SB 1112 creates a statutory poststorage process for vehicles removed and stored by public agencies. The bill requires the agency that directed the storage to notify the registered and legal owners quickly, give them a 10‑day window to request a poststorage hearing, and hold that hearing on an expedited schedule.
If the hearing finds the storage lacked reasonable grounds, the employing agency must pay the towing and storage costs.
The bill matters because it converts many informal towing practices into a short, formalized administrative procedure that protects owners’ opportunity to challenge a storage decision while imposing tight operational and fiscal duties on local agencies. The changes will affect police and sheriffs, municipal budgets, towing operators, and anyone who has a vehicle towed by a public agency.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires agencies to mail or personally deliver a storage notice to registered and legal owners within 48 hours (excluding weekends and holidays), gives owners 10 days from the notice date to request a poststorage hearing, and requires the hearing to occur within 48 hours of the request (excluding weekends and holidays). If the hearing determines there were no reasonable grounds for storage, the agency must cover towing and storage costs.
Who It Affects
City and county law enforcement and their tow contractors, municipal administrators who schedule and staff hearings, private towing companies that store vehicles for public agencies, registered vehicle owners and lienholders, and agents representing owners.
Why It Matters
It builds a fast-track due process layer into California’s vehicle storage regime, reallocating financial risk to public agencies when storage is found unjustified and creating strict timing rules that could strain agency operations and tow lot workflows.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 1112 walks an agency through a short, fixed sequence after an agency-authorized storage: notify, allow a challenge, and, if the challenge succeeds, pick up the tab. Once an authorized member directs a vehicle to be stored, the agency must promptly notify the vehicle’s registered and legal owners (or their agent) by mail or in person.
The notice must arrive within 48 hours, not counting weekends or holidays, and it must identify the agency, where the vehicle is stored, a description of the vehicle if available, the removal authority and purpose, and the deadline and method for requesting a hearing.
After an owner requests a poststorage hearing — the request can be made in person, in writing, or by phone — the agency must hold the hearing within 48 hours, again excluding weekends and holidays. The statute allows the agency to appoint a hearing officer who is an employee or officer different from the person who ordered the storage, preserving a basic separation between the initial decisionmaker and the adjudicator.
If an owner neither requests nor attends the hearing, the agency is treated as having satisfied the poststorage hearing requirement.If the hearing panel or officer determines that the agency did not have reasonable grounds to store the vehicle, the agency employing the person who directed the storage is liable for towing and storage costs. That financial backstop is the bill’s chief enforcement lever: it creates an incentive for agencies to document and justify storage decisions at the front end.
But SB 1112 also lists explicit exceptions: it does not apply to vehicles abated under the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program, impounds held for investigation, vehicles removed from private property under the private-property removal statute, or abandoned vehicles removed under the separate abandoned‑vehicle statute when the agency values the vehicle at $500 or less.Taken together, the bill erects a compact administrative remedy for owners to recover or contest stored vehicles while carving out procedural exemptions that keep certain investigative and abatement processes outside this expedited hearing framework.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Notice must be mailed or personally delivered to registered and legal owners within 48 hours of storage, excluding weekends and holidays, and must identify the agency, storage location, vehicle description if available, authority for removal, and how to request a hearing.
Owners or their agents have 10 days from the date on the notice to request a poststorage hearing by in‑person request, written submission, or telephone call.
The agency must conduct the poststorage hearing within 48 hours of a timely request, excluding weekends and holidays, and may assign an officer or employee who did not order the storage to serve as hearing officer.
If the hearing finds that reasonable grounds for the vehicle’s storage were not established, the employing public agency is responsible for towing and storage costs incurred.
SB 1112 excludes vehicles handled under the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program, vehicles impounded for investigation, vehicles removed from private property under Section 22658, and abandoned vehicles removed under Section 22669 that the agency values at $500 or less.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Opportunity for a poststorage hearing
Subdivision (a) requires the agency or person who directed the storage to give the vehicle’s registered and legal owners (or their agents) an opportunity to obtain a poststorage hearing to contest the storage. Practically, this creates a default right to administrative review immediately following a storage decision rather than relying solely on later litigation or impound-release procedures.
