SB 1269 authorizes the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to register and regulate chiropractors who provide ‘‘animal chiropractic’’—a defined set of manual and soft‑tissue therapies for nonhuman animals—while preserving veterinary authority over medical diagnosis and treatment. The bill sets up statutory definitions, creates a public registry, and bars unlicensed individuals from delivering animal chiropractic.
The statute draws regulatory boundaries rather than merging professions: it gives chiropractors a regulated pathway to offer certain treatments, requires the Board to adopt implementing rules, and builds in recordkeeping and intake requirements to promote continuity with veterinary care. For administrators and compliance teams, the bill creates a new license class, premises registration duties, and inter‑board coordination obligations that will require new internal controls and policies.
At a Glance
What It Does
Defines ‘‘animal chiropractic’’ and permits only chiropractors registered by the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners — who also hold specified veterinary‑chiropractic credentials — to perform it. The bill requires a public registry, premises registration, intake/consent paperwork, and minimum continuing education tied to the animal practice.
Who It Affects
Licensed chiropractors seeking to treat animals, chiropractic clinics that wish to host animal patients (including those in range settings), the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners and the Veterinary Medical Board (for consultation), and animal owners who use alternative therapies. It also implicates veterinary practices that coordinate care or receive medical records from chiropractors.
Why It Matters
This creates the first formal California regulatory pathway that separates a non‑veterinarian manual therapy from the practice of veterinary medicine while requiring documented coordination with veterinarians. The structure will shape market access, oversight costs, and professional responsibilities around non‑traditional animal care.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB 1269 sets out what ‘‘animal chiropractic’’ is and who may lawfully provide it in California. The bill confines that practice to licensed chiropractors who register with the chiropractic board and hold an acceptable veterinary‑chiropractic credential, and it requires the board to maintain a public list of registrants and to register the primary premises where those services are offered.
Chiropractors who do not register must operate under the direct supervision of a licensed veterinarian rather than independently.
Before any hands‑on treatment, the practitioner must obtain completed intake and application‑for‑care records and a signed consent. The application must make plain the practitioner’s professional limits — specifically that they are not a veterinarian, cannot be the animal’s primary care provider, and that animal chiropractic is an adjunct, not a replacement, for veterinary medicine.
If an owner lacks a primary veterinarian, the practitioner must provide veterinarian references. Practitioners must keep a medical record for each animal and provide those records to the animal’s veterinarian on request.The bill gives the chiropractic board authority to adopt implementing regulations and requires it to share proposed regulatory text with the Veterinary Medical Board; the veterinary board votes informally but cannot veto the chiropractic board’s regulatory action.
The statute also sets clear prohibitions: registrants may not perform services that would amount to the practice of veterinary medicine, and unlicensed persons (including chiropractic assistants) may not provide animal chiropractic. Finally, the bill clarifies that an animal’s veterinarian is not liable for actions or omissions of a compliant animal chiropractic practitioner.
The Five Things You Need to Know
SB 1269 defines ‘‘animal chiropractic’’ as evaluation and treatment of vertebral or extremity joint dysfunction or subluxation using chiropractic adjustment or soft tissue therapy.
To qualify, a chiropractor must be licensed by the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners and hold current certification from the American Veterinary Chiropractic Association, the International Veterinary Chiropractic Association, or another board‑specified credentialing organization.
The bill requires a minimum of eight hours of continuing education in animal chiropractic every two years for registered practitioners.
An animal chiropractic practitioner must register both themselves and the primary premises where they provide care, keep medical records for at least three years, and obtain intake, application‑for‑care, and consent forms that disclose limits of practice.
Registered practitioners may provide unsupervised animal chiropractic for a limited initial period (three months or eight visits, whichever comes first) after which they must refer the animal back to its primary veterinarian; the statute expressly prohibits providing veterinary medical services or allowing unlicensed persons to perform animal chiropractic.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions: animal chiropractic, practitioner, premises, board
This section creates the statutory vocabulary the rest of the article uses. ‘‘Animal’’ excludes humans; ‘‘animal chiropractic’’ is narrowly defined to manual adjustments and soft‑tissue therapy for joint dysfunction or subluxation. The statute also ties practitioner eligibility to holding a chiropractic license plus certification from named veterinary‑chiropractic organizations (with the board able to add others by regulation), sets a continuing education baseline, and defines ‘‘animal chiropractic premises’’ as the primary registered location where treatment occurs. These definitions set a bounded scope that will guide enforcement and regulatory design.
