SB 1407 amends Sections 17132.9 and 17132.10 of California's Revenue and Taxation Code to change who can exclude certain military retirement and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity payments from state taxable income. The bill removes the existing household income limits that defined who qualified, eliminates the current $20,000 cap on the excluded amount, and pushes the exclusion’s sunset from 2030 to 2037.
The measure also expands the statutory requirements for any bill that creates a new tax expenditure by requiring additional information beyond the current goals, performance indicators, and data collection items. SB 1407 takes effect immediately as a tax levy, creating near-term budget and implementation implications for the Franchise Tax Board and the state’s fiscal forecasting process.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill deletes income-based eligibility and the $20,000-per-year cap from California’s tax exclusions for federal military retirement pay and SBP annuity payments, and extends the exclusion’s sunset to taxable years beginning before January 1, 2037. It also supplements existing statutory rules about what information must accompany new tax-expenditure legislation.
Who It Affects
Directly affects retired uniformed service members and survivors who receive Department of Defense retirement pay or SBP annuities, regardless of their household income; it also affects the Franchise Tax Board (FTB), state budget offices, and tax preparers who must implement the broader exclusion. The General Fund will face reduced revenues relative to current law.
Why It Matters
By removing means-testing and the dollar limit, the bill broadens a targeted tax break and increases potential revenue loss, complicating budget forecasting and program evaluation. The added reporting requirements signal growing legislative scrutiny of tax expenditures but leave open how the state will measure results and enforce data collection.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Under current California law the state excluded up to $20,000 of military retirement pay and up to $20,000 of income annuity payments under the Defense Department’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for taxpayers who met specified household income ceilings; those exclusions were scheduled to expire for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2030. SB 1407 rewrites that framework by stripping out the income-eligibility test and removing the $20,000 cap, so that those categories of federal payments are excluded from California taxable income without the prior dollar limit and without regard to the recipient’s other income.
The bill applies the same structural change to both retirement pay and SBP annuities, making the state exclusion broader and available to a larger set of retired service members and survivors. It also extends the statutory sunset so the exclusion remains in effect through taxable years beginning before January 1, 2037.
The net effect is a persistent, larger exclusion that will reduce state personal income tax receipts compared with current law.SB 1407 layers a separate change onto California’s rules for creating tax expenditures: statute already requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to state goals, performance indicators, and data collection. This bill expands that statutory package by requiring additional information (the text does not enumerate precise new metrics).
That change creates a two-track outcome: broader benefit for the covered military pay categories, and stronger statutory expectations that future tax breaks will carry clearer performance and reporting obligations.Practically, the Franchise Tax Board will need to update forms, instructions, and audit protocols to reflect the wider exclusion and new reporting expectations. Because the bill takes effect immediately as a tax levy and references taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, taxpayers, preparers, and FTB must reconcile prior filings and withholding/estimation practices for recent tax years.
The change also shifts the budget picture: state revenue forecasts and appropriation decisions will need to account for a larger, multi‑year revenue reduction against other spending priorities.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill removes the income-based definition of “qualified taxpayer” for the retirement-pay and SBP exclusions, so eligibility no longer depends on household income limits.
SB 1407 eliminates the existing $20,000-per-year cap on the amount of military retirement pay and on SBP annuity payments that may be excluded from California gross income.
The exclusion’s sunset is extended: the exclusions will apply for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2037 (previously the sunset was January 1, 2030).
The bill augments statutory requirements for any new tax-expenditure bill by requiring additional information beyond current goals, performance indicators, and data collection—though it does not specify the new metrics.
SB 1407 takes effect immediately as a tax levy, creating immediate implementation and fiscal forecasting obligations for the Franchise Tax Board and state budget offices.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Military retirement-pay exclusion: removes income test and dollar cap
This section amends the statute that excludes federal retirement pay for service in the uniformed services from California gross income. Mechanically, it deletes the definition of “qualified taxpayer” that tied the exclusion to meeting specified income thresholds and removes the $20,000 ceiling on excluded retirement pay. For compliance this means taxpayers who previously were phased out or limited by the dollar cap may now claim a larger or full exclusion; FTB will need to define what documentation proves the payment’s source and whether any anti‑avoidance rules apply.