Timing and contents of the storage notice
Subdivision (b) prescribes that the storage notice be mailed or personally delivered within 48 hours of storage, excluding weekends and holidays, and lists mandatory content: agency contact details, storage location, a vehicle description (make, model, plate, mileage if available), the removal authority and purpose, and the 10‑day window and methods to request a hearing. That specificity aims to reduce disputes over notice sufficiency, but it also obligates agencies to compile certain vehicle data quickly and accurately.
Expedited hearing schedule and hearing officer
Subdivision (c) mandates the hearing take place within 48 hours of a request, excluding weekends and holidays. It permits the agency to designate a hearing officer who is not the same person who ordered the storage, which preserves a basic separation of roles and reduces immediate conflicts of interest while still allowing the agency to staff hearings internally rather than routing them to an external adjudicator.
Consequences of non‑appearance and cost allocation
Subdivision (d) treats an owner’s failure to request or attend the scheduled hearing as satisfying the agency’s obligation to provide a poststorage hearing, effectively streamlining administrative closure when owners do not act. Subdivision (e) assigns financial responsibility for towing and storage costs to the agency that employed the person who directed the storage if the hearing determines there were not reasonable grounds for the storage — a direct fiscal penalty intended to encourage careful decisionmaking and documentation at the time of removal.
Statutory exemptions and the $500 threshold
Subdivisions (f) and (g) enumerate exceptions: the poststorage hearing rule does not apply to (1) vehicles abated under the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program, (2) vehicles impounded for investigation under Section 22655, (3) vehicles removed from private property under Section 22658, and (4) abandoned vehicles removed under Section 22669 that the agency values at $500 or less. Those carve-outs preserve existing abatement, investigative, and private‑property mechanisms and exempt low‑value abandoned vehicles from the expedited hearing requirement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Registered vehicle owners and lienholders — gain an expedited, on-the-record opportunity to challenge a storage decision and a clear path to recover towing/storage costs if storage lacked reasonable grounds.
- Agents and representatives of owners — the statute explicitly permits authorized agents to request hearings by phone, in person, or in writing, enabling family members, legal representatives, or roadside services to act quickly on an owner’s behalf.
- Consumer and civil‑liberties advocates — the bill strengthens due‑process protections around vehicle removals by imposing notice and hearing requirements and a tangible financial remedy when storage is unjustified.
Who Bears the Cost
- Cities and counties (law enforcement agencies) — face potential new liabilities for towing and storage expenses when hearings find storage unjustified and will need staff and systems to meet the tight notice and hearing deadlines.
- Tow operators and storage facilities — while they will continue to perform removals and storage, they may face delayed payment or disputes when agencies are held financially liable and may need to comply with quicker release procedures.
- Agency administrators and hearing staff — agencies must create or expand administrative processes to accept hearing requests, schedule hearings within 48‑hour windows (excluding weekends/holidays), and document decisions to withstand post‑hearing scrutiny.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between protecting individual property rights through rapid administrative review and the operational and fiscal burden placed on public agencies responsible for public safety and nuisance enforcement. The bill strengthens owners’ ability to challenge storage but forces agencies to staff and finance a fast, resource‑intensive process that may slow enforcement or increase public costs.
SB 1112 tightens timelines and creates a clear cost-shifting rule, but it leaves several practical and legal questions unresolved. The statute does not define the evidentiary standard or the precise meaning of “reasonable grounds,” leaving agencies and hearing officers to develop local standards or risk litigation.
The exclusion of weekends and holidays for the 48‑hour windows may cause multiple calendar‑day gaps and complicate operational planning, particularly for vehicles stored late on Fridays or before holidays.
Other implementation issues include locating and notifying both the registered and legal owners within the short window, identifying who qualifies as a ‘legal owner of record’ (for example, lienholders or leasing companies), and managing hearings by phone or in person in jurisdictions with limited staffing. The $500 threshold for exempt abandoned vehicles raises policy questions about inflation and valuation—$500 may no longer reflect low‑value vehicles in many markets and could push more removals into the hearing regime or, conversely, encourage agencies to classify vehicles to fit an exemption.
Finally, the interplay between this poststorage hearing requirement and existing impound, abatement, and criminal investigation statutes could produce gray areas that agencies must resolve through policy, training, or litigation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.