This bill establishes the Immigrant and Refugee Affairs Agency as a cabinet-level agency in California and creates an Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs led by a Statewide Director of Immigrant and Refugee Inclusion. The Governor appoints the secretary (and up to two chief deputies) subject to Senate confirmation; the office is charged with coordinating state services, evaluating accessibility, creating a clearinghouse of resources, making policy recommendations, and engaging federal and local partners.
Mechanically, the bill transfers programs, related property, unencumbered funds, and state civil‑service employees performing those functions into the new office, creates an Immigrant and Refugee Inclusion Fund, and conditions use of the fund on legislative appropriation. It also restricts interagency information-sharing to demographic data, forbids sharing personal immigrant or refugee information outside the agency, and prohibits use of agency resources to assist immigration enforcement.
The statute is explicitly temporary and repeals on January 1, 2036.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a new state agency and internal Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs, centralizes existing and future immigrant/refugee programs, transfers staff and unencumbered funds, and establishes an appropriation-dependent inclusion fund. It limits data sharing to demographics and bars use of agency resources for immigration enforcement.
Who It Affects
State departments and units currently running immigrant-serving programs (their budgets, staff, and property), the Department of General Services and Department of Finance (who resolve transfer disputes), local immigrant affairs offices and community-based providers who coordinate with the new office, and immigrant and refugee communities who will be the subjects of the office’s programs and privacy protections.
Why It Matters
The law centralizes policy and accountability for immigrant and refugee inclusion and creates a unit that can reallocate staff and money across state government. Its data restrictions and enforcement ban set a privacy-forward precedent for how states handle immigrant information, while the sunset and appropriation dependencies create operational and funding uncertainty.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a cabinet-level Immigrant and Refugee Affairs Agency and places within it an Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs headed by a statewide director. The Governor appoints the agency secretary (and may appoint two chief deputies), all subject to Senate confirmation.
The office is designed to be the central planner and coordinator for state efforts that support immigrants and refugees, with authority to evaluate other agencies’ programs, recommend budget and policy changes, and develop guidance and technical assistance.
A major operational feature is the transfer framework. Any state office, agency, or department property and any unencumbered balances tied to immigrant- or refugee-related functions are moved into the new office; where there is doubt the Department of General Services resolves property questions and the Department of Finance resolves fiscal questions.
Employees who perform transferred functions and who are in state civil service (not temporary staff) move to the office and retain their civil-service status and rights, except for positions exempt from civil service.On funding and reporting, the bill creates the Immigrant and Refugee Inclusion Fund in the State Treasury; money deposited into that fund is available to the office only when the Legislature appropriates it. The director must produce a statewide inventory and plan for immigrant and refugee services (with a required report to the Governor and Legislature by January 1, 2027) and create an online clearinghouse by July 10, 2027.
The office must also provide biannual reports to the Legislature on progress and challenges.To protect privacy, the law narrows interagency information-sharing to demographics only and forbids sharing personal immigrant or refugee information outside the agency; the office must comply with state data-protection statutes. The bill also forbids using agency funds, staff, or infrastructure to directly or indirectly participate in immigration enforcement.
Finally, the statute is temporary: it specifies a repeal (sunset) date of January 1, 2036 and includes legislative findings required when a statute limits public access to records or meetings under the California Constitution.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds 'Immigrant and Refugee Affairs' to the list of state agencies and creates an Immigrant and Refugee Affairs Agency headed by a Governor‑appointed, Senate‑confirmed secretary (with up to two Senate‑confirmed chief deputies).
All property, unencumbered fund balances, and state civil‑service employees performing transferred immigrant/refugee functions move into the new Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs; DGS and DOF resolve disputes over transfers.
It establishes the Immigrant and Refugee Inclusion Fund in the State Treasury; funds are available to the office only upon appropriation by the Legislature.
Interagency information‑sharing is limited to demographic data; the agency may not share personal information of immigrants and refugees outside the agency and may not use agency resources to assist immigration enforcement.
The director must report to the Governor and Legislature on programs and a statewide implementation plan by January 1, 2027, launch an online clearinghouse by July 10, 2027, file biannual progress reports, and the statute sunsets on January 1, 2036.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Adds Immigrant and Refugee Affairs to the state's cabinet agencies
This amendment inserts 'Immigrant and Refugee Affairs' into the statutory roster of state agencies and preserves the standard secretary responsibilities for fiscal oversight and performance review. Practically, that change places the new agency within the existing cabinet-level management structure and subjects it to the same budget-review and oversight expectations as other agencies.
Creates the Immigrant and Refugee Affairs Agency and leadership structure
Section 12839 formally creates the agency and allows the Governor to appoint a secretary (and two chief deputies) subject to Senate confirmation; the secretary serves at the Governor’s pleasure. This provision establishes the chain of command and signals the office will be part of executive branch decision‑making at the cabinet level—affecting interagency coordination, appointment politics, and how immigrant policy priorities are elevated within the administration.
