SB1367 amends Government Code section 67041 to modernize and tighten the statutory language that defines the California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s governing body. The changes substitute gender‑neutral phrasing, refine residency and membership descriptions for local appointees, restate the Governor’s appointment and Senate‑confirmation role, and reconfirm the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency (or a designee) as a member.
On its face the bill is technical: it does not create new offices or add seats. But stripping archaic phrasing and clarifying who qualifies to serve can affect interpretation in contested appointments, the way the chair is selected and replaced, and the balance between local and state representation on the board.
Local elected officials, the Governor’s office, and the Natural Resources Agency are the immediately relevant players to watch for operational impact.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill updates the statutory description of the Agency’s governing body to use gender‑neutral language, to specify that local appointees must be sitting local officials (city council members or supervisors) and to restate the Governor’s authority to appoint two non‑basin members subject to Senate confirmation. It also codifies the internal appointment of the chair by the other members and a 30‑day backstop in which the Governor fills an unfilled vacancy.
Who It Affects
County boards of supervisors (El Dorado and Placer), the South Lake Tahoe city council, the Governor’s appointments unit and the State Senate (confirmation), the California Natural Resources Agency, and current and prospective board members who must meet residency or office‑holding qualifications.
Why It Matters
Even technical edits reshape how provisions are read and enforced: changes to who qualifies as a local member and the mechanism for filling a chair or vacancy can influence board composition, the pace of appointments, and the interplay between local control and state oversight in Tahoe governance.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
SB1367 rewrites the single statute that lists who sits on the California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s governing body. The bill's edits are largely language updates — removing gendered pronouns and awkward phrasing — but they also tidy up qualification and appointment language that determines who may serve.
The statute continues to allocate seats to local elected officials, two gubernatorial appointees who represent the public at large and are not basin residents, a chair selected by the board, and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency (or a designee).
On local representation, the bill clarifies that the board members appointed by the counties and the South Lake Tahoe city council must be members of those local governing bodies. For supervisors, it restates the requirement that the supervisor live in a supervisorial district that lies wholly or partly in the Tahoe region; that provision can limit which supervisors are eligible to serve.
The Governor retains authority to appoint two non‑basin public‑at‑large members, and the statute explicitly keeps Senate confirmation as the check on those appointments.The bill preserves the internal selection model for the chair: the six appointed members choose one additional member to serve as the permanent chair and that person serves at the pleasure of the appointing members. Critically, the statute adds a 30‑day clock: if the members fail to fill the chair slot within 30 days, the Governor steps in to appoint.
Finally, the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency (or a designee) remains a statutory member, maintaining a direct executive‑branch connection to the Agency’s governing body.Taken together, these are drafting and clarity changes rather than expansions of authority. Still, tidy statutory language alters how administrative staff, counsel, and courts interpret eligibility, appointment timing and the backstop for vacancies; that makes operational practices and internal appointment timelines the primary practical places where this bill will matter.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The statute continues to require that local appointees be sitting members of the city council or county board of supervisors they represent, and supervisors must reside in a supervisorial district that lies wholly or partly within the Tahoe region.
The Governor appoints two members who must not be residents of the Tahoe basin; those gubernatorial appointees remain subject to California Senate confirmation.
The six appointed members select one additional member to serve as the permanent chair; that chair serves at the pleasure of the appointing members.
If the board fails to fill a chair vacancy within 30 days, the Governor may fill the vacancy by appointment.
The Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency (or the Secretary’s designee) is explicitly listed as a governing‑body member, preserving an ex‑officio executive branch presence.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Modernizes statutory phrasing for the governing body
The statute’s opening clause is rewritten to replace archaic or inconsistent phrasing and to state directly that the governing body “consist of the following members.” That cut‑and‑paste tidy up reduces ambiguity in how the list that follows is read and signals an intent to make the provision read as a clear roster rather than a descriptive paragraph. Practically, improved drafting helps clerks and counsel apply the membership list in appointment documents and meeting notices.
