SB 1167 amends Vehicle Code section 12804.9 to reshape how low‑power, motorized personal devices are classified for California driver’s licenses. The bill explicitly excludes electric bicycles (as defined in Section 312.5(a)) from the M2 class, adds motorized scooters to the list of vehicles operable on a Class C license, and codifies a short‑term rental exception allowing operation of a rented motorized bicycle or moped without an M2 endorsement for up to 48 hours.
Beyond vehicle reclassification, the bill preserves and clarifies the existing testing and medical‑examination regime for commercial and heavy‑vehicle licenses, defines which health professionals can perform required exams, and authorizes the DMV to accept a range of outside certificates (employer skill certificates, law enforcement certificates, training program completions). These changes reallocate regulatory responsibility among DMV, rental operators, training providers, and healthcare certifiers — with implications for enforcement, operator liability, and licensing workflows.
At a Glance
What It Does
Revises the driver‑license exam and vehicle‑classification statute (Section 12804.9) to: (1) exclude electric bicycles from the M2 (motorized bicycle/moped) category, (2) treat motorized scooters as Class C vehicles, (3) allow 48‑hour short‑term rental operation without M2 endorsement, and (4) keep and clarify medical exam and outside‑certificate acceptance rules for commercial license classes.
Who It Affects
DMV operations and compliance teams; rental companies and micromobility platforms offering motorized bicycles or mopeds; manufacturers and legal counsel for electric bicycle and scooter products; commercial vehicle drivers and the healthcare professionals who conduct mandatory medical exams.
Why It Matters
The bill shifts where certain devices sit in the licensing regime — reducing endorsement requirements for e‑bike users and short‑term renters while expanding Class C to cover motorized scooters. That reshuffles compliance burdens (DMV processing, rental operator vetting, training demand) and creates enforcement and liability questions for local agencies and private operators.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 1167 rewrites how Section 12804.9 organizes vehicle classes and the associated testing and medical requirements. The statutory exam components remain broadly the same — written knowledge, sign reading, practical driving demonstration, and sensory/fitness checks — but the bill adjusts which devices map to which license categories and clarifies exceptions and delegated certificate acceptance.
The practical effect is a narrower M2 category and an expanded practical scope for Class C.
On medical and fitness requirements for commercial operators, SB 1167 keeps the two‑year window for a valid medical examination report to be on file before issuing or renewing Class A or B licenses or a Class C with a commercial endorsement. The bill specifies which practitioners qualify as ‘‘health care professionals’’ for these exams (doctors of medicine and osteopathy, physician assistants, registered advanced practice nurses, and chiropractors clinically competent to perform the DOT‑style exam) and permits the DMV to accept federal waivers or nonqualifying exam reports when accompanied by specified federal paperwork.SB 1167 also formalizes practical delegations the DMV already uses: certificates from authorized employers can substitute for driving tests for certain commercial classes, law enforcement agency certificates can stand in for M1/M2 driving tests for officers, and approved motorcyclist training program completion certificates may replace driving tests for M1/M2 applicants.
The DMV retains review and approval authority over program tests and the ability to require proof of financial responsibility before administering a driving demonstration.Two device‑specific changes matter for micromobility and rental markets. First, the bill excludes electric bicycles from the M2 class by cross‑referencing Section 312.5(a), meaning e‑bikes are governed by the separate rules that statute sets rather than by the M2/moped framework.
Second, it explicitly lists motorized scooters under Class C and creates a limited, 48‑hour ‘‘short‑term’’ rental exception that lets holders of any valid California driver’s license operate a rented motorized bicycle or moped without obtaining an M2 endorsement during the rental period. Those provisions will change which riders need endorsements, which operators need to verify endorsements, and how local enforcement treats rented devices.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill explicitly excludes electric bicycles from the Class M2 (motorized bicycle/moped) category by referencing Section 312.5(a).
Motorized scooters are added to the list of vehicles a person may operate with a standard Class C license.
The DMV may accept a medical examination report no more than two years old as a condition of issuing or renewing Class A/B or commercial Class C licenses; the statute lists which clinicians qualify to provide those exams.
SB 1167 allows operation of a short‑term rental motorized bicycle or moped for up to 48 hours without an M2 endorsement for any valid California driver’s license holder.
