deny or terminate employment based on a department determination of unsuitability, provided they act on the department’s notice.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The department generally uses a seven‑year lookback: convictions or formal discipline within the prior seven years that are substantially related to CNA duties can justify denial, except for specified serious felonies or sex‑offense registration crimes which are considered regardless of time.
Convictions dismissed under Penal Code sections 1203.4, 1203.4a, 1203.41, 1203.42, 1203.4b, or 1203.425 (and comparable dismissals/expungements) cannot be the basis for denying a certificate; applicants must supply proof if DOJ records do not reflect the dismissal.
The department cannot base denials on arrests that resulted in dispositions other than conviction, including infractions, citations, or juvenile adjudications, and may not require applicants to disclose criminal history before obtaining DOJ record responses.
If the department moves to deny or discipline, it must provide written reasons and appeal information; the applicant has 20 business days to request a hearing, which must be scheduled promptly and yield a written decision within the statutory timelines (hearing within 60 days of request; decision mailed within 30 days of hearing).
Instead of immediate revocation, the department can stay suspension, place certificate holders on probation for up to two years, or offer diversion agreements with tailored rehabilitation conditions; successful completion bars further action on the underlying allegations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Legislative findings and intent
This opening subsection frames the statute’s policy objective: reduce recidivism by removing categorical employment barriers and require the department to exercise discretion when assessing criminal records rather than imposing automatic disqualifications. Practically, it signals how subsequent provisions should be interpreted—favoring individualized assessment and rehabilitation rather than per se bans.
Grounds for denial: convictions and prior discipline
Subdivision (b) sets the primary denial standard. The department may deny certification for convictions or formal discipline that are substantially related to CNA duties, but with a default seven‑year limitation on how far back it may look. Two exceptions swallow that limit: serious felonies under Penal Code §1192.7 and crimes requiring sex‑offender registration under Penal Code §290 may be considered regardless of time. The subsection also narrows when historic disciplinary actions can be wielded—discipline older than seven years is only disqualifying when it involves sexual abuse/exploitation as defined elsewhere in the Business and Professions Code.
Restorative exceptions and limits on use of arrests
These provisions bar denials when an applicant holds a certificate of rehabilitation, pardon, or has a qualifying dismissal/expungement: the department must accept those legal remedies as effective shields against disqualification. The statute separately prohibits using arrests that did not lead to conviction as grounds for denial, and requires applicants to provide proof of dismissals when DOJ records are incomplete. Together these subsections prioritize final post‑conviction relief and accurate record‑based decisionmaking.
Procedures for criminal history handling, notice, and hearings
SB 1057 controls how and when criminal history enters the process. The department may not compel upfront disclosure; it must first obtain DOJ conviction records and then may request voluntary mitigating information. When denying or disciplining, the department must give written notice explaining reasons, appeal and reconsideration paths, and how to obtain and contest criminal history records. The statute prescribes tight timelines for administrative hearings—applicants have 20 business days to request a hearing, which must be scheduled quickly (generally within 60 days of request) and produce a written decision within 30 days of the hearing—and allows emergency suspensions when immediate public protection is necessary, with expedited hearings following.
Disciplinary standards, diversion, probation, and reinstatement
This cluster lays out the conduct that can trigger suspension or revocation (e.g., incompetence, abuse, misappropriation, fraud, impersonation) and builds in remediation options. The department may stay suspension and place individuals on probation with specified conditions for up to two years, or offer diversion agreements outlining treatment, training, and monitoring; successful completion nullifies action on the underlying allegations. The statute also explains reinstatement after suspension and permits revocation if a suspended person practices during suspension.
Employer notification and liability shield
The department must notify the employer when it determines an applicant or certificate holder is unsuitable and indicate whether the determination is final or under appeal. When employers or facilities rely on that notice to deny or terminate employment, the bill expressly protects them from criminal, civil, unemployment, workers’ compensation, and administrative liability—removing a key legal disincentive for employers to act on state determinations of unsuitability.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Applicants with dismissed convictions or certificates of rehabilitation: the bill bars denial based on statutory dismissals, pardons, or certificates of rehabilitation, clearing a legal path to certification that some applicants previously lacked.
- People with more recent, non‑serious convictions seeking reentry: by imposing a seven‑year lookback and requiring a substantial‑relation test, the statute increases the chance that applicants with older or less directly related convictions can obtain certification.
- Current certificate holders subject to alleged misconduct: diversion, probation, and stay‑of‑suspension options give licensees alternatives to immediate revocation and create structured rehabilitation paths that preserve workforce continuity.
- Employers and facilities: the express immunity from various liabilities when acting on the department’s notice reduces legal risk for facilities that must deny or terminate employment based on unsuitability findings.
Who Bears the Cost
- The licensing department: the statute increases administrative workload—reviewing DOJ records, evaluating substantial relation, accepting voluntary mitigation, scheduling expedited hearings, and monitoring diversion/probation programs—without specifying new funding.
- Long‑term care and home‑care employers: while protected from liability, they may still face staffing shortages and operational disruption when state notices force immediate hiring denials or terminations.
- Applicants with serious felonies or sex‑offender registration offenses: the bill expressly allows consideration of these offenses regardless of time, which preserves a durable barrier for those applicants.
- Administrative law system and courts: the compressed hearing timelines and potential increase in appeals and petitions could strain hearing officers and judicial review resources.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—protecting patients by excluding people whose past conduct is directly relevant to patient care, and promoting reentry by removing automatic licensing bars—but resolving that balance requires detailed, resource‑intensive case evaluations. Prioritizing individualized discretion advances rehabilitation but shifts the burden to the licensing agency and employers, risking inconsistent outcomes and administrative strain if the state does not back the policy with clear standards and capacity.
SB 1057 trades categorical exclusions for discretionary inquiry, but the statute leaves several operational uncertainties. The core determinations—what is “substantially related” to CNA duties and how to weigh mitigating evidence—are fact‑intensive and prone to inconsistent application unless the department issues clear standards and training for reviewers.
The bill requires expedited hearings and diversion monitoring without identifying additional staffing or funding, which could delay decisions in practice and create backlogs that undermine the statutory timelines.
Procedural protections are stronger for applicants with statutory dismissals and executive clemency, yet the law depends on accurate DOJ records and applicant‑supplied proof when records are incomplete. That creates a potential mismatch: applicants who cannot easily obtain or verify dismissal documentation may remain disadvantaged.
Finally, while employer immunity removes a legal disincentive to act on department notices, it does not solve the real operational cost to providers who must replace workers or absorb training and onboarding expenses—costs that could disproportionately hit smaller home‑care agencies and rural facilities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.