Local appointees must be sitting local officials and supervisors must meet residency tests
Section (a) clarifies that the members appointed by the two counties and by the South Lake Tahoe city council must be serving members of those governing bodies. It also restates the residency rule for supervisors — they must live in a supervisorial district that is wholly or partly inside the Tahoe region. That narrows eligibility to current officeholders and preserves an explicit geographic tie for supervisors, which matters for contested eligibility or vacancy planning when a district’s boundaries or population change.
Governor appointees remain non‑basin, public‑at‑large, and subject to Senate confirmation
This subsection reiterates the Governor’s authority to appoint two public‑at‑large members who are not basin residents and imposes a geographic split: one must be chosen from the 10 southernmost counties and the other from the remaining counties. Keeping the non‑basin restriction and the geographic division ensures the board includes statewide perspectives distinct from local basin interests and preserves the Senate’s advice‑and‑consent role for those appointments.
Board selects a permanent chair; Governor backstop for unfilled vacancies
Section (c) describes the internal mechanism for selecting the chair: the six appointed members pick one member to serve as permanent chair and that chair serves at the pleasure of the appointing members. Importantly, the statute places a 30‑day deadline on filling the chair slot; if the members fail to act, the Governor may appoint. That automatic backstop shortens the window for prolonged internal deadlock and gives the Governor a defined role in resolving a stalled selection process.
Ex‑officio membership for Natural Resources Secretary or designee
The Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency (or a named designee) is explicitly listed as a member. The provision maintains a formal bridge between state natural‑resources leadership and the regional planning agency, which facilitates coordination on environmental policy and state funding priorities but also embeds executive branch influence within the board’s composition.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local governing bodies (El Dorado and Placer counties; City of South Lake Tahoe) — clearer statutory language reduces ambiguity about whether appointees must be current local officials, simplifying nominating processes and legal review.
- Governor’s office — the 30‑day backstop for an unfilled chair seat gives the Governor a predictable, statutory path to resolve board deadlock should internal selection stall.
- California Natural Resources Agency — retaining the Secretary (or designee) as a statutory member preserves direct access to regional planning deliberations and lets the agency influence coordination and funding discussions.
Who Bears the Cost
- County boards and city councils — the explicit requirement that appointees be sitting officials may force local bodies to adjust nomination timetables or to replace an appointee who leaves local office midterm.
- State Senate — continued confirmation responsibility requires time and resources to vet the Governor’s appointees, including potential hearings for political or geographic disputes.
- The Agency’s administrative staff — implementing the 30‑day clock and documenting residency and eligibility may require more formalized tracking, legal review, and faster turnaround on vacancy notices.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances drafting clarity and the goal of preventing deadlock against the risk of shifting real influence: tightening eligibility and installing a Governor backstop solves ambiguity and stalemate but hands the state executive a quick route to alter board composition, raising a basic tension between local control of regional planning and centralized state intervention.
Although the bill is framed as nonsubstantive drafting, several changes carry enforcement and operational consequences. Tightening eligibility language to require sitting local officials removes ambiguity but also narrows the candidate pool; a vacancy or a local official’s resignation could trigger unexpected turnover if substitution rules aren’t in place.
The 30‑day deadline for filling a chair vacancy uses time pressure to avoid stalemate, but it shifts leverage to the Governor when the board’s internal politics prevent consensus.
Language choices also introduce latent ambiguities. The statute’s geographic prescriptions — the non‑basin restriction for gubernatorial appointees and the residency test for supervisors — are clear in intent but may generate disputes over the definition of “basin” or whether a supervisorial district “lying wholly or partly within the region” qualifies under changing district lines.
Courts or counsel could be asked to resolve these questions. Finally, calling the chosen member a “permanent chairman” while also saying the chair “serves at the pleasure” of the appointing members creates a governance tension: permanence in title versus conditional tenure in practice.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.