Registration, supervision, and limits on unsupervised practice
The bill bars chiropractors from providing animal chiropractic unless they either register under this article or operate under the direct supervision of a licensed veterinarian. Registered practitioners must enroll with the board and register their primary premises. The statute permits a short, defined period of unsupervised care (the text sets a three‑month or eight‑visit cap) before the practitioner must return the animal to its primary veterinarian for follow‑up, which protects ongoing medical oversight while allowing an initial course of non‑veterinary therapy.
Intake, consent, records, and public roster
Before treating an animal, practitioners must collect a detailed intake form, an application for care with required disclosures (including a statement that the practitioner is not a veterinarian and a query about recent veterinary care), and a consent form. Practitioners must retain medical records for a minimum of three years and provide them to the animal’s veterinarian on request. The board must publish a public list of registered animal chiropractic practitioners, a transparency measure that supports owner due diligence and enforcement.
Regulatory authority and inter‑board consultation
The State Board of Chiropractic Examiners retains enforcement over registrants and may adopt regulations to implement the article, including specifying credentialing organizations and standards of care. When it proposes regulations, the board must provide the full text to the Veterinary Medical Board, which will vote informally at its next meeting; the chiropractic board may proceed regardless of the veterinary board’s vote. The board must also set premises‑registration requirements and fees, capped at reasonable regulatory costs, creating a fee‑for‑service regulatory model.
Liability carve‑outs and prohibitions
The statute declares that an animal’s veterinarian is not liable for the acts or omissions of a compliant animal chiropractic practitioner, which narrows one potential source of vicarious liability for vets. It also makes clear what registrants cannot do: they may not provide services that constitute the practice of veterinary medicine, may not offer non‑chiropractic services at registered premises beyond animal chiropractic, and cannot delegate animal chiropractic to an unlicensed person, including chiropractic assistants. Those prohibitions create bright‑line enforcement triggers but also require regulators to define the line between manual therapy and veterinary practice.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Licensed chiropractors with veterinary‑chiropractic credentials — gain a clear, state‑recognized pathway to offer animal chiropractic and a public listing that can expand market access.
- Animal owners seeking adjunct/manual therapies — receive clearer disclosure, consent, and record transfers that support care continuity and informed choice.
- State Board of Chiropractic Examiners — obtains explicit authority to register, regulate, and enforce a defined subset of non‑veterinary animal care, allowing it to control practitioner standards and premises.
- Veterinary practices that coordinate care — benefit from mandated intake disclosures, record sharing, and referral requirements that preserve the veterinarian’s diagnostic primacy.
Who Bears the Cost
- Chiropractors who wish to treat animals — must obtain specified certifications, meet continuing education obligations, register with the board, and potentially pay premises registration fees and compliance costs.
- Chiropractic clinics and premises — face administrative obligations to register locations, maintain records for each animal patient, and implement intake/consent workflows.
- Veterinary Medical Board and veterinarians — will absorb consultative work reviewing proposed chiropractic regulations and may need to manage fragmentation of animal care without new funding.
- Animal owners — may encounter additional paperwork and the need to coordinate between chiropractor and veterinarian, and potentially higher out‑of‑pocket costs if services fall outside veterinary insurance coverage.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
SB 1269 balances two legitimate goals — expanding access to non‑veterinary manual therapies and protecting animal health by preserving veterinary responsibility — but resolving that balance forces a trade‑off: the statute enables a new set of providers to offer alternative care while placing responsibility for defining, policing, and funding the safeguards (training standards, scope limits, and enforcement) on regulators who must prevent fragmentation of medical responsibility without unduly restricting professional innovation.
The bill establishes a regulated niche for chiropractors treating animals but leaves several implementation questions open. The chiropractic board can add credentialing organizations and adopt standards of care, yet the text does not prescribe minimum training curricula, competency testing, or audit procedures beyond a basic continuing education floor.
That creates potential variability in practitioner quality unless regulations impose detailed training or supervision standards.
Enforcement will hinge on clear operational definitions. Regulators must distinguish permitted manual therapies from acts that constitute veterinary diagnosis or medical treatment — a line that can shift by species, condition, or technique.
The requirement to consult the Veterinary Medical Board gives vets a voice in rulemaking but not veto power, which may produce disagreement about acceptable practices and standards and could complicate cross‑board disciplinary coordination. Finally, the liability carve‑out for veterinarians narrows one risk but leaves open how malpractice and consumer protection claims against chiropractors will be handled, especially where delayed veterinary care worsens outcomes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.