The DMV may accept employer‑issued driving skill certificates, law enforcement certificates, and approved motorcyclist training program completion certificates in lieu of driving tests in specified circumstances.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Driver examination components retained and clarified
This subsection lists the components of the driver exam: written knowledge, sign‑reading in simple English, understanding of traffic control devices (including bikeway signs), a supervised driving demonstration, and sensory/fitness checks. Practically, it keeps the traditional five‑part structure but also authorizes the examining officer to request proof of financial responsibility before supervising a driving demonstration and to refuse the exam if the applicant cannot provide required proof.
Medical exam requirement for commercial classes
SB 1167 requires a valid medical examination report in an applicant’s record no more than two years old before issuance or renewal of Class A, Class B, or Class C with a commercial endorsement. The bill defines ‘‘health care professional’’ for this purpose to include MDs, DOs, physician assistants, registered advanced practice nurses, and chiropractors who are clinically competent to perform DOT‑style exams, and permits federal waiver acceptance under specific CFR authority.
Revises vehicle‑class mapping; M1/M2 definitions and exclusions
The bill restates the Class A, B, C, M1, and M2 scopes and inserts two substantive catalog changes: Class C explicitly includes motorized scooters and certain light buses; Class M2 is defined to include motorized bicycles or mopeds but expressly excludes electric bicycles as described in Section 312.5(a). It also preserves authority to grant endorsements and to require specialized written exams for particular towing privileges.
Accepting outside certificates in place of driving tests
SB 1167 allows the DMV to accept a certified employer’s driving skill certificate for Class A/B applications under limited conditions, law enforcement agency certificates in place of M1/M2 driving tests for officers, and approved motorcyclist training program completion certificates in lieu of driving tests. The DMV must review and approve program written and driving tests before a program can issue completion certificates, preserving administrative oversight.
Short‑term rental exception
This subsection creates a narrow, time‑limited exception: any person holding a valid California driver’s license may operate a short‑term rental motorized bicycle or moped without obtaining an M2 endorsement if the rental lasts 48 hours or less. The statute defines ‘‘short‑term’’ as 48 hours or less and thus creates a specific, administrable window for rental operators and enforcers to apply.
Operative date
The section includes an explicit operative date: the changes to Section 12804.9 become effective January 1, 2029. That delayed start gives DMV and affected stakeholders time to update forms, training, and enforcement guidance before the new classifications and exceptions take effect.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Electric bicycle riders and manufacturers — by excluding e‑bikes from M2, riders avoid endorsement and exam requirements tied to mopeds, and manufacturers face fewer licensing constraints that could affect consumer usability and sales.
- Micromobility and short‑term rental operators — the 48‑hour exception reduces the need to verify M2 endorsements for very short rentals, lowering operational friction and point‑of‑rental checks.
- Law enforcement agencies and employers with certified training programs — acceptance of agency and employer certificates streamlines credentialing for officers and commercial drivers who already receive on‑the‑job training.
Who Bears the Cost
- California DMV — implementation will require rulemaking, form updates, procedural changes, staff training, and system changes to track new categories and the 48‑hour rental exception.
- Training providers and rider‑education programs — narrower M2 coverage and the short‑term rental exception could reduce demand for some endorsement training, impacting revenue and curriculum planning.
- Healthcare professionals and clinics performing commercial driving medical exams — the statute increases demand for approved medical examinations and requires clinicians to meet competence standards and use DMV‑approved forms.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances reducing friction for everyday users and rental markets against maintaining clear safety, enforcement, and medical oversight for commercial and heavier vehicles; simplifying access for one group inevitably shifts verification, liability, and enforcement burdens onto regulators, rental operators, or clinicians without a single, uncontroversial way to allocate those responsibilities.
SB 1167 tries to thread two goals at once: make low‑power personal devices easier to operate and rent without pushing users into the commercial endorsement regime, while preserving commercial driver health and safety checks. That creates implementation headaches.
Excluding electric bicycles from M2 defers many regulatory questions to Section 312.5(a) and related statutes; enforcing where an individual device sits (e‑bike versus moped) will require clear technical criteria and guidance for officers and rental platforms. Rental operators will want a bright‑line test to know when the 48‑hour exception applies and when they must confirm an M2 endorsement.
Accepting a broad set of external certificates (employer, law enforcement, training programs) reduces DMV testing load but shifts verification and potential liability onto issuing entities. The statute lists which clinicians qualify to perform commercial medical exams, including chiropractors ‘‘clinically competent’’ to perform DOT‑style exams — a phrase that invites administrative disputes about competence standards and recordkeeping.
Finally, the delayed operative date (January 1, 2029) helps implementation planning but also extends the window where current, potentially inconsistent local practices remain in force, which complicates transition and public education efforts.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.