Survivor Benefit Plan annuities: same elimination of limits and cap
This amendment parallels Section 17132.9 but applies to income annuity payments received under the Department of Defense Survivor Benefit Plan. The change eliminates both the income-based eligibility restriction and the $20,000 limit for SBP payments. Practically, survivor annuitants across income levels may claim the exclusion; administrators should expect a higher volume of amended returns and refund claims where taxpayers discover the broader exclusion applies to prior tax years within the statutory window.
Stronger statutory expectations for reporting and evaluation
The bill modifies the statutory rubric that governs how the Legislature authorizes tax expenditures. Current law already requires goals, performance indicators, and data collection; SB 1407 requires additional information be provided when creating new tax expenditures. The text is not prescriptive about the new items, so agencies (and the Legislature) will need guidance about what qualifies as sufficient information and how the FTB will collect and publish it, creating a near-term implementation task for administrative rulemaking or internal guidance.
Immediate operative effect and budgetary consequences
The bill declares itself a tax levy and takes effect immediately upon enactment. That designation accelerates implementation: FTB must act quickly to modify forms, withholding tables, guidance, and audit procedures. For the state’s fiscal apparatus, the immediate effect and the extended sunset enlarge the projected multi‑year revenue impact and complicate current-year budget balancing and forecasting.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Retired uniformed service members with higher incomes — The removal of the income threshold and the $20,000 cap allows higher‑earning military retirees to exclude more (or all) of their federal retirement pay from California taxable income, increasing after‑tax income.
- Survivor Benefit Plan annuitants across income levels — Survivors who receive SBP annuities can claim the exclusion without previous income-based disqualification and without the prior $20,000 ceiling, improving benefits for surviving family members.
- Veterans and military advocacy groups — Organizations that advocate for veterans will see broader state tax relief for their constituencies, simplifying outreach and benefits counseling.
- Tax preparers and payroll administrators — Firms and HR/payroll departments handling retirement disbursements will gain new work helping clients claim the expanded exclusion and, where applicable, file amended returns for prior eligible years.
Who Bears the Cost
- California General Fund — The broader exclusion reduces personal income tax receipts, creating a direct fiscal cost that will require trade-offs in budget priorities or reserve use.
- Franchise Tax Board — FTB will incur implementation costs: updating tax forms and IT systems, issuing guidance, handling increased audit and amended‑return workload, and establishing data collection procedures tied to the new tax-expenditure reporting rules.
- State budget and fiscal agencies — The expanded and extended exclusion complicates revenue forecasting and may force reallocation of budgeted funds or delay other spending decisions.
- Non‑beneficiary taxpayers and public programs — If the General Fund absorbs the revenue loss without offsets, other taxpayers may indirectly bear the burden through reduced funding for public services or higher effective tax pressure elsewhere.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between broad, administratively simple tax relief for military retirees and survivors — honoring service by removing eligibility hurdles — versus the fiscal and equity trade-offs of widening a targeted tax break without means‑testing or explicit performance metrics, which increases revenue loss and reduces the state’s ability to direct limited funds toward need‑based priorities.
SB 1407 presents a clear trade-off between targeted tax relief and fiscal discipline. Removing household income tests and dollar caps makes the law administratively simpler for beneficiaries and ensures uniform treatment of retirement and SBP payments, but it simultaneously turns a means-tested benefit into a universal (for recipients of those payments) tax exclusion—raising equity questions about concentrating tax benefits on a group that includes higher‑income individuals.
The bill’s fiscal impact is straightforward: larger and longer exclusions mean larger revenue losses. What is less straightforward is how the state will measure the effectiveness of this tax expenditure, because the bill tightens procedural expectations for new tax breaks while not spelling out the new metrics or collection methods it requires.
Implementation details are another source of uncertainty. The FTB will need to determine what documentation satisfies proof-of-payment and whether to allow retroactive claims for prior years affected by the change.
The immediate tax‑levy effect and the bill’s application to taxable years beginning January 1, 2025, raise the possibility of amended-return surges and refund liabilities that could strain cash flows. Finally, the legislative text’s unspecified “additional information” requirement leaves open how aggressive future legislative oversight will be and whether agencies will receive resources and statutory authority to collect and publish the necessary data for meaningful performance evaluation.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.