Definitions, policy intent, and transfers of programs, property, funds, and staff
These sections define agency and office terms, state the legislative intent to consolidate immigrant/refugee programs, and lay out concrete transfer mechanics: property related to immigrant functions moves to the office; unencumbered appropriations tied to transferred functions also move into the office’s fund; and civil‑service employees performing transferred duties are shifted with retention of status and rights. The Department of General Services and Department of Finance are given gatekeeper roles to resolve uncertainty about what transfers. That creates a clear administrative path but also concentrates transfer decisions in two central agencies.
Immigrant and Refugee Inclusion Fund
This section establishes a dedicated fund in the State Treasury to receive transferred balances and other deposits. Importantly, money in the fund is not automatically spendable: the office can access it only after the Legislature appropriates those moneys. So while the bill centralizes financial resources, it preserves legislative control over expenditures and creates a dependence on the annual or supplemental budget process.
Agency purpose and authorized functions
The statute defines the agency’s purpose around enhancing immigrant and refugee inclusion and lists specific powers: evaluating other agencies’ programs, coordinating inclusion efforts, recommending policy and budget changes, creating a clearinghouse, monitoring implementation of laws, engaging stakeholders and federal partners, and making policy recommendations to the Governor and Legislature. These are broad, programmatic authorities rather than narrow grantmaking powers—intended to make the office a policy hub and coordinator across state and local systems.
Data restrictions, privacy compliance, and enforcement prohibition
This provision narrows interagency information exchange to demographic data, requires strict adherence to multiple California privacy statutes, forbids sharing personal immigrant or refugee data outside the agency, and bans use of agency funds, personnel, or infrastructure to directly or indirectly assist immigration enforcement. Operationally, it creates strong data‑protection obligations, affects casework and interagency workflows that rely on case‑level data, and may require new IT, legal, and compliance investments.
Reporting requirements and sunset
The bill requires reports to be filed in compliance with existing submission rules: the director must produce biannual legislative reports and a comprehensive inventory/plan by January 1, 2027, with a clearinghouse online by July 10, 2027. It also includes an explicit repeal date—January 1, 2036—making the agency temporary unless reauthorized. Section 65050 is amended to recast the statewide director role and to align duties and timelines to the new office structure.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.
Explore Immigration in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Immigrants and refugees in California — They gain a single state office tasked with coordinating services, producing a statewide plan, and restricting outside sharing of personal information, which could improve access and privacy protections.
- Local immigrant affairs offices and community-based organizations — The office creates an official coordination point, clearinghouse, and grant/technical assistance authority that can increase capacity and reduce duplicative outreach efforts.
- Policy makers and legislators — The centralized data inventory, regular biannual reports, and policy recommendations give legislators clearer information for budgeting and lawmaking relating to immigrant and refugee services.
- State agencies that struggle with outreach — Agencies will receive evaluation, best-practice identification, and coordination support aimed at improving program accessibility and effectiveness.
Who Bears the Cost
- State agencies and departments with transferred functions — They must relinquish staff, property, and unencumbered funds; operational disruption and reorganization costs (HR, IT, program continuity) fall on those agencies in the near term.
- Department of General Services and Department of Finance — These departments gain administrative responsibility to resolve transfer disputes, increasing workload and requiring legal and fiscal analysis.
- California Legislature and Governor’s budget office — The new fund and appropriation dependency create new budget priorities and potential trade-offs across programs during annual budget negotiations.
- IT, legal, and compliance units across state government — Implementing the demographic-only sharing rule and complying with multiple privacy statutes will require technical changes, new access controls, and legal reviews, generating upfront and ongoing costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is protecting immigrant and refugee privacy versus providing effective, data-driven service coordination: limiting personal data sharing reduces enforcement risk and protects trust, but it also removes the granular information agencies need to verify eligibility, measure outcomes, and coordinate complex benefits—forcing a choice between privacy safeguards and operational effectiveness.
The bill packs several operational trade-offs into a short statutory framework. First, the demographic-only information‑sharing rule and strict prohibition on sharing personal immigrant or refugee data outside the agency protect privacy but limit the office’s ability to use case-level data for individualized service coordination.
Many benefit programs and eligibility verifications require personally identifiable information; insulating that data could force workarounds (local referrals, client-mediated data sharing) that are less efficient or effective.
Second, the transfer mechanics concentrate decision authority with DGS and DOF but leave many practical questions open: which positions are considered ‘performing a transferred function,’ how to time transfers to avoid service gaps, and how to handle jointly funded programs. Because the Immigrant and Refugee Inclusion Fund requires legislative appropriation before money can be spent, the office’s ability to deploy resources quickly is constrained—creating a risk that staff and programs transfer into the office without matching operating dollars.
Finally, the statute’s sunset (2036) and specific near‑term deliverables (the 2027 reports and clearinghouse) create a compressed timeline that incentivizes short-term pilots and may discourage long-term structural investments without reauthorization certainty.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.